• Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Previous

Next

Your Mind at Middle Age: A Review of The Grown-Up Brain

August 23, 2010, 8:00 am

BrainMore or less every night for the last seven years, I’ve sung “The Star-Spangled Banner” to our kid as he drifts off to sleep. He looks forward to it, and sings along about half the time. It’s a sweet, patriotic moment—except for all the times I blank on the words.

It’s not that I hate America, or somehow don’t really know the lyrics: I’ve sung the anthem more than 2500 times over the past seven years—it’s engraved in my mind. Every six months or so, though, I lose all recollection of three or fourlines for several nights in a row. (Like these poor souls [YouTube], except with less talent.) After about three nights, the lyrics come back, and everything’s back to normal.

While I haven’t started forgetting names yet—yet—this lyrical blackout has always felt like an harbinger of middle age, or of absentminded professordom, and so it was with great interest that I picked up Barbara Strauch’s The Secret Life of the Grown-Up Brain: The Surprising Talents of the Middle-Aged Mind (Viking, 2010). Strauch brings good news: Unlike previous models of aging, which saw mental function as a long, slow death, new brain science suggests that the middle-aged brain continues to develop new functions and abilities for a very long time, especially with a little care.

Strauch is the deputy science editor and helah and medical science editor at the New York Times, and you can tell: The book is brisk and clear, with a journalist’s preference for the illustrative example.

The book begins with several reassuring points: that such maladies as midlife crises and empty nest syndrome aren’t real; that middle-aged people (here defined as roughly 40-68 [woot! still not middle aged!]) continue to perform well on cognitive tests, often outperforming younger whippersnappers; and the observation that many people are happier in middle age than at other times of their lives.

Strauch describes several different kinds of research, all of which potentially have good news about middle-aged brains. These come in two different types: developmental research about what goes on on the brain as we age, and research into neuroplasticity, or the way the brain changes in response to the environment (cognitive demands, food, overall health, experiences, etc.).

Developmentally, it turns out that, while we might not be growing tons of new neurons as we age, our brains do gain more myelin, the fatty substance that facilitates connections between neurons, for many decades. Also, it turns out that the brain compensates for aging by getting its hemispheres to work together. This “bilateralization” allows the brain to work more efficiently than it does at earlier times of life. Education helps facilitate this process.

It’s not all good news, of course. The mild forgetfulness associated with middle age—where are my keys? why did I put my Pynchon in the pantry?—is real, an artifact of distraction, a surfeit of things worth remembering. (In my example, it doesn’t help that the national anthem is the last song I sing, so my brain’s already processing what I should work on after the kid’s asleep, even though I’m only conscious of finishing the bedtime routine.)

While the brain might be programmed to improve in middle age, even nature could use some help. What’s more, the new research delightfully confirms some ancient wisdom. First, a sound mind really does seem to be associated with a sound body. Recent research associates exercise with brain growth and improved performance. (Noted by Meagan Timney in this space a few weeks back.) Likewise, mom’s advice to eat your fruits and vegetables stands your brain in good stead. The research Strauch cites are bullish on antioxidants’ ability to maintain brain health.

Apparently, not only can an old dog learn new tricks, but its brain will become stronger for the effort. Whether its mastering complex video games, learning a new language, or even making new friends, the deliberate attempt to force your brain out of its old patterns pays off in increased cognitive function, well into old age. I would have liked to see more discussion of mindfulness/meditation practices in this section, as those seem related to brain function, too.

The book has a few drawbacks. First, like any book of popular science, it ends up occasionally getting out in front of the science, particularly in areas around diet. And there’s not a lot of skepticism directed toward the claims around neuroplasticity, even when people have financial interests involved. (In fact, Strauch’s preferred rhetorical trick is to cite the formerly skeptical.) The most disappointing, however, has to do with class. Consider, for example, a passage such as this one (she’s quoting Sherry Willis, the noted researcher):

“And it’s odd to think that the brain would not continue to develop. . . . Most professional jobs are very stimulating and complex and, even in leisure time, we have more opportunities to take up complicated things like photography.” (26)

The book tends to address itself to the holders of these professional jobs, rather than to grappling seriously with the implications of this new science for our social wellbeing. As a result, there can be a breathlessness about new strategies we can try (in our leisure), or drugs we’ll have access to, when what seems to be needed is a serious re-investment in education. (Chapter 8 explains the lifelong benefits in brain health that seem to accrue with education.) The main social woe that Strauch seems concerned with is age discrimination, which I don’t even think would make my top 5 or 10 list of social problems or opportunities associated with mental functioning.

That said, this is a book that will likely interest many readers of ProfHacker. It brings good news about our mental lives, and recommends as a path to “continued success” the ProfHackerish advice of “‘deliberate practice,’ a commitment to working at a skill over and over and meticulously zeroing in on faults” (25).

Image by Flickr user Liz Henry (yes, that’s her brain) / Creative Commons Licensed

This entry was posted in Productivity, Reviews, Wellness. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment (15)

15 Responses to Your Mind at Middle Age: A Review of The Grown-Up Brain

11182967 - August 23, 2010 at 5:20 pm

Already then in my 60′s, a few years ago pains in my right arm (I’m naturally right-handed) led me to teach myself to use a computer mouse with my left hand. I’m now a better mouser left-handed than right-handed. I don’t know if this has made my brain better, but it suggests that even fairly detailed neuromotor activities can continue to be learned at a later age.

bjackerson - August 23, 2010 at 5:59 pm

#1 just gave a very good example of neuroplasticity…the brain changes in response to cahnges in the body and the environment. But it has to be trained to do so.

catheleenj - August 24, 2010 at 3:11 am

Age discrimination is real! Look at AARP…an organization who’s purpose is to aid and support the elderly. However I read a critique that suggests even AARP discriminates against the oldest old groups, focusing on the younger baby boomer population instead.

sdorley - August 24, 2010 at 9:07 am

[Comment deleted by editor. Please read the ProfHacker Commenting and Community Guidelines. Thanks!]

kate3392 - August 24, 2010 at 9:29 am

[Comment deleted by editor. Let's try not to get off track. Thanks!]

vaneblucas - August 24, 2010 at 9:40 am

[Comment deleted by editor. Let's try not to get off track. If you have some comments to make about the book reviewed here, please share them. Thanks!]

murleenray - August 24, 2010 at 11:02 am

Like the author, I find myself having what I call “brain farts”–when I can feel the wheels turning, but am not accessing the information I know I possess. Fortunately, it usually comes back in a few hours or even a few days. Unfortunately, it is extremely embarrassing to have one of my “senior moments” in front of a class of college freshmen. My elderly parents might be used as an example for how to maintain brain plasticity well into an advanced age. My 87 year old mother continues to read and stays involved (mentally at least) in current affairs. She’s able to form new memories, although I’ve noticed that it often requires a physical component, such as driving somewhere so that she sees and has a “body memory” to help the memory stick. My 86 year old father is almost the complete opposite: he sits for hours in front of a computer playing mindless solitaire games. He complains about his loss of memory and his overall mental confusion, but refuses to engage with more mentally stimulating activities. Fortunately, being in education automatically forces upon one the need to continually remain mentally active. I am looking forward to many years of mental gymnastics that should keep me mentally fit–barring any onset of Alzheimer’s.

lost_angeleno - August 24, 2010 at 11:45 am

Two thoughts come to mind. First, my experiences, and my wife’s, are just the opposite of these. Though intellectually active all our lives, moving into our 60s has brought numerous impairments with no counterbalancing strengths. While two examples constitute only anecdotal evidence, I have heard friends say the same thing, and so I wonder just how representative and inclusive the data samples were for this book. Mr. Jones offers one weakness in the study, diet, and I have to question whether or not there were other flaws in the samples, modeling, and extrapolations. Needs further discussion.Second, more conspiratorial, I wonder what use this study will be put to, to advance the political agenda of those who want to move up the retirement age for Social Security, etc. If the study is flawed, it could have very serious negative effects for our elderly colleagues and friends. It is not wise to take this work at face value–the consequences are too important.

bbaylis - August 24, 2010 at 2:16 pm

Thanks for pointing me to a new resource that I definitely want to read. Due to a traumatic brain episode in March 2009, I have been left with aphasia. In trying to work through and live with aphasia, a communications disorder that does not normally effect intellect, I was directed to the book “The Man who Mistook His Wife for a Hat and other Clinical Tales” by OLive Sacks, who also wrote “Awakenings” the book upon which the film by the same name, staring Robin Williams and Robert DeNiro, was based. “the Man who Mistook His Wife hor a Hat” is soemetimes funny but always informative about a disorder that is more common than Parkinson’s Disease but hardly anyone knows about. One very interesting story in Sacks’ book is about a patient who only ate food on one side of her plate and then complained about still being hungry but had food left on her plate. She eventually learned to go around her food try to the other side where she saw the food and would eat it. For the past 18 months, through therapy and hard work I have been recovering words by reconstucting synaptic connections lost to the trauma and retraining my brain by constructing my connections. The human brain is a wonderful entity. You can teach an old dog new tricks and you can reteach an old dog old tricks that he has lost

kaybar47 - August 24, 2010 at 3:33 pm

On the lighter side: while the author looks at the 40-68 age range and crows “woot! still not middle aged!”, I look at it and think “AllRight! still middle aged”.

lakemendota - August 24, 2010 at 3:36 pm

Good for you bbaylis.I’m 67 and have a somewhat stressful retirement job at a University. It’s the names, I keep on forgetting people’s names. Frustrating and embarassing. I deal with it by writing down the names in a notebook I take with me when I go to meetings where I know I’ll be talking to or about certain people.

wilkenslibrary - August 24, 2010 at 4:24 pm

It doesn’t work if you’re talking __about__ someone, but if you’re introducing two people, and you forget one or both names, asking “Do you two know each other?” usually leads one of them to thrust out a hand and say, “No. I’m Jane Smith.” Those of us on the upper end of middle age need all the tricks we can learn…

mbsss - August 26, 2010 at 8:40 am

I very much enjoy the meandering thoughts of Jason B. Jones, and there is seldom a time when neuro-anything fails to capture my attention. But something rather Pynchonesque is actually happening on this page, this week, which I find fascinating, but disturbing. First, that the editor has chosen, perhaps rightfully so, to delete so many comments makes one wonder what Jones provoked. Second, that Jones chose to open his editorial describing a ritual that likely provoked responses that were edited makes one wonder if it is alright to address one of the catalysts that prompted Jones’ picking up Strauch’s book. As an ex-pat who has been living and teaching in Europe for the last 10 years, I am often asked (particularly since late 2001) about the kinds of “contextualizing” done by Americans–both in and out of academic settings. The question, of course, is seldom asked in a particularly sympathetic matter. So a reference by Jones to the US National Anthem as a bedtime activity for the contextualization of a book review comes across rather differently from say, a reference to Goodnight Moon, Harry Potter, Runny Babbit, or even the family prayer. Just a point of clarification from Jason and/or the editor might be in order therefore. Is the author a rather humorous and cynical fellow who is pulling our leg, in a rather theater-of-the-absurd and Pynchon-like way, or is this contextualization and his practice, “real”?

george_h_williams - August 26, 2010 at 10:54 am

As the editor in question*, @mbsss, I can perhaps provide some clarification: readers will sometimes want to launch their own topics in our comments threads, rather than address the topic of the post for which the space to comment is provided. When that happens, I delete those comments and ask commenters to stick to the topic at hand. At ProfHacker, our Commenting and Community Guidelines are separate from and different than the more general guidelines followed by the other parts of the Chronicle.Please contact ProfHackerCHE@gmail.com with any further questions or comments about editorial policy here. Thanks!* In other words, I’m the editor who deleted the comments in this thread. However, there are three of us who take on editorial responsibilities for ProfHacker.

jason_b_jones - August 26, 2010 at 10:56 am

@mbsss I never lie about my kid. (I also write for Wired’s GeekDad blog, and so am used to a certain kind of frame.)The Star-Spangled Banner became part of our routine very simply: He fights sleep like a mortal enemy, and always has. When he was an infant, there were nights when it seemed like we’d rock him for hours before he’d drop off . . . one of those nights, I couldn’t think of anything else to sing, and so I pulled out the anthem. It seemed to work. Over time, it stuck.(My wife would recite prepositions to him in a flat monotone voice, so we all have our different strategies.)And, obviously, this is just part of his routine!

  • The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • 1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
  • Washington, D.C. 20037