• May 25, 2013

Previous

Next

Scrivener, Scrivening, Scriverastic

March 8, 2010, 6:00 pm

[This is a guest post by Ryan Cordell, whose post on Things previously appeared on ProfHacker. In the interval, Ryan's gotten a job (beginning in the fall) at St. Norbert College, in De Pere, WI. -- JBJ]

It seems I’m becoming the Mac software guy on ProfHacker. I’m cool with that.

Today I’m writing about Scrivener, an enhanced word processor from the folks at Literature and Latte. If Things is an important part of my daily workflow, Scrivener is essential. In fact, more than any other program Scrivener ensures my loyalty to the Mac platform and helps me quash my desire for a netbook (I’ve yet to find a comparable composition tool for Windows or Linux, but please let me know in the comments if I’ve missed one). I don’t remember how I wrote before discovering it, and I can’t imagine writing without it.

So that’s high praise—perhaps a bit overblown—but this software changed the the way I think through, organize, and perform my professional writing. As with Things, I won’t aim to give a complete tutorial: Literature and Latte hosts a series of video tutorials on their website that will walk you through most of Scrivener’s features. Instead, I’ll try and detail why I find Scrivener valuable for academic writing and teaching. (Note: Click on any of the images to view a larger version.)

1. Writing as project

In Scrivener you don’t create a document, you create a project. That project, in turn, has a binder divided into two big categories: “Draft” and “Research.” You can also create additional categories.

The drafts category can only contain two things: folders and documents. This is the place for your writing. What I love about Scrivener’s binder metaphor is that I can compose each chapter not as one huge file, but as a series of shorter documents grouped under a folder or master document.

As the texts required of me have grown longer, it’s become harder and harder to keep them mentally organized. Remembering how the sub-sections of a chapter fit together, and then how those chapters fit together into a book, is difficult to do when looking at one continuous stream of pages.

Scrivener fixes that problem. By allowing me to compose in short sections, rather than 40-50 pages at a time, Scrivener allows me to better visualize the arc of of a long piece. Scrivener’s “Corkboard” view (shown above), displays for visual thinkers the synopses (more on that shortly) of each document in a given folder or folders as index cards on a corkboard. The outline view—

presents the shape of a folder or folders for more linear thinkers. In either view I can click-and-drag elements to reorganize my project, as I can in the binder itself.

Most importantly, the binder approach allows me to write in bits and pieces, stops and starts. When I have an idea, however small, I create a new document in the relevant chapter and write it down. That snippet won’t sit in the middle of a longer document, taunting me, but I also won’t forget it. I can return to it when I have time to flesh it out.

I also have a folder in my binder called “Fragments” in which I collect ideas, ranging from a single sentence to a few paragraphs, that I have yet to find a home for in the larger project. Many of these never find their way into the main document, but Scrivener’s ability to collect and organize all of my thoughts about each project has proved invaluable. When I get stuck in a chapter I immediately browse through my fragments, and often I find just the right prompt to break my writer’s block.

2. Research at hand

The second main category in Scrivener’s binder is “Research.” Here you can collect folders and documents, but also images, webpages (which can be retained as web archives or converted to text), PDFs, Office documents, and even audio and video files. I could list more file types here; I’ve not encountered many source files Scrivener won’t import. For my dissertation, I mainly collect PDFs of articles I’m working, notes on print sources, and scans of primary sources, which are for me mainly images of 19th Century religious periodicals.

A Scrivener project file is really a folder, and the formatting of items you import is preserved. These files can be viewed/watched/listen to within Scrivener, or opened in an external editor using Scrivener’s contextual menu. What’s more, any changes you make in the external editor will appear in Scrivener if you save the file (so, if I add notes to a PDF in Preview, after I save the file those notes will appear when I view the PDF in Scrivener’s viewer). If I want to export a file from my Scrivener project—if I want to send an article I’m working from to a colleague, for instance—that’s also easy. I can either open the file in an external editor and use the “Save As…” command to save a copy elsewhere on my harddrive, or I can use the “Export file” command in Scrivener’s File menu.

What makes this collected research especially valuable is Scrivener’s split-pane view.

By clicking the button in the toolbar, I can display two items from my binder simultaneously (Option + click will alternate between a horizontal and a vertical split pane):

When working from sources, then, I don’t have to flip constantly between the document and my screen. Instead, I can transcribe directly from the source within Scrivener. When working from my notes—

—I can copy and paste directly from the notes document into my draft.

The split-pane view is the most valuable feature of Scrivener to my daily work. In fact, Scrivener is rarely open in single-pane mode on my machines. There are many uses for Scrivener’s split-pane mode beyond those I use. One of the tutorials on Literature and Latte’s site, for example, discusses using the split-pane mode to transcribe from audio files.

One note about collecting research items in Scrivener: it’s not designed to serve as a large-scale database, and it can be overloaded. When I first started my dissertation I collected everything in Scrivener, and as the project file grew above 1 GB the program started to crawl. I’ve since ported my comprehensive database to DEVONthink, and bring into Scrivener the most relevant images and PDFs to what I’m currently working on.

3. Document Metadata

You’ve already seen Scrivener’s synopses in the screenshots of the outline and notecard views. Synopses for each document or research item are edited in the info pane that can be opened along the right side of the window. Here you can also label items. Labels change the color of the item’s index card and (if you set this as a preference for the application) the items icon in the binder. Label names are also customizable. Again, for visual thinkers labels can help distinguish what’s in your writing cue from what’s finished or what’s set aside.

Below the label you can set the item’s status: to-do, first draft, revised draft, etc.

At the bottom of the info pane you can do three things: add notes to an item (the notepad icon), compile references for an item (the bookmark icon), or assign keywords to the item (the key icon). I honestly rarely use the notes feature here, as there are so many other spots to take notes in Scrivener. I don’t use keywords much either; they’re essentially a tagging system within Scrivener that I’ve not found much use for, though I know others rely on them for finding things.

I do use the reference pane, though. Here you can compile references internal to the project, either by clicking and dragging them from the binder or by clicking the “+” and navigating to them. You can also include external links, which can be files elsewhere on your harddrive or websites. Clicking any of an items references will open that item, in Scrivener for internal links and in the appropriate program or browser for external links. By building my reference list as I work on a given section, I can quickly return to cited works.

4. Full-project search

Following on metadata, by compiling all of my writing and current research on a project, Scrivener allows me to search my drafts, notes, and PDFs. Searches pick up on terms in documents, synopses, notes, and keywords.

5. Distraction-free writing

Many folks swear by Writeroom as a solution to the distractions of writing on a computer. Scrivener’s full-screen mode offers a similar solution. When I click the full screen button the rest of my desktop (and even the rest of Scrivener’s interface) fades to black, highlighting only the document I’m working on:

Full-screen mode can be styled, so if you prefer green-on-black hacker text you can make that happen.

6. In-line footnotes and annotations

You no doubt noticed the strangely highlighted text in the above example. While composing in Scrivener, text can be tagged as “Annotation” or “Footnote.” When exporting a draft into Word or another format, I can choose what to do with each kind. I can treat annotations and footnotes differently, ignoring one and exporting the other. Annotations can be exported as comments within Word, and footnotes can be exported as either footnotes or endnotes.

Some writers might find this distracting, but I’ve found that I prefer the in-text notes during composition. I don’t have to page from my spot in an argument to the end of the document in order to check a reference or annotation, and so I’m not distracted from my writing by the mechanics of its presentation.

7. Tracking variations and other riffs on a project

Scrivener makes it very easy to track my revision process. I can duplicate a document or folder before revising, and save the old version in my “Old Drafts” folder. I can use the split-pane feature to keep my old draft side-by-side with a new revision. Scrivener also has a “Snapshot” feature, so I can take a snapshot of a document at one point in my revision and then, if the revision goes horribly wrong, restore to that snapshot.

I also keep any riffs on a project in its binder: paper or panel proposals, conference papers, or lectures that grow directly from that project go in a separate folder for easy reference. Again, this allows me to refer directly to the text as I write, say, a paper proposal.

8. Robust options for composing and exporting

Scrivener allows me to compose a number of different document types. I tend to write rich text documents that I export to Word to send to my readers, but Scrivener supports other kinds of writing projects that should resonate with the Prof. Hacker crowd. Documents can be created and then exported in plain text, rich text, .doc, .docx, HTML, and even Multimarkdown formats. As I said above, individual files can be exported using File–>Export, but longer drafts (which may include many documents from the binder), can be prepared using File–>Compile Draft:

Here I can choose which documents from the binder I want to include in the draft, what metadata I want exported, and the file format of the draft (I didn’t mention all the possible formats because, honestly, I’ve not experimented with many of them).

Under “Text Options”—

I can tweak even finer settings, such as how my footnotes will be represented in the exported document.

9. Keeping a class together

So far I’ve written only about how I use Scrivener for research projects, but it’s also become a valuable part of my teaching. Whenever I begin teaching a new class, I create a new project for it:

In these project I collect all the documents I create or gather for that class over the semester: class outlines, quizzes, final exam questions, sometimes even student papers (remember that Word files can be viewed and edited within Scrivener). I find this a much better solution than a Finder folder packed with documents. By collecting the class in a Scrivener project all of its materials are organized and searchable.

Conclusion

I’ve not covered everything Scrivener can do in this article, but I hope I’ve given you an idea of why I think it’s such valuable scholarly tool. I was fortunate to discover Scrivener early in the dissertation-writing process, and to pass it on to a number of my colleagues. Literature and Latte offers a free 30-day demo, and once you decide to buy it charges an astoundingly-low $39.95.

I know there are some other Scrivener users in the ProfHacker audience. Please use the comments to offer your own tips and tricks.

10. Bonus Tip

This bonus tip, like my last, depends on Dropbox. If you use this magical folder-syncing software, then you can keep your Scrivener projects in your Dropbox and access them across multiple machines. I love using Scrivener’s split-panes view on my home iMac (on the large screen both panes are as large as my entire laptop screen), but when I’m on campus I write on my laptop. Using Dropbox, my Scrivener files for both research projects and classes are always at hand.

To doubly repeat myself—Make sure that you close your Scrivener project on one machine before opening it on another. Because of the incremental way Dropbox syncs files, keeping the same project open in two places risks losing changes made in one place or the other. Unlike Things, though, Scrivener will actually alert you if you try and open a project that is already open elsewhere, so you have to work hard to make this mistake in Scrivener.

[Image by Flickr user Markus Rödder / Creative Commons licensed]

[See larger versions of all Ryan’s screenshots here.]

 
This entry was posted in Productivity, Software, Teaching and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

19 Responses to Scrivener, Scrivening, Scriverastic

Alexandra - March 8, 2010 at 6:37 pm

Gaaah, you had me so excited. I was even sure to buy it without even downloading the trial first (which was a first for poor-student-me). Until I read that it’s for Mac only. Does anyone know of a similar program for Windows (XP)?

PS Thanks, profhacker.com, for existing. I love this site.

Mike Hickerson - March 8, 2010 at 7:48 pm

Alexandra,
Check out the “Links” page on Scrivener’s website:
http://www.literatureandlatte.com/links.html

It includes a long list of alternative programs, including several for Windows.

Rana - March 8, 2010 at 7:54 pm

I adore Scrivener! I use it very much the way you describe for teaching; it’s the best way I’ve found yet for keeping all of my files in one place, ready to hand. If it had a spreadsheet subsection, and a slideshow option, I’d toss MSOffice and never look back.

(At this very moment I’m taking a break from grading in Scrivener – I set up comments rubrics, and cut-and-paste in student work, and just go through the lot in one blob. It makes an excellent backup, and gives me a sense of how students have been progressing from assignment to assignment.)

Another great thing about it is that you can set up word count targets for individual documents or the master document as a whole, and you can set them for overall target or daily targets. So if you know you have a 900 word review to write, it will show you a progress bar to let you know how far you’ve gotten. Similarly, if you set yourself a daily writing goal, it will track that progress as well. It’s wonderful.

It’s also FAR less of a memory hog than something like MSWord. Right now Word, at rest, is demanding 55MB of my memory space; Scrivener a paltry 35MB.

Font and formatting handling can be a bit weird, but that’s the only real drawback I’ve found so far.

Ryan Cordell - March 8, 2010 at 8:43 pm

Thanks for mentioning the word-count targets, Rana! That completely slipped my mind when putting this together. I try and set a “standard diss chapter” target when I start a chapter, and then use the handy progress bar to monitor my progress toward that goal (or sometimes, to keep track of how much I’ll need to cut when revising).

John - March 8, 2010 at 9:01 pm

I started using Scrivener for NaNoWriMo last year and have now started using it in my academic writing. I love the index card motif of organizing research as this is how I learned to do it so long ago before the Internet was available. Anyone else remember libraries with tombs of abstracts to search and cross reference? I can tell by this post and comments that I am nowhere near using the full potential of this program. Thanks for the post.

Chad - March 8, 2010 at 9:33 pm

Thanks for this review (and for your previous one on Things). I’ve tried Scrivener in the past but couldn’t figure out how to integrate it with my bibliographic program of choice (Sente) including how to export from Scrivener into Pages for final formatting and printing. Do you use a citation app alongside Scrivener?

Scott - March 8, 2010 at 9:47 pm

Thanks, Ryan – I’ve been using Scrivener for a couple of years now, and this taught me a new thing or two (didn’t know about the vertical split screen feature, though I use the horizontal one frequently).

Like Rana above, the font and formatting business in Scrivener drives me crazy. But I tend to write my “primitive accumulation” in Scrivener, in order to collect and organize the small bits before I have a full draft (though the notes and research stay in Scrivener for quick reference).

Like with GTD solutions, I’ve taken a very strong interest in cross-platform solutions since I’ve started doing much of my research on a netbook running Linux and occasionally Windows. Scrivener’s files are a combination of xml and rtfd format, so it’s reasonably easy to access a reference from within another OS on Dropbox (the BinderStrings.xml has all of a project’s indexed text).

It’s frustrating for my cross-platform tendencies that the killer features for me are all fairly simple ideas: a project as a searchable, freely order-able collection of files, with the ability to view several files at the same time as a unit (say, a chapter section), and a flexible metadata scheme. But nobody else has all three. I’m about to end a short experiment with trying to start a chapter using Evernote (it’s great for collecting, but lousy for presenting and organizing), and it seems to me, too, that the best solution for researching and drafting academic work is only going to work on the Mac. Maybe it’s time to get working on a Hackintosh…

Also, if I recall correctly, they have a discount for educational licenses.

Ryan Cordell - March 9, 2010 at 8:35 am

I must confess that I don’t. When I started grad school (and was, I like to think, less savvy about this stuff), we were pitched Endnote, which I tried and hated. Perhaps the problem was with me, but I found that I spent more time reformatting Endnote’s imported citations than I spent entering them myself. I gave Endnote up, and by the time I’d found out about managers like Sente or Zotero I was so far in that creating a citations database seemed like a huge time investment.

That said, under the “General” preference pane for Scrivener, you can choose a “Bibliography/Citations Manager” (the preference is toward the bottom, just over “Import Options”–I had trouble spotting it). According to Scrivener’s documentation, once this is set you can then call up your manager through the menus Text–>Bibliography/Citations or using the hotkeys CMD+SHIFT+Y. If you try this, let me know how well it works with Sente.

If anyone out there knows if Scrivener will play nice with Zotero, let us know that, too. I do need to shake off my laziness and start rebuilding my citations databases soon.

Scott - March 9, 2010 at 8:56 am

Yes! For me, Scrivener plays just fine with Zotero. At least for Zotero’s wonderful drag-and-drop-a-reference tool: you select one or more references within a folder (use case: for each folder in Zotero, select all and drag into its own Scriv page), and just drag it over. That works fine for Scrivener, and spits out bibliography entries in whatever format you’ve selected. (Text format tends to be ugly for ANY pasted text in Scrivener – and it’s a rummaging-through-the-menus ordeal to get the equivalent of “paste matching document style” in word.) But it’s really kind of magical.

My “Research” pages in Scrivener tend to look like this: Bibliography entry, notes on how I’m planning to use a source, then quotations with page references. You could also keep all the bibliography entries on a single page, then link each entry to notes and transcriptions. (That would be great, actually.)

Speaking of drag and drop, my “export” method for Scrivener to Word is just to click “Edit Scrivenings” on the pieces of my draft I want to export, which gives you those in the viewport as a continuous document. Select all, copy, and paste. It captures all the annotations and footnotes (I suppose using the preferences active in the export menu).

Uh-oh, it’s almost 9. Time to switch into Scivener.

Amy Cavender - March 9, 2010 at 12:21 pm

Thanks for the post, Ryan! I’m intrigued enough that I’ll be checking out the demo this week.

Scott - March 9, 2010 at 9:46 am

A quick note on accessing .Scriv documents from other computers. It saves a folder of files, which is actually pretty easy to edit. BinderStrings.xml is the index file, and for each “page” in Scrivener, it gives you a numbered .rtfd file (numbered in order of creation). One can freely edit the .rtfd files outside of Scrivener without breaking anything. When the document is opened within Scrivener and saved, the program updates the BinderStrings file, which acts as the search index. Nothing breaks, and it’s a simple ecosystem.

Just in case anyone else is interested in using Scrivener on a main computer and adding to existing research pages or tinkering with bits of writing from another, non-Mac computer. (For new files, you’re best off just using .doc or .txt and copy-pasting into Scrivener.)

Amy Cavender - March 9, 2010 at 4:51 pm

Zotero should also play nicely with Scrivener via its RTF Scan feature.

KB - March 10, 2010 at 8:12 am

Many thanks for the post on Scrivener, Ryan, much appreciated. Sorry to hear that font and formatting are driving a couple of commenters crazy, although I’m not sure why this would be. Scrivener’s formatting options should be fairly straightforward (it uses the same text engine as TextEdit). If you want to paste text with no formatting (that is, so that it matches the formatting of the text in Scriv), you can just use Edit > Paste and Match Style (shift-opt-cmd-V), the same as in most other Mac programs (Pages, TextEdit) etc. And remember you can always change the keyboard shortcut so that cmd-V invokes Paste and Match Style instead of regular Paste by using the Keyboard pane of System Preferences.

To the poster who had problems exporting to Pages, this is probably because Pages has poor RTF support (and Apple don’t make the .pages format available to third-party developers so no one outside of Apple can support the Pages format directly).

But if anyone has any problems, feel free to drop me a line or post on our forums at http://www.literatureandlatte.com/forum, as I’m always around to answer questions and help solve any issues that you have with Scriv.

Thanks again!
All the best,
Keith
(Scrivener developer)

P.S. Regarding cross-platform support… Watch this space (I hope). :)

Scott - March 10, 2010 at 9:41 am

D’oh – I never noticed the Paste as Matched Style in the menu (I suppose I’m used to the ONLY MS Word feature that I really like, the tooltip that pops up on pasted text asking about style). That does exactly what I need (I often clip things into Scriv), and I suppose that change alone will keep my document looking clean and consistent with no effort. Thanks so much for taking the time to explain.

And I’d like to second Julie’s sentiment below – this is wonderful software, and I’d also be thrilled to see a Windows version. I, too, will be eagerly looking forward to its release…

Julie Meloni - March 10, 2010 at 8:29 am

Keith, cross-platform support would be spectacular. You don’t need me to tell you that, I’m sure… Would gladly pay a premium (above the Mac price) for a non-Mac version.

Rana - March 10, 2010 at 2:43 pm

The font and formatting on Scrivener bugs me because it’s inconsistent, and the look of it is often crap. In some ways it’s too customizable; I don’t want to gauge whether I want my paragraphs spaced x points between text lines, but y points between paragraphs, and I find the interface for that to be less than intuitive. It’s also hyper-aggressive about capitalizing letters that come after periods, and, unlike Word, where a simple control-z takes care of it, the only way to correct it is to use the mouse or arrows to highlight the errant letter after the word’s been written and change it manually – a real pain in the ass.

For things like bold, italics, underline, yes, it’s straightforward. Dealing with the overall look of a page, not so much. It’s hard for me to predict what it will look like after printing, because the spacing on the screen doesn’t bear a clear one-to-one correspondence with what shows up on the paper, or in another document. When the formatting matters, I export to Word to fine-tune later, but being able to visualize the layout while composing is part of my thinking process. The footnote mechanics are also a little odd.

So while I love nearly everything else about Scrivener, this is one thing that continues to chafe.

Mike Duvall - March 11, 2010 at 9:25 am

Great review of Scrivener, Ryan.

I have used Scrivener for a while for writing up interviews and interview essays and I like it. I haven’t used it successfully yet for academic articles, but I’ll likely give it a try again soon. But here’s something different I used it for last week.

In a writing class, I pulled up on screen my scriv file for an interview essay that I wrote in order to talk about process, since my students, too, are writing interview essays. The scrivener file had my audio file from the interview, my rough notes in cards, and my final draft. Having everything in one place worked out very well and stepping them through my process (which I didn’t pitch as THE process) with the program was helpful, I think.

Andrew Halfacre - March 14, 2010 at 5:43 pm

Hi Rana

Did you know you can turn off the capitalise behaviour in the preferences? Look under text editing and uncheck “capitalise first letter of every sentence”.

Also, to be fair to Keith, Scrivener is not a page layout programme, it’s designed for writing up to the last draft. His assumption is that you will use something else for the very final version to get all the layout goodness you desire. My workflow is to get all the content right in scrivener and then export to something else to make it pretty.

The something else is either Multimarkdown to HTML, which works astonishingly well, OR Multimarkdown to RTF and then make it pretty in Pages.

I find writing in plain text (courier) and using a few basic markdown commands gives me the biggest payoff by enabling me to write once and create lots of different outputs from the same Scrivener text.

When I’ve wanted consistent paragraph spacings in Scrivener I’ve found it most useful to create a new style from an ideal block of text and then get Scrivener to default to that style. That gets me the quickest result on formatting text nicely. (But mostly it’s Courier and MultiMarkdown)

Mike W - March 21, 2010 at 12:39 am

I agree that Scrivener is fantastic for writing projects as well managing existing courses. Here’s a quick demo I made last fall to show how useful Scrivener can be in the course design process and subsequent implementations of the course. Hope this helps. Thanks for the great blog!

  • 1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
  • Washington, D.C. 20037
subscribe today

Get the insight you need for success in academe.