• Monday, May 28, 2012

Previous

Next

Helping Kentucky Tell Its Tales

August 24, 2011, 6:30 pm

The gift of the gab is alive and well in Kentucky.

For 50 years, William Lynwood Montell, a professor emeritus in folklore studies at Western Kentucky University, has recorded stories in the Bluegrass State from varied professions—doctors, lawyers, funeral-parlor operators, one-room school teachers. Each collection has become a “Tales From” title in a long-running collection of books from the University Press of Kentucky. Montell’s latest, Tales From Kentucky Sheriffs, is just out this month.

Sheriffs proved particularly forthcoming. To gather their accounts, the folklorist did what he has long done: He set out with his tape recorder in hand not just to workplaces and conventions but also county fairs, blueberry festivals, and other gatherings, and just bounded up and asked people to tell him about their lives.

For his sheriffs book, he learned all about the lawman’s life from characters with names like Peanut Gaines, Fuzzy Keesee, and Tuffy Snedegar. They recalled the good old days when an out-of-work young man could go to the sheriff’s office, ask for a job, and be out on the street the next day, deputy’s badge pinned to his chest.

There, with not a scrap of formal training under his gun belt, the new deputy was ready to confront perps of many varieties: runners of moonshine, marijuana, and methamphetamines; a drug addict who tries to hide, naked, in her clothes dryer; a fella who complains that the sheriff has arrived to arrest him too late to get him to the local lockup in time for dinner; a monster of a football player, deranged by LSD, driving a stolen milk truck the wrong way down an interstate; and drunken brawlers, of course, but sometimes they could be the sheriff’s own friends.

Montell says of his sources: “The stories they tell me are so important because they describe what local life was like”—specifically, what it was like for citizens who might not normally figure in history books. “I could care less writing about kings, queens, and presidents,” says the scholar, in what is clearly a much-practiced line.

The scholar is a native of Monroe County, in the state’s south. After working as a bank teller and a stint in the U.S. Navy, he enrolled at Western Kentucky University and got hooked on folklore during a course in his senior year. He went on to a doctorate at Indiana University and studied folklore, social and cultural history, and cultural geography. He then worked at Campbellsville College (now University), in his home state, before taking a job at Western Kentucky in 1969. He founded the institution’s folklore department in 1972, and until 1999 taught and did research there.

Montell found the oral history of his state to be fertile ground. To date, he has published 27 books with Kentucky.

Particularly since retiring, the oral historian has pumped out volumes at a rate of about three books every two years. For Tales From Kentucky Funeral Homes (2009), he collected the reminiscences of funeral-home directors and embalmers about the business of burying over the previous 50 years. They told of old burial practices, African-American funeral customs, funerals in snake-handling congregations, burial mix-ups, in-home embalming, fainting relatives, pallbearers falling into graves, and even of the old days when a funeral director might travel on a horse-drawn wagon to a remotely located corpse.

Just as informative and entertaining were Kentucky lawyers—their Tales From book appeared in 2003. One told Montell: “A woman was sitting on the witness stand, and the lawyer asked her, ‘Did you, or did you not, on the night of June 23rd have sex with a hippie on the back of a motorcycle in a peach orchard?’ She thought a few minutes, then said, ‘What was that date again?’”

The lawyers were not only funny; they were also forthcoming with insider details, such as how judges take to dogs wandering unwelcome into court.

Little wonder that Montell’s books have done well for the Kentucky press. They have brought in about $600,000 over the years, and all have sold over 1,000 copies. Some continue to sell more than 500 copies each year even a decade after publication. His best seller has been the lawyers volume, which has sold about 6,000 copies for around $80,000.

Mind you, far outstripping all the Tales From Kentucky titles have been Montell’s two books of ghost stories, which have moved over 20,000 copies, each. Their subject matter, says John P. Hussey, director of marketing and sales at Kentucky, snuck in under the press’s mandate to represent the local lore of the state. “Our regional publishing program is a little different from some university presses that might not take a title with the word ‘ghost’ in it,” he says. “It’s part of a folklore emphasis, for us.”

Montell puts it this way: “Ghost stories do have scary elements, naturally, but I love ghost stories because they begin by describing an old house, how many rooms are in it, and what kind of furniture, and then the weird personality of Uncle Joe or Auntie Jane.”

Not to preserve what he does would be to lose whole slabs of the state’s history, he says: “Historians used to say that folklore was the falsehood of history; but in reality it’s the history of 99.99 percent of the world’s population that never gets in the history books.

“The stories people tell me are so important because they describe what local life was like.”
He says such is the case, for example, when a sheriff tells him about not taking people to jail but instead buying them a burger to sober up, and dropping them at home.

Montell sees his mission as one of promoting a form of social equity: He says interviewees often exclaim “’You’re a university professor and you want to talk to me about these things?’

“By golly, that’s why I’m so proud of what I’ve done.”

So proud that, even at a still-youthful 80, he presses on with more volumes. His current projects are on preachers’ and nurses’ stories. While his books don’t come with much scholarly apparatus, they have made him something of a legend among folklorists. He has received many awards, including a 2001 Governor’s Arts Award in the folk heritage category.

Montell is also a publicist’s dream. Wherever he goes around the various reaches of the state—the rural, the Appalachian, the urban, the academic—he hauls boxes of his books to sell to any takers. And he similarly misses no opportunity to tell younger Kentuckians to get out from in front of televisions and computer screens and ask their grandmas and granddaddies to tell the old family stories.

They can always do what Montell did with his grandchildren: Take them camping in a cave and regale them with the tales his grandparents told him. “And,” he says, “by golly”—he uses the phrase often—“my grandchildren have not forgotten those stories.”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • gsudduth

    Interdisciplinary doesn’t EVEN want to hear from MFA artists; after being riffed I haven’t gotten much more than a ‘thanks for applying’ if that.

  • ohiograd

    Twice in the past year we have offered a position to a person who at first was not offered the position.  When the initial frontrunner didn’t work out (for any number of reasons), we went back to the ‘also ran’ and offered the position to him/her…primarily because our 2nd choice conducted herself/himself so well in the aftermath.   In my own case, I didn’t get a significant promotion first time around, but a year later the president came back to me and ‘gave’ me the position and said it was one of the biggest mistakes he had made in his career (to overlook me the first time).  Whenever you conduct yourself with dignity in these situations, you stand a better chance, both at your own institution and at others, of earning the next advance in your career.

  • fly_on_the_wall

    Frankly, all of these travails and the entire premise of this piece is
    painfully hard to swallow for well over 50% of readers of this publication. I
    am not unsympathetic, mind you. What do you think the situation of the average
    adjunct is? Our lives are endless turn-downs for positions we are already showing
    we are doing masterfully and deserve chances for better. We inhabit a very strange professional world in which all of the basic values to be upheld are instead up-ended. The proof in the pudding is the incomprehensibly bad management that riddles the campuses and departments where we work, and more bittersweet, in the many students who make efforts to take every course we teach, who when we tell them we cannot give academic advice come to us anyway for life guidance, and tell us point blank that we are the best thing that has
    ever happened in their education (this happened to me twice only yesterday, and
    many times before). But just getting an interview is practically a life-changing event. And after 9 years of looking yielded only 4, all of which were turn-downs at different institutions in my state for positions I obviously was highly qualified, three of which for reasons of political correctness over educational skill and therefore as blatant as they were unstated, I gave up three years ago. I began looking to leave this state and this profession, since clearly, this state and this profession do not want me regardless of how well I do it. It’s an illusive search in this employment climate. I feel your pain. Now, how about feeling mine? And doing something about it.

  • 22054280

    I knew this would be the position that I would be in when I was asked by the provost what I would do if I did not get the job.  Not expecting the question, I responded with honesty – that I would be mad and upset for a while and then I would realize that I am on the team and do my job the best I could.  So, they hired the other person, she came and was a failure for the 8 months she was here.  She could not relate to any of us, made work tense and unfriendly, and resigned because of it.  Playing second fiddle only made worse by waiting for her to leave 3 months after she announced her resignation and not stepping on her toes while she did no work for the future.  No search the second time, just an automatic appointment minus the pay increase.  Now the question is whether to leave this place to feel respected.  I agree with the other posts that doing the work for others while they get the credit is not a long term solution.  I also think that going to work in a place where you do not feel valued is a continuous challenge.   

  • laker

    Years ago I applied for an “Assistant to…” position for which I was well-qualified and in which I was very interested. I was passed over in favor of an opportunity hire, which I understood, and could support given the university’s lack of diversity at that level, at that time. What dismayed me was the way the hire used the position to complete a dissertation on the university’s time and subsequent move to a position outside the organization. I received the nicest, and most complimentary “rejection” letter of my career (I have kept it) and stayed positive about the college and my options. Six months later I was hired by one of the Deans as an Associate Director and Special Assistant to the Dean for … which opened up great opportunities for me professionally and personally. Staying positive, continuing to good work and being a team player made the difference for me. Anger is a counter productive emotion and activity.

  • misstrudy

    The stories I am reading here are hair-rising. I am aware that there are two—three, four, or more!–sides to a story, of course, but I also tend to believe that hiring practices are more often than not far from being strictly fair or based on merit. Other things count, such as who you know, who likes you, the biases of the members of the hiring committee, etc.  In my case, I have not been selected a couple of times for what I believed to be my dream job and for which I considered myself a perfect fit. Perhaps something is wrong with me, but when not selected even for an interview, and knowing that others were selected I didn’t think were such a great fit, I cannot recall feeling more than a “oh well!” sort of brief disappointment and didn’t dwell long on it at all.  Not even more than a couple of days, if that. I cannot imagine going on a rampage about it.  Nevertheless, I don’t think the less of those that react otherwise.  If a person believes strongly that a case has to be made about it publicly or that he/she is not appreciated and should leave for another job, then maybe he or she should actually do that.  Taking what is defined here as “the high road” is not always the best thing to do for that person or that circumstance.

  • http://www.facebook.com/DanaCruikshank Dana Cruikshank

    A non-academic example – I worked at a major television network and got cut in a large lay-off action in the 2001 recession. Jobs in the industry were scare, and there was plenty of competition. A former co-worker who was also a good friend and I wound up finalists for a job at another network. The executive in charge showed up 45 minutes late for my interview, and it was clear he had forgotten the appointment. After saying he had another meeting in 15, I offered to reschedule. No, no, he insisted, we could meet now. I did the best I could in the remaining 10 minutes. Later that day, my friend interviewed for the full 90 minutes and surprise!, she got the job. It seemed so unfair (and frankly, it was). I was furious. Another former colleague advised me against lodging some sort of complaint – it wouldn’t get me the job and could get me labeled as ‘difficult’. My friend who got the job took me out for a drink and said she was sorry how things turned out, but she didn’t really have anything to apologize for, she hadn’t done anything wrong. It was hard to accept at the time, but she was right.
    In time, I had another position in the industry, a strong friendship that still endures and the realization that I dodged a bullet – I could have worked for a rather flakey boss. It works out in the end, but it helps to have people around you who can help you see the big picture, lick your wounds and not add any self-inflicted one. If you’re in this position, surround yourself with such people.

  • http://www.facebook.com/DanaCruikshank Dana Cruikshank

    and help those you know who end up in similar straights.

  • http://www.facebook.com/DanaCruikshank Dana Cruikshank

    I like your line about wallowing in self-pity for a day. It’s important to face the anger and rejection head on, but not to dwell on it. Have your catharsis, vent it out in a health way, then move on. You’ll thank yourself for it later.

  • redkhan

    Having just begun the “better opportunity” than the one I wanted, I’d like to share some of the challenges involved.  I had competed with a colleague in an election for department chair that he won. But I decided to throw my loyalty toward my colleague who became chair for the remainder of his tenure in the position rather than fight it or even regret it. First, it took no time at all for the inappropriateness of the choice of a less qualified person to be noticed. Department members who had not voted for me expressed regret and hinted that they would support a coup d’etat of sorts.  It took a lot of forbearance not to join the “trash the new chair” movement.  Second, it was difficult to watch consistently bad decisions being made that affected the future of both people I cared about and people who, in some sense, deserved to bear the consequences of their choice.  I had to fight a very perverse schadenfreude for several years.  Finally, when the chair crashed and burned in a rather spectacular way that even transcended some of the department’s worst expectations, I had to fight the urge (and the mixed signals from department members) to go for the chair position again. Over the year in which the old chair was on his way out and a new chair was being chosen, I finally learned in every possible way that, while I could be the chair I wanted to be, I could never be the chair my colleagues wanted.  

  • swagato

    My comment was not at all flippant. Although I can see how it may be (mis)perceived as flippancy, you will actually note that I do not denigrate the work adjuncts do at all. Rather, I simply advocate for a somewhat rapid and perhaps “cold” downsizing of the labour glut faced by universities today. The only immorality involved here is, arguably, the immorality perpetrated by a would-be academic who persuades himself into believing he may be good enough to produce research and scholarship meriting a full-time tenure position at a leading university.

  • 22108469

    What a great publishing tale. Would love to read more “Tales from American University Presses.”

  • http://www.facebook.com/jon.kay2 Jon Kay

    What a great article for a great scholar! Lynwood has been a mentor for several generations of scholars interested in folklore and regional culture. I had the good pleasure to take an oral history and folklore class with him at WKU. A class that shaped my work as a public humanist.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=8115295 Libby Tucker

    A wonderful article about one of our great folklorists! Lynwood Montell’s book “Ghosts along the Cumberland” inspired me to write my own study of college ghostlore.

  • linzhi

    How many fashion brands do you know of sunglasses ? LV ,Gucci ,Prada, Oakley ,Ranban and so on. I fina a Sunglasses Online Sale e-shopping which offers most fashion brands of sunglasses ,and the items on website are very cheap and high quality , you should love it.

  • cp3242

    Having worked in admissions for the better part of a decade, I have serious concerns about early action and early decision programs. 

    1) In talking with high school seniors, I’ve come to realize that most of them do not understand these programs. Those who attend private prep schools often have the benefit of former selective admissions counselors turned college counselors. However, most students remain confused. Each school plays the Early Action/Early Decision game differently, so even when I offer free workshops, I can’t education middle income to low-income kids about a common set of standards. 

    2) In addition to not understanding the admission policies, many students misunderstand the financial impact of Early Action or Early Decision. What do terms like “loan free” and “need blind” mean? When I explain to students that meeting “100% of demonstrated need” means that they are still responsible for paying or borrowing whatever the government deems is their EFC, they are often surprised. They thought that applying Early Decision to a “loan free” school was safe… until they realized that as a middle-income kid, they could still be responsible or $20,000/year or more in college costs. I’ve also spoken with students who don’t apply Early Action because they fear financial penalty, even when it’s not binding. I can’t say that I blame them because applying Early Action does give the impression that you’re willing to pay if you’re admitted. 

    3) If you’ve spent much time with seniors, you’ll know that they change their minds almost daily about where they’re going to school. One student who was absolutely CERTAIN of her decision in August when she began the early admissions process was miserable in the spring at the thought of attending the school. Why do we keep pushing the timeline back when the vast majority of students are not ready to make such a heavy decision? 

  • rmsouthall

    What I find most interesting about the proposed “legislation” and the comments being made during the override period is that college athletes, over whose existence and monetary well being NCAA-member university athletic administrators hold sway are completely left out of this discussion. And the kicker is, no one seems to see anything fundamentally inequitable about this. 

    The NCAA and its members’ college-sport hegemony is so complete that both NCAA-member athletic department administrators and the general public perceive the mere consideration of these proposals as evidence of college-sport’s paternalistic beneficence. In addition, if any ungrateful current or former college athlete were to have the temerity to suggest revamping the “Collegiate Model” and allow athletes to just be paid up to the full cost of attendance, the most likely refrain would be, “Don’t you realize you’re already getting a free education?”

    Within this hegemonic landscape one thing is conveniently lost on many observers: NCAA athletes can – and routinely do – violate NCAA policies, but since they are not NCAA members, they cannot introduce or vote on any such proposed legislation. During next month’s NCAA Convention, when any “student-athletes” in attendance (for whom this educational collegiate model supposedly exists) register and receive their credentials, the sign describing their “White” lanyard will read: “Voting rights – no Speaking rights – no.”

    When the “powers that be” within the NCAA membership determine they cannot afford either an increase in athletes’  pay or multi-year discounts on grant-in-aids payments, the proposals will simply be over-ridden and the voiceless athletes will have no recourse but to accept the state of affairs. But, I’m sure the athletes, through the NCAA’s Student Athlete Advisory Committee (SAAC) will loudly advise the NCAA membership of their displeasure.

  • sand6432

    The opposition to these measures, especially the one against multi-year scholarships, helps reveal that the emperor of college sports being supposedly for the benefit of the “student-athlete” wears no clothes. If this isn’t a revelation of purely business interests embedded in academe, what is? — Sandy Thatcher

  • conahec4u

    Certainly, I’ll be interested in learning more about Shiv Nadar University. Please send me the information to fmarmole@email.arizona.edu 

  • conahec4u

    In response to jlowers and sanmarcos08, in the article I mentioned that the full funding is provided by the Albukhary Foundation. This foundation was established by Mr. Syed Mkhtar Albukhary. Coming from a poor and disadvantaged family, Mr. Albukhary made the promise some 20 years ago “to establish a university to provide opportunities to bright students from underprivileged and disadvantaged backgrounds to receive tertiary education and become useful, productive and caring members of society”

  • conahec4u

    Thanks for sharing your reflections on your visit to AIU.

  • The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • 1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
  • Washington, D.C. 20037