• Monday, May 28, 2012

Previous

Next

Making the Most of Your Off-Season, Part 2

July 25, 2011, 9:51 am

In Part 1 of this post, I focused on two key things that academic job seekers should do during the summer to improve their chances of finding a position: Keep up with the job listings, and network. Here are four more off-season activities that every prospective candidate should consider:

Plan your attack. Summer is the perfect time to re-evaluate your job-search strategy and decide what has worked and what you might want to change during the next round of applications and interviews.

For instance, are you looking at all of the possible jobs that you might be qualified for, at every kind of institution? Are you paying attention to openings all over the country? Or are you artificially limiting yourself by looking, say, only at research-oriented jobs in the part of the country where you prefer to live? That sort of decision is personal, but if you really want and need a job, you might consider broadening your search.

I’ve been telling people for years, in this space, that they shouldn’t ignore the community college-job market just because they have dreams of being research professors. No, there’s no guarantee you can get a community-college job, either, but by opening yourself up to the possibility, you increase your list of potential employers by about 40 per cent.

The same holds true for geography. If you’re an adjunct looking for full-time work, you have two ways to maximize your chances: Stay where you are, try to make yourself indispensible, and hope for a tenure-track opening, or be willing to move across the country.

Revise your materials. If you’ve been trying for a while and you haven’t gotten many interviews, that may be an indication that your application materials need work. Take a long look at your resume or CV format, and compare it to sample formats you can find on the Web. Better yet, ask friends who have gotten jobs — or at least interviews — to share their materials. Update your teaching statement. Play around with your cover letter to see if you can make it more engaging and persuasive.

I was fascinated, a few weeks ago, to read my fellow blogger Isaac Sweeney’s post entitled “A Recent Cover Letter,” in which he shared a sample letter he had written. The letter itself was unlike any I had ever seen in academe — honest, straightforward, conversational, short. I thought to myself, “I appreciate what Isaac is doing, but he’ll never get a job with a letter like that.”
Au contraire. In his very next post, Isaac informed us of the happy news that he has just landed a tenure-track job. Obviously, his decision to try something different worked for him.

Enhance your CV. One of the best things you can do to improve your application materials is to add more substance. If you’re not doing much else this summer, it might be a good time to pull out that manuscript you’ve been playing around with for years and see if you can finally turn it into a publishable piece. Get back in the library or the lab and tackle that research project you’ve been putting off. Polish that book proposal and send it off to some editors. Find out what conferences are coming up in the fall that you might be able to attend and begin putting together a presentation.

There are other activities besides writing and research that can enhance your CV, too. Find out if there are any volunteer opportunities available in your community that might relate to your professional goals, such as a neighborhood literacy program or a summer-science camp. See what seminars or short courses your college might be offering as the new semester approaches and that might enable you to develop a new pedagogical approach or technological skill. All of those things could help you stand out from other candidates and make you more marketable.

Sharpen the saw. Remember that nobody can be in job-hunting mode all the time. We all need downtime to relax with family and friends, read a good book, take a trip. And summer, of course, is great time for all of the above. You may well find that, if you get away from the job search for a little while, you’ll be able to return to it fresh and with renewed energy.

After all, even Kobe Bryant takes a couple weeks off after the NBA playoffs. Then he’s right back in the gym, hoisting 500 jumpers a day.

This entry was posted in The Two-Year Track. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • deliajones

    I just wrapped up a hiring committee for an English position at my cc.  Over 100 applicants, eight interviews. Every single candidate we interviewed was experienced with an online platform such as Blackboard and used technology extensively, whether their courses were face-to-face, hybrid, or online.  This matters a lot to community colleges today for a variety of reasons.  For example, comunity colleges are moving heavily into online courses (I’m not saying that’s a great idea but it is a fact.)  We also expect faculty to create experiences that facilitate student engagement, and technology, well-chosen, can certainly do that.
    So I would suggest that instead of “polishing up your paper,” those interested in a cc position polish up your educational technology.

  • masticool

    There are various option in career in GEO like:

    Agricultural Specialists
    Cartographers
    Demographers
    Forest Managers
    GIS and Remote Sensing Specialists
    Regional and Urban Planners

    I have seen more contain on this link below:

    http://inspiringbeans.com/detail/article/article/BA-in-Geography-Opportunity-jobs-for-you/

  • robjenkins

    You’re right, Delia. I did mention that, briefly, but I’m glad you emphasized the point.

    Best,
    Rob

  • comicsprof

    My Catch-22 on this: by the time I have my strategies in place for networking and job search, it’s time for the semester to start! I spend a chunk of my summer teaching pre-college programs, and am always doing academic writing (lately, much of it paid, to my great surprise and delight), and my job search organization always seems to fall by the wayside until I’m back at work.
    If anyone has advice or insight on this dilemma, I’d like to hear it. 

  • jwgilley

    Times are going to change

  • 12083503

    These FB coaches are like little gods. If they have some success, are not caught cheating and have the alumni support they will be allowed to squander millions of dollars. – until they cannot anymore because Billy Bob Alumni wants him fired for not winning a national championship.

  • jffoster

    1. The NCAA’s jurisdiction here is doubtful.  They’re putting their oar in because they are becoming increasingly ineffectual and irrelevant, even as some of their rules get stupider and stupider.

    2. The Penn State youth and child seduction scandal is only incidentally connected with football, or with sports in general.  It could as easily have happened in a College of Music with a preparatory department and thus children around a lot with college personnel and other faculty having easy access to them. (Note: I know of no such instances.).  Would the NCAA presume to chime in then? I doubt the AGO, AAUP, or Musician’s Federation would.

  • pianiste

    The “youth and child seduction” part of the Penn State may be only “incidentally connected with football” (although it’s not just incidentally connected to coaches in a variety of sports, re the other recent scandals in gymnastic, swimming, tennis, etc.*), but the coverup is very much connected with football.

    Jerry Sandusky went on with what he’s accused of doing for as long as he did because Joe Paterno–either proactively, or because he deliberately turned a blind eye, or because he simply refused to believe one of his own could be involved in such deeds–protected him. Paterno was the most powerful man on the Penn State campus. The president of the university and the AD tried to get him to step down in 2004, and he refused, probably because he–how ironic!–wanted to get to victory no. 409 and be remembered as the winningest football coach in D-1 history.

    In this scandal, the AD and a vice-president did little or nothing about Sandusky, and when the scandal broke, the president inadvisedly said he stood 100 percent behind them. This is probably because nobody wanted to go against Paterno, and nobody wanted to go against Paterno because he was the powerful man on campus, and he was the most powerful man on campus because of football–$70 profit, 100,000 in the seats for home games, etc.

    If you include–as with Watergate–the coverup as part of the Penn State scandal, then it is indeed directly connected to football.

    * Veritable worship of young bodies, close approximation to them, locker rooms, showers, etc.

  • jffoster

    If, as seems at least plausible if not probable, that there was a cover up, then I think you’re correct that the motivation for it was certainly related to the peculiar circumstances of football at Penn State.  NCAA’s jurisdiction is still doubtful, and of course they’re considering trying to change the rules to allow them to assert jurisdiction.

  • 12080243

    Piansite, your comments need to be repeated over and over to offset the misrepresentations college sports advocates repeat over and over.

  • ndkchk

    It’s difficult to argue that the coverup was limited to just football when the president of the university also heard about Sandusky and did nothing. Sure, what Joe Paterno heard was far more damning, but it’s also a problem that Graham Spanier heard some version of events and did not act – likely due to the university attitude towards big-time sports.

  • katisumas

    You’re so right!

    But how could these people refer to rape and molestation as “child seduction”????? 

  • pianiste

    Other than having a football coach with a long, long tenure, how “peculiar [are the] circumstances of football at Penn State” compared to those at Auburn, Alabama, Ohio State, USC, Oregon, Tennessee, etc., etc.?

  • Socratease2

    He does repeat them over and over.

  • Socratease2

    I agree Paterno’s position at Penn State was unusually powerful and influential but to say he was powerful because he brought in money and fans and therefore no one would touch him. Well, I don’t know about that. No university gets rich off athletics not even Penn State. Their athletic department may be self-sustaining or turn some profit but FB merely funds all the olympic sports and athletic dept. staff salaries. By the time you get done with the AD debit-credit ledger, I seriously doubt the money remaining, if any, put Paterno in a position to dictate much. It wasn’t money that gave him power. Plus, to say that you have to believe that administrators at all levels at Penn State (Admissions, Registrar, Student Affairs, etc.) hav zero professional ethics or backbone and would simply do anythng he said. I don’t believe that for a second.

  • Socratease2

    Apparently the gods can be deposed pretty easily then.

  • Socratease2

    That is one of the few things I can agree with here. You are right with each passing second. Right about what, I have no idea.

  • 12080243

    Good to hear from you, again, Socratease2.

  • pianiste

    As does Socratease2 his thinly disguised advocacy for bigtime college spectator sports.

  • riffusa

    “No university gets rich off athletics not even Penn State.”

    Really I think what you’re saying is, how do you quantify the revenue the prestige of a successful athletics program brings to your school? 

  • Socratease2

    Hi 12080243. I can’t reply to pianiste but you were close by. I really am not an advocate of big time spectator sports. Personally, I like college and NHL ice hockey and that is what I watch. I detest March Madness, was thrilled the NBA season was almost cancelled and am not a big FB fan. But I do love sports and competition in general and I was a student-athlete who ran cross-country and track in college. So I was not lavished with big time sports love believe me. I think athletics, if conducted with the right principles, has a place in a university and  that is a far different statement then I am a closet advocate for spectator sports. If I profited off sports in any way, my position might be more cynical, but I don’t. What is my payoff to support big tiime college sports? None, so, for those who think otherwise…whatever. So, once again, all I am saying is things are bit more complex than “college sports are all corrupt and demean the university.” That is just not true and I will continue to argue against sloppy analysis. The media coverage (and associated $$) of college sports is what has changed so quickly and is the ultimate cause of much that is wrong with the current system. The money is what allows the “arms race” in building new trainining facilities, stadiums and in financing the balooning salaries for coaches. Sports themselves are not the issue so I think people should target curing the disease not kill the patient.

  • 12080243

    Good to hear from you, Socratease2. I have to say, the topic is like salty potato chips. So here goes: The challenge is to identify “the right principles” and show that it works on university campuses. Folks have developed rules, and modified them again and again to address the misconduct and corruption of big-money sports for decades and the results are that big-money sports is incompatible with universities. [I’m not referring to the nitpicking blather from the NCAA.) We, academics, are not equipped to control big-money sports on our campuses. Just as we are not equipped to prosecute criminals among us. You can’t have big-money sports, football/basketball, on universities without the hundreds of thousands of fans and wealthy donors. They are symbiotic. Can’t have one without the other. And, they want winning teams. So, control their enthusiasm for winning teams. Control their insistence on having winning teams. Put forward “the right principles” to accomplish control that will change human nature to the point that big-money sports is not corrupt.

  • Socratease2

    All true, I know it is easy to say, “if done correctly and with integrity….” when that is the very issue at hand and I have no idea how to bring all the ducks into a row so that boosters, alumni, athletes, coaches, faculty make the enterprise defendable.  I know I have seen the good, the bad and the ugly of what college sports can produce and I guess I still have some optimism but the NCAA needs to create reform with a big R instead of the middling proposals I read today. I still say the kids are generally ok, it is the adults around them that need to do better.

  • 12080243

    Well said. Have a wonderful weekend.

  • davi9187

    A short, but cute holiday greeting from the Pirates at Southwestern University:
    http://www.facebook.com/SouthwesternUniversity

  • http://twitter.com/daless14 Anthony D’Alessio

    Merry Christmas from Newman University!
    http://www.youtube.com/user/newmanuniv?feature=mhee

  • http://www.facebook.com/erinedlund Erin Edlund

    Check out ours: http://dctc.edu/go/holiday/

     

  • The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • 1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
  • Washington, D.C. 20037