• Monday, May 28, 2012

Previous

Next

Making Conscious Career Choices

September 29, 2011, 8:00 am

Most of us attend graduate school because we love the subjects we study.  We work hard.  We learn.  We grow.  We change.  We can’t see ourselves doing anything else.  But we suffer.  We have angst.  We lose relationships.  We go into debt.  And we endure all of this because we love the discipline.  We anticipate a career in a field that will excite us for decades.  We assume we’ll become a professor.  (OK, stop laughing.)  We assume this as grad students because we don’t know what else we can do with a Ph.D. in [insert your discipline of choice here].

It’s academic job season.  Hundreds if not thousands of people are now applying for tenure track positions across the country.  But as we know, jobs are scarce, and the competition for these scare jobs is intense.  The process of applying for these one-shot-in-several-hundred positions can be demoralizing and expensive.  Many are applying to these jobs because they assume that’s what they are supposed to do with graduate degrees, and still they know their chances of getting a job are slim.  On the other hand, other people are applying for jobs because they don’t know what other options might be available.  They don’t know their other options.  Being a professor is what they are supposed to do with a graduate degree, but it might not be what they want to do.

If you are finding yourself in the “what-do-I-do-with-myself-if-I-don’t-want-to-(or-can’t-be)-a-professor-position,” you might check out a few resources.  Jo VanEvery, a Ph.D. in sociology, and Julie Clarenbach, a Ph.D. in Rhetoric, both academic coaches, created Conscious Career Course, a six-week course that can help academics think about their educations differently, think about their skill sets more creatively, and can open up career options that they might never have considered.  A series of 90-minute conference call session covers topics as “Activating Your Curiosity,” “Identifying What You Have to Offer,” “Identifying What You Care About,” “Expanding Your Possibilities I and II,” and finally, “Putting It All Together.”  These calls include conversations, lessons, readings, and exercises to help academics reconsider their career paths.

Students in the Conscious Career Course are not passive listeners during a conference call, it’s important to know.  Each student participates in the calls (as desired), is a part of a simultaneous online chat session with other students during the conference calls, and has access to other students and instructors during the six-week course session.  Lastly, students have between-session homework that helps them—individually—work through ideas, fears, doubts, or possibilities.

If you are interested in this course, check out the Conscious Career Course website, as it contains all the details of the course (dates, times, costs, etc.).  The next course begins on October 6, and the courses are scheduled through 2013.

Full disclosure: I attended the Conscious Career Course in during the summer of 2011.  The course is intense and thorough, and I found myself struggling to think differently about my skills, weaknesses, strengths, desires, and hopes.  I’m usually very self aware, but this course taught me much about myself and the kind of career I desire.  I would recommend it to anyone on the job market, considering leaving higher education, or even those who want to think differently about life’s path.

If you are not quite ready for a full course on possibly leaving higher education, Jo and Julie also offer a free eCourse, Myths and Mismatches, a course that asks you to think about your situation in ways you might have considered.  Each day for 10 days, Jo and Julie will send you—via email—content that describes a myth or mismatch in academia.  You can answer the questions or ignore the questions.  They are simply questions for you to think about and apply (or not) to your own situation.

Lastly, if you are certain you wish to stay in higher education but maybe not on a tenure-track, Bethany Nowviski, Director of Digital Research & Scholarship at the University of Virginia Library, wrote a ProfHacker piece about a year ago:  “The #alt-ac Track: Negotiating Your ‘Alternative Academic’ Appointment.”  This detailed post has many suggestions about how to, well, negotiate your #alt-ac career.   Well worth the read.

All of this brings up questions that we’ll cover in future ProfHacker posts:  How are we preparing graduate students for a life outside the tenure track?

But in the meantime, how about you?  How do decide if you are cut out for a tenure-track position in higher education? When do you decide this?  How do you begin to find out what else you can do?  Please leave comments and suggestions below.

[Image by Flickr user Môsieur J. and used under the Creative Commons license.]

This entry was posted in Editorial, Profession and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • http://www.rogerwhitson.net/ Roger Whitson

    Billie! Why did you write such a great post on the job market today?!? Now I have something else to include in my post…BAH! ;)

  • billiehara

    Bwhahahaha. Just trying to keep you on your toes!

  • http://brendabethman.com Brenda Bethman

    I realized partway through grad school that while I loved teaching and researching, my true talent was administering (please don’t hate me even though I’m an administrator!). I was lucky to be in a supportive department who encouraged me to go in that direction. As a grad student, I held several administrative assistantships, which helped me later when it was time to get a job. Currently, I direct a university women’s center, serve as acting director for our women’s & gender studies program, and teach German, women’s & gender studies, and honors courses. It’s a great gig — I even get to do some research and have a book coming out this fall.

    BUT, had I been in a different grad program, I don’t know if I would have found this out as easily or been as prepared for the alt-ac job market. I would really like to see more humanities programs think about how they could provide admin experience for their grad students. Not only would it benefit them if they decided to go the alt-ac route, it would help them if they get a faculty job as well.

  • pippi

    In grad school, I had planned to get a tenure-track job in English, get tenure, then move into administration. Couldn’t get a tenure-track job and burned out teaching composition in part-time and non-tenure full-time jobs. I have since moved twice into instructional technology/faculty development positions, but in this second one, I still moonlight as an adjunct. No, you never know where you might go, but a tenure-track position sure could open a lot of doors. There seems to be a ceiling I can’t break through without that tenured background.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=667415239 Freddy Cardoza

    These issues are paramount in the matter of moving into higher education.  Because there is a need for doctoral candidates and scholars to have help in ascending into academic positions, I have just launched the professional portfolio based service, “Academii.”  http://www.academii.net.  It is designed to position academic job seekers to move more efficiently into academe.  As a Department Chair and member of the Provost’s Office at my university and graduate school, I hope the service encourages our colleagues to share it with their doctoral students and graduates who are looking for academic roles. 

    http://www.academii.net

  • TRTerry68

    The PhD job market in many fields has not been good for many years. If you know that why do you spend 5 to 7 years getting a PhD? I suspect it is like the hundreds of high school and college sports standouts who believe that they will beat the odds and play in the pros.

    There was a time when one of the professional assignments of each graduate faculty member was to see to it that each of their PhD graduates had a job.

    Now every student who is believed to be able to “get through it” and thinks that they can beat the odds is admitted and in time graduated and added to the que.

    Most of us have more than one thing that we “like” to do. However, that great creative destruction of the market dictates what we can make a living doing. Training up for something with a known, foreseeable glutted market does not show a grasp of reality. Is it good policy to have those without a grasp on reality teaching?

    Maybe the rules should be changed so that for a graduate program to be “licensed” it be required to place every PhD graduate in a tenure track position and admit no more students than it is willing to so place. The students who want the degrees to check a box on their job resume (many K-12 teachers are in this group) can go the “The University of the Elephant Rising From The Ashes” and similar institutions.  

  • dashwood

    I wonder if this is legally actionable. If (1) one sets up a web site with what is promoted as an anonymous comment section, (2) individuals avail themselves of the opportunity to post anonymous comments, (3) those comments and their identities are revealed publicly, and (4) individuals making the comments can show that they have been damaged by having their names and comments revealed publicly, can the person seek damages in a civil court?

    Just wondering.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_GGYJHDUNVKTEZHQGY7VKCTZ2RM Me

    As stupid, thoughtless, and repugnant as these types of sites are, this individual wins no plaudits for encouraging such behavior and then turning around and self-righteously outing those stupid enough to have played along. The real nugget of hypocrisy though:

    “Though the identities of PSUacb’s posters have been revealed, the site’s
    creator would only comment anonymously, for fear of physical violence.”

    But no one who has posted vile comments about others would ever have to fear the threat of physical violence? I’m all for anonymity where it serves a constructive purpose (wrote the guy using a pseudonym), but if you’re going to violate others’ anonymity, and potentially place people in jeopardy for the stupid things they’ve said, you might want to be willing to step forward yourself.

    This person (people?) would have been better off staying as far away from such a site as possible.

  • http://twitter.com/NoelineL NOELINEL

    Sounds like cyber-bullying with permission from the authorities.

  • nuckollsr

    The author writes: “Gossip sites like these pose tough questions
    for college leaders. Some students say the anonymous forums are
    breeding grounds for harassment. A few colleges tried to slow down the
    sites in the past by blocking them on their campuses or asking their
    creators to remove posts that named students.”

    This is a tee-ball hit . . . college leaders should make this a teaching moment. Bullies of all stripe are despotic progressives in training. They are exercising and honing the skills necessary to exert force or fraud against honorable innocents without a trace of remorse or empathy. Award them a degree of some high sounding skill and they’re ready to join elites at all levels of government equally willing to bring force of law or regulation to bear against anyone for any reason . . . as long as “small sacrifices are made for the greater good”.

    The only difference between the leader of a street gang, a DesPro in Congress and Saddam Hussein are the circumstances of their rise to power and the degree of power they hold. As soon as honorable behaviors for the protection of liberty are marginalized, the civil society is at risk for implosion. When a society no longer values and protects the liberty of independently self sufficient individuals and their ability to exchange value freely, growth stops, freedoms are forfeit and the society self destructs.

    This exercise in self immolation has been demonstrated countless times throughout history. For an institution of higher learning NOT to rise to occasion and explain this to their charges is a gross dereliction of duty as citizens of the United States of America.

  • http://twitter.com/PSUacb PSUacb.com

    There were many posts contributed by non-Greek students. When I chose to remove students’ names and leave only their organizations, there was no point in leaving up posts made by unaffiliated students.

    Also worth noting is that almost everyone identified is a freshman.

  • nuckollsr

    “I’m all for anonymity where it serves a constructive purpose . . .”

    How can this ever be constructive under the system of law crafted by our founding fathers? The courts of past circumstance call for the gathering of evidence, the testimony of honorable witness, judgement by peers and dispensing of justice in accordance with constitutional law. Making any portion of this process “secret” turns out the lights and elevates risk for dishonorable behaviors to go unobserved and ignored.

    Turn out enough lights, ignore a sufficient number of dishonorable behaviors and the observers become compliant and complacent. This gives rise to the present makeup of our government where 2 millions plus openly violate the liberties of everybody. It all started with behaviors of a few that were kept secret . . . a few that could quash the whistle blowers with impunity . . . or simply ignore them.

    It takes courage to make one’s allegations of dishonorable behaviors publicly . . . but it is the duty of every citizen who values their freedom.

  • rlr524

    Sure, posting mean comments anonymously shows everyone you “suck.” But I don’t get how the site creater thinks he is any better by lying to people. Then the self-righteous comment below about freshman students. This guy sounds like as much of a jerk as anyone who posted on the site. Young people learn best when someone sets a good example. Maybe he will grow up one day, too.

  • rlr524

    Most do outgrow it, right. Obviously the creator of psuacb.com has yet to do so.

  • The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • 1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
  • Washington, D.C. 20037