• Monday, May 28, 2012

Previous

Next

Using Gmail Priority Inbox to Help Filter Your Incoming Mail

September 2, 2010, 3:00 pm

Google Priority InboxA few days ago, Google released Priority Inbox for Gmail, which is an opt-in experimental (read: “beta”) setting that is rolling out incrementally to Gmail users—I was lucky enough to get it on Monday but your mileage may vary. If you see a link at the top right of your Gmail interface (where the settings and help links are located) alerting you to the Priority Inbox (it will say “New! Priority Inbox”), you can click that link to activate the Priority Inbox feature and begin to configure an additional method for filtering your e-mail.

In addition to the basic spam filtering, and any actual Gmail filters you have created on your own, and any labels you have created and apply manually or automatically, the Priority Inbox functionality can help you to sort through what remains. Before going further with my own discussion of it, I recommend taking the next two minutes to watch this cheerful (and accurate) video:

What follows is an example of how Priority Inbox works for me—and by “works” I mean both “this is the functionality, click click click” and “this is how the concept applies to my workflow.” As always with ProfHacker posts, I’m not saying to run off and opt-in to Priority Inbox (if it’s even available to you as an option) especially if you have a system that works really well for you. But if you lack a system, or find yourself wading through a lot of bacn to get to the important stuff, Priority Inbox might just be the missing piece to your e-mail related productivity puzzle. In just a few days, it has proven itself useful for me (and also fascinating).

Original Settings

When you opt-in to Priority Inbox, the default settings will split your inbox interface into three sections: Important and unread, Starred, and Everything else. The default number of messages shown in each section is 10. Additionally, the left column links (typically to Inbox, Sent Mail, Drafts, your labels, etc) will change to include “Priority Inbox” before just regular ol’ “Inbox,” as shown below:

Google Priority Inbox

At first glance, this might seem a bit confusing: are there 15 messages in the Priority Inbox, and 27 more in the Inbox? No, actually. In this instance there are 15 messages in the Priority Inbox and 12 messages in my “Everything Else” area; if I switched to the regular Inbox view there would be a total of 27 unread messages. More on that in a moment, but I wanted you to see the first navigational change that would occur if you opted-in to Priority Inbox.

The first thing I did after opting-in was to change the default settings, because the three sections, and ten items per section, doesn’t work for me. I already have a filtering system in place, so mail gets labeled according to its content when necessary. I also keep a lot of mail in my inbox if I haven’t dealt with it but at some point in the future will need to. I also don’t use the “star” functionality, so “Starred” as a priority filter is meaningless to me. Finally, I wanted to be able to indicate important things even after they’ve been read.

Changing Settings

I like the settings options (in Gmail. go to Settings then the Priority Inbox tab) because they allow for a great deal of flexibility while also maintaining the core functionality of the Priority Inbox addition. In other words, I can make it do a lot of new things without giving up the old things (my existing filters, for example).

Priority Inbox Settings

As you’ll see in the examples from my own interface further on in this post, I immediately changed my settings to include only two sections: Important and Everything else, because that’s how I work. You probably work differently, but in my e-mail world, it’s either stuff I need to deal with right away (or stuff I need to keep thinking about in one form or another all the time until the task has been completed) or it’s…well, “something else.” That something else could be information I know I won’t have to deal with for a month or six, but I know myself well enough to know that once I file it, I’ll never think about it again (and that’s bad). Or, it could be the aforementioned “bacn”—not “spam,” because it’s something I want…it’s a term that essentially means “email you want but not right now.” I could have just as easily called “Something else” the “BacnBox” and been perfectly happy.

How it Actually Works (and learns)

Priority Inbox works by learning who (and what) you read and reply to and determining “importance” based on that information. Additionally, and most importantly, you can train it—which includes teaching it new things and correcting its mistakes—both at the per-message level and at the level of the filter.

For instance, the following message was filtered into the “Everything else” section upon receipt:

training it

This filtering made sense because although Audrey Watters and I communicate often, it’s via Twitter and not actual e-mail. So, Gmail wouldn’t know that I would always put Audrey’s messages in the “Important” section. But with a simple click of the plus sign icon indicated in the screenshot, I trained the system to know that messages that look like this should always be “Important.”

The messages that look like this statement is important, because this is not a direct filter of “all messages from Audrey Watters should be considered Important.” Instead, just clicking the plus sign icon might teach the system something about message as well as message sender. For all I know, Priority Inbox could have just learned that any e-mail messages with “omg” in the subject should be sent to the “Important” section. I don’t know. I will keep an eye on that.

But you can edit actual Gmail filters to specifically prioritize all messages from a particular e-mail address (or any other filterable content) in some way:

working with filters

In the example above, I’m both applying a label and marking as important all e-mail from my boss. Because really, who wouldn’t?

So What Does it Look Like?

When Priority Inbox is up and running and you login to Gmail (or click “Priority Inbox” from the side navigation) you will see the sections—in my case, “Important” and “Everything else,” but again yours might be different (especially if you keep the default three-section interface). In my “Important” section, you can see it includes a mix of filtered and unfiltered mail, read and unread, and some things that might surprise you (although these images are intentionally kept a little unclear so you’d have to look really closely if you want to see specifics):

priority: important

Some surprises might include the fact that I have Twitter notifications in the “Important” section. This is true, I do, but it depends on the person; I have trained Priority Inbox to learn who I e-mail and Twitter direct-message with on a regular basis, such that Twitter notifications of messages from those people look like regular important e-mail.

In the “Everything else” view, you’ll also see Twitter notifications, but not from regular e-mail correspondents—Priority Inbox learned that. You’ll also see e-mails from people I don’t e-mail on a regular basis, but they are still e-mails that I want to receive.

priority: everything else

After working through the unread mail, a cleaned-up view of a Priority Inbox-enabled Gmail interface looks something like this:

cleaned up priority inbox

If I don’t want to see the categorized view then I can just switch to “regular Inbox” view, using the link in the sidebar. This will be the result (looks like simple Gmail):

regular inbox

Do note, though, that the “important” indicator icon is still present next to each message (as appropriate) in the “regular” view.

Conclusion

My conclusion is that after three days, I love Priority Inbox and it definitely has helped me feel better about the state of my e-mail, or at least to understand at a glance how the content of that e-mail truly is categorized. Others have noted that by using Priority Inbox “you basically are telling Google what and who matters to you [...] Do you trust them? I do, but you might not, and that’s ok.

Have you enabled Priority Inbox for Gmail (if you use Gmail)? If so, what are your thoughts? How might it boost your productivity? Let us know in the comments.

 
This entry was posted in Productivity, Software and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment (14)

14 Responses to Using Gmail Priority Inbox to Help Filter Your Incoming Mail

smharrin - September 2, 2010 at 8:49 pm

This post led me to pop over to Gmail and turn on Priority Inbox–will let you know how I like it, but my initial session suggests I’m going to like it. I haven’t ever fully exploited the power of gmail labels but I think this will be even better.At the moment, though, I’m distracted b/c I love all the colored labels in your inbox screenshots, so I’m fooling around with the look of my inbox.

jmeloni - September 3, 2010 at 11:06 am

Hi @smharrin – I left a comment here last night but it has mysteriously disappeared. The upshot was: I love labels, and the colors tend to be the colors of the schools related to those labels. I’m a little…over the top with that. :) Do let us know how you like Priority Inbox!

peril - September 3, 2010 at 11:23 am

There have been a few great Gmail posts lately, this one is definatly great. I wish Google would make a desktop client, but until then, it’s stil by far the best web client.For those with multiple gmail acconts who don’t wnat to be logged into all of them at once, check out firefox plugin here: http://www.longfocus.com/firefox/gmanager/Been using it for a while now- pretty slick really.~ Aaronhttp://drperil.com

kfoxt11 - September 4, 2010 at 7:18 am

I like this post. Very thorough. I haven’t tried this feature yet, but I’m considering it. I do have system of labeling and using the stars, but sometimes it still gets a bit overwhelming. Thanks for all of the tips and the insight.

bizdean - May 14, 2012 at 6:30 am

You mean Spiro Agnew didn’t make up that “nattering nabobs…” phrase? And here I was giving the man too much credit.

austracademic - May 14, 2012 at 8:34 am

Never badmouth your current (or past) employer or anyone from those institutions which have employed you–even if the problems are known with regard to the institution or with individuals, you will be seen as disloyal and a complainer–and you never know what the relationship is between the person you are talking to and the people and institutions you are discussing negatively. 

Focus on why you are applying for the job.  If you find it necessary to discuss why you are seeking to leave, find a professional reason that will explain, for example:  change of direction in research focus, funding problems associated with the university (making clear that the funding issues are not directly related to yourself or your specific research area), desire to be in a geographic area where research facilities are located,  Or find an acceptable personal reason, such as partner is relocating to city/area for professional reasons.

Your potential new employers want to know that they are desirable, not merely the escape route from an unacceptable situation.  There are a number of reasons to leave–which ones serve your interests best in the telling?

gwwyo04 - May 14, 2012 at 9:39 am

In this economy, I guess I’m surprised that this question still comes up. Isn’t almost everyone “on the market” to some degree–either actively seeking or just “looking around?”

In addition to avoiding negative comments about the current employer or “sucking up” to the potential employer, it would seem that, “I’m seeking opportunities that match the position description” and then go on to explain how you fit the particular job in question, would be a good answer.

nybound - May 14, 2012 at 10:49 am


In this economy, I guess I’m surprised that this question still comes up. Isn’t almost everyone “on the market” to some degree–either actively seeking or just “looking around?” ”

Interesting observation… although I caution people against the greener grass syndrome. Almost everywhere has its issues. The state budget may be getting cut, but that’s true pretty much everywhere. You could jump to a private school, but unless it’s an ivy league school, it will likely have serious issues in the coming years as the student bubble begins to unwind. Every place has jerks and nice people. Try to minimize your interactions with the former and enjoy the latter. 

I’ve been fortunate enough to be able to move a couple of times when I had to for family reasons, but some academics just always seem to be looking for greener grass, and  seeing it just about everywhere else. Of course, if it truly is the Titanic, and there is credible talk of them eliminating your department, you gotta get outta there! I think you can be honest about that reason.

rsgassle - May 15, 2012 at 3:28 am

I once was in a department where literally half the faculty was at war with the other half, and my side was losing. People there told me that every department has politics. I bailed and went to another university. Within a week, I was talking to a professor there. When I told him where I had come from he said, “Oh, yes, they’ve had a reputation for faculty infighting for twenty years.” True, there are problems everywhere, but you don’t get a reputation for something if you are just like everybody else.

dbcarr - May 17, 2012 at 12:27 pm

You really must focus on the positive aspects of the institution where you are seeking an appointment. For example, “I would like a setting in which I’ll have greater opportunities to work closely with my students;” “Your interdisciplinary center has just the sort of mission and faculty that would enable me to expand my research in the directions I seek. It’s too tempting an opportunity to let pass.” Perhaps once you have landed the position and moved there you can grouse about the conditions at your former place of employment, but I would recommend against that as well, unless there are other faculty in similar positions. Even they will tire quickly of that, though; your new institution is your home. Treat it with that respect.

div411 - May 17, 2012 at 1:11 pm

Gene Fant, a regular contributor, needs to learn English,   He writes ”feel like you are serving” rather than “feel as if you are serving.”   Not one of my first-year students here in Aberdeen, Scotland, and least of all any students here from non-English-speaking countries, would commit so egregious a grammatical howler.   Maybe at Union University proper English is not appreciated or even recognized, but at higher-ranking universities it is both.   There are many ways that V-P Fant can master English.   I suggest he avail himself of one of them.

DS

wingedwarrior - May 17, 2012 at 1:15 pm

“There are many ways that V-P Fant can master English.” Perhaps a better phrasing would be, “V-P Fant can master English in many ways.”

klwatt04 - May 17, 2012 at 2:51 pm

I can’t imagine a situation in which one might find one’s fellow faculty member obnoxious enough to leave the department….wait.

margray - May 17, 2012 at 7:37 pm

Good grief you are being picky.  Have you paid any attention to his point?  What is wrong with feeling like something, anyway?

  • The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • 1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
  • Washington, D.C. 20037