In one of our Wednesday open threads a couple of weeks ago, George mentioned my policy for handling late assignments. I’ve written about it on my personal blog before, but I thought I’d expand on it in a PH post since it’s something people have told me they find useful and even provocative. Keep in mind that I mostly teach writing. Even when a course is not specifically a writing course, almost all of my assignments are writing assignments, and that shapes my policies in general. In terms of late work, I try to keep things clear and simple. I will take any essay up to a week late without a grade penalty, but I will not offer any comments on that essay at all. Since I usually offer students the chance to revise all of their major assignments (except at the end of the semester), the lack of comments puts them at a significant disadvantage. I always offer to meet with students in my office, but there is a pretty big difference between having a concrete set of specific comments on a draft and a series of notes taken during a office visit.
I developed this policy after reading What the Best College Teachers Do by Ken Bain, a book that has been mentioned now and then on this site. I can’t remember if he mentions this policy specifically or if I thought of it on my own after reading his book, but this policy works for me because it relates to one of the key principles Bain raises throughout his text: policies need to align with pedagogies. In other words, the policies we create in our classes should clearly support our teaching goals. As a writing specialist, I want my students to recognize that they are writers who make choices. They must decide where to put commas, how to frame a piece of evidence, or what font will provide them with a particular ethos. I feel like my late policy aligns with what I’ve come to call “choice pedagogy” because it gives students an option without forcing them down a particular path. They must recognize, however, that their choice comes with consequences. In this case, those consequences directly affect their writing because the lack of comments will make revision choices more difficult. Some readers may argue that grade penalties still allow students to make choices, but I feel like the goal of a penalty is to push students to turn in their work on time. I feel like my version shifts the emphasis from the grade and to the writing, which is where I want their focus to reside.
In my department, some of my colleagues have argued that a grade penalty is more important because deadlines in the business world are rigid, and students need to get used to working with such rigidity now. There’s a lot of logic to that, and it’s a fine reason to enact such a policy. But my professional experience with deadlines has been different (experiences that have had no connection to the corporate world, I should add). Often, I’m pretty good with deadlines, but sometimes I haven’t been, especially early in my career on the tenure track when I would let anxiety and workload get the best of me. Luckily, I encountered many editors who were willing to let me get something to them a few days or even a couple of weeks late with no ramifications. That’s a big reason why I started rethinking how I handled deadlines in my own classes.
Of course, no policy is perfect. In the comment to which I linked above, George mentions students who might turn in everything late. That can happen, though it’s been quite rare in my classes; plus, if they do turn in everything late and always miss out on comments, then that is their choice. Often, students will turn in the first essay late and then realize what they have missed, so they never do it again. Last fall, I did have a few students who did not even turn in essays within a week after the deadline, and they wanted to revise. I asked them how they could revise something that had never been drafted. They complained, but I reminded them that they had an entire week to get something to me late. They simply chose not to do that. The best examples of this policy benefiting students come from the few times really good students have been swamped with work. Perhaps they had exams in other classes at the same time or other pressures. Knowing they could turn in work for me late without asking and without penalty has been a positive option for them. Some students benefit from a brief respite, and I’m happy to build that into my courses.
In no way do I intend to be seen as arguing for readers to adopt this policy for their classes across the board. One of the benefits of diverse policies in our classes is teaching students to handle shifting expectations when, say, supervisors change once they have a job. I do think that faculty need to be able to articulate why they have enacted the policies they have, though, and I do think that policies and pedagogies should align clearly. How do you handle late assignments in your classes, and how do those policies support your teaching goals?
(Photo by Flickr user apesara and licensed through Creative Commons)




6 Responses to Developing Policies for Late Assignments
Rana - October 22, 2009 at 7:40 pm
I have late penalties because I don’t want to be dealing with an endless trickle of assignments over the course of the semester; as it is, there does tend to be a flurry of last-minute submissions the last day of class, as I require that all of them be completed (however badly) in order to earn a passing grade.
The way I work it is this: Let’s say a paper is due Tuesday the 1st. I dock a grade’s worth (B to B-) for every day past that that it is late, so a C+ paper turned in Thursday would earn a C- after the penalty. The docking continues down until the paper reaches a numerical F (50%) and will not earn anything lower than that. Given that an assignment that isn’t turned in at all gets 0%, there’s an incentive to turn in something, eventually.
To avoid the late penalties, the students have two options:
1) Turn in a hard copy the day the assignment is due.
2) Email me a copy, which will stop the penalty clock. If they turn in a hard copy by the end of the next class, I will count it as having been turned in on the day it was emailed. If they don’t remember the hard copy, then the full late penalty applies, dating from the day that the hard copy is turned in.
The second option, I explain to them, is not to give them extra time on the assignment, but to allow them to avoid late penalties if for some reason they are unable to get a hard copy to me on time. (Printer troubles, too sick to come to class, etc.)
Students who turn in work late do have an opportunity to remove the late penalty – I give all students the opportunity to revise assignments, averaging the grades of the revision and original. If a student who turned in a late paper revises it, I will use the pre-penalty grade on the draft for the average, not the grade with penalty applied.
Basically, I want to deter students as much as possible from turning work in late, while not making it so punitive that students just give up if they miss a deadline.
My logic – which I will explain if they ask – is that it’s not fair to me, or their peers, to submit work late. It increases and complicates my workload, it may give them an advantage (in terms of new information) that their peers didn’t have, it ties up classes in which we discuss each others’ work, and it messes up schedules that I carefully arranged so as to ensure that the work was spaced out and coordinated with the readings.
That said, I also have the policy that late work is better than no work, so there’s always a spate of long-neglected things showing up the last day of class. Those all get automatic numerical Fs, and no comments (other than a note about how late they are) – but it’s still better than 0s.
Nicole Wyatt - October 22, 2009 at 8:08 pm
For essay based classes I sometimes accept papers throughout the term, with the proviso that anything late gets no commments and will be graded at my leisure, which may mean it is left till the class is over.
However I find this is only practical with small classes, since otherwise I end up with way too much grading at the end of term.
In classes with problem sets where I want to work the problems later in class one can’t accept anything late. I usually point this out to students so that they understand why I am inflexible about it.
Janice - October 22, 2009 at 10:18 pm
This has a certain appeal. The great time-suck in assessing written work is providing useful comments. If I have to stretch this out over two or three weeks, it’s difficult to sustain (especially in a class of 135!).
There are some assignments I don’t accept late — tutorial response papers are due on the day they’re due, full-stop. Since they can drop the lowest 2 out of 7, it’s not onerous in my mind.
G. Michael Guy - October 23, 2009 at 9:09 am
I have a very strict policy on makeups in my syllabus: No makeups are accepted, don’t ask. But inevitably students ask, and inevitably I say yes. Grrrr on me. I’ve never had a habitual, repeat offender. I occasionally take off like 5% of their grade for being late, but I’m not consistent. Something about just wanting to give them credit for work they did just always makes me take it. I’m not very speedy at grading late work if I’ve already graded everyone else’s. Perhaps that’s their penalty. But then I profess math–it’s a bit different.
Rana - October 24, 2009 at 4:28 pm
I should add that I’ve tried the no-comments approach, but found it didn’t work for me, because the comments help ME explain why an assignment earned the grade it did, without having to re-read it on the spot while the student stares at me.
Todd Petersen - October 25, 2009 at 8:11 am
I try to look for natural consequences for any penalty in my classes. I, too, have found in the writing world that deadline extensions are generally forthcoming if you pre-negotiate them. In order to address the arguments for accepting a late paper, which annoy me and waste my time even when I keep to the policy and say no (generating flack in the evals like, “he’s difficult to deal with”), I have created a submission window: you can start turning it in on one day and keep turning it in for a week. Then it’s really over. If you turn it in early, I’ll give you more feedback, because I’ll have the time. If you turn it in late, then you’ll get less, because, you’ve decided to wait. Students seem completely okay with this and have said so in their evals. There is no impact on me, and they feel like they have more control.