• Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Previous

Next

College Coaches Could Benefit From More Instruction on Title IX, Report Says

August 1, 2011, 4:04 pm

How much do college coaches know about Title IX? And why does it matter?

These are the questions that preoccupy Ellen Staurowsky of Ithaca College, who has long had the impression—but no empirical evidence to back it up—that Title IX is an oft-discussed but little-understood topic in college athletics.

“There’s so much controversy around Title IX, and coaches are an incredible conduit of information to athletes,” she told me recently. Yet, she says, “there’s been no attempt to figure out how much coaches know about Title IX.”

Knowing the law exists is different than actually understanding it, thought Staurowsky, a former athletic director at William Smith College who is now a professor of sport management at Ithaca. So she crafted a survey and sent it to 4,500 coaches across all three NCAA divisions. Aimed at measuring “Title IX literacy,” the survey—which drew responses from nearly 1,100 male and female coaches, the majority of them head coaches, in 22 sports—revealed that many stumble over the fundamentals of the federal gender-equity law. (The results of the survey, which concluded last year, will be published in a forthcoming article in the Journal of Intercollegiate Sport.)

Staurowsky’s hunch was partly correct. The majority of coaches scored well in their understanding of Title IX’s three-pronged approach to compliance (70 percent were correct) and of the law’s proportionality test (80 percent). But their knowledge of Title IX was spotty in some other key areas. One of the questions, for instance, asked respondents in a true-or-false format to state whether Title IX enforcement calls for a quota system. Only 16 percent chose the correct answer, which is “false.” On another question, she asked coaches to answer whether booster money was governed by Title IX (it is). On that question, only 38 percent selected the correct answer.

But the responses also suggested a reason for the gap in knowledge: The vast majority of coaches—83 percent—reported that they never received formal instruction on Title IX as part of their preparation for becoming a coach. Instead, most said they learned about Title IX from news headlines and NCAA publications.

So why does it matter whether coaches know the particulars of a 39-year-old federal law?

For starters, Staurowsky says, it’s hard to know whether the law is being enforced without first knowing what it requires. And she said she was concerned that a lack of understanding in some athletic departments could have a chilling effect: Among female respondents, 70 percent said they felt it was their responsibility to advocate for gender equity within their athletic department. Yet 20 percent of female respondents also reported that they felt they could be fired if they raised concerns about gender equity.

“When we already have so few female coaches to begin with”—recent studies suggest that women make up 20 percent of all college coaches—“that means that this is a significant amount of pressure,” Staurowsky says.

As Title IX heads into its fourth decade, Staurowksy says she’d like to see athletic departments be more proactive about educating coaches on the nuances of the law. She acknowledges that it won’t be easy. Coaches are a famously busy lot, and adding one more item to their to-do list “might be seen as too much,” she says.

But the open-ended comments at the end of the survey gave her hope that at least a few coaches might be open to more guidance.  “The coaches poured their hearts out,” she says of the comments. From both sides of the Title IX debate, Staurowsky says, their message was often pleading: “We would like some way out of this quagmire.”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • budlevin

    yup. i cannot imagine ignoring an acquaintance as we pass in the hallway. any acquaintance. maybe it’s a southern thing, but i like it. 

    i’m at a small and friendly school (ca 3000ftes).  we do tend to give each other an emotional boost when it seems needed. or even when not.   seems to work — it’s a happy place. 

  • vceross

    What immensely weak egos academics have!  What’s most important to us is that our opinions are heard and our abilities recognized?  We sound like children, or lovers.  Good lord.  I expected to see such things as courseload reductions, research funding, sabbaticals, promotions, offices, resources, etc.  You know, the kinds of things rational beings in the workplace typically seek from higher-ups.  Give me money, time, resources and I’ll tip my hat to you when you cold-shoulder me in the halls.

  • jon_margerumleys

     Here’s a Midwestern perspective–to the best of my ability, I acknowledge _everyone_ I meet in the hall, whether I know them or not.  Why walk past people that you could connect with, at least for a moment?

  • sand6432

    There would be no Title IX controversy if it weren’t for the imbalance that football introduces into the system.  What school would eliminate football to solve a Title IX problem? Rather, the burden is upon all other men’s sports to right the imbalance created by football. Is this fair?–Sandy Thatcher (a former male varsity swimmer)

  • linzhi

    Are you crazy in fashion brand?  Do you want to get a fashion handbags ? I know a Designer Handbags Outlet shop ,which offer most designer handbags .If you are interest ,please follow me ,i will take you to the designer world.

  • lesmaha

    Also, the Canadian Mounties were on the job in New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina.

  • coyabean

    Such critical thinking here! I doubt that parking, in and of itself, led this man to quit. Horrible parking after accumulating 31 years of other grievances is what likely led him to quit. If you’ve never had a job where one more insipid comment or 4 hour meeting or bad boss or level of security added to the copier machine access doesn’t push you to do what you wanted to do anyway – quit – then maybe you’re the one with the privilege problem. It’s human. Leave him alone.

  • ramanujam

    Parking is a problem on my campus, too, especially on rainy days.  In a couple of cases, faculty members came back to take their motor cycles and found the tyres deflated.  A punishment for parking the vehicles at unauthorized places on campus!  What is much more vexatious than inadequate parking is professors lining up to use the only one men’s room on campus.  In June 2011, when we came back to college after summer holidays, we found that the loo had disappeared and that a classroom stood in its place!

  • spinnaker

    The chair has his own space, but is only on campus three of five days. No reason the sign couldn’t say “reserved for chair M-T-R.

  • http://www.facebook.com/andy.guy3 Andy Guy

    There are some great ridesharing applications that colleges and universities can get that alleviate these problems.  Check out Ridaroo – ridaroo.com.  My school used them and it saved a lot of people money.

  • drmink

    I served on a university parking committee, so I have a special perspective on the issue. Enforcement is a cash cow for the university. We made over $600,000 a year in student parking fines, and increased enforcement on days when it rained and snowed. They were the days the students were more willing to risk a ticket for parking illegally. Garages are expensive (we turned down a thousand space garage because of the 10 million dollar price tag). We ultimately shipped students off to the far end of campus, provided more shuttles, and told them to be grateful we didn’t make them walk. They were not happy.

    As for faculty, why do you insist that the only viable option is to wait for a space to open in the lot of your choice? The first thing I learned as a new faculty member was that if I arrived at a certain time or day, parking was always available in this lot, but not in others. It took about a month. While I was not happy passing student vehicles parked illegally, I never turned down a opportunity to have them ticketed. I even told an ROTC professor to talk to his students about the role of honor when I caught one parked illegally in the faculty lot.

    I’m sort of spoiled at my new job. Parking is $20/year, and the only lots that are ever full are the faculty ones. I part in the free lot 50 yards away, but my colleagues still complain about the lack of space. I just smile. 

  • minnesotan

    For my generation, walking distance was uphill, both ways!

  • http://twitter.com/proedgeltd David Matthews

    it just proves that even on a striving world economy and shortage of petroleum products– skyrocketting prices, people want to stay within their comfort zone.

  • 11274135

    We had a delightful person the the parking office whose tag at the bottom of her emails was “Parking is my responsibility, not my fault.”

  • studenthealth

    Anassa kata kalo kale ia ia ia nike.  Bryn Mawr!  Bryn Mawr!  Bryn Mawr!  President McAuliffe and women making a caring difference in the world. (forgive the fractured Greek)  Margaret Ross MD (Link) BA 1970  Director, Behavioral Medicine, Boston University Student Health Services

  • karld

    It isn’t just international business, this problem exists locally as well.  There is a lack of collaboration between higher education and small businesses that might not have direct international sales.  Colleges and Universities should concentrate on providing work ready graduates, whether they chose creative writing, theater arts, or mechanical engineering.

  • gloverparker

    The Dean is right.  Many of us have been discussing the importance of purposefully linking international experiences – work, service, study and internships – to the career development of students.  See my article in the NAFSA International Educator, “The Right Tool for the Job,” and my recent AIFS publication, “Student Guide to Study Abroad and Career Development.”  Senior campus administrators need to approach the needs of the global marketplace with a vision of designing international experiences which have the intended outcome of strengthening student intercultural competencies to enable them to better compete in the global workforce. See more on my Global Career Compass blog at: http://globalcareercompass.wordpress.com/2011/12

    Martin Tillman

  • rhoccrim

    The increasing amount of interaction around the globe requires a cultural sensitivity and understanding as the background and foundation for these interactions. Most US based global corporations require their upper echelon of leaders to serve at least a few years in posts outside the US if you want to advance in the organization. The skill sets developed, the tweaking of the US centric worldview, the understanding of foreign markets and societies, cannot be adequately developed via live video conferencing or History Channel excerpts. It requires a cultural communication capability that should start early in an academic career and be reinforced throughout student’s studies.
       

  • mscardenas

    I agree with the questions that need to be asked and subsequently answered. Our students are more diverse now than they were 20, 10 even 5 years ago and it’s imperative that our faculty/admin reflect this diversity.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=626155601 Gordon Brooks

    Does anyone else find the caption under the foot image odd?  We have eight fossil bones from a foot and they happen to be identical to a common gorilla’s foot, but it is confidently asserted that the fossils are not from a gorilla???  I can’t smell or taste it, but it sure looks like fossil bones from a gorilla so where does my logic break down?  Either way, it seems like a rather weak foundation to build a conclusion on, pun intended :o).

  • kweber

    If you read the article, you’ll find that the bones in this foot were capable of making motions that a gorilla is not. Though I agree, the image is strangely captioned for making that point…

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=626155601 Gordon Brooks

    Thanks for the reply.  I did read the article, but it still seems to follow the same logic that if it looks like gorilla bones, then they likely are and we don’t need to add any interpretation to them.  I realize there will be slight differences and a 4.4 million year old fossil could have seen additional deterioration during that time.  It just seems inconclusive to base a lot of what this article states as fact when there has been no discussion about the physiology of the (missing) hip for example or if these 8 bones show different attachment points for ligaments and tendons.  Can you see those sorts of things on a fossil that old?  Please understand I’m not trying to be rude or argumentative.  I simply want to understand how these conclusions are reached.