• Monday, May 28, 2012

Previous

Next

The Misogyny of Thieves

August 3, 2010, 2:28 pm

Unless all you want is a joy ride, stealing a car is a two-step process. First you have to steal it. Then you have to sell it.

Often car thieves have mentors who guide them during their first thefts. In a new paper, based on interviews with 35 active car thieves in St. Louis, researchers quote a thief known as Killa, who says he serves as a “technical adviser” to up-and-coming criminals:

I’m like switching roles from learning to now teaching. Some look out, some know how to break it down, some know how to just do it all themselves. It’s all in how they learn. You gotta learn from someone. Yeah, it’s a cycle.

This mentorship process was pretty much the same for both men and women who were learning to steal cars. The women were taught how to quickly bypass keyed ignitions, how to flick wires together to start the engines. They also learned how to take advantage of careless motorists who left their cars running in their driveways or while they ran into a store.

But when it comes to dumping the cars, men have an advantage. They are more connected to a social network of criminals that provides access to chop shops, where the cars can be dismantled and sold for parts. Women often didn’t know how to profitably dispose of their stolen goods. If they did know of a chop shop, their access was only through a male thief.

From the paper:

Without these contacts the ability to profit from auto theft was significantly curtailed. The next profitable source for those who lack access to these higher outlets was to sell vehicle parts and accessories on the streets. … Yet, even those who sold parts on the street relied upon social networks to either move parts or become aware of customers.

While it was harder for women to gain access to criminal networks, once they earned the trust of “male gatekeepers” they were able to profit from the vehicles they had stolen. Which provides some hope that this glass ceiling (windshield?) might eventually be smashed.

(The article, published in Justice Quarterly, is titled “Establishing Connections: Gender, Motor Vehicle Theft, and Disposal Networks.” The authors are Christopher W. Mullins and Michael G. Cherbonneau.)

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment (6)

6 Responses to The Misogyny of Thieves

11272784 - August 3, 2010 at 5:20 pm

Let’s avoid the temptation to start a distance learning program for this “profession”, mmmmmmm’kay?

11319762 - August 3, 2010 at 6:07 pm

How about Angelina Jolie in “Gone in 60 Seconds”? Or Parker in “Leverage”?

nuffsed - August 4, 2010 at 10:33 am

Where’s the ACLU when you need them? (Tongue firmly planted in cheek) Sheesh.

dr_redrum - August 4, 2010 at 3:21 pm

Was there any link found between gender and model or size of car stolen? For instance, did the women steal Priuses and Fits – small in size – while the men stole Escalades and Hummers – big in size?

tombartlett - August 5, 2010 at 11:41 am

@dr_redrum The study didn’t mention what kinds of cars the thieves were stealing, so no breakdown by gender on that.

cmullins - September 2, 2010 at 3:01 pm

@dr_redrum–our data showed that women (and men for that matter) targeted cars they knew how to steal (i.e., the old screwdriver in the ignition trick). This was mainly older cars without sophisticated protection technology. Size had nothing to do with it, as you well knew when you posted.