You know that professor in your department who cranks out 20 papers a year and whose c.v. is the size of a phone book? Have you ever wondered whether that kind of productivity actually builds an academic career? It depends on what kind of career you want to build, according to a new paper by two economists. Daniel S. Hamermesh of the University of Texas at Austin and Gerard A. Pfann of Maastricht University, in the Netherlands, examined the careers of 1,339 full professors who teach in 88 highly ranked economics departments in the United States. They found that — all else equal — publishing a high volume of papers does little to improve one’s reputation among one’s peers, or to improve one’s odds of winning a major scholarly award. But it does appear to improve a scholar’s odds of being hired by a new university, or of landing a higher salary. So if that’s your game, by all means, publish away. The paper was discussed on Monday at Freakonomics and The TaxProf Blog.
|
Previous Oklahoma State U. Halts an Anthrax Study, Citing Plan to Euthanize Baboons |
Next Student Debt Rose for 2008 Graduates, Says State-by-State Report |
Publish and Flourish? a New Study Examines Scholarly Outputs and Reputations
November 30, 2009, 9:19 pm
Confirm Your Email Address
You must confirm the email address associated with your account to use this Chronicle feature.
If you have already confirmed your account, try refreshing your browser.
E-mail a Friend


One Response to Publish and Flourish? a New Study Examines Scholarly Outputs and Reputations
cwinton - December 1, 2009 at 11:23 am
Publishing papers is a game academics indulge in either by choice or coercion. Perhaps 1 paper in 10 (to be generous) provides an actual contribution, with the rest being modest spinoffs to impress those who value volume over quality, and yes, I’ve played the game both ways.