While the term “unconference” has been applied (or self-applied) to a wide variety of events, it usually refers to a lightly organized conference in which the attendees themselves determine the schedule. In most cases, unconferences attempt to avoid the traditional unidirectional paper model in favor of meaningful and productive conversations around democratically agreed upon topics (organized into sessions). Unconferences traditionally have low registration fees, and therefore run on a much more conservative budget (compared to more traditional meetings or conferences). The other thing that sets unconferences apart from traditional conferences is that they usually have far fewer attendees. It is not uncommon for unconferences to be attended by no more than 75 to 100 people.
Despite the fact that the unconference idea got its start (and is still going very strong) in the tech sphere (at events like BarCamp, FooCamp, and BloggerCon), they are becoming increasingly popular in the scholarly landscape. This is no great surprise as many scholars are beginning to feel that traditional academic conferences and meetings are perhaps not as productive as they once were. In addition, in today’s economic climate (with many departments reducing—or even completely removing—travel funds) the financial burden (I’m mainly talking about the often very high cost of registration) of a traditional conference has made it impossible for many scholars to attend more than one or two conferences in their domain (or perhaps none at all). Hence the often very low registration fees of an unconference makes them quite appealing.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying there isn’t a place for traditional conferences in academia. They are important for a lot of reasons (not the least of all being part of the tenure and promotion machine). However, I think that unconferences fill an extremely important niche in the scholarly ecosystem. It is worth noting that several traditional conferences are planning on experimenting (or have already experimented) with unconference sessions—essentially, an unconference within a conference.
I was very fortunate to co-organize Great Lakes THATCamp (a regional THATCamp) this past March and found it one of the most rewarding and exciting things I’ve ever done. As such, there were some things that I learned during the process which might prove useful to those adventurous souls who are thinking about organizing their own unconference (either as a standalone event or as part of a traditional conference)
As is customary with many of my similarly themed “here are some tips” articles on ProfHacker, these notes are hardly exhaustive. Instead, they simply represent some highlights of my experience that I feel should be passed on.
“Lightly Organized” Doesn’t Mean No Organization
Just because an unconference doesn’t have the organizational and logistical trappings of a traditional conference (lengthy paper submission/acceptance cycle, mind boggling schedule, detailed conference program, and complete conference abstracts) doesn’t mean that a lot of work doesn’t go into to making sure they are organized well. I was quite surprised by the number of colleagues (people unfamiliar with the unconference model) who, upon hearing that I was co-organizing Great Lakes THATCamp, said something akin to “well, I guess that means you don’t have a lot to do.” Nothing could be further from the truth. If an unconference is to be done right, it’s not just a matter of getting some rooms, setting a date, and spreading the word. “Light organization” is an art unto itself. There are things that need to be organized and controlled—there is absolutely no doubt about that. However, you can’t step over the line into over-organization (trying the control every little bit of the event).
Venue that Facilitates Conversation
One of the most important hallmarks of an unconference are meaningful and productive conversations—whether they take place in large groups, small groups, or between two or three attendees. As such, unconference organizers should do their best to arrange a venue that facilitates these kinds of conversations. If you can manage it, a venue with a variety of room types and sizes is great. If all you can manage are classrooms (which might be the case if your unconference is taking place on a university campus), try to to get rooms where the chairs/desks aren’t bolted to the ground. This allows the attendees to reconfigure the space as they see fit. If you are able, also try to find a venue that has smaller, informal conversation spaces as well. Conference rooms are great for this. Don’t discount two or three comfortable chairs (or even benches) strewn hither and yon in hallways and corners. Anywhere where people can hang out comfortably during the day and have meaningful conversations (there is that phrase again).
Remember, An Unconference Isn’t About You
An unconference is as much about the participants themselves as it is about you. You might have organized the event, but it doesn’t belong to you. As such, you need to make sure that, whenever possible, decisions are made by the attendees themselves. In many ways, each attendee should be seen as much of an organizer as you.
Be Flexible
This is easily the most important thing I learned when organizing Great Lakes THATCamp. Be flexible. Flexibility and fluidity is the name of the game at an unconference. Attempting to control every aspect of the event with an iron fist will probably end up in disaster. If the participants want to change the overall schedule on the fly, let them (remember, the participants are as much in charge as you are). If participants decide to change the topic of a particular session midway through, don’t raise a fuss. If you need to push lunch forward so that the momentum of a particularly fruitful and exciting session can continue, do so. If the way in which you planned on building the initial schedule isn’t working out, figure out a better way (and don’t be afraid to ask the attendees themselves).
The Bottom Line
The subtext of all of these thoughts (in one way or another) is that you should never forget that the conversations between attendees drive an unconference. You need to do everything you can to facilitate these conversations.




5 Responses to Notes on Organizing an Unconference
tjfarrel - May 17, 2010 at 4:01 pm
[Comment editorially removed; please see the ProfHacker Commenting and Community Guidelines, which support thoughtful contributions to an ongoing conversation.]
samplereality - May 17, 2010 at 4:49 pm
[Editor's note: Mark's comment below refers to the text of the comment above that was removed. Mark's comment should still make sense.]I don’t think Ethan’s observation that an unconference “isn’t about you” refers in any way to traditional conferences. He’s not suggesting that organizers of traditional conferences are seeking glory or that they see their conference as all about themselves.Rather, Ethan is referring to the fact then when one is organizing (albeit lightly organizing) an unconference, it’d be easy for participants to think of that gathering as, say, Ethan’s Conference. When one person is sending out all the email, establishing the dates, and setting up the rooms and technology, he or she becomes the face of that conference, rather than some largely anonymous program committee.So Ethan’s comment is not a jab at the incredibly selfless and thankless efforts of traditional conference organizers; his comment is a reminder to people organizing smaller conferences or unconferences: it may be your vision and energy that got the (un)conference going, but once the event begins, you cede the direction and control of the conference to your participants.
emmadw - May 18, 2010 at 9:19 am
As well as: “Don’t discount two or three comfortable chairs (or even benches) strewn hither and yon in hallways and corners. ” … I’d also try to ensure decent wifi coverage & electricity sockets. That gives delegates the chance to share electronic resources and/ or those who like to live blog/tweet etc., the ability to include colleagues who aren’t there – maybe even to participate in some sessions!
ethan_watrall - May 18, 2010 at 10:05 am
@emmadw – I comletley agree with the power issue. there is nothing worse than a large room that only has one or two sockets. At one meeting that I went to, the organizers ran power strips to strategic places in the room so that everyone (or mostly everyone) could plug in.
jwjulius - May 20, 2010 at 7:08 pm
I’d add a couple points. It may be easier to add an unconference component to a more traditional event than to build an entire unconference from scratch. Unconferencing is a great way to close an event, allowing people to further explore new ideas and deepen connections with colleagues who have similar interests.Another term often used regarding unconferencing is “open space technologies”. This site provides a good deal of background on the concept as well as some practical resources and many more how-to tips: http://www.openspaceworld.org/cgi/wiki.cgi?