• June 19, 2013

Previous

Next

Modeling Technology in the Classroom: A Student’s Guide

August 28, 2009, 11:21 am

By flickr user spakattacks. CC-licensed

Whether or not we are approaching any grand Singularity, technology continues to change in new and interesting ways. Users continue to stress the limits of any given system, and creators expand the system to accommodate new growth. Nevertheless, many professors – even, or perhaps especially, younger professors – still seem to be at odds with the idea that technology can be integrated into the classroom with any manner of success. It seems that for every tech-savvy edupunk soldier, there is a techno-phobic professor unwilling to consider that the shiny, beeping, distracting things that have invaded their classroom and have been shoved down their throats might actually be useful.

However, there are simple, easy ways to entice even the most techno-skeptical professor, and to make our gadgets a welcome friend in the classroom.

  • Always, always ask, and respect the answer given. I am often seen around campus with one of my computers – my aging Gateway, my OLPC-XO, or now, my netbook – I use them to take notes, and occasionally record lectures.  While I love the devices, the first thing I always do is ask if the professor minds that I use them. That means, of course, that they sit out for at least the first day of class – besides, what is there to record/take notes on the first day (aside from inputting syllabus into a google calendar, but more on that below)?  Asking the professor their technological preference also allows you a moment of face-time.  Introduce yourself, show off the tech and it’s capabilities, and cleanly ask if they would mind the use.  In many cases, they’ll be relieved that someone asked. Note: Tech-savvy professors need not necessarily want the devices in class. Though Jason Jones is giving away iPod touches, he refuses any laptops in his classrooms, and with good reasoning.
  • If you are allowed a device into the class, Look up more than you look down. In a particular classroom at my university, there is a large window looking into a small storage space in one of the classrooms. Because this space is often dark, the glass acts as a great mirror, and as such, a gateway to people’s laptop screens.   If your prof. lets you use the gadget, don’t become absorbed in it, and keep all social-networking to a bare minimum.  If your eyes are caught wandering, not only will you end up looking like a fool, but you’ll bear another black mark against technology in the classroom.
  • Shut. off. your. Cellular. Phone. Cell phones are great. They might even have some interesting pedagogical implications within the classroom. But for every legitimate, class-related reason to whip out the cell, there have been roughly six hundred thousand people who accepted a text, responded, or left class to take a call (the worst was actually the student who answered a call in a class that I attended, then asked the professor to quiet herself. No, I am not kidding).  Leave these off, in your pocket. Vibrate might even be too much of a temptation.

As for less-direct methods, there are simple ways to evangelize for tech in small, subtle ways.

  • Insist on digital methods of transfer for assignments. This is where lots of Professors draw  the line. There seem to be two heated camps in terms of collegiate education: Those who demand the Dead Tree Format, and those who demand electronic transfer. Suggest a foolproof way to transfer documents: Sharing a Google Doc, for instance. For that matter.
  • Enlist the students around  you. The average student likely does not know  what a Google Doc might be, or not see the point of using one. Above, I mentioned transcribing the entirety of the syllabus into a Google Calendar will be time-consuming, but worth it — not only is there a living link that can be accessed when the physical page is not nearby, but you’ve also just become the most popular student in the class by sharing it. More over, when the professor gets wind of the extra effort, they will likely be curious to its effect.
  • Increase the amount of tech in your non-tech assignments. Organizing a group project? Set up a Google Group mailing list, or a PbWiki. Powerpoint? Nah — there are other alternatives already , not to mention the Google Presentaton option? Note the use of some slick application in the research of a paper, like Delicious or Zotero. By showing professors new, interesting, and potentially useful sides of technology, you could plant a seed that inspires them to incorporate newer methods into their pedagogy.

As a student, you can help introduce the super-awesome tech where it can actually do some good. Just put your phone away for an hour or so, and all will be well.

What are some other sneaky, cool, or interesting ways to introduce technology where it otherwise might not have been found on campus?

[Image by Flickr user spakattacks. CC-licensed.]

This entry was posted in Hardware, Software, Teaching. Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to Modeling Technology in the Classroom: A Student’s Guide

Jason B. Jones - August 28, 2009 at 1:39 pm

The Hand-to-God-it’s-true, totally delicious irony of this most reasonable post by @alxjrvs?

He got the alert that it was posted . . . on his cell phone . . . in the middle of a conversation with a profoundly techno-skeptic professor, who particularly hates cell phones . . . and promptly lost the plot of the meeting for a few minutes.

When I told her what the topic of his post was, her knees buckled with laughter.

Alex Jarvis - August 28, 2009 at 1:45 pm

My defense: that profoundly techno-skeptic happens to be your wife , it was a meeting teaching her to use wordpess (which is well within the flavor of the post) and what derailed the meeting was not the post itself, but the libelous tag one editor slipped in before posting.

This man is a liar and a scoundrel!

Rana - August 28, 2009 at 1:46 pm

Good advice. The only parts I’d quibble with are the cell phone section and the “dead tree” section.

I think that asking about the professor’s cell phone policy rather than just not using one is a better idea. Believe it or not, I actually don’t mind if my students have their phones on in class, because they’re all mature enough to get up and leave the room if it goes off. Since many of my students are nontraditional students, with responsibility for elderly and sick family members, including small children, cutting them off from access seems excessively draconian. I do ask them to set it on vibrate and let me know if it’s likely that they’ll need to take a call that day, and to sit near the door so they can leave with minimal disruption.

(Obviously this is not the same thing as a student having a long conversation in the middle of lecture after their My Humps ringtone plays.)

The other thing is the dead tree issue. Although I am slowly making the transition to online submission of shorter assignments, it’s never going to be possible for me to accept entirely electronic submissions for longer written assignments. I need to be able to write comments in response to particular sections, draw connecting arrows to relevant points, and flip back and forth between sections, and so far I have yet to find a computer program that makes that as easy (or as portable) as doing that by hand.

The other issue is that so many students are woefully ignorant about formatting issues, and I’m not really interested in using scarce class time to teach them how to reformat their Windows-based .docxs into something our webmail system can handle and which, at the end of the process, my Mac is able to read properly. I have to assume that a good portion of my class is nearly computer-illiterate (beyond email and basic word-processing) and, sadly for the more tech savvy students, I have to structure the class around this lowest common denominator.

(Again, at another institution, this might not be an issue. But I have some students who are so technophobic that they still write out their drafts longhand – and they are not unusual at the place I teach.)

Rana - August 28, 2009 at 1:48 pm

laughing

Jason B. Jones - August 28, 2009 at 2:06 pm

I have at least two colleagues who require all work be submitted in longhand!

Andre Malan - August 28, 2009 at 2:15 pm

My favorite trick is sharing my quizlet decks with my classmates on the discussion boards. When doing group work I always insist on Google Docs over Office.

Rana - August 28, 2009 at 3:51 pm

Oh, my. Is it for a calligraphy class?

(My students’ handwriting is, on average, so messy that I can’t imagine doing that and keeping my sight!)

Drew - August 28, 2009 at 6:30 pm

In my last semester as a student I headed up a group project and used GoogleDocs to organize the group. In a nutshell, Microsoft word + Email would have worked better. The other individuals were not comfortable with the technology and I probably am no the best techno-ambassador.

On a side note, I should never be allowed to have a computer in a class room.

Andre Malan - August 28, 2009 at 6:34 pm

What was it about Google Docs that made it harder than office?

Alex Jarvis - August 28, 2009 at 6:51 pm

There is a sort of deliberate paranoia regarding unknown technology for some people in my experience. For instance, my sister (who, while entering college, uses only the basic features of any given word processor, using microsoft works on her previous computer up until it broke) has become stalwart in her drive to purchase microsoft office. While there are some legitimate claims to Microsoft office, as I mentioned, they really don’t apply to her – OpenOffice, or even GoogleDocs, would have worked just as well (or better). However, out of a convoluted set of fears and confusions, she refuses to try any alternatives and, instead, wants to spend the 100+ dollars on Office. Now, perhaps my anger towards this particular end-user is the outcome of the Narcissism of Minor Differences, but these are the kind of problems that one can face: Interesting, Pedagogically relevant DIY approaches are hard to sell to an audience used to powerful, expensive, ultimately proprietary tech.

It should be noted that tone has a lot to do with it: many times (specifically regarding the above example) the wrong tone can completely set someone off. Condescending attitudes, while prevalent in the geek community (we’ll get those jocks one day, I reckon!) needs to be cast out if our supercoolhappytimemagic-juice is to be absorbed wholesale.

Andre Malan - August 28, 2009 at 7:04 pm

The reason I insist on Google Docs in my projects is less about issues of DIY vs. proprietary vs. price (although I do care about these issues), it is simply about the functionality that Google Docs has over Office, namely collaborative real-time editing.

My approach for teaching it to peers is to just create the document and start it, then send the URL to teammates before we meet for the first time. I then show them how to use it in the first meeting. I have had great success.

Thus my comment, above, I would love to know what about Google Docs slowed Drew and his team down. Was it tone? Was it access? Was it unfamiliarity with the tool? Or was it a feature that Office had that made it better than docs for the specific project?

Alex Jarvis - August 28, 2009 at 7:08 pm

to that particular method – I have actually written the bulk of my output during my college years in Google Docs. Being Agnostic about where my files are held is the biggest benefit.

Drew - August 28, 2009 at 7:09 pm

Ultimately it was fear on part of the other people in the group. In this instance it appears that they were not interested in trying what they had not seen before. I’m not an ace on Google Docs, but it seems to be pretty intuitive.

Drew - August 28, 2009 at 9:27 pm

Excellent Points all around.

What I took away from the experience was:
-Consider the people you are dealing with
-Consider the Project and the scope of the project.
–for shorter projects its not worth fighting the technology battle anyway.
–will using a more advanced or foreign technology even benefit the project.

Julie Meloni - August 28, 2009 at 8:46 pm

It appears that after a certain threshold of nested replies, the reply option goes away. This is one of the reasons I voted NO on the “nested replies? yes or no” poll. But anyway…introducing people to new technology really does require a focused and consistent effort to do so, and — intuitive or not — as a student yourself (Drew) I could easily see an even greater resistance from your peers. By that I mean without the added incentive of the instructor saying “this is what we’re going to do,” what real reason did they have to follow along?

I’m not at all saying it wasn’t an admirable attempt — absolutely it was — but it gets at the greater point that yeah, not everyone wants to change, or even knows what they could change, etc, and without some really compelling reason and consistent guidance and support, it probably isn’t going to happen. And that goes for both students and professors…

  • 1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
  • Washington, D.C. 20037
subscribe today

Get the insight you need for success in academe.