• Monday, May 28, 2012

Previous

Next

Create Forms with File Uploads Using Dropbox Forms

March 21, 2011, 11:00 am

book_with_squaresA few weeks ago, I set out to digitize the application form that students fill out to work in our writing center. I thought I’d use Google Docs Forms, which I’ve used quite happily for similar projects in the past. However, I need a way to collect writing samples from potential tutors, and Google Docs Forms do not allow users to upload or attach files. I could ask applicants to cut and paste a writing sample into a text box, but this would result in a spreadsheet with one enormous field at the end.

When I shared my problem on Twitter, folks pointed me a to a few alternative form-creation services that do accept file uploads, but each of these charge a monthly fee. As I’ll only be accepting applications a few times a year, I really don’t want to pay a month-to-month fee.

Then this post at Lifehacker introduced me to Dropbox Forms, which integrates directly with the web form builder JotForm. In short, when you build a form in Jotform, you can include a “file upload” field. The first time you do this, you must grant permission for JotForm to access your Dropbox account. Then, when users fill out the form you’ve created, any files they upload through the form will be placed on your Dropbox in the folder Dropbox–>JotForm–>Send a File.

Voila! A free-to-build form with file upload. JotForm can offer this service for free, I assume, because the files aren’t stored with Jotform, but with each user—so JotForm doesn’t foot the bandwidth bill. And Dropbox—which must, at this point, be the official app of ProfHacker—once again saves the day. If you don’t have a Dropbox account at this point, get one and then try out JotForms.

[Creative Commons licensed photo by Flickr user ollesvensson.]

This entry was posted in Software and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • http://www.briancroxall.net Brian Croxall

    This is such a great find, Ryan. Thanks for sharing. I’ll be pointing this out to several people I know who are looking for options like this.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=651346855 facebook-651346855

    Awesome find! Thanks!!

  • amnirov

    This is going to suck. Private equity firms = satan.

  • Guest

    lol! I actually gave up on all of them and simply use a blog and my private website, plus the listserv. It works.

  • cust0s

    As one who teaches both face-to-face and online, I would argue that the investment was well made.  The only collapse I could see would the impact on private schools who utilize online learning and fail to meet the requirements of newly proposed congressional legislation (e.g. gainful employment rule, etc.).  There was no way any investors could have seen this coming.  Most students in the online environment have been just as diligent though the major difference seems to be that they love and “need” the convenience of learning off campus just to maintain their employment, family connections, etc.  So, again, seemed like a good investment but the new legislation complicates things UNLESS you are a public school (e.g. tax payers are now the investors, right?).  Not so fair if you ask me.  Just my 2 cents.

  • cust0s

    Hey Gray,

    Why not Salmon Khan?  Remember his http://www.khanacademy.org/? He accomplished this so well…  or so I thought… and he made it free to everyone.

  • CanAmSteve

    I’d say they are fishin’ with dynamite. Everyone thinks there is some pot of gold in e-learning but no one has found it, so buying up any company with even a hint of success gives Big Money a place to put their dollars to work with some hope of future reward.

    For the most part, e-learning has been evolutionary rather than revolutionary. You still see “e-learning” programs running on the accepted “academic year” and simply mimicking F2F instruction but “with computers!”

    The corporate world, OTOH, sees shortcuts and money savings, so can be hoodwinked by LMS sellers into seeing ROI that may never materialize.

    LMS and course-management software should be standardized and it should be free. Service providers can make a living developing and supporting the framework, but IMO proprietary solutions are a waste of time and money.

  • mdefusco

    When will education see that the four mainstays of growth in any field are ideas, people, government and capital (in that order)?  Education is the second largest industry in the US (valued at over $1 trillion each year – behind only healthcare) with  no really organized access to capital.  Blackboard, whose growth was once spurred by its access to public markets, now decided that the oligopoly of several large institutional investors disabled them and decided on more orderly capital.   The results will be another chance to challenge assumptions and to assume a board that will insist on growth (not necessarily quarter to quarter).   This is a wonderful sign of a growing industry that has capital options.   We didn’t have similar negative reactions when Providence made a similar buyout several years ago of EDMC (now back publicly traded)  or when Goldman invested in Laureate.   We should applaud when risk capital wants to reinvorgorate firms that get stymied by their own success. (Peter Drucker once commented that the one way to insure a firm’s failure was to have 5 years of uninterrupted success).  That’s how industries stay vibrant.  Ask  General Motors.

  • czander

    Will the cost for using Blackboard increase? Given the track record of these buy-outs boys, of course the cost will increase. Consumers beware whenever the investment firms get into something the consumer suffers. Just look at what these guys are doing to the price of food.

  • CanAmSteve

    No direct argument – as long as you consider education just another place to make a buck. If e-learning is analogous to – say – the invention of moveable type in its importance to dissemination of knowledge, then we could be talking about who makes the best printing press.

    Or not. While I can take my content and shop it to any number of service providers who will compete to offer me the best product, the current e-learning market is based on technological dead-ending customers (and Blackboard’s history is a prime example).

  • mdefusco

    Part of free enterprise is the payment for risks taken.   When “buy-out boys” invest in companies that have reached their maturity and hope to take it to new heights, they deserve to be paid for taking the risk.  As far as the cost of food, it was not long ago that people spent there entire lives (and those of their families) feeding themselves.   Thank goodness that we have gotten to a point where not everyone is required to feed ourselves and we can focus on developing other ventures because we are more productive.    Or perhaps we go back to the good old days when everyone farms.  Can we count you in for your 40 acres czander?

  • etjatm

    This ought to make response to support requests soooo much better. lol.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=13756380 Cole Spolaric

    I can’t believe anyone would spend nearly 2 billion dollars on such a piece of crap!!!!

  • manitoga

    Don’t forget that Bb has intellectual property for Prometheus, Angel Learning, WebCT, Xythos, SafeAssign, Eluminate and WIMBA, in addition to it’s Learn platform.

  • johnakline

    I’m laughing at Cole’s post. And I agree. That quality would never be accepted for a commercial product. And it all just feels old  -as if web 2.0 didn’t happen. Which is why we keep seeing new and better LMSs popping up. Let’s hope that the competition will motivate Bb to improve. I think the new structure afforded by this purchase will allow Bb to be more innovative, improve its products and serve the academic market better. Or not – but then that is the nature of competition.

  • richardtaborgreene

    those greedy psychopaths Harvard Business School graduates screw up again—-their inablility to feel causes constant errors of theft and judgment—-all that eliteness, all those clever econ cover stories for theft, all that psychopathology hidden by elegant ideas from greed-inducing faculty, and to think the REST OF ACADEMIA WORSHIP THEM AS THEIR OWN ELITE—-yuk yuk yuk

    this private equity will soon be private iniquity.  

  • http://scantron.tumblr.com scantron

    thank you! this is exactly what i was looking for! so glad jotform offers this function! 

  • The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • 1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
  • Washington, D.C. 20037