• Monday, May 28, 2012

Previous

Next

Satisfaction

October 27, 2011, 1:46 pm

When I tell people that I have been granted a sabbatical (which I feel obliged to tell you is officially called “leave for professional advancement for the benefit of the College” by my institution), they often appear surprised that I, a non-teaching professional staff member, am eligible for such a thing. Being on sabbatical seems to convey a sense of scholarly import not usually associated — at least by outsiders — with student affairs, or with community colleges.

I’ll let my dissertation committee judge the scholarly importance of my work while I’m on leave. And hopefully my college will find my results beneficial. Meanwhile, I want to get the word out that community colleges often accord the work of student affairs a great deal of respect. I’ve worked at several other institutions, all of them four-year colleges or universities serving more traditional student populations, so I have some basis for comparison. None of those four-year institutions offered a leave for professional development to anyone except teaching faculty members.

In addition, collaboration between teaching and non-teaching faculty and staff members is both collegial and commonplace on my campus. The work of student affairs is to assist students in achieving their academic goals and to support faculty members in creating an effective learning environment. Over all, faculty members and administrators understand that our work with students outside of the classroom — whether through leadership programs, counseling services, conduct and conflict resolution, financial aid, or career and transfer advising — supports the academic mission of the college.

And, yes, my research engagement has direct and indirect benefits on my work. My results will provide additional information about community-college students and what helps or hinders their progress. In conducting interviews, I’ve been able to direct students to resources for financial aid or other services, which they may not have gotten otherwise.

This type of environment is not only more satisfying and rewarding as an employee, it also benefits those who ultimately matter: the students. When an adviser helps a student select the right course for transfer, when a professor walks a distressed student to the counseling center, when a financial-aid staffer helps a student in need, everyone wins.

So if you’re in student affairs and looking for an environment where your professional development will be supported, where your work will be respected, and where you will encounter a diverse array of inspiring students, a community college might be perfect for you.

This entry was posted in Administrative Hiring, The Two-Year Track. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • Guest

    Why is it necessary to mention this?  Governments and NGOs all over the world spend an order of magnitude more than corporations are spending.  But their hearts aren’t really in it:  they are making billions of dollars/pounds in subsidy from tax-payers for things like totally useless wind farms.

  • Guest

    Is this the guy that said we’re all going to die in hurricanes as the world heats up (to congress, or was it the US senate) and has now changed his mind?  Yes… I think it is.  He’s a snake-oil salesman just like Mann.

  • Guest

    His work hasn’t been “verified” – it’s been “reproduced”.  What this means is that groups of people have taken his methods and the same data he used and come up with the same results.  Some have even replicated his mistakes in order to do so.   His work is still unmitigated rubbish of course, especially his wonderfully fictitious ”hockey stick”.

  • Guest

    Yes, we shall.

  • Guest

    He has you ignorant fool.  Ask Steve McIntyre how hard it was to get any data out of Mann for the purposes of replication.

  • Llammy

    Crickey! I have never seen so much ad hom, appeals to authority and straw men in a comments section!

    If as some have tried to point out, Mann has been libelled why does he not sue? This has been going on for some years with S.M. etc openly critical of Mann’s work. Montford in his book, “The Hockey Stick Illusion” lays it all out but once again, no threat of legal action. Tenney etc all throw themselves behind Mann with appeals to authority and claim the HS has been cleared but has it really? Not from what I read!

    None of this is real science and shame on the lot of you for trying to pass it off as the real thing! If there is nothing to hide, share the data that is mostly paid for by the taxpayers, stop it with the false oil company funding argument (check out where the CRU funding comes from!) and simply let the truth out. It is the real way to save the planet. Even sceptics used to donate into ecological causes until “Climate” scientists muddied the water!

  • Llammy

    Only one thing to say in reply to that rubbish……….Chris Landsea, an honest bloke! 

    http://www.webcitation.org/6005fkwJv

  • Llammy

    Your models say that temperatures should be rising now, empirical science says temperature has been statistically flat for ten years or so. Your post reads like a religious rant rather than a scientific reality! Full of ad hom, straw men and appeals to authority with a little “global health threat” to try to scare the little people! Pathetic!

  • EWorrall

    Politicised science is dangerous, and can lead to bad places. http://www.michaelcrichton.net/essay-stateoffear-whypoliticizedscienceisdangerous.html

  • yellow1

    Well said, Julie. I work on the Academic Affairs side of administration at a two year school, and I’ve found my experiences to be close to yours from the Academics side. Working at two year colleges (I’m at my 3rd in my career) has always meant a GREAT working relationship with all areas in Students Affairs. I think it is admirable that your institution allows this “break” for you.

  • juliewhite

    Yes, I am very grateful!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=749729202 Paul Dunn

    I find that the trend in hiring temp staff to teach has significantly degraded the student learning experience and seemingly little administrative support to address this systemic issue. I think that if you had activist students and not 20 year-olds that are willing to roll over for bad policy decisions when they do not know any better, you would find that there is a backlash against privatizing our public educational system in the making.

  • raza_khan

    Hi Julie

    I am glad to hear that it worked for you!  With the turmoil in the economy, we just have to re-think how to do the same old with less and less resources amid a growing student population.

    best,

    Raza
    ___________________
    Raza Khan, Ph.D.
    Dr.Raza.Khan@gmail.com

  • 11144703

    “And I’ve been poring over my own latest books”

    Rich, I can understand reviewing your own work for refreshing one’s memories for ideas, but hadn’t you been “poring over” your books as you were writing and editing them with all that free time on your academic hands?  Or are you merely (and embarrassingly) hyping your own work in response to a question that is totally unrelated to your answer here?

    Or maybe you need to pore over your books because you’re one of the myriad of academic poseurs (I will be kind and refrain from naming names) who has “researchers” virtually write the book and then the poseur merely puts together 2+2, necessitating your “poring over”?  I certainly hope not…you sound like you’re trying to keep it real…         

  • The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • 1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
  • Washington, D.C. 20037