• Monday, May 28, 2012

Previous

Next

Why I Am an Adjunct: Take 3

July 25, 2011, 10:58 am

Isaac Sweeney and Eliana Osborn have both written about their experiences as an adjunct. I, too, am an adjunct faculty members, but for different reasons from them, so here’s another perspective.

My first professional identity was as a high-school English teacher. I was a naive, 22-year-old from a fairly small, rural town, teaching in a much more heterogeneous community in Cincinnati, Ohio. Perhaps things have changed (although I don’t think so), but the policy at the time was to put the least-experienced teachers with the most educationally disenfranchised and/or seemingly disengaged students. You know, the first-year teachers get the classes that no one else wants to teach.

Thanks in large part to incredible mentors, and the lessons taught intentionally (and unintentionally) by my students, I survived my first year, and went on to thrive at the school. Ultimately, however, I decided that a career in K-12 public education was not a good fit for me, and I moved into higher education and student affairs.

But I have to tell you, there’s nothing like the high you get from teaching a good class. When it’s going well, you can feel the energy in the room. I teach night classes now, and it takes me hours to wind down after a particularly engaging session. I might be a bit sleep-deprived the next day, but the adrenaline from that great class carries me through my day.

Since I made the move to student affairs, I have sought opportunities to teach part-time whenever possible, and that has kept me in touch not only with students, but also with faculty members. I can see how institutional systems help or hinder learning, and sometimes I can make changes, via my my administrative role, that make real differences in the classroom. It also keeps me in touch with the realities of the classroom, for both students and faculty members. My adjunct role complements my “day job” quite nicely.

However, regardless of our circumstances or reasons for teaching, adjuncts deserve better pay; an office fit for grading, computing, and seeing students; and better support, collegiality, and acknowledgment from other faculty members and administrators. I’m reminded of the time, during my first year of teaching, when my most challenging student invited me to his junior varsity basketball game. There weren’t many people at the game, and no one who came specifically to watch him play. I congratulated him on a good game afterwards, and he was a different student from then on. A little recognition and respect goes a long way, for students and teachers.

This entry was posted in Adjunct Life, Teaching, The Two-Year Track. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • polisciguy

    Julie,

    I can relate to the joys you have experienced in the classroom. Having taught at the K-12 and college level, I understand how the adrenaline rush from a class can keep you going the rest of the evening (I have a night class this fall, which should be interesting for my day job). I also have been invited to many extracurricular events and love to support my students especially, like you said, when there are few others who come out to do so. It can make all the difference in the classroom.

    And, even as I seek to turn my night job into my day job, I can attest to the fact that adjunct work keeps me sane and gives a joy that I am being productive for a larger group of people. It is a great feeling indeed.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Eliana-Osborn/572634960 Eliana Osborn

    I think you’ve made a great decision for keeping yourself involved in the teaching side of things.  Your perspective will be a benefit in all aspects of your ‘day job.’

  • faynielsen

    I do the same thing.  Teaching as an Adjunct helps me to understand the Retention issues in my day job.  Thanks for the article.

  • ecforest

    I agree.  Teaching is a real high for me as well!

  • johnbarnes

    I’m don’t think I’d work in student affairs on a bet — but entirely from the viewpoint of someone who used to teach, what a great thing you’re doing for yourself.  Aside from the teacher’s high, the more lasting effect is what you say: staying in touch with what it’s really like in a classroom.

  • juliewhite

    Yes, you are right about that!  I’m curious as to what you makes you say that about student affairs?  :-)

  • comicsprof

    I agree completely. I came to teaching late in life and now I can’t imagine doing anything else. I’m currently doing some admin work on special events as I prep for my fall classes (one in the College proper, two in continuing studies). It’s a rough life financially, but there’s nothing like having a class where it’s more than a lecture and the students are right there with you.

  • profmurph

    A naive article by White. When will she and others understand that they are part time employees working “at will” by the school? They are not entitled to the same privileges as full time workers. I have been an adjunct for the past seven years and do not expect anything but a paycheck.

  • juliewhite

    I’m not sure where I say I’m expecting anything other than a paycheck?  And I actually am a full-time worker, as I indicate in the post.

  • johnbarnes

    A matter of knowing your own disposition, and more or less for the same reason that a person with a slow reaction time like mine should not be a pilot or fireman. 

    I used to explain to advisees that the biggest difference between high school and college was that in high school the teacher was supposed to really want to help the students, and the subject was a way to do it; in college the teacher was supposed to really like the subject, and be looking for students who were (or could become) worthy of sharing it.  Student affairs offices do great work in handling the routine and chronic accidents and miseries but fundamentally they’re about the student, not about the study.  Somebody has to be, I suppose, but it’s better that it’s not me; I’m better at sharing the fascination of theatre history or set design or fictional structure than I am at growing whole people.  Student Affairs is welcome to enable all the whole people they can get their hands on; I just like to help the whole people pick up drawing, building, and writing.

    Probably there’s room enough for both, even in a busy schedule.

  • juliewhite

    That’s an interesting way to describe the different fields of academia.  I do think of them as different roles, that’s for sure.  

  • titivillus

    For updates, information and comment on this issue from the ‘inside’, see: http://donsspeakout.wordpress.com/

  • titivillus

    In particular, some individuals who have commented below might like to read this text on the same site – http://tinyurl.com/7pw44cm – where they will find their mediocre arguments for ‘free speech’ exposed, dissected, and dismissed.

  • titivillus
  • titivillus

    Wo Sie gerade ‘tendentiousness’ sagen: only a philistine could bemoan the fact that Owen Holland might continue his ‘poetical and political activities’ and, let’s not forget, his thesis, at public expense; only an idiot would describe intellectual and social freedoms as ‘lifestyle’; and only the most superficial of glib rhetoricians would seek to imply that this had anything at all to do with ‘violent riots by privileged students’. What must pass in your mind for some kind of flourish, your concluding remark about William Blake, is stupid in so many ways that I don’t think it deserves further attention or comment.

  • http://twitter.com/plstepp plstepp

    I have no sympathy. “Dissenters in attendance were loud but peaceful, shouting Willetts down.” Sorry, there’s nothing peaceful about the shouting down of views one disagrees with. It’s exhibit A of the “ugly repression” that the headline-writer decries.

  • marka

    Sorry … this says it all:  ‘As the event began, the dissenters in attendance were loud but peaceful,
    shouting Willetts down; the minister decided to cancel his talk shortly
    thereafter.’

    So … they shouted him down, and in effect expelled him from the forum.  Bullying, pure and simple.  And the natural consequence is that one of them is ‘shouted down,’ and ultimately ‘expelled’ from the forum, for said bullying.

    Seems just to me – perfectly tailored to the incident, and its natural sequelae.

    What’s the beef?  He, and others, could hold their own forum.  Or, he could publish his protest.  Or … you get the picture.  He intentionally disrupted someone from speaking his mind, and then complains when some ‘disrupt’ him?  Gimme a break …

  • marka

    Ah, ever the gentle-man … anyone who disagrees with you is ‘stupid,’ ‘superficial,’ ‘philistine,’ ‘idiot’ 

    Ad hominem attacks do not impress me … except with the paucity of the position being argued. 

    He who cannot debate the substance of the comment is condemned to vilify and demonize his opponents, for he can do nothing else. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Adam-Dickes/866505187 Adam Dickes

    Once again the discussion descends in to another senseless dichotomy, as if their was one correct position which would resolve the dispute. Owen Holland may have behaved insensitively, without grace, not according to the proper forms, outside of the norms of acceptable behaviour. That may be the case. But why did he do so? 

     People in positions of power are provided with a platform on which to set out their agenda. In contrast, those at the receiving end of this agenda have no such platform from which share their views on the  decisions that will have drastic effects on their lives. Unsurprisingly, this leads to frustration. To even the balance, those without a voice find it necessary to make symbolic actions, such as sitting in the wrong part of the bus in Washington, or setting oneself ablaze in Vietnam.Those who take part in such symbolic acts are often vilified by those in positions of power, as they are small acts of defiance on behalf of those without a voice. That so many feel is is justified to expel a student for attempting to level the playing field a little speaks volumes for their positions within the establishment. Such asymmetric warfare is threatening to the natural order.Although I disagree with his actions, I stand with Owen Holland. It is him and his ilk that will make the world a better place, not those who are already comfortably embedded within the hierarchy of power, whether ineducation or politics

  • nematoda

    One of the few sensible comments made thus far, although given the number of “likes” most of the anti-Holland comments have received, I would guess your comment is not going to please many readers.

  • fiscalwiz

    How is drowning out the speaker by chants and shouts consistent with a marketplace of ideas?  Probably doesn’t merit “rustication,” the cool new word of the day, but does merit condemnation as behavior consistent with being a lout and being someone I wouldn’t want as an academic colleague or as an instructor for my grandson. 

  • ztlights

    LEDhttp://www.ztlights.com

  • The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • 1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
  • Washington, D.C. 20037