• Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Previous

Next

Nobel Prize Honors 3 for Discovery of Accelerating Expansion of Universe

October 4, 2011, 6:05 am

Three astrophysicists working on exploding stars known as supernovas won the 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics today, for their “discovery of the accelerating expansion of the universe through observations” of supernovas, according to a citation from the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.

The winners are Saul Perlmutter, of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and the University of California at Berkeley; Brian P. Schmidt, of the Australian National University; and Adam G. Riess, of the Johns Hopkins University’s Space Telescope Science Institute. Mr. Perlmutter, head of the Supernova Cosmology Project, was awarded half of the prize, which is worth about $1.5-million this year. Mr. Schmidt and Mr. Riess, both of the High-z Supernova Search Team, shared the other half. The group has previously been honored with Shaw and Gruber Prizes.

In an interview with The Chronicle in 2004 about the implications of the discovery and of the universe’s possible end in a violent “Big Rip,” Mr. Perlmutter made light of the situation. “Our family has made only the usual preparations: a three-day supply of water, extra batteries, reading matter,” he said. But he noted that, for higher education at least, there was an upside: “Previous turnover in universes has led to early retirements, opening up new opportunities for younger faculty from a more diverse population of species.”

Today’s award, the second of the 2011 Nobel Prizes, follows Monday’s award of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine to three scientists, one of whom died last Friday.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • Guest

    Congratulations! This sounds like amazing work. I have been reading up on the new super-telescope in Chile and this is all very exciting. Congrats!

  • dovhenis

    A Pathetic Absurdity

    Nobel 2011 re universe expansion: There is definitely no
    dark energy or matter. Definitely. This is a pathetic absurdity:

     

    Neutrino Velocity > Light Velocity?

     

     

    I. From

    http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2011/09/live-chat-have-neutrinos-broken.html?ref=em&elq=94d706ec04024fdc9b3ae6e49236f125

    3:05

    Alfons Weber: 

    OPERA has only measured the average speed of the neutrinos
    from CERN to Grand Sasso. But there is no reason to assume that the neutrinos
    became faster or slower on their way. We actually don’t know of any mechanism
    that could have accelerated or decelerated them on the trip. 

     

    Dov Henis:

    ***If the total arriving neutrinos mass is less than the
    total starting mass their velocity would accelerate: some of the mass
    reconverts to energy (Einstein) acting on a decreasing mass (Newton)…

     

    II.

    A.

    From “Galaxy Clusters Validate Einstein’s Theory”

    http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2011/09/galaxy-clusters-validate-einstei.html?ref=em&elq=94d706ec04024fdc9b3ae6e49236f125   

     

    “a classic prediction of general relativity: that light will
    lose energy as it is escaping a gravitational field. The stronger the field,
    the greater the energy loss suffered by the light. As a result, photons emitted
    from the center of a galaxy cluster—a massive object containing thousands of
    galaxies—should lose more energy than photons coming from the edge of the
    cluster because gravity is strongest in the center”

     

    B.

    Energy/mass dualism and light, why not and neutrino…

     

    By  the below updated
    comprehension of gravitation light will lose MASS as it is escaping a
    gravitational field. The stronger the field, the greater the MASS loss suffered
    by the light. It is due to the energy/mass dualism that the loss of mass would
    be loss of energy…

     

    The universe cycles between two poles:  singularity/all-mass ,  and 
    maximum-expanded/nearly-all-energy.

    E=Total[m(1 + D)]  
    (D = distance travelled by mass since singularity)

     

    Update definition of gravitation per the above E,m,D
    relationship. The essence/definition of gravitation is:

     

    “Gravitation Is the propensity of energy reconversion
    to mass”.

     

    C.

    What, whence and whither, mass format:

     

    In the expanding universe the point of
    formation of the light, or of the neutrinos,  of any mass format,  is – “as far as the mass
    format is concerned” -  its
    singularity point.  Its motion
    distance is D.  Its m decreases as D
    increases, maintaining a constant mD = E and therefore accelerating  …

     

    Look Ma! It’s Converting!

     

    Dov Henis (comments from 22nd century)

    http://universe-life.com/

    http://universe-life.com/2011/09/21/the-lhc-chases-its-tail/

     

    PS:

    Universe expands per Newton’s motion laws, obviously…

    Also, universe physics constants should vary, probably
    slightly, between galaxies clusters due to varied clusters sizes…

    Also, the clusters formed by dispersion at inflation…

    DH