• Monday, May 28, 2012

Previous

Next

Weekend Reading: #scimom Edition

May 6, 2011, 2:52 pm

Glassware

I generally think that people–even faculty–have the right to take care of their family, broadly construed, and to do a good job at it, and even, as far as possible, to arrange their schedule so that they are both effective in their work and good family members. And so, in honor of Mother’s Day in the US this weekend, let me plug the myriad contributors to the #scimom meme on Twitter and numerous blogs.

#scimom is sort of a Reese’s Peanut Butter Cup opportunity, wherein two blogging communities who don’t often talk to one another–moms and scientists–are invited to comment on their overlap. It’s an active hashtag on Twitter, and David Westcott‘s been posting links to Delicious. One of my favorite examples is from Kate Clancy, whose Context and Variation blog I’ve linked to regularly in this space:

At the beginning of each semester, my husband and I sit down with our schedules: our regular faculty meeting times, lab meetings, office hours, teaching hours, and how much time we want to exercise. We also look at our daughter’s schedule, since she has swimming twice a week. Then we slowly work out an equitable arrangement of pickups and drop-offs that we stick to, with the closest thing we can approximate to religious fervor, for the whole semester. I no longer go out for social coffees or lunches and stay at my desk the entire day (though at least I am standing). When our daughter goes to sleep, I often work for a few hours, though I certainly don’t do this every night unless I have a major deadline approaching. This is the reality of my job if I want to be a mom and academic.

This is pretty much the same thing as in my family. The only difference is that my wife usually goes to sleep shortly after our son does, and then gets up at 3AM or so, while I usually stay up until 1 or later, and then go to sleep. Which has been hard to sustain over the long haul, but it lets us be present, engaged parents, as well as decent academics.

The #scimom discussion’s potentially a valuable one, because it makes visible the idea that the two roles of mother and scientists don’t have to be mutually exclusive, and helps improve the climate for mothers in higher education. All of which is just a longwinded way of saying, happy mother’s day!

On to the links!

  • if you liked my post on Neal Bascomb’s book about the FIRST robotics competition, The New Cool, then you might also like my interview with him over at GeekDad.
  • Archive is a journal that “focuses on the use and theory of archives and special collections in higher education,” and its first issue is now available online.
  • Relatedly, at MEDEA there’s an argument that “The Academy needs to Be More Social”: Sadly, it seems like most digital SC still takes place through anti-social media channels such as listservs, thus missing opportunities for discussion and collaboration and helping the information to reach wider audiences. In this post, I argue that scholars should at least try to learn to be more web-savvy and take advantage of the multitude of free tools that are out there.
  • I think I feel the same way about cloud computing and Slavoj Žižek–both are simultaneously indispensable and somehow unreliable. Fortunately, Žižek’s here to explain it all: The paradox is thus that, as the new gadget (smartphone or tiny portable) I hold in my hand becomes increasingly personalized, easy to use, “transparent” in its functioning, the more the entire set-up has to rely on the work being done elsewhere, on the vast circuit of machines which coordinate the user’s experience. In other words, for the user experience to become more personalized or non-alienated, it has to be regulated and controlled by an alienated network.
  • I’ve been meaning to link to Stephen Ramsay’s “Life on the Command Line” for a couple of weeks: I don’t do anything with GUI apps anymore, except surf the Web. And what’s interesting about that, is that I rarely use cloudy, AJAXy replacements for desktop applications. Just about everything I do, I do exclusively on the command line. And I do what everyone else does: manage email, write things, listen to music, manage my todo list, keep track of my schedule, and chat with people. I also do a few things that most people don’t do: including write software, analyze data, and keep track of students and their grades.

This week’s video features Michio Kaku on “The World in 2030″ (via the Institute of Physics blog:

Two bonuses: Via @wendyphd, “Obvious to you. Amazing to others,”, by Derek Sivers, and Existential Star Wars, which is awesome.

Have a great weekend!

Photo by Flickr user Beige Alert / Creative Commons licensed

This entry was posted in Editorial and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • wbgleason

    Hmm…

    The same issues of “Women in Love” are in the book and the movie. And with Glenda Jackson, you don’t have to use so much imagination…

    Bill

    nice job, Michael

  • trendisnotdestiny

    Dr. Ruse,

    As a former infrequently bathed and embittered graduate student who enjoys the panoptic gaze of identifying hegemony, I want to say that you for your article(s), subtle sense of humor and endearing language…. You are one of a kind!

  • pocvecem

    I think we need to distinguish among three types of people who fall into the “let’s not teach this pop culture stuff” camp:

    1- People who believe the recent/pop stuff has no deeper or lasting value (or complexity) and who see more classic material as having proven its worth.

    2- People who object on political grounds to the Frankfurt School (and other Marxist), post-structuralist, feminist, and other Left-inspired theories and methods that are often applied when studying the pop/recent stuff, and who find that targeting the recent/pop content is less polarizing among the public than lambasting the politics. This group also includes people who understand that many academics (especially in the MLA disciplines) intentionally operate with political agendas and will respond much less favorably to any criticism of the politics.

    3- People who object on epistemic grounds to the Frankfurt School (and other Marxist), post-structuralist, feminist, and other Left-inspired theories and methods that are often applied when studying the pop/recent stuff, and who find that targeting the recent/pop content is easier for the public and nonspecialists to understand than the epistemological issues.

    Therefore, I find it interesting to see Ruse’s references to Kant and Hume. I think it goes to show that one can use contemporary and popular material to illustrate something more significant. But at the same time, I think Ruse misses the concerns some people have when making the criticisms he is responding to. Or: just because contemporary material can be taught substantively does not mean that it is often taught that way.

  • mavprof

    Mr Ruse, thanks for your inclusion of the sizeable excerpt from Mr Epstein’s article, though it did cut into your allowed word limit. Know also I’ll have to ignore your “[a]nd so on and so forth” summary judgment on it and look forward to reading his whole essay, given his renown for putting convincing ideas in lucid prose.

    I think pocvecem’s setting out of some of the objections to teaching “pop culture” spot-on. And I’d add that while I shouldn’t want to prejudge how you employ it specifically in your courses, I think in general it seems its culinary equivalent might be “stone soup”: just take a few pebbles of what is popular, superficial, and ephemeral, and add what is exemplary, profound, and timeless–et voila!

  • markbauerlein

    It is important to keep in mind Joseph Epstein’s biography. He never really was an academic, and his experiences at Northwestern many, many years ago were formative ones. Also, he was the long-serving and widely-admired editor of the distinguished quarterly The American Scholar.

  • chuckkle

    What, Epstein taught at Northwestern since the early 70s and (recently I guess) retired and was never really an academic? What are you talking about? He was in the English department, not a contract hire football coach. Please explain.

    Chuck Kleinhans

  • markbauerlein

    Epstein is a fiction writer, essayist, editor, and public intellectual.

  • goxewu

    According Wikipedia (this isn’t a paper for Prof. Bauerlein’s class, so I figure I can cite it), Epstein is an “essayist, short story writer, and editor.” (Hey, that’s kind of close to Prof. Bauerlein’s description. Did he consult Wikipedia, too?) But, again according to Wikipedia, Epstein was a lecturer at Northwestern from 1974 to 2002. Unless he was just giving the occasional guest lecture (chuckkle says Epstein “was in the English Department”) , that’d make him an academic to most people.

    So, like, both?

    And 2002 isn’t really long enough ago to make experiences from then count as “formative” for somebody born in 1937, is it?

  • mavprof

    goxewu: After Mark Bauerlein noted Mr Epstein’s experiences as a lecturer and writer at Northwestern in the 70s to be “formative,” you wrote: “And 2002 isn’t really long enough ago to make experiences from then count as ‘formative’ for someone born in 1937, is it?” Well, it seems from 1974 for the then relatively young Epstein (at 37), it could very well have been a formative period for a lecturer and writer, no? Sorry if I spoiled your “gotcha!” moment with MB.

  • markbauerlein

    The point was that Michael repeatedly refers to Epstein as “retired prof,” but Epstein was always an outsider to English academics. As for his “mental constipation,” his record as editor of American Scholar speaks for itself. Finally, many traditionalist humanities people object to the inclusion of mass culture products in the humanities classroom (they’re fine with them in the social science classroom) not because they dislike it (the dialogue in the final showdown in Shane is clipped and sharpened to a brilliantly tense edge) or because they’re old-fashioned. They do so because they believe that the heritage of Great Books is a better formation, and with the limited amount of humanities course work most students get, one has to choose materials uncompromisingly.

  • goxewu

    Sorry, but Epstein hung around Northwestern for 28 years, giving him ample chance to (a) modify/correct/shake-off those “formative” experiences (never mind that 37 might charitably excused as “relatively young” in today’s Bud Light dude culture, but it wasn’t in the mid-1970s), and to (b) become a de facto academic. If the arrow were pointing in the other direction, and someone were accusing Epstein of *not* being a legit academic, we’d sure hear howls of protest (and from the likes of mavprof, I’d aver).

    Epstein. was. an. academic. (And I think an academic is a pretty good thing to be.)

  • goxewu

    “Michael repeatedly refers to Epstein as ‘retired prof,’ but Epstein was always an outsider to English academics.”

    Harvey repeatedly refers to Mary Jo as a vegetarian, but she always took the bus to work.

    If elaboration is necessary: Are “retired prof” and “an outsider to English academics” mutually exclusive? And if they are, why–was it because Epstein taught hardly at all and came into the department only once a semester to collect his mail, or because his cultural views were out of synch with those of “English academics”? If the latter, then Epstein is a “retired prof who was always something of an outsider to his fellow English academics.”

    At least that’s what my editor would have said in notes mode.

  • mavprof

    Like Joseph Epstein, another literary outsider who kept his distance from mainstream academia but who nonetheless did hold a position as lecturer (at Cambridge the Greater, mind) was the great F R Leavis.

    During term holiday I once met a senior university colleague of mine at the departmental mail room, and remarked to him, “Well, E—–, I’d be a great place to work without all the students, wouldn’t it? “Ah, yes,” he said wistfully, “All Souls, Oxford . . .”

  • gtcouser

    Sorry to be picky, but I’m an English professor. In context “plumb job” sounds like kinky sex.

  • chuckkle

    Try a saber saw.

  • The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • 1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
  • Washington, D.C. 20037