• Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Previous

Next

Former Mayor Leans on NYU to Disavow Report on Terrorism

October 8, 2011, 11:11 am

Edward I. Koch, a former New York City mayor, has called on the dean of New York University’s law school to disavow a report critical of terrorism prosecutions, according to The New York Times.

The report, published in May by the law school’s Center for Human Rights and Global Justice, accuses law-enforcement agencies of entrapping young Muslim men. It focuses on three prominent cases and characterizes the threat of domestic terrorism as “manufactured.”

The Times says that prominent alumni of the law school recently brought the report to the attention of Mr. Koch, who is also a graduate, and that he urged the school’s dean, Richard L. Revesz, to disavow it. He also asked Mr. Revesz to distribute a rebuttal written at the former mayor’s urging by U.S. Rep. Peter T. King, a Republican of Long Island who has held controversial hearings on the radicalization of American Muslims. When Mr. Revesz refused, Mr. Koch decided to take his beef to the news media.

“We provide a forum for a lot of different views, including controversial views,” John Beckman, a vice president of the university, told the Times.

“Academic freedom doesn’t mean you have the right to distribute false reports, and when called to your attention, to do nothing about it,” Mr. Koch responded. “The dean doesn’t seem to care whether it’s factual or not.”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • dank48

    The question is, Does Mr. Koch care whether it’s factual or not? If so, perhaps he could share his infallible method for detecting counterfactuality. It would be very useful to the rest of us.

  • chedie

    “Academic freedom doesn’t mean you have the right to distribute false reports, and when called to your attention, to do nothing about it,”

    What evidence is there that this is a false report? Just another prominent alumni who thinks he has the right to run his alma mater.

  • anonytrans

    Officially disavowing one piece of scholarship implies that the institution endorses every other document produced by its researchers, so I guess university officials should be fact checking and evaluating everything their
    employees produce just in case their is something else they feel the need to
    disavow.