The American Association of University Professors has urged South Dakota State University to reverse its decision to fire an entomologist, arguing that the institution failed to follow appropriate dismissal procedures. Michael Catangui, a tenured professor in the university’s department of plant science and an Extension Service entomologist, said in an interview Tuesday that he has been fired and locked out of his office without any formal dismissal procedure. A university spokesman declined to comment on the dispute, saying it was a confidential personnel matter. In a letter sent to university officials this month, Gregory F. Scholtz, director of the AAUP’s Department of Academic Freedom, Tenure, and Governance, said Mr. Catangui should have been afforded a hearing in front of a faculty committee before being dismissed for what his department’s head characterized as “serious performance deficiencies” and insubordination. Benjamin H. Kantack, a retired Extension Service entomologist who had been in regular contact with Mr. Catangui, said he believes Mr. Catangui was dismissed partly as a result of a disagreement with his supervisors over when farmers should be told to spray soybeans for aphids.
|
Previous |
Next Congress Approves Supplemental Spending Bill Without More Money for Pell Grants |
AAUP Objects to the Squashing of a South Dakota State U. Bug Expert
July 27, 2010, 7:54 pm
Confirm Your Email Address
You must confirm the email address associated with your account to use this Chronicle feature.
If you have already confirmed your account, try refreshing your browser.
E-mail a Friend


5 Responses to AAUP Objects to the Squashing of a South Dakota State U. Bug Expert
mbelvadi - July 28, 2010 at 6:45 am
If that last sentence is true, this case may well be the poster child for academic freedom and tenure. As I read the article, I kept expecting that there was some kind of criminal or sexual impropriety allegation involved!
gaprofessor - July 28, 2010 at 7:07 am
So much for tenure. As much as the public whines about it, there seems to be no reason administration cannot use to fire faculty. I think the insubordination club is very much the new weapon. I keep wondering if the faculty member in question annoyed some corporate donors to the university.
schultzjc - July 28, 2010 at 10:03 am
The two comments so far are irresponsible, given that a) the final sentence in the report is hearsay, and b) that statement could be interpreted many ways (e.g., for spraying, against spraying, how much to spray, what to spray etc. etc.). Gossip. Wait for facts to emerge.
mike91 - July 30, 2010 at 6:29 pm
schultzjc,The issues you raised are irrelevant. It wouldn’t matter if an enraged professor murdered a smart aleck student. If university policy requires a hearing before a faculty member is terminated, university policy *requires* it.
mwilsonk - August 1, 2010 at 3:50 pm
It is appalling that the Chronicle has tried to make a very unfortunate situation into a joke with a silly headline. Perhaps if the writer of the headline is fired and locked out of his/her office, he/she will begin to take these sorts of situations, which happen more frequently than one would like to think, seriously. I think an apology is in order.