The General Synod of the Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church fired nearly half of the members of the Board of Trustees at Erskine College on Wednesday and replaced them with interim trustees, according to The Index-Journal, a South Carolina newspaper. The church had investigated the college after students complained that professors were questioning their religious faith. Sixteen members of the board were left in place. A restructured board will take office in June, and the college will revise its bylaws. Randall T. Ruble, who is to retire as the college’s president in June, said in a statement that the change was strictly a governance shift. “No changes in administration, faculty, or staff are being made,” he said. But William Crenshaw, an English professor, expressed doubt. “It looks like they’re trying to take over the college and imprint the college with their own kind of narrow Christianity,” he said. “That does not bode well for Erskine to continue as a liberal-arts center.”
|
Previous Credit-Rating Agency Wants Colleges to Disclose More About Finances |
Next |
Church Fires 14 Trustees at Erskine College
March 4, 2010, 10:00 am
Confirm Your Email Address
You must confirm the email address associated with your account to use this Chronicle feature.
If you have already confirmed your account, try refreshing your browser.
E-mail a Friend


24 Responses to Church Fires 14 Trustees at Erskine College
mcmullen84 - March 4, 2010 at 11:15 am
As someone who was present at this meeting (and also an alum of Erskine), the term ‘fired’ is inaccurate – the entire board was dismissed and then reconstituted. No individual board members were targeted. In addition, the actions were taken to bring the operations of the college and seminary into compliance with its existing mission-statement as a Christian liberal-arts college. No one is seeking to eliminate the liberal arts focus but to build on and enhance that commitment, and thus Dr. Crenshaw’s observation is inaccurate as well. These actions occured due to past intransigent resistance from the Board and administration from carrying out the mission statement which they supposedly agreed to support.
disembedded - March 4, 2010 at 12:50 pm
Time will tell….
arnoldas - March 4, 2010 at 5:40 pm
Dear mcmullen84,”the entire board was dismissed and then reconstituted. No individual board members were targeted.”I congratulate you for as fine an example of gobbledegook and obfuscation as I’ve seen in a long time. What do you know, when the lights came on again, there was the ‘reconstituted’ board and 14 empty chairs. But how did they know to leave? Ah, inner light, my friend, inner light.
disembedded - March 4, 2010 at 7:30 pm
Yes, indeed.
mcmullen84 - March 4, 2010 at 9:17 pm
Mr or Ms disembedded, you are a person of few words ;-)For a fuller account of the Synod meeting, anyone may look at http://tinyurl.com/yg8jlee . The only gobbledegook has come from the Erskine Board for decades now.
disembedded - March 4, 2010 at 9:30 pm
In the words of the esteemed former President J. M. Lesesne….
amnirov - March 5, 2010 at 6:05 am
Why are religious colleges even accredited?
disembedded - March 5, 2010 at 9:28 am
In this particular case, that might well be a very good question
shuelin - March 5, 2010 at 10:15 am
@amnirov:That’s a laughably bigoted response. Even though I have deep reservations about how the ARP Church is exercising its authority in this case, they at least have not forgotten that education always serves some end. At church-related liberal arts colleges, that end is to produce thoughtful and faithful Christians. At secular privates and big publics, the end is to produce docile consumer-citizens to fuel the late-capitalist market state. Boards exercise authority to preserve the desired end in those institutions just as much as they do to preserve the distinct end of church-related colleges. Not to do so would be willful neglect.
disembedded - March 5, 2010 at 11:44 am
“At church-related liberal arts colleges, that end is to produce thoughtful and faithful Christians. At secular privates and big publics, the end is to produce docile consumer-citizens to fuel the late-capitalist market state.”Now that’s a curiously interesting proposition….
shuelin - March 5, 2010 at 3:29 pm
“Our education as currently structured and practiced fits us only for being wandering gypsies for America, Inc.” — Ashley Woodiwiss, channeling the spirit of Wendell Berry.
knmys - March 5, 2010 at 4:33 pm
“At church-related liberal arts colleges, that end is to produce thoughtful and faithful Christians.”‘Thoughtful’ doesn’t typically go with ‘faithful’ when it comes to religious beliefs. I might have given partial credit for ‘kind and faithful’ or ‘generous and faithful’, and full credit for ‘tithing and faithful’.C+
zsdavis - March 5, 2010 at 9:37 pm
McMullen – When a body is dissolved and subsequently reconstituted with half of it’s original members, it is hard for me to see how you can claim that no individuals were targeted. It seems obvious (to me, at least) that those fourteen board members who lost their seats were targeted, for some reason or another. Nevermind that Dr. Taylor and the Stuart Foundations have been two of the College’s largest donors over the course of the last ten or so years, because trustees aren’t supposed to raise money, right?The college, if it desires to continue to produce students who go on to impact society, must have leading it Trustees who are role models for students. Having a Board composed of pastors, Christian men who have a Christian occupation, does nothing for students who want examples of individuals who live their lives in a Christian manner while being the top scientists, businesspeople and academics in their fields.I hope the Synod will realize this. Soon. My four recent years there were wonderful and I hope that in the years to come students will be able to say the same about their “Erskine Experience”.ZSDavis ’08
kirvine02 - March 5, 2010 at 9:38 pm
“‘Thoughtful’ doesn’t typically go with ‘faithful’ when it comes to religious beliefs.” I guess this proves stereotyping and bigotry aren’t confined to the active, practicing Christians. If the accounts of intimidation are true according to the reports cited in their minutes, then their action was protecting the freedom of speech, thought, and religion of the students; such an action would only be acceptable in most schools if the students were intimidated because they had liberal, non-Christian views.
knmys - March 5, 2010 at 10:10 pm
kirvine02 -According to The Index-Journal article cited above, one of the professors at the school had been “under fire by members of Students Aligned for a Faithful Erskine.” Said the professor: “I try to teach critical thinking… Part of critical thinking is asking questions about everything. You don’t accept anything just because someone says it.” Further, some students object to having their faith questioned, a topic that creates an uncomfortable situation for the school.So… at least in this instance, it seemed like the school (and the students in said group) are more interested in pursuing unquestioned faith rather than critical thinking about said faith. There’s a reason the phrase is ‘blind faith’, and it appears that this school is promoting it.
jmc1973 - March 6, 2010 at 1:36 am
@ knmys -The Index-Journal article is slanted by Ms. St Claire Burns Donaghy and others on the staff who themselves sit squarely on the left of this issue. What you are not seeing in that article or in the one here at the Chronicle is the other side of this. Funny how they did not include anyone from the Synod meeting or any of the students who spoke out at the Synod meeting. Liberal journalism at its finest.
disembedded - March 6, 2010 at 2:59 am
Note: In addition to its action regarding the Board of Trustees, the Synod is going to revise the bylaws of the college.
relpolitics - March 6, 2010 at 11:06 am
Some folks following this may want to look at interesting discussion on Sola Scriptura and Rationalism of the last few days at http://www.sbcimpact.net Baptists, Baylor in particular, have gone through this miasma for some time. One great article to google up is about Jeffrey Lyle and Underwood in Mother Jones in 2004. Underwood is now President of Mercer and in the good graces of many Baptists. I think the deliberations at Erskine may bubble up into the politics of the SC state school superintendents race; but we shall see. In longstanding look at how Baptists dealt with matters similar to Erskine, I have a strong suggestion. I think it would be great if Pulitzer Prize Winner Marilynne Robinson, something of an expert on John Calvin and America’s culture wars–google up discussion of her in recent Harvard Review and the Cheryl Miller review of her novel in Claremont Review (Fall 09)–were invited to Erskine with Notre Dame’s Mark Noll for a weekend. I’m sure the Trustees and Erskine’s President know who the most outspoken critics of the faculty are. Invite those folks and parents of students and have a weekend civil discussion of these matters. Maybe it is the parents who need the education, and not the professors. Invite Dr. Underwood from Mercer. He has had experience in these matters. And do take a look at Barry Hankins Uneasy in Babylon to see how Baptists succeeded and failed in their attempts to navigate these waters. Also see Randall Balmer in recent essay at religiondispatches.org on what Baylor’s selection of Ken Starr as its new President may mean for the future direction of that school.
disembedded - March 6, 2010 at 12:16 pm
@relpoliticsExcellent comments on this issue.
relpolitics - March 6, 2010 at 2:19 pm
One post above had issues with the Index report. He may find the front page story in the Greenville News online more to his liking as several students get to comment in the piece. Rather a long link, but you can google or copy and paste this url for an interesting story if so inclinedhttp://www.greenvilleonline.com/article/20100306/NEWS/303060023/Synod-replaces-14-Erskine-College-trustees-as-some-students-question-professors-worldviews
relpolitics - March 6, 2010 at 8:09 pm
Further reading into the Erskine situation suggests Ersline’s SAFE group is the problem. Let’s hope a good journalist in South Carolina will explore the origin and funding of this student group to see who is pushing their definition of Christian that seems to have a lot in common with focus on the family and enthusiasts for intelligient design on the Texas School Board.
amnirov - March 7, 2010 at 5:51 pm
It really is impossible to be a thoughtful christian. Christianity relies on faith and faith is the exact opposite of thought. If there were a college whose charter demanded that students and faculty believe in unicorns and pixies and fairies and suggested that they sacrifice cats and hold ceremonies at oak trees on significant dates… what would be the world’s response?
relpolitics - March 7, 2010 at 10:25 pm
Yales Jon Butler is scheduled to speak tomorrow at Erskine on The Surprises of Religion in America. Could be quite an interesting lecture event if anybody pays attention; maybe parents and SAFE Students.
shuelin - March 8, 2010 at 9:35 am
@amnirov:A lovely example of the straw man fallacy. May I cite your comment as an illustration for my students?