• Monday, May 28, 2012

Previous

Next

Mapping Novels with Google Earth

April 6, 2011, 3:00 pm

Globe

[This is a guest post by Erin Sells, a Visiting Assistant Professor of English at Lander University in Greenwood, SC. She writes about modernist literature, the one-day novel, and Anne Enright, and is interested in academic community partnerships and higher education policy. You can follow her on Twitter @erinsells --@jbj].

The use of models and other abstract forms in literary study has recently seen a revival in a digital age that puts data and sophisticated data management systems in the hands of the literary scholar, teacher, and student. Pedagogical applications of these abstract models are rich with possibility for the literary classroom, and offer exciting opportunities for engaging non-English majors and non-traditional learners in the advanced study of literature, as well as challenging students to verbally articulate visual and spatial knowledge.

In an upper-division undergraduate English course in which I taught Virginia Woolf’s Mrs. Dalloway, I assigned groups of students to create online, interactive maps for different characters in the novel using Google Earth mapping software. We later layered these individual maps to create a comprehensive map of the novel. The abundant detail in the novel and the diverse digital applications in the Google Earth software allowed students to incorporate pictures, sounds, videos, and the text itself into the map, creating an exciting visual and spatial representation of the novel, and an exciting new path for teaching and understanding the work of Woolf.

Creating maps of novels is obviously not a new venture. The edition of Mrs. Dalloway that I used in my course included a map of the characters’ movements through London in the frontispiece, but by using an online mapping tool to create a digital map, students are able to create a far denser and richer visual representation of the novel that can incorporate a wider diversity of information and media into a consolidated, interactive, and collaborative study tool. This moves the literary map beyond the limits of literary tourism and into the realm of interactive pedagogy and digital scholarship.

My mapping assignment was born out of a graduate seminar on Technology, Literature and Curriculum taught in conjunction with Emory University’s Department of English and ECIT (Emory Center for Interactive Teaching), a technological pedagogy center in the Emory University library. Similar projects have resulted in the Google Lit Trips website , a helpful resource with completed maps and tutorials on how to use the maps in classes of all levels, including K-12. A Duke University student has written up an interesting article on the origins and potential of the Google Lit Trips project. Other resources for similar mapping projects are the Google EarthOutreach YouTube channel, which includes a comprehensive set of tutorials on how to use Google Earth, as well as instructions on how to use Google Docs spreadsheets to assemble Google Earth maps. ProfHacker’s very own Brian Croxall (who was a tremendous help to me as I planned and implemented this assignment) and Jason B. Jones have also designed assignments for creating interactive timelines using Google Docs spreadsheets and Google Maps in conjunction with the Exhibit and Timeline scripts created by MIT’s SIMILE project. Combining a mapping assignment and an interactive timeline assignment would be an interesting way to expand upon both, perhaps assigning different students or groups to complete different parts of the timeline or map and then using them to create a resource for the whole class. In this way the assignments could be made to address several texts studied in the course of a semester.

There is a wide variety of mapping software programs available to scholars today, which brings us to the question: why use Google Earth for this assignment? The most obvious answer is, of course, that it’s free. I also envisioned this mapping project as a group assignment, and wanted to make collaboration between group members as easy as possible. The Google Earth software can be downloaded for free onto each student’s computer and a map can be created in a file that is sharable and editable by each student. Additionally, while there is a learning curve involved in using Google Earth, compared to more sophisticated (and expensive) mapping programs, it’s relatively low. A few small portions of class time devoted to learning how to insert some simple HTML code and demonstrating some of the Google Earth program features (perhaps with the assistance of some of those aforementioned tutorials on the Google EarthOutreach YouTube channel) is all that most students will need to create a pretty spectacular map. If your students are anything like most of mine were, they’ll be able to teach you a thing or two about the program before it’s all over with.

Although I developed this assignment for an upper division English course—Special Topics in the 20th Century English Novel—because the course fulfilled an upper division general education writing requirement, many of my students came to the class from majors outside of the humanities. The idiosyncrasies of Woolf’s prose style can be difficult to parse for even the hardiest English major. For the uninitiated, or for those less familiar with more traditional avenues of literary study, the mapping assignment became a useful tool for first anchoring the prose in geographical detail, and then expanding upon those geographical details with pertinent images, sounds, and historical information. The map itself is just a starting point—as layers of information into the sights and sounds of the city on this summer day in London are added it becomes a multi-dimensional research project and gives students a guide to navigating a difficult novel.

In my assignment, each group of approximately seven students was assigned a character to “follow” and map through the novel—Mrs. Dalloway, Septimus Smith, Peter Walsh, and Elizabeth Dalloway. In reflection papers students submitted after completing the assignment several explained that this specific focus on a certain character and certain portions of the novel necessitated narrowing their gaze to the point of close reading. Additionally, placing these characters in a specific spatial context revealed important details related to their characterization. For example, the group mapping Peter Walsh as he followed the young woman wearing a red carnation were shocked to discover that he followed her for several miles across London. The group mapping Elizabeth Dalloway down the Strand investigated the buildings she notes passing and what that particular part of London was like in the 1920s, and discovered that her journey across the city represents a marked deviation from any path (or mode of transportation) her mother would be inclined to take.

The groups were also instructed to note, map, or include:

  • important landmarks that appear —or, as in the case of the many chiming clocks marking the passing of the hours—sound in the novel. Statues, tube stations, shops, and parks—all found a place in the maps and helped shape our sense of the characters in the novel and the spaces they inhabit.
  • any audio files that might be pertinent to a particular landmark or event in the novel. One group found an audio clip of Big Ben tolling and included it in their map so that we could all hear the sound of the “leaden circles dissolving in the air.” Another discovered the sound of a London ambulance bell from the period and placed it in their map so that we could all hear the sound of Septimus’s body being carried away through the city
  • any images that might be relevant to a particular landmark or event in the novel. Some students found and scanned pictures from books on London in the 1920s; others set contemporary pictures of landmarks they found on the web next to historical pictures they had found to provide a comparison. A photograph of a British civil airplane like the one that might have been employed for skywriting, and pictures of the many types of flowers mentioned in the novel were also included.
  • the quotation from the book that led them to map a particular point, so that the text itself would in a sense be a layer of the map.

Here’s a screenshot of the result:

Mrs. Dalloway in Google Earth

Click for full-size

Each group also gave the class a presentation or “tour” of their map using the computer and projector screen in the classroom, explaining different features and pointing out important aspects of the characters’ movements. After each group had presented its map, we combined them into a single map, and discussed what the intersections of the characters’ paths might have to tell us about the novel. The Google Earth maps of the novel were a dynamic presentation tool and created a perfect centerpiece for discussions of spatiality, temporality, and characterization in the novel.

In the students’ reflection papers on the assignment I discovered an interesting trend—the handful of English majors in the class were decidedly less enthusiastic about the mapping assignment than the many more non-English majors in the class. Several times I came across the comment, “I would have much rather just written a paper.” Although I think much of this criticism comes from distaste for group work, presentations, and stepping outside of a comfort zone created by having already written countless essays in English classes, it has caused me to consider how this assignment might become a better tool for writing pedagogy. In future versions of this assignment, I still plan to have the students create their maps in groups and present them, but I will add an additional writing requirement focused on using the maps to create a thesis around what has been learned or revealed—about the city, characterization, spatiality, temporality, flânérie, etc.—from the experience of mapping the novel. It may be possible to have the students map their essays onto the maps they have created, so that their critical analysis of the novel becomes a part of the visual and textual study tool as well.

Photo by Jason Bachman / Creative Commons licensed

 
This entry was posted in Software, Teaching and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • http://about.me/dittman dittman

    Interesting stuff – I gave a presentation last week at PCEA about a similar project I completed using captivity narratives at the community college at which I teach.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=682475387 Eric Lease Morgan

    Interesting!

    I thought of doing something very similar but in a more automated way: 1) feed a plain text file to name entity software such as Stanford’s (http://bit.ly/e0SnA6), 2) get back a list of geographic places, 3) use any number geo-location tools, such as WWW::Gazetteer (http://bit.ly/gG7QVA) to get latitudes and longitudes, and finally 4) plot the result on a Google Map.

    The result is not nearly as fine-tuned as the one described above, but it is relative fast.

  • chura

    This is intriguing—a text in my field that lends itself to this type of study is Thoreau’s Walden. I explain to students that Thoreau was a land surveyor who measured and mapped the Walden Pond environs before actually inserting the map he made of the pond into the text of Walden. I show students how Thoreau measured and I’ve even had them redraw the Walden map using data (field notes) I acquired from Thoreau’s draft surveys, which I’ve studied in person (but they are also now available online). Measuring and mapping his environment—including a frozen 61-acre pond—was a painstaking process, but Thoreau thought it important enough to include the visual product of his efforts in Walden because he believed what Emerson wrote, that “the laws of physics translate the laws of ethics.” I think studying Walden by redrawing Thoreau’s map does, as you say, “challenge students to verbally articulate visual and spatial knowledge” in a way that certainly helps to appreciate the text. Thoreau is perhaps a special case but this insight seems applicable to the “visual and spatial” worlds of other literary works. I’m pasting below the caption to the frontispiece of my book, Thoreau the Land Surveyor, and I’m wondering what other texts might be approached from perspectives that pay attention to a physical world speaking dynamically within them:

    “In the winter of 1846, Henry Thoreau began the composition of Walden, not with the drafting of sentences but with the drafting of a landscape. The line from point A at the southern extremity of the pond was the first measurement in his Walden survey. Point B is where he stood with a tripod-mounted surveying compass on the pond’s frozen surface. Radiating outward from point B are lines of bearing, labeled A through Z at the far edges of the full-size document. The genesis of Walden was a materialization of the earth’s magnetic field, a merger of mathematic and linguistic symbols transcribed in physical contact with the pond itself and authored as much by the compass needle as by Thoreau.”

  • http://about.me/jbj Jason B. Jones
  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=682475387 Eric Lease Morgan

    For something similar but different, I created an interface to see what words Thoreau used in Walden when he used a given word — http://infomotions.com/sandbox/network-diagrams/bin/walden/

  • pippi

    I’d like to do something like this with my first-year writing students to help them visualize Coetzee’s “Waiting for the Barbarians” as both map and timeline, but the place is fictional, like Faulkner’s Yoknapatawpha County. So I don’t think Google Earth or Maps would work.

  • http://micahvandegrift.wordpress.com Micah Vandegrift

    Very cool idea! Here at Brooklyn Public Library we did a similar project with the literary history of Brooklyn – available here – http://www.brooklynpubliclibrary.org/map/literary/

  • bstorck

    To “interesting” I will add “provocative.” I do not have experience teaching before a class, but as a graduated English major I sympathize with the other English students in your class. I’m curious to know if others think this tech-driven approach to assigning, teaching, and discussing a novel may serve best at introductory courses rather than at advanced levels where some knowledge and technique should be assumed. That the need and value of close reading only occurred to some students AFTER the Google Maps project suggests to me that non-major students benefited from this approach, but I can understand if students with an English focus thought this as an unnecessary (or gimmicky?) approach.
    More generally, I am interested to know if humanities and English faculty believe such tech-savvy approaches undermining or at cross-purposes with the subject matter. Is attention and focus to the language of a piece of literature or the language in the curriculum compromised by this push for more demonstratively technological lessons? I thought this particular lesson made a more interesting argument for the media than the novel which was ostensibly the subject of study, like Woolf as introduction to new apps in Google Maps. (That may be an exaggeration but it could be a future source of revenue for cash-strapped departments outside of business or engineering schools.)
    Thank you, Prof. Sells, for sharing your project.

  • http://ProfHacker.com George H. Williams

    In my experience, people who respond with skepticism to assignments like this make 2 mistakes: 1) They don’t think about the fact that this is one assignment among many, and perhaps the only assignment that makes use of this particular technology, and
    2) Because they can’t imagine that this would be useful in their classroom, they conclude that it would not be useful in anyone’s classroom.

    Erin writes, “The idiosyncrasies of Woolf’s prose style can be difficult to parse for even the hardiest English major. For the uninitiated, or for those less familiar with more traditional avenues of literary study, the mapping assignment became a useful tool for first anchoring the prose in geographical detail, and then expanding upon those geographical details with pertinent images, sounds, and historical information.”

    So, yes, the course could have been nothing but close reading of Woolf’s prose, but literary studies has for a very long time incorporated a wide range of approaches to literature, including–but not limited to–close reading. Historical context, literary historical context, details of practices of writing/revision/publication/circulation, and yes, geographical or cartographical context–these are some of the things that those of us who teach courses on language and literature bring into the classroom. This doesn’t mean that an approach to the assigned text that only asks students to engage in close reading and careful attention to language is wrong; rather, close reading is just one of many valid approaches. Here, Erin has described one approach. It’s highly unlikely that this is the only thing students did in the class.

    Here at ProfHacker, we often say that we’re a blog about failure, meaning that we take seriously the need to try things out and (if they don’t work the way we want them to) to learn from our mistakes. But learning from our mistakes doesn’t mean “I should have known better” or “I’ll never do that again.”

    Above, Erin explains that her English majors tended to dislike this assignment and said that they would have rather just written a paper. I’ve found that students, in general, can be somewhat resistant to learning new things when they already know how to do familiar things well. This is not, however, enough of a reason for deciding not to teach them new things. And it’s true that students often dislike having to work with others, or having to make a presentation in front of the class: but life requires us to work with others–and to make presentations to others–quite often. My philosophy has always been that it’s better to learn how to do these things well while still in school than to not learn them until one’s promotion (or employment) depends upon the ability to do them well.

    Erin writes, “In future versions of this assignment, I still plan to have the students create their maps in groups and present them, but I will add an additional writing requirement focused on using the maps to create a thesis around what has been learned or revealed—about the city, characterization, spatiality, temporality, flânérie, etc.—from the experience of mapping the novel.” This sounds about right to me!

    …my 2 cents.

  • http://www.briancroxall.net Brian Croxall

    I’ve wondered about how to adapt assignments like Erin’s to fictional places. You could certainly just pick a plot of land in Google Earth–say in Death Valley–and lay down polygons, lines, and more to build up your own representation of a fictional place. But being confronted by actual geography might be hard. Perhaps then it would work just as well to have students sketch the maps by hand? Not as interactive in the end, but it teaches some of the same principles.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Rosa-J-Hong/1350707861 Rosa J Hong

    Thank you for the article. Very similar to what I am preparing for a Franco-Canadian novel, ‘Volkswagen Blues’ by Jacques Poulin. Also, I have been using Google Earth in my university-level intermediate French courses. Students created GE presentations (in French) on less-known Francophone countries such as Senegal, Belgium, Haiti, Vietnam, Egypt, Lituania, Monaco, etc. Happy to hear that GE is used in other Humanities courses. Excellent initiative and would love to hear more about your project and student experience.

  • drrom

    Thank you, Erin, for this incredibly insightful article on using mapping with literary studies. You offer up not only an assessment of the assignment, but also student learning goals, multiple student expectations, outcomes, successes, failures — exactly what Digital Humanities requires in order to advance itself to those pedagogically-focused/intensive institutions.

    If only we could capture a video of you and your students to this type of assignment, demonstrate it dynamically — that would really pop their tops off.

    I’m gonna share this with my entire department.

  • pippi

    That’s one possibility, and I have the summer to browse the globe for a good spot. Another idea I’ve had is to draw a generic image of a large plot of land (or snap a photo from Google Earth/Maps) and have students insert it into a mind-mapping app, like XMind, and lay out a timeline or items in the plot over the image.

  • Guest

    I am a huge fan of Google Earth! I got the inspiration for the Earth & Space QUEST (http://tinyurl.com/earthspacequest) from Google Lit Trips :)

  • la_profesora

    Sure, why not cut foreign languages? Louisiana is doing so well that it can afford not to be part of the global economy.

  • old nassau’67

    Among the programs eliminated will be football and men’s basketball. The millions of dollars in coaches’ salaries will distributed among academic departments; and the millions of square feet in sports-dedicated stadiums, practice facilities, weight rooms, dorms, cafeterias, etc., will be adapted for all students’ use.

  • Tarkio

    I agree, but if no one is enrolling in these majors, then they are costing money and having little positive impact. Using French as an example, merely because it was mentioned previously, perhaps it can be offered on some campuses but not on each and every campus and therefore be strengthened where it’s offered. I hate cuts, but I would hate to see courses in the most popular majors not available to students who need them to graduate, as happens in some states frequently. Just my thoughts,

  • la_profesora

    Also using French as an example, a “university” that does not allow students the opportunity to study the works of such authors as Hugo, Dumas, Verne, Balzac, Flaubert, Zola, Proust, Descartes,Voltaire, Rousseau, Camus, Sartre, etc. in the original language does not deserve to be called a university. The function of a French department is never solely to produce French majors; it has always also been to produce history majors, women’s studies majors, political science majors, music majors, international studies majors, film majors, literature majors, and other disciplines where one might conceivably need at least a reading knowledge of French to be able to function well as a professional in one’s field. There are many ways a program can have “positive impact” besides producing majors.

  • lgrein

    Most long standing universities and colleges would benefit from a review of programs such as the one in Louisiana. Over time topics and topic interest change and some review and pruning should be done. This does not just apply to very old courses (over 25 years) but too much of the technical offerings as well. Just because someone once felt a program or major was important does not mean a certificate or degree in the topic is still needed today and even if a full course of study is still the better solution that course may be better taken remotely from a school near the topic source. I still remember hearing an instructor with a broad mid-Atlantic accent trying to speak in Mandarin and I just had a laugh with a colleague about an offering for Treads in eCommerce Development for an area of our nation that is without Cell coverage. Today’s students know they can take remote courses from real experts at schools that are a part of the topic. Why have second rate (sorry if it offends) offerings. I wonder why others posted here cannot see this effort in Louisana as what it is. Cleaning up the over ripe remains.

  • jffoster

    No, a ‘program’ is not simply ‘the courses students “need” ‘. A major in your French is largely focused on literature and a relatively superficial and shallow summary of “culture”. What students “need” contingent upon what it is they want to do with their knowledge of, say, French.

  • jffoster

    “but a good college program gives students the ability to analyze a different
    culture,”

    But a good foreign language program (major, minor, “certificate”) generally does not “give students the ability to analyze a different [or their own] culture”. You learn to analyze cultural systems in Anthropology, not in the language arts. You learn to analyze languages in Linguistics, but not generally in the Language Arts, though good major programs in the latter often include some Linguistics.

  • smac5

    Let’s put it this way: if those schools that are cutting languages
    were to put resources into them instead, you might well find that they
    did do all those things, but if they only have the the personnel to
    teach the language itself, then they can’t do anything else.
    Different colleges are different – at my school, language programs
    have events about their culture,including film history and theory and
    ways to look at other cultures, and offer seminars that cover the
    literature of various periods and locales, including literary
    theories, even some courses for people who do speak the language. The
    language departments s aren’t the problem, it is (as I said more
    cryptically before) that they are not supported in a way that allows
    them to have real programs … which results in them being criticized
    for not offering anything meaningful … which results in more cuts
    … which means even less cohesive courses … which results in them
    getting cut altogether…. And don’t think other fields won’t be
    strangled next.

  • jffoster

    Smac, language arts faculty are not, with very rare exceptions, trained to nor experienced in anaylzing culture and sociocultural systems. Literature and where the museums are and the like is a part of culture but only a part, and a relative surface part at that.

    You say that “if those schools that are cutting languages
    were to put resources into them instead, you might well find that they
    did do all those things, but if they only have the the personnel to
    teach the language itself, then they can’t do anything else.”

    Not if they use the money to hire Ph D’s in foreign languages arts, no they won’t. “Cultural studies” isn’t social scientific description and analysis of sociocultural systems, and literary “theory” isn’t theory at all in the sense that scientists and social scientists use the term.

  • smac5

    As I said, we are talking about two kinds of institutions. I’m sorry
    you are only familiar with the one kind, and I admit to near total
    ignorance of the other kind and its realities. The debate should be
    about what language departments can do, and then put resources there,
    not dismissing them in order free up funds for something at least as
    debatable. I suspect we agree on that point.

  • jffoster

    We probably don’t agree on that. First, we do not seem to agree on what language departments and programs can and cannot do. Second, it is not really “de4batable” that, despite their occasional pretensions, foreign language departments in American colleges and universities — small and large — cannot teach economics, social organization, cultural geography (beyond the very rudimentary level), or the like because their faculty are not, excepting the very rare case, qualified in such fields. Those kinds of things are done in Economics, Anthropology, Sociology, History, &c. departments by faculty trained in those fields. What foreign language departments can do is teach the language at beginning, intermediate, and advanced levels, the literature, and a general survey of the arts and an perhaps elementary civics book level (which I do not disparage) survey of institutions. I had in fact a very good course in the last, called “Civilisation Franc,aise” taught in French, when I was an undergraduate, and NOT a French major. But it wasn’t political science, comparative economics, or Civil Code v Common Law comparative law.

    Some foreign language departments can and do do a good job of teaching composition course sections in business writing and / or scientific expository writing. But business operations and practice, of say, French corporations, are generally beyond the capabilities of French department faculty trained in literature. I know of no language department that fully houses, for instance, a program in international business, thoughr a number of them participate in such programs. A person trained in Japanese language and literature is not apt to accurately analyze the relative efficiencies and effectiveness of rice production in Japan v the United States with respect to each in its respective entire social and cultural system.

    Some language departments hire real linguists and give pretty good courses in linguistic analysis of the language in question; others do not. It was not, for instance, a language arts trained professor who first showed that French participlial agreement is ergative and can be accounted for with a single rule. It was a linguistic typologist in an Anthropology department.

  • smac5

    Then I think we have a fundamental difference of opinion about what
    the academy’s purpose is.
    Thank you for the thoughtful discussion. I’ve never got into one with
    anyone anonymously before because I’m always afraid eventually they
    will become flaming exchanges. But this has been great!

  • mbelvadi

    Since most librarians don’t have strong math backgrounds, any tools that can help them conduct this kind of analysis is a good thing, and I hope the group opens it to North American users soon.
    While I’m not a fan of Big Deals generally, some institutions will have much more of a “long tail” pattern in their journal usage than others which is one of the chief benefits of such packages.

    The quality of an institution’s interlibrary loan service is also a factor – some libraries using the latest technologies in ILL can routinely get articles in 24 hours or less except at peak times of the semester. ILL service can serve that long tail demand enough to reduce the value of the Big Deals.

    Canada has an enormous advantage over the US in this regard, as it is not subject to the overly restrictive “5 in 5″ rule that most US libraries believe that they have to follow (although it is not actually in US law). The “5 in 5″ rule is actually pretty ridiculous since it makes no allowances for different size/type of institutions – a tiny liberal arts college and UC Berkeley have the same absolute limits per journal per year.  (“5 in 5″ says that any single institution within any one calendar year cannot ILL more than 5 articles from the most recent 5 years of any particular journal title for “free” – with the 6th, they have to start paying copyright royalties per article).

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=14826035 Pat Dolan

    So let me get this straight: when a person slams an entire discipline based on a cursory reading of the titles of cherry-picked articles and dissertations, and people complain about the shoddy writing, the people upholding the standards of–scholarship? reasonable conversation?–are a “mob”?

    Let’s see how you like it: “Riley, Texas, Bubba Jocks, Academic Conformity, Mob Rule and the Real World,” is a pretty stupid title. Your title indicates you don’t know what you’re talking about. (No, I didn’t read your article, why would I?) I think your entire discipline, and your scholarship should be an object of ridicule. The only reason you have a job is because white guys who spout conservative memes find it easy to have their voices heard in the national press. (Actually, here’s an study people do all the time: count. People like you have disproportionate access. There’s pretty convincing scholarship on that subject, scholarship whose statistics and other methods satisfies the canons of even the most cautious investigation. A responsible blogger would know about it.)

    If you think that writing for a blog doesn’t mean you have to know what you’re talking about, clearly you don’t read the blogs I read.

    You would think after all this time, people would quit with the “What she said can’t be racist! She has a black husband and kids.” One more time: people who have non-white friends, acquaintances, even lovers and family members, say racist stuff all the time. That particular way of arguing really does indicate a shoddy thinker.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=14826035 Pat Dolan

    I’m eagerly awaiting your indignant response to this, “The archbishop of Washington criticized Georgetown University on Tuesday for its invitation to the secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Kathleen Sebelius, to speak at an awards ceremony on Friday at the university’s Public Policy Institute, The Washington Post reported.”

    Actual intimidation on campus. From the top down. I predict you devote column after column vigorously defending the first amendment rights of Secretary Sebelius. (By the way, she does not have a right to be invited. And, if she speaks, and the bishop rebuts what she says, I won’t whine about it. I might call the bishop out of touch with reality, American Catholic thinking, a right wing ideologue and a pedophilia-enabling misogynist. But that’s how arguments proceed in the real world.)

  • jwaage

    Had Riley written an opinionated rant about her personal view of African American Studies based on the titles of a few dissertations, she would have had, as usual, a few replies from annoyed critics. We are all used to that kind of blog from her. However, her title was: “The Most Persuasive Case for Eliminating Black Studies? Just Read the Dissertations.”, yet she clearly did not read the dissertations. Those of us who teach students to think and find their voice and contribute to knowledge would never condone such an attempt at journalism. We let CHE know that and it was escalated first by her lame response and that of a CHE editor. 

     The majority criticism against Riley was about journalistic standards. She had a history of half-baked comments about things she knew very little about but this one was so far over the top and so critical of the students whose dissertations she had cited that CHE readers said enough. Hopefully, CHE will find a better representative of the conservative voice to write pieces that stimulate discussion and thought rather than eye-rolling and increased disrespect for the intellectual abilities of conservatives.

  • quacker

    The protest against the Sebelius invitation is a response to her promulgation of the HHS mandate that requires all employer health plans to provide free contraceptives, sterilizations and abortion-inducing drugs, regardless of any moral or religious objections.  Under the mandate, ministries of institutions like Catholic schools, hospitals, and charities—educating the young, caring for the sick, feeding the hungry—are not considered sufficiently religious to qualify for the Mandate’s narrow “religious exemption.”  In fact, Jesus himself would not qualify due to his service to those outside of his faith. Not only will such institutions be forced to provide services that directly contradict the teachings of their faith, but—more alarmingly—the federal government is claiming the right to decide for religious institutions what constitutes their ministry.
    Thousands of Catholics have signed petitions urging Georgetown to rescind the invitation.  They are insulted that Georgetown is giving aid and comfort to the ‘enemy,’ the same womon who defended the mandate at a NARAL abortion-rights fundraiser, proclaiming that “we are at war” with the pro-life movement.  The plain and simple fact is that you cannot be truly Catholic and pro-abortion.  Throughout its history, the Catholic Church has proclaimed the sanctity of life, from conception to natural death.     

    The bishops have not varied from Catholic ideology.  But some Americans who call themselves Catholic have decided for themselves what they think Catholic doctrine should be.  The Catholic Church is not a democracy in which those who purport to be members get to “vote” on the precepts of the church.  Individuals and institutions like Georgetown, who don’t wish to comform to Church teachings, should quit calling themselves Catholic and leave. They and the Church will likely be the better for it. 

  • manoflamancha

    You could have tried a more succinct title, like: ” Bring in the usual suspects”. 

  • 12080243

    Mobbing is a protective throwback to crude animal instinct. For an interesting review of the subject see, Kenneth Westhues at http://arts.uwaterloo.ca/~kwesthue/mobbing.htm. Mr. Westhues was also the subject of an excellent article in CHE. See, http://chronicle.com/article/Mob-Rule/36004/

    Some commenters seem to think that mobbing is justified in some circumstances. I’ll let others debate that, but I may ask a question or two about it. What’s interesting to me is to review mobbing that occurs when researchers report on issues like high-profile athletics, race, accreditation, etc. and provide supporting documentation and reliable evidence from open records requests, sworn depositions, court testimony, etc. The same kind of mobbing occurs then. Mobbing that enforces retaliation against the messenger/researcher. Do you (folks that justify mobbing Riley) care that they get mobbed? Are you as rabid in your concern then as you were with regard to mobbing Riley?

    At the University of Southern Mississippi, I documented in research projects the lying, cheating, and stealing by some faculty and administrators with regard to our Business College’s reaccreditation. A sacred (university) cow, if there ever was one. For some details, see  http://ssrn.com/author=397169 ”Is Accreditation a Reliable Authority on Academic Auality” and “University and AACSB Diversity.”

    And if you want to read about a university president supporting mobbing, be sure to see the series running on usmnews.net: “President Martha Saunders Under Oath (Parts 1 – 4, with Parts 5 and 6 to be reported soon). If you have any doubt just how corrupt a university administrator can be, we’ll put that notion to rest for you.

    Chauncey M. DePree, Jr., DBA (Accounting with a minor in Logic and Ethics), Professor, School of Accountancy, College of Business, University of Southern Mississippi.

  • rollinsecoprofs

    Why not focus your blog on something powerful and not trivial (I wrote something that lots of people disliked and the CHE took away my platform….waaahhhh), like rogue presidents, administrative bloat, and ignorant and uninformed boards of directors…..all individually doing vastly more harm to the academy than this issue could ever possibly do…and some research ahead of time is always a requirement I impose on my students before just blogging/slogging away without actual information.   

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=14826035 Pat Dolan

    Exactly. Catholic bishops consistently protest when speakers who believe in unbridled capitalism, pre-emptive war, torture, and other things in direct contradiction to Catholic moral teachings are invited to Catholic institutions. They don’t confine their vigorous interventions in the political realm to the misogynistic and homophobic.

    I was educated by the Sisters of Saint Francis and the Jesuits. My PhD thesis was on Thomas More. The statement, “Throughout its history, the Catholic Church has proclaimed the sanctity of life, from conception to natural death,” is risible, and Sr. Louis Clare and Father O’Brien would be laughing along with the rest of us. Thomas Aquinas didn’t know about conception (nobody did until the 19th century), and Thomas More wanted to burn all the Protestants.

    Oh, and if you don’t want to follow employment law in the US, don’t employ people. It’s that simple. If Catholic institutions don’t want to be public institutions, that’s fine. They can discriminate all they want. But as long as Georgetown takes my tax money (last I looked tuition was deductible) and Catholic hospitals take my Medicare withholding, they’ve got to follow the rules.

    Who do you think you’re kidding?

  • Socratease2

    Football is not an academic department but neither is the debate club. They are both sponsored by the university and, as they exist within the scope of the school’s academic mission statement, they are supposed to have some connection to promoting student academic or personal growth and development. I don’t think that was a great way to word that sentence since, of course, a comparison to the football program is not going create any positive associations in this climate of  “all athletics are bogus.”

  • silencenolonger

    Timing is everything, and it may be on Riley’s side.  Right now the North Carolina DA is seeking a fraud investigation against the black studies department at UNC Chapel Hill, the most prestigious public university in NC. This is an extract from an article in the Charlotte Observer
    http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2012/05/11/3232564/unc-chapel-hill-might-take-action.html
    Julius Nyang’oro received $12,000 to teach AFAM 280 – Blacks in North Carolina. The 19 students enrolled in the course were to learn about the state’s legacy of slavery and racism, and how blacks fought to overcome it.
    It is a course that typically involved classroom lectures, research papers and exams, according to syllabi from other UNC-CH professors who taught it. Nyang’oro, the department’s chairman, was expected to teach it that way as well, university officials said.
    But Nyang’oro did not hold classes or require any exams. His one-page syllabus said that because of the “compact nature” of the summer schedule, the students would spend that time largely on their own to find one or two black leaders in North Carolina to be the subject of a research paper due at the end of the session.
    Now, university officials say they may seek action against Nyang’oro for not teaching a class as they had anticipated. The move comes after The News & Observer inquired about summer school payments to Nyang’oro.
    “Through our review, we learned that Professor Nyang’oro provided instruction for a course in independent study format that had been approved to be taught in lecture format,” said Nancy Davis, a UNC-CH spokeswoman. “Had the Summer School been aware that he was treating it as independent study, he would not have been paid for the course. We are reviewing appropriate next steps.”
    The summer school payment is the latest development in what appears to be the biggest case of academic fraud at UNC-CH in decades. An internal probe released late last week found 54 classes within the African studies department in which there was little or no indication of instruction. The probe also found at least 10 cases of unauthorized grade changes involving students who had not completed their course work or a final exam before the class ended.
    Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2012/05/11/3232564/unc-chapel-hill-might-take-action.html#storylink=cpy

  • Socratease2

    “For all the lip service about universities being “market places of
    ideas” and havens for unpopular thoughts, three stories over the last
    week or two drive home the reality that there is a clamor by many  in
    the academic community for either ideological conformity or resistance
    to “interference” from the Real World that feeds it.”

    Blah, blah….a bunch of tired ideas being trotted out here. I am to take it that three disjointed examples prove a definitive pattern or trend in academia? Some one needs a methods class. They most certainly do not prove anything of the sort, that is awful rhetoric and to accent the misinformation with an (faux) authoritative “drives home the reality” is completely absurd. Perhaps it drove home some reality in Vedder’s mind though sounds more like he drove home, drank too much and then decided to write a blog.

    The university, as much as any institution, exists within the real world (not sure why we are capitalizing that) and that tired cliche of the university existing outside society is just lazy thinking. Just ask a university that has lost 50% of its state funding what world it exists in.

    What lip service? Universities are just as politicized as the rest of society, that is part of their existing in the Real World, duh. And historically, universities have seen examples of horrid censorship and most certainly have not been havens for “unpopular thought.” There is nothing new here.

    And “clamor by many?” How many is that exactly who are clamoring for “ideological conformity?”

    Must be nice to be able to write blogs where you create arguments out of whole cloth and try to pass it off as “common sense” commentary. Nice try, but you would do well as a politician who apparently are free to confabulate information, present it as gospel and then backtrack later and say, “That was not meant to be a factual statement.”

  • operalala

    Yes, football is not an academic department, but Vedder lumped Black Studies with it, and called them wholesale “academically dubious” – an outright, unsubstantiated affront to an academic program.
    The only similarity between the academic Black Studies department and the non-academic football team is the larger presence of blacks in each, relative to our universities at large.

    I hope the CHE editors know what a dog whistle is, and what Vedder did here.

  • luther_blissett

    Sadly, the evidence against Vedder’s sophomoric claims is the comment thread to this very post. He iterates NSR’s over-generalized, evidence-free position on Black Studies, but notice: no one’s “mobbing” him. Why? Because he’s not calling for the total destruction of an academic field based on a reading of three dissertation titles. See? Vedder criticizes Black Studies, and eighteen people in two days have replied. Clearly, there’s a major difference between NSR’s attack and Vedder’s, and it has nothing to do with “group-think” or mobbing.

    However, Vedder does make sophomoric claims about Black Studies programs with absolutely no evidence. As an academic, he should be ashamed of himself. I don’t care if this is a blog post. When I get into an argument with friends at a bar, I still supply evidence for my claims. Vedder’s ideologically-driven attack simply reveals his blinders.

  • 11144703

    Pat, you wrote that Ed O’Brien is a “pedophilia-enabling” person.

    How exactly did Ed enable pedophilia?

    I’m going to love your answer to this charge that would have a good chance of getting you sued for defamation successfully. Perhaps you’ll resort to generalizations that all the hierarchy were enabling pedophile priests (and bishops) to prey on minors, but that feeble answer really ain’t good enough to avoid a successful defamation lawsuit.  

    Maybe you’ll simply ignore my question.  That would be the wiser choice because I don’t see a way out for your reckless, defamatory charge.

  • http://twitter.com/HotCornerBlues Gary

     >>And “clamor by many?” How many is that exactly who are clamoring for “ideological conformity?”<<

    At this site alone, 6500.

  • The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • 1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
  • Washington, D.C. 20037