• Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Previous

Next

Pitt and Syracuse Join ACC in Major-Conference Shakeup

September 19, 2011, 12:17 am

After weeks of heated speculation and escalating momentum, another round of conference shakeups reignited in earnest this weekend, signaling the possibility of an imminent upheaval in the mercurial landscape of college sports.

Early Sunday, the Atlantic Coast Conference confirmed that it would add Syracuse University and the University of Pittsburgh, making it, with 14 members, the largest football conference of the six major Division I leagues. The ACC’s unexpected announcement was just one of several fast-moving squalls on the conference horizon that sped up over the weekend involving institutions from North Carolina to Texas.

Syracuse and Pitt’s decisions were a blow to the Big East, which was already mourning the loss of its founder and first commissioner, Dave Gavitt, who died on Friday. And the ACC’s commissioner, John Swofford, hinted that his league might not be finished with its search for more members: While the conference is “comfortable” with 14, he told reporters, it is not “philosophically opposed” to 16. (The league evidently has options: Syracuse and Pitt were reportedly two of at least 10 institutions to inquire about joining the ACC, Swofford told The New York Times.)

Meantime, Texas and Oklahoma are also getting serious about leaving their faltering league, the Big 12, possibly to join the Pac-12. Regents of both universities are scheduled to meet on Monday to discuss their conference affiliation, with action possible, the Austin American-Statesman reported. Texas has also reportedly reached out to the ACC.

Pac-12 Commissioner Larry Scott—who courted Texas last year but lost out to an 11th-hour rescue of the Big 12—is reportedly working on a deal that would allow Texas to join his expanded league and still keep its new Longhorn Network.

But the Big 12’s troubles aren’t limited to the possible loss of its two biggest programs. Texas Tech and Oklahoma State are reportedly pursuing the Pac-12 as well. And Texas A&M appears headed for the SEC.

The weekend’s upheaval comes at a time when conference affiliation has assumed unparalleled importance for many major-college programs. Media-rights contracts have driven much of the recent reshuffling: Leagues with expansive geographic reach can secure footholds in key television markets, and are able to bring in ever-higher sums from media companies with a seemingly insatiable appetite for college sports.

Hefty payouts to institutions in conferences with the richest deals—programs in the Pac-12, for instance, will eventually receive an average of $21-million annually from the league’s $3-billion media contract—have proven irresistible to many institutions.

“In all my years of collegiate administration, I’ve never seen this level of uncertainty and potential fluidity among schools and conferences,” Swofford, the ACC commissioner, told The New York Times. “Schools are looking for stability.”

The conference maelstrom troubled the NCAA’s president, Mark Emmert, who predicted that the reshuffling would have consequences for athletes and coaches forced to travel more than 1,000 miles from, say, Pittsburgh to South Florida.

“This is not about playing Monopoly and moving pieces around on the board,” Emmert told USA Today on Sunday, not long after the ACC’s announcement. “These are real institutions with real students and real coaches and real programs, and it’s much, much more complex than playing a simple game.”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • steverankin

    Greed, greed, greed.

    I know it costs lots of money to run Division 1 athletic programs.  But these super conferences are bad for college sports, long term.  I’m hoping for the day that another school completely outside any of these forming super conferences will rise up and trounce all of them.  

  • cwinton

    Schools have been into conference swapping for close on 100 years (consider the old Southern Conference, which at one time had 20 teams and spawned the ACC and SEC), but at least in the past the motivation was to hold travel to a relatively small geographic locale.  This latest round just adds further mockery to the term student athlete, where the obvious outcome is that conference scheduling will require teams to travel thousands of miles for games, adding heaven only knows how much expense to programs already running in the red.  Justification for this form of collegiate sports has never sounded hollower.

  • goxewu

    You gotta love this post coming right on the heels of the one headlined, “In Conference Politics, Cooperation Can Still Prevail.”

    Apparently, money talks, cooperation walks.

  • bryancthornton

    The most recent Atlantic Monthly has an article about the NCAA and college athletes.  I think it would be wise to take some pressure off the players and recognize that their goal of excellence in a chosen sport trumps focus on studies at a point of time in their life.  The players ought to be able to focus on their athletic goals and later be given a free education.  Athletes do not have to be students and students do not have to athletes.
    When recruited as an athete for a sports team, the school should provide a stipend, room and board and safe and adequate training facilities for the duration of his or her contract
    If and when an athlete choses to fully embrace the  academic side of the house, they should be given the opportunity to focus completely on their studies.  They should be provided a conditional academic scholarship that includes room and board.

    Here is the link:  http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/10/the-shame-of-college-sports/8643/#.TnfGnjL3xV4.email

  • goxewu

    Questions:

    Since a college football player would, while he plays football, be essentially a university employee and a student only later, would he have to pass any admission requirements at all?

    Would he even have to have a high-school diploma?

    And, if the postponed college education isn’t contractually mandatory, why couldn’t a college just hire any able-bodied football player it wanted, even a pro who’d never finished college?

  • 11179188

    Football and basketball, the big cost/high revenue sports drive these decisions, but most of these schools field 20+ teams that don’t command the atention and resources of the big 2. Softball and baseball, for example, play dozens and dozens of games, travelling all over the country from February till June.  Broadening their travel range means more time on the road, more time in airports, more time in hotels, less time in class.  I know this will sound naive, but I wish student-athlete well-being would play a part in these decisions.

  • supertatie

    Me, too!  Time for Notre Dame to win it’s first national championship in over 20 years!

  • supertatie

    I don’t see how this would work.  “Room and board” for a 25 year old?  So, you pay their way for 4 years as an athlete, and then you pay their way for another 4 years as a student? 
     

    As Goxewu points out, if you don’t have to be admitted to college, why wouldn’t this just go the way of the Olympics, and have the colleges hire well-paid gladiators – professionals?  And, if someone isn’t going to school, why insist that they can only play for three years?  Or four years?  Or five years?  If they’re winning football games, will schools let them go, with no “graduation” as a demarcation point?  Or perhaps the schools will go even younger, instead of older, and start bringing them in from high school.

    If they’re winning football games, they will have to be paid.  Lots.  And then, like the pro teams, it won’t just be a question of changing conferences, it will be teams actually leaving SCHOOLS.  The USC Trojans can become the UCLA Trojans for the right amount of money, just like the pro teams hold cities hostage if they don’t get their new stadiums. 

    There is no such thing as a “free education,” and tuition has already
    outstripped inflation by some ridiculous multiplier.  The rest of us who
    don’t play sports would end up subsidizing this.  College is increasingly beyond the means of all but the most financially successful.  Or, it saddles people with student loans the size of mortgages.  Offering to hand out “free education” is absurd.

    Not to mention the inevitable cries of “racism” when the majority of paid athletes – who under this proposal would not ever have to get a college education – turn out to be African-American.  When their stint as a “paid college athlete” is done, and they opt not to attend college, and they find themselves with injuries and concussions, but no pro career, and no education, then what?

  • kpartlow

    Great and timely article. I’d like to think that Dr. Hudzik would be pleased to know that his former Senior International Officer colleagues in the CIC (Big Ten Universities and the University of Chicago) have recently chosen to invest their time and resources into deeper collaborations aimed at advancing their universities’ missions through comprehensive internationalization. One upcoming collaboration is the hosting of the Global University Summit 2012 in May in Chicago, where the CIC with the University of Illinois are co-hosting an international gathering of some 100 presidents of research universities around the world in conjunction with the G8 summit.The theme of the Summit is “Developing Talent to Drive Innovation in a Global Society.” For more information, go to: http://www.engagement.illinois.edu/globalsummit2012/

  • wedigo

    Dear John

    A great and necessary
    article pinpointing to the needs of internationalization and the necessary
    measures to be taken. It is important to develop a campus culture that views an
    international academic experience as self-evident. It needs the leadership but
    especially the faculty of an institution to convince students to register for
    courses with a compulsory international component. Though I want to stress a
    European view: excursions of a few weeks are not the best means for an
    international experience. Experiencing cultural differences and teaching and developing
    sensitivity needs time and should be incorporated into the curriculum wherever
    possible. I fully agree with John that we do not experience a paradigm shift in
    the basic concept but a change in scale. Your mention of the most important
    points of emphasis is absolutely correct, vital and a good compass to success.
    Thank you!

  • sotohana

    Thanks so much for your contribution, John.
    What can I say if I read you and others about this issue! I am a researcher and teacher in a developing country, Mexico. I think this emphasis is important to stablished a comprehensive internationalization program at mexican HEIS.

  • Socratease2

    Science is a method of observation and testing, it makes no sense to say “science thinks” anything because only people can think and science itself only supports what repeated empirical testing by people confirms. Science has no position on the existence or non-existence of the matrix. I, on the other hand, do have an opinion. What the hell are you talking about? Is this the Keanu Reeve’s matrix or something that might actually exist and can be tested by science? What tripartite nature of man? I’m afraid to ask but what the hell.

  • http://crystalmatrix.us/ Major_Ray

    Socratease2 
    Scientists do think and we draw conclusions based on observations. However, my point is that since man is not just material, there are some realities that are beyond science.  Spiritual discernment is no less true because science cannot measure it. I am a scientist and a theologian and I have yet to find any conflict between the two. The conflict is in the  interpretation of observable data. It’s like being able to see beyond the veil while the people on the other side are calling you a liar. Accumulated knowledge does not translate into wisdom. Read Matt 24, Luke 21, and Mark 13 KJV. Also see John 3:16. I hope you find Jesus, brother.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001487392929 Juan Galindo

    What is science?
    In essence, science is a perpetual search for an intelligent and integrated comprehension of the world we live in.
    Cornelius Bernardus Van Neil (1897- ) U. S. microbiologist.
    Dear colleaguas Congratulations.