• Monday, May 28, 2012

Previous

Next

Demystifying Faculty Searches

October 8, 2010, 10:17 am

We’re about to place our first ads for our searches for this year. Consistent with my principles about what I write here, and what I think is useful for job-seekers, as with last year I will update you on these searches to the extent I can to help clarify how the process works for our small, rural, private university.

At the moment, we’re preparing to conduct four searches. Three of them are replacement positions: one in educational psychology, one in exercise science, and one in Spanish. One is a brand-new position in biology (something in the biomedical area, but we’re casting a broad net), which is a reward for our biology program for its tremendous success in the past few years in increasing enrollments coupled—crucially—with a real enhancement in student success. Three of the positions are strictly at the entry level, while we’re going to advertise the educational psychology program at the assistant or associate level in hopes that the contractions in public-sector employment may enable us to hire someone with more experience.

We’re thinking now about advertising. We’ll advertise in the usual places, The Chronicle and other professional Web sites, and in the MLA Job Information List for the Spanish position. We’re debating about other locations, such as Diverse: Issues in Higher Education. The problem is that job ads are very expensive, and we need to think about the potential return on our investment for advertising in each location. For perspective, I just authorized up to $1,500 to advertise the Spanish position. Multiply this by several positions, and it becomes obvious how expensive it is simply to start a search.

What will be interesting this year is how a couple of years’ worth of really bad job markets are going to affect our pools. Last year’s searches had larger (and therefore stronger) pools than those we did the year before, and I am curious to see if that effect continues this year. In previous years, we have struggled to recruit Spanish faculty members, and I look forward to seeing what happens this year, in particular, given the increasing level of Spanish spoken here in Storm Lake. We’ve had outstanding pools and great luck in hiring in the sciences, and I certainly hope that continues. I am happy that we have the resources to hire, and even to create a new position (we may create another, the one in some area of sustainability I discussed last summer), and I hope this year again to be at least moderately helpful in demystifying the process.    

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment (8)

8 Responses to Demystifying Faculty Searches

jruiz - October 9, 2010 at 8:30 am

It’s been a while since I was involved in advertising positions, but we used to do a block ad of all positions in the CHE and separate ones in specific joblists (e.g., MLA). Don’t know if it’s still cheaper that way. Good luck on your searches.

sumitindrani - October 9, 2010 at 10:34 am

You might also think of advertising on specialized academic lists for the relevant subject; some are free and some charge a fairly small fee. For example, the H-NET family of lists.Disclosure: I am a volunteer editor for an Asian Studies list in that family.

div411 - October 11, 2010 at 4:00 am

At a first-rate university, the aim would be to hire the best person in the field. If the best person or persons were unavailable, the position would not be available. At Buena Vista University the aim, I daresay, is to hire someone who has a college degree. If no one with a degree applies, the fallback is a diploma of some kind.Jaded in Utah

judithryan43 - October 11, 2010 at 10:47 am

To div411: isn’t that rather a rude remark?

11223435 - October 11, 2010 at 11:05 am

Or maybe the remark of someone tired of reading the perfectly obvious about Buena Vista? (Even if a bit rude.)

Where does the Chronicle find these purveyors of theirs? I’d almost rather read about the knockoff handbags and sneakers

cmsmw - October 11, 2010 at 11:09 am

11223435: No, it’s not obvious at all. Your tastes in a place to live and work should hardly be considered the universal norm. Snobbish remarks don’t have a place in a serious discussion on this topic.

clayfabulous - October 11, 2010 at 12:02 pm

Let’s hope your HR department manages to place the correct ad in the correct place. It’s expensive and ugly when poorly worded job descriptions pollute the market. It happens every day. Accurate descriptions are one of the most under appreciated aspects of a job search.

11223435 - October 11, 2010 at 12:05 pm

To cmsmw: Your obvious inferences are completely wrong. If by “your” you mean me, the place where I live and work is more like Buena Vista, and I’m quite happy here. And I’m not being a snob–you are simply assuming that someone who is bored with the obvious and says so can only be speaking from some elitist mountaintop.
I’m not doing so, and you’re very quick to assume and then to judge. But, enough of this: I’m bored with you, too.

  • The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • 1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
  • Washington, D.C. 20037