• Monday, May 28, 2012

Previous

Next

Do They Play Soccer Against the Upper East Side Philosophers?

August 5, 2011, 5:05 pm

In the age of print on demand, every Tom, Dick and Stanislaw can set up a publishing house of his or her own. Some do, at times inventing the name of a publisher just to provide cover for the novel or self-help book one desperately wants to present to an eager world.

But few have sought to compete with university presses, gatekeepers of the high-cultural and scholarly. Let’s be serious, after all—there’s not much buck-bang in being serious. Publish monograph writers without subventions? Publish highbrow, rarefied material without a university to underwrite the losses? The absence of a thousand scholarly and high-literary presses blooming in the age of self-publishing confirms an old truth: Most people aren’t crazy.

All the more reason to welcome Upper West Side Philosophers, Inc., a previously unknown (to this critic) venture that sent along two slim volumes to be considered for the 2011 National Book Critics Circle Award in Criticism. At first, looking at the return address, I presumed the package came from a cult that worships Isaac Bashevis Singer.

Not so. In fact the two petite volumes are from far-from-petite names: the much-lauded German poet  Durs Grünbein, winner of Germany’s Büchner and Nietzsche prizes, and the even more renowned German cultural critic Hans Magnus Enzensberger, who has, over his four decades of scintillating work, picked up not just the Büchner Prize, but the Heinrich Böll, Heinrich Heine, and Erich Maria Remarque prizes.

As Singer might have cracked, “They need an NBCC Prize?”

Both Enzensberger’s Fatal Numbers: Why Count On Chance, translated by Karen Leeder, and Grünbein’s The Vocation of Poetry, translated by Michael Eskin, are niftily packaged essays about the size of those excellent “Prickly Paradigm” paperbacks from Marshall Sahlins—no shame in an era when Harry Frankfurt’s On Bullshit makes the bite-sized book a success many would like to emulate.

On their own merits, both books delight. Grünbein’s essay, prefaced by a warm piece recalling how he learned words from his puzzle-master grandfather, is his 2009 public lecture delivered at Frankfurt’s Goethe University on the 50th anniversary of the Frankfurt Poetry Lectures. It  begins by noting that the lecture is being held in the so-called Poelzig building, the former corporate headquarters of I.G. Farben, developer of the Zyklon B pesticide used in the gas chambers. Frankfurt University bought the building in 1996—it now houses the departments of theology, philosophy, history, culture studies and modern languages.

Grünbein can’t help observing that, across town, the university’s legendary Lecture Hall Number Six, where Adorno wondered about writing poetry after Auschwitz, is slated for demolition. The lecture gets even more stinging as Grünbein turns autobiographical about his fast-rising career and what’s aesthetically possible in poetry today. The Vocation of Poetry makes an inviting entry point to his work—see Ashes for Breakfast: Selected Poems (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2005) for more.

The title essay of Enzensberger’s volume, in turn, offers this highly insightful polymath meditating on probability, with historical sweep back to Girolamo Cardano, author of the 1524 treatise On Casting the Die. (If the Paduan scholar  and trickster were alive today, he’d be cheating at three-card-monte in Times Square while holding a research appointment at Columbia.)

Enzensberger, now in his 80s, then ranges forward to pondering the notion that “whenever one is dealing with probabilities, there’s always a  catch.” Gödel, Turing, and Benoit Mandelbrot come into the conversation as Enzensberger mulls over fractals and the frequency distribution of outlier figures such as Christ and Stalin—along the way he plays with the “right of probability theory to exist.” In the book’s second short essay, “On the Metaphysical Antics of Mathematics,” Enzensberger is similarly resourceful,  invoking Robert Musil on the wonder of numbers. Like Grünbein, Enzensberger is a world-class writer and intellect whose work appears in English too rarely—for a broader taste of it, try Zig Zag: The Politics of Culture and Vice Versa (The New Press, 1998).

And who are the generous Manhattan patrons making Grünbein and Enzensberger more available to us? According to the “Upper West Side Philosophers, Inc.” website, two enterprising thinkers and entrepreneurs.

Kathrin Stengel, Ph.D., identified on the site as the group’s co-founder and president,  “studied philosophy at the Universities of Leuven (Belgium), Munich and Konstanz (Germany)” and “has taught philosophy at Seattle University and the Rhode Island School of Design.” Her bio on the site explains that Stengel, in addition to publishing “widely on ethics, aesthetics and epistemology” (she has a book titled Das Subjekt als Grenze (The Subject as Threshold) that compares Wittgenstein with Merleau-Ponty), also organizes “international philosophical events” and teaches Vipassana meditation.

Her co-founder and vice-president is Michael Eskin, Ph.D., identified as “a former Fellow of Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge” who has “taught at the University of Cambridge and Columbia University.” According to his bio, he publishes on Nabokov, Levinas, Bakhtin, Mandelstam and Celan. One of his engagingly titled publications, issued under the pseudonym Misha Waiman, is 17 Prejudices That We Germans Hold Against America and Americans and That Can’t Quite Be True.

Together—we’re guessing they’re together, since Eskin’s bio says he lives with his wife and three children in Manhattan, and Stengel’s bio says she lives with her husband and three children in Manhattan—they founded Upper West Side Philosophers Inc. a few years ago as “an independent space and place for the practice of philosophy in a way that is rigorous, yet embodied, disciplined, yet relaxed, historically founded, yet geared toward everyday life.”

According to the site, UWSP offers a philosophical studio in which you can practice “Yoga for the Mind”—a registered trademark “R” accompanies the phrase,  in case you think that “Inc.” is pure affectation—and philosophical walks in Riverside Park. You can even “order in” a philosopher “should you prefer practicing philosophical  thinking in a venue of your choice.”

Why shouldn’t one of the world’s oldest professions take a hint from another? At least the site doesn’t describe itself as “Incall/Outcall.”

Is this how Harvard University Press started? Or where Harvard University Press should be headed? Can other university presses get into the act, offering to hand-deliver volumes of, say,  the Loeb Classical Library, to your apartment, accompanied by baklava and ouzo?

Since this is PageView, not a blog on entrepreneurship, we’ll leave it there. As mentioned, the books bring us two world-class authors who should be better known here, especially by American humanists and literati. Further exploration of “Yoga for the Mind” is up to you.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • jasoncole765

    Book it: The Vocation of Poetry  is an awesome selection. My sister-in-law children saw me reading it and wanted to keep it :).  I was impressed with my young nieces thrust for knowledge I could not help but get her the adventures of cinnamon spice http://jpwbooks.com to read.  Fatal Numbers:  Now i must check this one out,  and the success of the pocket size book is trying to be repeated by  Penguin Books… something call the “Flipbook”…. Google it.

    Great Page View!

  • madamedelphine

    In recent years I have read all the publications available from UWS Philosophers and each one has been an intriguing experience.  “The Vocation of Poetry” and “Fatal Numbers,” the particular subjects of the above article, are written/translated with a lucid beauty.  These, and the other books available from UWS Philosophers, are remarkable for the insights they provide, and the ways in which they provoke and entertain the reader.

  • http://www.facebook.com/thomas.mcgonigle Thomas McGonigle

    I discovered this small publishing house a few years ago when they had a table at the small press fair in early December. They had published a book on suffering… I would love to have been able to write about these little books, but like Romano, it seems, we don’t know how to go about describing what these books are about. He printed his inability which takes the form of evasion, I did not print my inability by resorting to the silence of not writing… I do think on the other hand instead of publishing two authors who seem to be popular because of seeming to be both modern and vague, it would have been more interesting if theseublishers having access to the German language should have been publishing the greatest German writer since Goethe, Ernst Junger, whose untranslated books are of much more interest since they arise from Junger’s total engagement with what has created us now in the 21st Century…they should have shaken off the taboo against this essential voice.

  • sand6432

    It might be noted that Alfred and Blanche Knopf did much the same thing about 100 years ago when they imported and translated the works of European philosophers.—Sandy Thatcher

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1109293497 Alice Hunsberger

    Thanks for stepping into this river once and bringing us this catch. It makes me proud to be an Upper West Sider. I wonder how much they charge for a philosophy stroll—how to put a price on infinite value? Maybe there’s a Groupon. And really, that low blow about equally old professions, shouldn’t you have saved that for the big publishers who exist to turn a profit?

  • linzhi

    How many fashion brands do you know of sunglasses ? LV ,Gucci ,Prada, Oakley ,Ranban and so on. I fina a Sunglasses Online Sale e-shopping which offers most fashion brands of sunglasses ,and the items on website are very cheap and high quality , you should love it.

  • mbelvadi

    Many people, and unfortunately many school programs, confuse “gifted” with “high achieving”. Unfortunately, due to  a complex mix of factors, many poor minorities who are gifted are also low-achieving (usually called “underachieving” when they’re gifted). If the “gifted” programs are only designed for “gifted high achievers” then the minorities will be left out. It’s ironic, because they are exactly the students who can benefit the most from them, the ones who fail to cope with being ill-challenged in the regular program, as compared with the high achievers, who by definition cope well and just hit the “ceiling” on the regular programs.

  • erichoover

    11144703 – I don’t have a “narrative,” nor did I “erase” anyone. I was just directing readers to an interesting article that has implications for readers in higher education. And it’s true: summaries of articles often don’t cover all the details in nuances contained in those articles.

    Eric Hoover 

  • 11144703

    Eric,  I certainly understand (and thank you for your perceptive response).  However, I think your analysis requires you to more than merely passively pass off an article.  I’m still surprised you didn’t note that it erased Asians, although it’s perfectly understandable in the self-styled progressive media since Asians disrupt / transgress the progressive narrative (not your narrative, as I now realize) of the oppressive, perpetually privileged white people versus the long suffering, perpetually oppressed people of color.  No diversity, there.

  • Guest

    Music teachers are the right kind of gays in the eyes of the mainstream liberal media, so they are allowed to sleep with underaged boys without being demonized. 

  • jffoster

    For the record, you will note I used the pluperfect subjunctive.  I know of no cases where this actually happened in a Music College / Conservatory. Perhaps I should have written “If this were to have happened…..” to make the hypothetical abundantly clear.

  • cwinton

    The decision to play the last 3 games, whatever the motivation, at least fits with how teams that have been placed on probation are treated (although some might argue this case rises to the level of the one at SMU, where the NCAA required the school to shut down its program).  PSU will be bowl eligible, so the real proof in the pudding will be how they handle possible post season games.  To my thinking the school should announce it will not play beyond already scheduled games (which also means they would not contend for the Big 10 championship).  The argument that you would be punishing innocent players doesn’t wash, since infractions by one or more players can lead to the same kind of outcome.  Isn’t that one of the lessons teamwork is supposed to teach?

  • moehnandasc

    Perhaps this might be considered. Play the reaming scheduled games as to cancel them will hurt not only Penn State, but the Universities they are playing. Accept a bowl bid so as not to hurt the players that have worked so hard, but donate all the proceeds from the bowl game to an orginiztion that helps protect and heal victims of this type of abuse.
    Just a thought

  • sand6432

    If the incidents had involved a currently employed coach and been recent events, then cancellation might have been appropriate. But to take such a step in response to an incident involving a nonemployee occurring nearly a decade ago seems extreme. But I do like the idea of donating any bowl game profits PSU makes to child abuse charities (to the extent that Big 10 revenue sharing allows).—Sandy Thatcher

  • victorl

    Penn State is only beginning to learn what the actual “costs” are to arrogance and contempt toward the truly vulnerable.  The students at Penn State who feel they had “nothing to do” with the priority given to sports over other issues are learning that there really is a price to pay for keeping one’s head in the sand (or bleachers, or sky boxes).  Penn State should not just bemoan their fall from grace (if that is how they consider what’s gone on), but reflect on what else might have fallen by the wayside with this coordinated lack of oversight of the university’s athletic program.  If such a horrific and egregious disregard could be sustained for so many years at such an high administrative level by so many, can this truly be the only crime, abuse, etc., that has been brushed aside in the name of leaving the school’s image (and sports profits) untarnished?  An ethical lapse like what’s gone on at Penn State did not emerge from nowhere.  This is a culture of “no-higher-priority” athletic prominence.  I’ll be surprised if it were the only instance we learn about. 

    In part, this ethos gets sustained by pandering to what your “customers” (students) want, rather than what faculty, educators, administrators, etc., must understand a university to be.  They’ve proven that they know how to run Penn State as a business, and can show a profit, and can please their share-holders, advertisers, and sports alumni.  It might be nice if they could come round to a sense of what a non-profit educational organization should be doing, and how this is so very different from big business, or, as we’ve seen, a “winner-take-all” athletics contest.  It will be interesting to follow the trajectory Penn State’s trustees chart as the school moves forward.  Will there be any reprioritization?

  • academicvalues

    FYI Penn State is a fine academic institution.

  • The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • 1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
  • Washington, D.C. 20037