• Monday, May 28, 2012

Previous

Next

Visibility vs. Shameless Self-Promotion

October 12, 2011, 12:04 pm

I have two colleagues who are extraordinarily talented and highly visible. While both are recognized for their drive, intelligence, and expertise, people tend to find one of them charming and the other one annoying. What accounts for the difference? It’s really pretty simple. One promotes ideas, while the other promotes herself. One shares information and the other shares what can only be characterized as personal press releases. One celebrates the accomplishments of her colleagues, while the other thanks her colleagues for making her success possible.

Getting ahead professionally tends is easier when one is recognized and well regarded. Evaluations are higher, nominations for positions and awards come more easily, invitations to speak occur more frequently, and referrals for consulting or advice are more likely. Being visible and connected also increases job security, as it is harder to oust people who have a solid base of support. There is really no question that a strong presence and reputation make new opportunities easier to identify and pursue. But how do we create personal buzz for ourselves? What’s the best way to build a solid reputation? How can we increase our visibility without being tiresome?

Here are a few thoughts.

First, do no harm. The goal is to have people talk about you -– in a good way. You can be perfectly brilliant, but if people talk trash about you, you’ll achieve the wrong kind of visibility. You probably have your own list of behaviors that lead to negative visibility, but I’ll admit to talking about people who are chronically late to meetings, cancel commitments at the last minute, hog airtime, pontificate, spout uninformed conspiracy theories, make people cry, steal credit from others, and yammer on about their many accomplishments.

Be focused. I know, I know, people in the academic world tend to blanch when they hear the phrase “personal branding,” but it matters. If it makes you feel better, we can refer to “creating a professional niche.” Regardless of what we call it, it’s important to think about the mental image we want others to have about us. A sense of consistency is important, so think about how you want people to consider your work and your style. Take a little time to write down three phrases or sentences that capture who you are or who you want to be and make sure that your behaviors, actions, and decisions are consistently aligned with those descriptors.

Share your ideas as much as possible. Debating whether you really have time to speak on a conference panel or deliver a paper? Wondering if you’ll draw a big enough crowd at a concurrent session? Unless you are likely to embarrass yourself by being unprepared, seize every opportunity to share your ideas and work.

Be appropriately visible, but not perpetually available. I received this advice many years ago and have to admit to struggling with it a bit. If people ask me to attend something, I tend to want to be accommodating. However, a mentor once told me that I suffer from terminal niceness. “Being too accessible also diminishes people’s perception of your value. You need to go to things that will advance your agenda, not their agenda, and that means saying ‘no’ even when there is time on your calendar.”

Let others promote you. Did you win an award? Have you published an article that might have popular appeal? Were you appointed to a professional-society leadership position? Make sure an announcement gets forwarded to your communication office or the local press. Having your institution or local paper publicize your accomplishments looks better than spouting off about yourself. Getting a friend or colleague to share your good news can be powerful as well. If you get into the habit of doing it for them, they will do it for you.

What are some strategies that have increased your visibility? What do you think constitutes shameless self-promotion?

This entry was posted in General Interest. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • profadavis

    Studio space is expensive? Compared, say, to athletic facilities, which are regularly upgraded to draw talented faculty and students, or laboratory space? It’s the same reasoning that shuts down so many venerable literary journals for trivial savings. There’s a shortage of honesty here. Say rather that studio space is expensive relative to the value we actually place on art and the arts (which is quite different from the value we claim to place on these things).

  • dianpratama

    yes i like that, its true..

  • mkant69

    Focus on providing value to the reader, as opposed to just the author.

  • zzhu107

    This is a useful piece – I was just thinking this morning that faculty and staff in higher ed do not toot their own horns enough. It’s not even on their radar most of the time. The key is to be brief and stay on message. More importantly, show your appreciation for others when promoting your own accomplishments. Chances are you didn’t get there all by yourself. Finally, why not share good news of colleagues as well? It’s just good professional karma. 

  • walkingtree

    While there are a few passages that I can agree to, this essay reminds me how intricate an academic mind is. It’s all about how to behave yourself and, to a degree, manipulate others to act for your interests. In other words, you are telling us to be shrewd enough to be successful in this game. It also suggests that successful academics are just great at mind games and political/social game, rather than being good scholars with passion and personality. I prefer imperfect people, who are just themselves and not trying to be somebody else–so they can score a big A with other people.

  • blendedlibrarian

    I expected this piece to offer more about using social media to both share one’s own work and point folks to the work of colleagues worthy of attention. True, some folks have perfected the art of the “humble brag” (“Gosh, can you believe I won the Scholar of the Year Award. I never expected that to happen”), but we can always learn more about how to use the new media properly to develop one’s brand.

  • hariseldon

    As an adjunct at the fringes of higher education, I am struck by the fact that, with disappointingly few exceptions, the successful academics I have known are remarkably self-absorbed.  Our institutions would be vastly better off if, in the words of AA’s 12 Traditions, we “place principles before personalities”.  

  • bizilizi

    “What do you think constitutes shameless self-promotion?”  A colleague “A” regularly sends campus- wide announcements of her upcoming (fiction) book publications, book signings, and other events promoting her books, some very long and rambling. On the one hand, these are milestone achievements in her writing career, which I applaud and admire. On the other hand, that feeling of being bashed over the head a million times grows annoying. She informs us by the same email service when her book is completed, how the drafting stages have gone, how she is working with publishers, what stage of the publication process she is in,etc. Worse, some emails are unedited, so we receive edited versions of them a day or two later, ugh. In effect, she has turned this form of communication, the campus wide email service into a kind of blog site for herself.

    None of this is necessary as Allison Vaillancourt notes.  The school’s weekly rag includes announcements like these, and it works,as  I found from my own experience. I had two articles published in an academic journal, and as soon as the school’s weekly came out, all kinds of faculty were approaching me about it and congratulating me. What amazed me in this process was that some faculty I didn’t know beyond passing in the hallway and swapping pleasantries (I didn’t spread the word through campus email or word of mouth beforehand because it didn’t feel right).   

    Another colleague had the same ‘quieter’ approach as me, with the addition of dropping a one-liner through campus-wide email, inviting us to her publishing event.  Granted, there is no hard and fast rule in these circumstances, but being regularly bombarded by colleague “A”s approach is overkill for me, and others it turns out–it actually turned a group of us off attending her book-signings and engaging with her in general.

  • totoro

    I have a professional blog and also post some updates to academia.edu and linkedin. So people who are interested can subscribe and get updates. I also include a lot of other stuff in the blog so a lot of the self-promotion is subtle. Our department makes e-mail announcements of all papers published in top journals and all books. But your colleague’s behavior sounds counterproductive.

  • Socratease2

    Of course the two ousted ex-jocks are upset, after years of entitlement and living in a bubble at NC, I am sure they felt privileged to act as boorishly as they chose. The first few rows is not an anything goes area, there are rules and I am glad the ref stepped in. Screw the coach and his comments, just because someone is a legend or a great doesn’t mean they can come back to campus, get drunk, sexually assault students, harrass refs. Oh, they didn’t rape anyone, sorry, that will likely be next weeks story.

  • davi2665

    So the smartmouth antics of a couple of former basketball players got them kicked out of a game.  Disruptive louts should be disinvited, whether “escorted” out the door by someone from the team, or from security.  Why are misbehaving players/fans/coaches tolerated and pampered, and then the referees criticised for trying to retain some degree of decorum in the arena.  Good for the referees.  Keep up the good work.

  • GatesMaura44

    my classmate’s mom made $ 18460 l ast week. s he is ge tting p aid o n the l aptop a nd mo ved in a $ 571 600 house. A ll sh e did w as g et lu cky an d fo llow the t ips ma de cl ear o n th is si te ===>> ⇛⇛⇛⇛► http://job2seek.blogspot.com

  • educationfrontlines

    Most states have provisions for specially-skilled individuals such as artists or engineers, etc. to be given a restricted license/certification to teach in the K-12 classroom without undergoing an accredited university teacher program.  Thus a glass-blower can teach an art class; an engineer can teach a “shop” class. The US Dept of State debacle appears to be driven by a lack of investigative homework and superficial legalism, similar to the recent ill-conceived proposals by DoL to prevent farm children from having normal farm experiences.

    This story is not playing out well amongst the public over here in China, and it is impossible to explain the US actions in any terms other than “mean spirited.” Other countries such as the UK, have Confucius Institutes that operate the same, and they have no problems with utilizing their teachers.
     
    When it comes to education-related policies in Washington DC, it appears that superficial decision-making encompasses not only the USDE, but also the DoL and Dept. of State.

    John Richard Schrock

  • burger1376

    Sorry, but does it really matter what the Chinese think about US actions against the confucious institute in the USA?  The Chinese are currently on a 100 day xenophobia campaign where many people have been pulled off their bikes, locked up in bars, and dragged out of homes to show their papers and make sure they are legal.  The US should do the same to the Chinese.  After all, there are far more illegal Chinese in the US than there are illegal Americans in China. 

    Mean spirited?  The Chinese have taken that crown already. 

  • lokigod40

    as Dawn replied I am surprised that a mom can make $7903 in 4 weeks on the internet. have you seen this web site

    *(C L I C K  O N  M Y  N A M E  F O R  T H E  L I N K)*

  • BallardKaren22

    my friend’s aunt made $17398 the previous week. she is making income on the internet and bought a $578000 house. All she did was get lucky and try the steps written on this website===>> ⇛⇛⇛⇛► http://job2seek.blogspot.com

  • The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • 1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
  • Washington, D.C. 20037