• Monday, May 28, 2012

Previous

Next

What do you need to keep?

January 24, 2012, 8:00 am

papers When you have an idea or a question and want to know more about a topic, what’s the first thing you do?

Do you turn to Google search, or a scholarly database, or another online reference? Or do you turn first to your personal library of books, notes, papers, URLs, and screenshots?

Your answer to those questions should direct your approach to collecting and managing references of any sort.

If your first impulse is to turn to your own curated collections of information, and you’re able to locate what you need when you want it, then whatever system you’re currently using is probably a good one.

But with the near omnipresence of digital reference material, many of us no longer turn first to our own collections. Yet we were trained, explicitly or implicitly, to collect and save large amounts of information.

In Scott Belky’s recent book Making Ideas Happen: Overcoming the Obstacles Between Vision and Reality, he argues that most people spend too much time collecting notes of various kinds, and goes so far as to say:

References obstruct your bias toward action.

Now, the scholar and archivist in me bristles a bit at that, but I think he’s right in pointing out that what he calls “Action Steps,” or what David Allen would call “next actions,” can easily be lost in the midst of notes and reference material for a project.

Many times, we hold onto an email, the URL of a website, or the PDF of a journal article, as a kind of emblem of an action we intend to take: we plan or hope to someday respond to the email, browse the website, or read the article. If those actions are important, then they should be captured and put into your action list. Otherwise you’re just piling up digital clutter.

Asking yourself why you’re holding on to something, when you expect to refer to it again, and how you’re going to find it when you need it can help you streamline your reference system. (Tools like Evernote, Catch (formerly 3Banana) and DevonThink can help you tag, manage, and easily retrieve those references.)

Sure, hard drive and cloud storage is faster and cheaper than ever; sure, we have better search tools; but if you just keep everything, then you lose sight of what’s most important.

Today, with so much information all around us, there’s less and less that you really need to keep yourself. Focus on the important stuff and let go of the rest.

What have you been keeping that you could let go of? Let us know in the comments!

[Creative Commons licensed image by flickr user Niklas Bildhauer]

This entry was posted in Productivity and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • http://historyinthecity.blogspot.com/ Michelle Moravec

    What have you been keeping that you could let go of? Let us know in the comments!
    I am still working off xerxoed copies of archival material I collected in the early 1990s.  I have this fantasy in which a stu digitizes them all for me, but in the meantime, they’ve traveled across the U.S. serveral times with me, in now-ancient, cracking plastic file bins.  

  • ghbrett

    I finally got rid of two 4 foot long cardboard file drawers with fading photocopies from a 7 year attempt for a PhD (no go) in addition to other articles on related IT topics. There are only one or two articles that I wish I still had and that was 3 or 4 years ago I made the big dump. I know where I can go to find one of the articles. As I write this I don’t remember the other 2 or 3 that I needed. 

    Now about my Evernote, MS Expression Media & DEVONThink treasures? Hmm, can I depend on the Internet Archive’s Time Machine. Will Government (with persuasion from BIG BUSINESS) lock me out or even delete info I think is worth while? I read about a couple cloud storage sites being shut down cause they had some pirated content, but what about all the other innocent content. Hmm, I did transfer from 5.25″ floppy’s to 3.5″ diskettes, to SCSI drives, to some CD’s and now on FireWire 2Tb drives (yes 2 of them, plus 1 1Tb and 2 500Gb external drives) all with important stuff, photographs, and even duplicate info (just in case). That one I’ll think a bit longer about.

  • http://twitter.com/andy_breeding Andy Breeding

    I have recently spent time purging old, electronic work files of dubious value; in the process I got better in touch with what I have and have organized it for better retrieval. However, letting go of information on the assumption that you will be able to find it again presupposes that the internet “out there” will preserve it and keep it accessible/findable.  I am somewhat dubious about this. A question you should ask yourself:  even if you could find it, how long would this take, and would the effort be justified?  

  • nyhist

    forget e-files! I keep archived notes forever (and by notes I mean old note cards I wrote by hand or on a manual typewriter eons ago when I researched my PhD dissertation). Just today I had reason to dip into them to find a couple of pieces of data I needed. Thank goodness I never purged these ancient files. I do urge readers to be careful about dumping things you think you will never need again. . .for I just did need such.

  • mstripling

    You couldn’t pay me to get rid of my stuff. Thirteen years into a biography project, I need it all.

  • mschedlb

    If it doesn’t take up needed space, then I say “keep it”. You might need it eventually (I often go back to stuff I did in the early 1990s). Of course, there’s also some historic and sentimental value to it. As long as it doesn’t impede your current work, why “purge”.

  • puretoo

    The examples you give (URLs, PDFs, emails) aren’t nearly the burden that paper is. Last summer, I scanned 12 file drawers and 3 boxes into PDFs – some 30,000 pages, now all searchable. It’s fantastic!!

  • 11331315

    I will admit that I am an academic hoarder, and my office and desktop (the wooden one) and the hard drives on my workstation reflect that. I have found that once I read and save the article, I can find it. And if I cannot immediately find it, I know where to search for it. I save sent emails in order to retrieve a dataset i sent to so-and-so. Packed away at home in an outbuilding are the spiral notebooks of recopied lecture notes from my undergraduate days (B.S. in 1969), all the acetate transparencies from 17 years of teaching (I haven’t taught in 10 years) plus all of the Jstor and other PDF articles from my dissertation research and graduate school (PhD in 2006). Now that I intend on retiring, I may purge the paper and contented cows may find comfort on the shredded past as bedding in the barn.

  • clasqm

    Never, ever, discard anything. My first serious computer had a 40Mb hard drive. Today I have files larger than that. Drive space is cheap and plentiful. I have e-books in Calibre, PDF journal articles in Papers, miscellaneous notes in Evernote. On my iMac, Spotlight will find any of that data instantly. My most vital files are backed up to Dropbox, everything else to a 1TB Time Machine volume.

    Just because things are available online does not mean they will always be there. Five years ago I quoted papers from a conference with URLs. Yesterday I rechecked those references and the entire website was gone. But I still have the PDFs …

  • drjennycrisp

    Just yesterday, I was wishing I still had my notebooks from my undergrad days. Now, I do wish I’d digitized them so they’d be searchable, but I wish I had them in some form, and I only have two or three of them… somewhere. I think.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Shallee-Page/612196292 Shallee Page

    And, even if the internet preserves it out there, I can’t assume that our university system won’t cut off chunks of our access at any time to cut costs.

  • brianborchers

    I’m making a concerted effort to get rid of old files full of research papers, manuals, and the like- this material isn’t easily searchable and there’s simply no practical way to use it.  Furthermore, all of the published materials are available through the internet, my university library, or at worst interlibrary loan.  On the other hand, I’ve recently recovered a bunch of old email and files that I’d archived on CD-Rom because I didn’t have enough disk space for it.  Now, storage is cheap enough that it’s easy to store all of this stuff and searching through it is easy so I can quickly find important information.  

  • jsibelius

    I know when I need regular information on a topic, I’ll just go look it up again.  So I used to discard most things.  Now that I manage a department, I have learned to archive everything that has to do with that because there are times you need to refer back to a very specific document.  Unfortunately, managing that load has meant it’s simply easier to archive everything, period.

  • http://nathaniel-campbell.blogspot.com/ Nathaniel M. Campbell

    Just yesterday, in preparing for a lecture today on Gnosticism, I pulled out from the file boxes the folder containing my notes from a graduate course in Patristic Exegesis.  Those notes helped me to clarify and organize what until that point in lecture prep had been a jumble of scattered remembrances and half-a-dozen books/articles spread across the desk.

    And I frequently use photos I took myself during study and research trips through Europe in my powerpoint slides.  N.B.: Powerpoint is great for showing pictures of art and maps, not so much at any other endeavor of learning.

  • jefftylerpmp

    Digitize it and archive it.  Then you can data-mine with a search engine.  Never keep paper; too cumbersome. :)

  • bookwomanca

    If the print isn’t duplicated in JSTOR or some other database that has digitized all contents from volume 1, you need to remember when digitized content started to be available. Anything before 2000 might or might not be archived digitally. Seems like everything is online and it almost is for recent stuff.

  • The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • 1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
  • Washington, D.C. 20037