As the new academic year approaches, there are probably several things on your to-do list: finalizing new syllabi, straightening up the office, course prep, and putting the finishing touches on your summer writing projects. But whether you are still in graduate school, starting a shiny, new post-doc, out on the tenure-track, or further along in your career, this is a also a good time to take stock of your finances. Specifically, before you get into the throes of a new term, you should take a look at your retirement account(s) and make sure that you are where you need to be in saving for the future.
It can be disorienting and strange to think about retirement when you begin your academic career. Retirement seems like another lifetime from now, something in the far off distance that we can worry about later. But when I began my current position, I was determined to learn about financial planning. I had managed to avoid major pitfalls by not spending money I didn’t have, but moving from graduate school to full-time employment presented me with new opportunities and new complications: health insurance, retirement planning, flex-spending…When I was confronted with all of this information at faculty orientation a few years ago, I was overwhelmed. In addition, retirement planning can be intimidating for many academics in no small part because we get a later start on saving than most due to the years we spend in graduate school living paycheck to paycheck. Maybe you were one of the lucky few who could contribute to a retirement plan while living on a graduate stipend, but many graduate students consider themselves lucky to have broken even upon filing the dissertation. Others might not have been so lucky and need to begin paying back their student loans.
Depending on where you work, you might have different options for your retirement plan. Most colleges and universities offer faculty a defined contribution plan. My college’s plan is offered through TIAA-CREF. Other schools might work with another financial institution such as Fidelity or Vanguard. Generally, these plans are structured so that if an employee contributes a certain percentage of her salary, the employer will match that contribution. Sometimes it is an even match, meaning that if an employee puts in 5%, then the employer matches 5% yielding a 10% total contribution. Sometimes the match is less balanced: if you contribute 3%, your employer might match 7% or as much as 10%. Be sure to check with your human resources office to find out the figures on your campus.
If your employer offers this benefit, if at all possible, you should absolutely contribute the requisite amount to obtain the match. Rather than a benefit, I think of this fund as part of my salary albeit part of my salary that I can’t touch for a few decades. If I didn’t make this contribution, I would basically be throwing away free money. Another way to look at it would be to think that you are giving your employer a 5% discount on your services. I am all for getting discounts, but I’m not such a fan of giving them especially at the expense of my future self.
If you work for a public institution, you might have the option to choose whether you want to invest in the state pension plan—a defined benefit plan—instead of a defined contribution plan. The downside of these plans is that in many cases they are not portable. In other words, unlike the defined-contribution plan outlined above, you can’t take these plans with you if you take a different job at another institution unless your fund has vested (usually after 5 years). These plans vary from state to state, and in some cases, from institution to institution, so if your college offers this kind of plan as an option, it is a good idea to talk to HR personnel as well as some of your colleagues about whether it might be a good fit for you.
If you have opted for the defined contribution plan (or if, like me, that choice was made for you), you still have to decide how much to contribute and how to allocate your contributions. I’ve already suggested that you should contribute at least the minimum required to secure your employer match. But if you can, most financial advisors recommend contributing more, and taxes should be deferred on any monies that you contribution until you withdraw the funds upon retirement. How much you should contribute is a personal decision, which will depend on whether or not you have a one- or two-income household, your number of dependents, your desired retirement age, and your current financial health and obligations. A general rule of thumb I’ve learned from reading various financial columnists is that you should be putting between 10-15% of your take-home income towards your retirement account(s).
How to allocate your contributions: With TIAA-CREF, you have two options. You can choose your allocations yourself, deciding what percentage you would like to dedicate to equities of various stripes (large-cap, mid-cap, small-cap, value or growth), and how much to contribute to more conservative investments like bonds. This option is generally recommended for those who are more aggressive in their investments or who like to keep an eye on their nest eggs and manage the funds themselves. The other option is to elect to have the good folks at the financial institution manage the funds for you. In this instance, you simply tell them when you plan to retire (35 years, 30 years, 15 years), and leave the rest to them. This option is recommended for those who are less comfortable with risk or who want to let someone else worry about the details. There is no single correct answer to this question—the right answer is the one with which you and your family are most comfortable.
Ask questions: Whichever company you are working with, you should not be afraid to ask for advice. Often, at the beginning of the academic year, HR will offer employees the opportunity to meet with a financial advisor so that you can ask questions and make sure that you are where you want to be in planning for the future. If your situation is especially complicated, you might find it worthwhile to hire a financial advisor, but if you just have basic questions about whether or not you are saving enough to meet your retirement goals, you might start with the free consultation and see whether it is sufficient.
Check back occasionally: You’ll want to keep tabs on your funds every once in a while, but constantly monitoring the market’s ups and downs especially with the current volatility is a recipe for unhappiness. But that doesn’t mean that you should set up for fund and forget about it. Instead, you should check in once a month to make sure that your investments are in line with your expectations. You might want to make adjustments once you have had a few months with your allocations.
If you want to see how much you should be saving towards your retirement or whether or not you are on track, you might visit the planners provided by CNN Money. In addition to CNN Money, you also might check out the following financial websites: Get Rich Slowly, SmartMoney, and MSN Money.
Are you on track with your retirement? What advice do you have for those just starting to build their nest eggs? What is the one thing that you know now that you wish someone would have told you back then? Please share in the comments section below.




8 Responses to ProfHacking Your Retirement Account
heatherwhitney - August 13, 2010 at 10:12 am
Great info! For those who might not have the benefit of institutional plans (such as grad students or adjuncts), you can get started on retirement funds with putting just a little bit every month into a Roth IRA. T. Rowe Price is a good choice because you can start putting in as little as $50/month with no initial deposit. Every little bit helps!
trendisnotdestiny - August 13, 2010 at 10:25 am
You might have suggested the idea of Roth IRA (if they qualify) since many pension funds have been raided or been invested (infected) with low quality debt instruments and high risk equity holdings…..The Roth allows for $5,000/year without the tax deduction but you never have to pay taxes on the earnings… Also, you get to choose whatever investment vehicle you want that is not pooled with other assets… This can be seen to be an advantage of stealth in a world where capital and information move quickly….The match is a good deal, but balancing defined contribution plans deferral percentages with funding a Roth (while incomes qualify) is a more stable approach that relying upon CREF investments to be the engine of growth during one of our worst economic downturns…. Also, prudent investors might consider buying investments that track water companies since:1) the planet is warming2) drinking water is in short supply3) the longterm affects of aspartame are questionable4) migration, intensity of weather & structural erosion affect the watertableThe next 20 years is all about capturing the last of the natural resources by private interests…… those who are invested in these sectors will make money
eetempleton - August 13, 2010 at 3:01 pm
@trendisnotdestiny Thank you for mentioning Roth IRAs. I didn’t bring them up because IRAs are a topic that could be a column of their own, but they are definitely worth looking into, especially for those who are not receiving retirement benefits from their employer.Also, in today’s Kiplinger Report (another great site for finance information), there was a helpful article about the benefits of paying down debt vs. saving for retirement.
jklinker - August 16, 2010 at 9:43 am
One other thing to keep in mind is that although a defined contribution plan is portable, a general rule of thumb is that $200,000 in a defined contribution plan will generate $1000 a month over retirement assuming a withdrawal rate of 4%. Those who select a defined pension plan do not have to save such large sums to generate the same $1000 a month in retirement. However, as you mentioned, the downside is those plans are not portable. Enjoyed reading your thoughts on this as it affects so many in academe.
eszter - August 16, 2010 at 12:12 pm
Didn’t see the following in your piece, sorry if I missed it. When going on leave on a fellowship, it is important to think about how your retirement contributions may be influenced by the specifics of your scenario. Fellowships often don’t come with full benefits and so may not contribute to your retirement. At the same time, your home institution may well be paying only part of your salary and thus may not make the usual contributions you’re used to. At minimum, it is something worth looking into and asking some questions about.This general topic is an important one that especially junior folks don’t seem to think about enough so it’s nice to see you covering it!
drjeff - August 16, 2010 at 12:57 pm
Just to make it crystal-clear for anyone finance-adverse:A “defined benefit” plan (aka “old-fashioned pension”), if it’s available, normally pays MANY TIMES what you would reasonably expect to get (barring huge contributions) from a “defined contribution” plan. In some places (like one place I taught), you even get to NOT pay Social Security taxes (which normally take over 6% of your salary).The disadvantages to defined benefits plans are:1- You can’t take it with you. You have to investigate what would happen if you go elsewhere in X years, and weigh that.2- You are trusting that you will get paid, by a private corporation that could go bankrupt or out of business, or a government entity that could go bankrupt. This used to be a remote (non-)possiblity, but there are something like a dozen states right now where people are talking about drastic measures being needed to address “exorbitant public-employee pensions.” If you work for a state university and have a defined-benefit plan, that’s you, my friend, even if it doesn’t seem exorbitant to you.I wouldn’t presume to offer advice here, just providing some facts as clearly as possible.
eetempleton - August 16, 2010 at 1:45 pm
@eszter Really good point about fellowships–thank you for pointing that out!Thanks too to drjeff and jklinker for clarfying some of the points about defined benefits vc. defined contribution plans.
gkllevy - August 17, 2010 at 5:00 am
Another benefit of contributing to any tax-deferred account, whether it be to a defined benefit or contribution plan, is that these dollars are not part of your present taxable income and so your tax bracket may be lower, depending on how much you subtract from your gross pay. What this means is that if you contribute x amount per month, you will see a lesser amount subtracted from your net pay, e.g., the $20 you subtract from your gross pay results in only $15 less in your net pay. I am five years away from retirement (70 is the new 65, especially with the present pay cuts or no raises and the high cost of living) and now find that my retirement pay (combination of pension, Social Security benefits, and IRA required minimum distribution), will probably equal my pay as an active employee. So converting IRA’s to Roth IRA’s after I retire may not be less expensive than I assumed (the theory is that retirement pay will be less than active pay and therefore the Roth tax bite in retirement will be less), so maybe it’s a better idea to buy Roths in smaller increments with money that’s already been taxed than trying to avoid the taxes by buying only tax-deferred investments.Also, in order to preserve the assets I now have, I probably should have bought more long-term care insurance when I was younger when the premiums were cheaper for me. Even though younger faculty members seem to have little interest in their financial situation twenty or thirty years from now, their life insurance and long-term care insurance premiums are so much less expensive at their age than at my age. So some thought, actually a lot of thought, should also go into protecting the wealth they will be building up over the next twenty or thirty years.