• Monday, May 28, 2012

Previous

Next

Along the Heroin Borderline

October 12, 2011, 7:30 pm

The addict’s narrative has a centuries-long tradition—Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Thomas de Quincey, Charles Baudelaire, Jean Cocteau, William S. Burroughs, Alexander Trocchi. But accounts rich with ethnographic detail rather than literary reach or lurid indulgence have been few.

In Border Junkies: Addiction and Survival on the Streets of Juárez and El Paso, out this month from the University of Texas Press, Scott Comar tells the story of his life on the down-and-out streets of United States-Mexico border cities.

While a furniture mover and long-haul trucker, steering his rig all around the country, he became more and more deeply entangled in the temptations, compulsions, short-term satisfactions, decline, and desperation of heroin. That brought him, for several years, into the day-to-day worlds of other junkies and also the dealers, prostitutes, “coyote” people smugglers, thieves, and casual killers who were his neighbors and sometime friends, hosts, and suppliers.

Comar, now a Ph.D. candidate in history at the University of Texas at El Paso, describes not only those colorful characters, but also the patient social workers, missionaries, shelter workers, and physicians who tried to help him escape, often necessarily letting him trudge his own path towards perdition or salvation.

The scenes Comar paints are hallucinogenic, themselves. Ciudad Juárez, as it began to become the most blood-drenched killing field of narcotrafficking, was a dusty maze of taco-stand- and bar-lined tracks where heroin was inexpensive and obtaining it was easy. Holding onto it was not always such a snap; it required that junkies have their wits about them when it came time to pay off the police. Riding about in pick-up trucks, armed with machine guns, cops often not only oversaw drug laws, but also controlled drug channels.

Chiva—Mexican brown-tar heroin—and its kin became Comar’s abiding companions, at first to his exultation, but soon to his anguish. His life flattened out, as a junkie’s will, into the tedium of obtaining the fix that would tide him over to the next one while he sank lower and lower into panhandling and disarray. Comar states at the outset of his narrative: “In no way do I wish to glamorize or minimize the pains, fears, and uncertainties associated with the lifestyle of a drug addict.” And he does not.

Long after he lost his truck, and failed repeatedly to rehabilitate, he became a fixture of Juárez’s back streets and the bridge that leads across the border to El Paso. As ugly deaths took many of his drug associates—his Mexican friends—he survived thanks to a kind of spiritual awakening. In his book he thanks “the nameless and faceless people whom I encountered daily on the streets of Juárez and El Paso. It was their unconditional grace that kept me alive during some of my darkest moments.”

Is this not a strange book for an academic press, specifically Texas’s Inter-America series?

Not really, says one of three series editors, Howard Campbell, a professor of sociology and anthropology at UTEP. He says Comar’s memoir casts light on the social ills of addiction and poverty that pervade border culture, and much else—the background to the horrific drug-related slaughters of many thousands of Mexicans in recent years, for example. “The book shows what it’s like on the streets among the people who are actually consuming the drugs,” he says. “You seldom get accounts from street-level junkies” versus those from the “highly literate, decadent elite,” he says. “It’s a frog’s-eye view of things.”

Comar began writing Border Junkies before he knew it—in the form of a journal he compulsively kept while still a daily drug user crossing back and forth over the border as he phased in and out of narcotic suspension. By the time he began to use his journal as the basis of a book, he was enrolled in a master’s program in history at UTEP, where he now is in the department’s borderlands doctoral program. Now eight years into rehab, with a wife and young son, Comar says academe represented his last opportunity for a future. He initially aspired only to become a substitute schoolteacher, but met with so much academic success that he began to aspire to more.

He agreed to flesh his journal out into a book at Campbell’s encouragement. The professor got to know about Comar at a UTEP graduation ceremony, a few years ago, when Comar repeatedly mounted a stage to receive undergraduate awards. He was, recalls Campbell, a tall, ungainly, man with soda-bottle eyeglasses, “staring out at the audience as if he wasn’t sure why he was there.”

Some time later, Campbell approached Comar at a grocery store and found him not just shy and rather skittish, but also a “goldmine of information” on the subject Campbell was himself studying—the border drug trade. Soon, over morning runs at a UTEP track, the two were conferring on Comar’s evolving memoir, whose introduction Campbell ended up writing.

Campbell also pressed for Border Junkies’ inclusion in the Inter-America series, where the book now sits alongside other contributions to the growing academic subdiscipline of border studies, which since its inception in the 1980s has always welcomed first-person accounts of borderland identity.

As an account of the ways homelessness, poverty, and addiction fuel the use of narcotics and societal decay in the Mexican urban landscape, Border Junkies is a complement to other series titles, like El Narcotraficante: Narcocorridos and the Construction of a Cultural Persona on the U.S.-Mexican Border (2004) by Mark Cameron Edberg, about the rise of the narcotrafficker as larger-than-life “social bandit” and cultural icon. Other books in the series address the spate of brutal murders of women in Ciudad Juárez, sex workers in Tijuana, and changing enforcement of immigration laws along the Texas-Mexico border.

Border Junkies also complements Campbell’s own, 2009, Texas-press book (not in the Inter-America series), the highly regarded Drug War Zone: Frontline Dispatches From the Streets of El Paso and Juárez. Based on Campbell’s 20 years of treading the same streets as Comar, it includes oral histories of drug traffickers and law-enforcement officers to cast light on what makes that spot on the border the drug cartels’ prime conduit of cocaine, marijuana, and methamphetamines for U.S. consumption.

Comar says his hope was to explain some of the dynamics of that trafficking, but also to advance understanding of the obsessive nature of addiction and consumption and to promote recovery programs and keep them alive “at all costs.”

Expanding his journal into a book certainly helped him to survive, he says by phone. “Being in recovery and looking at the whole story was therapeutic,” he says. “I always thought, ‘Wow, if I could write a book about this, it would be a pretty good story.’”

He was able to write Border Junkies, he says, because “I had an awakening where I realized I’ve got one more shot at life. I benefited from the work ethic I learned as a truck driver in the moving business. I’ve been able to take that and apply it to my schoolwork. It hasn’t failed me yet.”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • http://skepticaljew.blogspot.com/ MKR

    [Inserted into other comment.]

  • http://skepticaljew.blogspot.com/ MKR

    “For decades, the rationale for why the humanities are essential to the college curriculum were the same.” –As it were. 

    Actually, I count three subject–verb disagreements: besides the one in the first sentence, there are these two:

    “The humanities has been on the defensive for more than a century.” They has?

    “In the last few years, though, the rationale for why the humanities should stay in the college curriculum have changed significantly.” It have?

    It is also a bit rich that someone who uses a phrase like “clearly transparent” (second sentence) should chide Matthew Arnold for indulging in “tautology” (third paragraph).

    These solecisms distract from a post that otherwise makes some worthwhile points about the misuse and overuse of Arnold’s famous phrases.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Dave-Newport/100000330111921 Dave Newport

    A better number 1 might be: “how old are you? If you are over 50, plan for retirement, not a new job.” If <50, read on.

  • livebythegoldenrule

    At what point does moving on make sense?  I’m at that point now.  I have been actively searching for a decent librarian and/or archivist position for several years after my museum art librarian position was downsized, never to return.  Nada.  Nada.  Landed one school librarian job after that which was like being incarcerated in Leavenworth and critically understaffed and underpaid.  The competition for these jobs (or, I should say, what is left of these jobs) is fierce.  It’s not that I have no experience in the field – have 15 years, but still no takers.  I’ve come close in a few interviews where it’s down to two people, but when you have 300 people going for one job, “close” is still not enough.  So, after much thinking, I am leaving the profession for good and returning to the administrative field – that’s right – clerical and secretarial jobs.  This is all I can find in this abysmal economy and, even then, competition is tight.  I am very afraid for our future when I see the state of the economy and its lack of good jobs.  Most that I see are $10 – 15/hr with no benefits.  Who can realistically live on that for any length of time, let alone support a family?  Middle manager jobs have been almost totally eliminated – and that is what most librarians and archivists are.  So, now I’m off to an interview for a part-time job as an administrative assistant to a local scientist.  This is all I can find and I’m grateful for even this.  Just sign me – No Longer a Librarian.  Yes, I’ve moved on.

  • http://twitter.com/JoVanEvery Jo VanEvery

    I would advise that the corollary to #1 is “are you publishing”? There are too many people out there that think all the low paid teaching jobs they are doing are “good experience”. They aren’t. If you cannot demonstrate that you are committed to scholarship by finishing your PhD and publishing from it, then you aren’t going to get a tenure track job. If you don’t like the sound of that, stop looking sooner rather than later.

  • http://who-will-kiss-the-pig.blogspot.com Richard Grayson

    I’m old enough to know a great many people who have moved on and are now over forty, and by now I don’t think any one of them regrets it.  Humans are wonderfully adaptive.

  • changing123

    Sortaretired, you are right on target. In 14 years I have worked under 7 deans (4 in the past five years) and 6 provosts, and in that time I have seen individuals push through change without ever getting to know the people and units who are needed to make those changes successful. It really does boil down to respect.

  • cwm4c

    Hiring is not that complicated–we make it so.  We drag it out both through the search process, then the hiring, and finally–the only area we should–once the new person is on-board.  That is where we should spend a year focused on ensuring the transition goes well.  The rest of the process wastes much of our time–we could cut it in half, or by 75% and not notice an effect on quality.

  • educationnet2007

    Aside from the illegality issue that is commonly argued by pundits who believe the heart of the matter with drugs is criminality, Comar’s book shows how mind and mood altering substances affect personal judgment and behavior.

  • mycantarella

    I plead guilty. As a parent– and now grandparent– I issue praise all the time. Maybe too much. But I also plead some special circumstances. I am African American.  Minority kids don’t always bask in the glory of a world that loves them. There are studies that even show that their parents, more concerned with survival, don’t praise as much as those more privileged by ethnicity or affluence. So while as a dean and administrator I also have concerns about students who come to college with attitudes of great entitlement they feel is due them. I also think that we have to take cases individually and that maybe some students need more affirmation than others. At The Eagle Academy Schools for Boys in New York City where I chair the advisory board, one of the strategies helping these minority young men beat the odds and graduate is that they are in a culture where finally they feel valued. Some ego strength is needed for survival, too much becomes arrogance and is unacceptable. Finding the balance is key.
    Marcia Y. Cantarella, PhD Author, I CAN Finish College: The Overcome Any Obstacle and Get Your Degree Guide

  • KMHahn

    As I think about this I am reminded about my first application to graduate school. I asked my boss for a letter of recommendation and he asked me to write something up to get him started. In the end he just signed what I wrote. I had taken the reference instructions at face value, writing a letter highlighting my strengths and weaknesses. I was too young and naive to understand that mentioning weaknesses on a letter of recommendation is not common.  At the interview I met an almost hostile group. Looking back (the story is much longer) and considering the experience (I did not get in), I learned that letters of recommendation are not to be written honestly. This seems to permeate our culture more than can be blamed on “generation me.”

  • texasguy

    The University of California, San Diego was built top-down around an existing research institute.  The idea was to develop academic excellence from the beginning.  Universities that start as a teaching institution have problems recruiting research-oriented faculty and end filling the gaps with teaching-oriented faculty who will not necessarily adapt very well when the university starts adding graduate and doctoral programs.

  • The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • 1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
  • Washington, D.C. 20037