• Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Previous

Next

Open Letter to 2010-11′s Newly-Tenured Professors

May 27, 2010, 2:00 pm

The Tenure LetterLast week, Billie Hara kicked off a new series here at ProfHacker that will cover, as she so eloquently put it, “the transitions we experience and move through in higher education.” Her entry covered incredibly important advice for those who are starting their first jobs on the tenure track. While Billie just completed her first year in such a position, I’d like to write a little about what I learned this past year, my first year after earning tenure. It’s a touchy subject, I’ll admit. For so many, tenure is the Holy Grail of academia. So few get the chance to pursue it let alone earn it. That’s probably why there is so little discussion about what to expect after completing such a major goal. In seeking input for this post, though, I have found out that many experience a range of emotions and even a fair amount of confusion about what to do next. Hopefully, with this post (and your comments on it), we can start to address some of that.

Don’t be surprised to experience survivor’s guilt. When we receive the notice that we have officially earned tenure (mine is in the photo above), it’s common to feel joy or relief most immediately. For many people, these positive feelings are sometimes followed with guilt, especially if others you know were denied tenure or if there are still people from your graduate program who have spent years on the job market looking for their first permanent position. If you feel such guilt, recognize it for what it is and work through it. It’s a natural response to a problematic working environment.

Don’t be surprised to feel like you’re floundering. Many of us first set our sights on tenure during graduate school (if not before). It’s been the major thing on our professional minds for years. When we earn it, we celebrate it. But many people responding to my call for advice told me in some form or another that, often during the summer after earning tenure, they felt quite a bit unsure about their professional footing. The tenure clock is a big motivation for many of us. After it rings, don’t be surprised if you don’t know what to do next. As one person put it, “You can have your five-year post-tenure plan and still feel at sea.” Again, recognize such confusion as what it is and give yourself the time to work through it.

Do remember that you can still say no. After earning tenure, many faculty become eligible for even more committees and administrative positions. While we should contribute service to the institutions that have just offered us tenure, it does not mean that we have to do everything we’re asked to do. One person offered me this provocative thought: “The university is built on the backs of adjuncts and associate professors. Be careful about accepting everything you’re asked to do.” It’s no longer about padding a CV or making a tenure committee happy. It’s about putting our skills to their best use and believing in an institution that believes in us.

Do accept the responsibilities that come with tenure. It wasn’t long after earning tenure that I raised my hand at a college faculty meeting to state a point about adjunct labor at my institution that had been bothering me for years. It did raise a few eyebrows I later heard, but that’s okay. Adjuncts often don’t have a voice in such meetings, and junior faculty are often rightly or wrongly afraid to say some of these things themselves. If tenured faculty stay quiet, how will any positive changes get made, whether at local, state, or national levels? I believe it is the responsibility of the tenured to speak when needed.

Do determine if and when you want to go up for full professor. As one person wrote to me, “No one wakes up a decade after tenure and decides to go up for promotion the next year.” In other words, you have to be just as methodical about how you will earn full professor as you were about seeking tenure. Oh, the stakes are certainly lower. In most cases, you don’t lose your job if you are denied promotion, and most places allow you to go up again if you fail the first time. You can also decide whether you’ll go up in eight, ten, or fifteen years. Still, you have to map out if and how you will earn that promotion. Perhaps you will decide that you will not pursue it, or you might put off making the choice for a few years. But it’s much better in the long run for you to make that choice rather than wake up and realize you waited too long or have been pursing activities that won’t help you reach that goal.

Do cut yourself some slack. The academic freedom that comes with tenure makes many of us want to do more. We can finally pursue that nebulous project that’s been in our head for years since we no longer have to worry about what happens if it falls apart. We can take on that administrative role that’s always appealed to us without worrying if it means less time for scholarship. However, tenure does not mean we can do it all. One person wrote to me to say, “You have to find a peaceful space to inhabit that you can justify as ‘enough.’”

In a nutshell, I’d like to offer this final thought from a ProfHacker reader: “Remember how lucky we are, and be nice to the department’s secretary.” Good advice, indeed.

Many people helped me out with this post, including @janineutell, @baconred, @jmittell, and @dittman along with other anonymous contributors. If you have further thoughts to add, please comment.

[Creative Commons licensed photo by Flickr user nhighberg]

This entry was posted in Profession. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment (18)

18 Responses to Open Letter to 2010-11′s Newly-Tenured Professors

22221103 - May 27, 2010 at 3:39 pm

[Comment deleted by editor. Please read the ProfHacker Commenting and Community Guidelines. Thanks!]

mrhammond - May 27, 2010 at 4:15 pm

Wow! The last response was pretty…amazing. I was just going to point out that perhaps the photo above shouldn’t link to your personal Flickr photostream… I’m happy to learn the author has a fondness for Hello Kitty bandaids, but it seems an odd leap from this otherwise interesting take on the transition to tenure.MRH

drnels - May 27, 2010 at 4:59 pm

If anyone thinks that Hello Kitty bandaids (and I’m wearing one right now) are the strangest thing about me that I’ve posted online, then they just haven’t looked far enough. But thanks for appreciating the article!

bphil - May 27, 2010 at 5:33 pm

Tenure should give a faculty member the space, freedom and inspiration to experiment pedagogically, to become the teacher who tries something new, who does the research about learning and teaching and breaks out of the old habits that so many of us adopt for safety’s sake. Want to teach a course without grades? Wait until you’re tenured. Want to have a course contract rather than a set of rigid assigments? Want to break out of rote memorization in a course on biology? Interested in using social networking in innovative ways that your more stodgy colleagues may not understand? Want to incorporate gaming technology into a course on Plato? Wait until you’re tenured. So: why is it that tenure too often works like marriage?

newlytenuredprof - May 27, 2010 at 6:13 pm

Thanks for the mentoring. The time period leading up to the decision is incredibly stressful even for those that are fairly confident. As someone who was considered a shoo-in for tenure by the campus-at-large, but was then raked over the coals at the department level, I honestly feel that I suffer from academic PTSD now that I survived the initiation gauntlet. I really appreciated this pep talk.

22221103 - May 27, 2010 at 6:18 pm

[Comment deleted by editor. Please read the ProfHacker Commenting and Community Guidelines. Thanks!]

terminalmfa - May 27, 2010 at 6:30 pm

Very timely article for me. Having just earned tenure a few months ago and having gotten over the initial feelings of joy and relief, I’m finding a weird sense of depression setting in as I struggle to define what my post-tenure track life should look like.

drnels - May 27, 2010 at 8:25 pm

@terminalmfa, your feelings are really why I wanted to write this. I felt that way, too, and felt like something was wrong with me for feeling it. Then, I found out it was actually pretty common, and it makes sense when you think about it.

jones41 - May 28, 2010 at 8:14 am

The “academic PTSD” comment hits home. After I earned tenure, I had what I called “tenure hangover” for the next year. It took me quite a while to regroup and figure out my next steps (a five-year plan focused on research and on stepping away from an administrative position that has become increasingly time-consuming). Getting tenure has prompted me to redefine myself, which has been difficult and disorienting, in a very good way.

sstrada - May 28, 2010 at 10:12 am

Individuals who routinely say no are often questionable tenure prospects.

recurver - May 28, 2010 at 10:26 am

Interesting that this post engendered comments that had to be deleted…

drnels - May 28, 2010 at 12:27 pm

@sstrada, I think you raise a good point, but that might be institutional. I received two no votes at one level in my tenure process and was told that one of the issues raised at that level was that I said yes too much. I agreed to do too many things, and I think that argument was spot on, too. Maybe the key word in your comment, to me, is “routinely.” If you routinely say no or yes, then you might look like you really can’t make decisions for yourself and think things through. Hmmm….@recurver, I fully expected this post to frustrate certain groups. As I said in the post, some people fight so hard yet never even get the oppotunity to pursue a tenure-track job that it can feel very wrong to talk about the negative aspects of earning tenure. After all, everytime someone with tenure complains, it’s easy to say, “At least you have a job.” That said, we all need to do what we can to make the university a good place for all people at all levels. Plus, we do have pretty clear commenting guideliness here at Prof. Hacker. It’s possible to offer alternative perspectives yet still fit the commenting guidelines, but I don’t think those deleted comments did that.

jimshort - May 28, 2010 at 1:18 pm

As a participant observer of higher education for more than half-a-century, it is my impression that the relief and exhileration one experiences after tenure and promotion to associate profession is too often followed by failure to continue the promise and hard work that led to these rewards. Associate professor is an honorable status, to be sure, granting the freedom to say “No,” to experiment and to pursue new goals, as the post suggests. At the research university from which I am semi-retired, however, the associate professor rank has too often become the “dead wood” of the university. Newly minted associate professors must be attuned to the primary missions of the universities they serve if they are to continue to be successful. Finding the right fit in any institution requires continued effort to achieve excellence.

drnels - May 28, 2010 at 1:51 pm

@jimshort, I think you make a really good point. One spin I want to add to what you say is that many newly-tenured profs are simply exhausted. I knew a woman who said that it wasn’t until after she earned tenure that she was able to go to bed before midnight. Because of her kid’s and husband’s schedule, the time to write was from about 11:00 PM to 3:00 AM, and she was up at 6:00 AM most mornings. She didn’t publish for a few years after earning tenure simply because she chose sleep instead. Many people on the tenure track spend some time (often the last year or two) in a panic mode where they work constantly to earn tenure, but it’s not a mode that anyone can maintain for an extended period of time.For some, it’s different. I know other people who felt such a sense of freedom that they began pubishing more post-tenure because the pressure hold them back was off.My point is that the pressure of the tenure process encourages faculty to behave one way pre-tenure and one way post. It’s not always that faculty become lazy after earning tenure or start to coast. It could be that they are exhausted or shifting their focus to their kids or other family members or are taking on more service.

jimshort - May 28, 2010 at 2:24 pm

Point taken, and appreciated. The entire process ought to be less brutal than it sometimes is.

drnels - May 29, 2010 at 2:28 pm

@jimshort, you clearly have a point, too. I do also remember being in grad school and taking a class from a professor who had just earned tenure and was putting all of his energy into a catering business. He taught his classes well and served on a committee or two, but I don’t remember hearing about him publishing or presenting at a conference or anything like that.

mnogojazyk - June 1, 2010 at 9:05 am

I read with interest Dr. Highberg’s concluding word of advice to be nice to the departmental secretary. I’d like to amend that to be nice to everyone. Remember you were once a lesser professor, a graduate student, and a lowly undergraduate student yourself.

william_patrick_wend - June 5, 2010 at 12:12 pm

Thank you for standing up for adjuncts!

  • The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • 1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
  • Washington, D.C. 20037