An Oregon state appeals court has held that Portland State University did not illegally retaliate against a faculty member by responding to her decision to file gender-discrimination complaints with outside agencies by refusing to process a grievance she had submitted. It is common for faculty contracts to have “no two bites” provisions barring employees from pursuing grievances through both the agreed-upon grievance process and complaints filed with some agency or court. A state labor board, however, had sided with Portland State’s chapter of the American Association of University Professors when it filed an unfair labor practices complaint accusing the college of illegal retaliation for refusing to enter into a grievance process with the faculty member after she submitted formal discrimination complaints elsewhere. In its ruling overturning the labor board’s decision, the state appeals court said the college had not engaged in conduct that could be called retaliation in simply trying to consolidate efforts to resolve the dispute into a single proceeding.
|
Previous Law Student Sues St. John’s U. for Rescinding Readmission Over Drug Charges |
Next |
Oregon Ruling Sharpens ‘No Two Bites’ Clause Common in Faculty Contracts
February 4, 2011, 3:30 pm
Confirm Your Email Address
You must confirm the email address associated with your account to use this Chronicle feature.
If you have already confirmed your account, try refreshing your browser.
E-mail a Friend


7 Responses to Oregon Ruling Sharpens ‘No Two Bites’ Clause Common in Faculty Contracts
11126724 - February 8, 2011 at 12:32 pm
Why would she want to enter a grievance process after filing a complaint elsewhere? Isn’t the next logical step to go to court? They have better remedies than any grievance process.
cwehlburgtcu - September 1, 2011 at 3:41 pm
Thank you — reading this helps to remind me why we do what we do.
–Catherine Wehlburg
realtyannie - September 2, 2011 at 8:42 am
Elegant, concise, balanced, on-point. Wonderful message! Thanks! :)
richardtaborgreene - September 2, 2011 at 8:08 pm
The above cover parts of 3 out of 64 capabilities of highly educated people from my dataset of 8000 eminent people from 41 nations and 63 professions where were asked who rose to the top of your profession via being highly educated in who they were and how they acted—what specific capabillities did they use to rise? Not bad given the time constraints. Try Are You Educated? 64 Capabilities from youpublish.com for the 61 others.
Linda Goldstein - September 5, 2011 at 2:35 pm
Great discussion of the importance of education in our society.
Linda Goldstein - September 5, 2011 at 2:38 pm
Great discussion of the importance of education in our society.
siobhancurious - November 10, 2011 at 11:10 am
I’m not sure I’d agree that these are the main purposes of higher education. I’ve written some thoughts on this article, and those purposes, here:
http://siobhancurious.com/2011/11/10/five-purposes-of-higher-education/