When I decided to work on a Ph.D. in English literature, back in the early ’90s, I remember having a conversation with my wife that went something like this:
“Well, it will take me four or five years, but at least when I’m done, I will make a good living. I guess that professors start at, what, about $75K? I hear that full professors all make way over $100 grand.”
My wife, who went to a small, underendowed private college, just laughed. “Um, I think we need to drive through the faculty parking lot at a couple of campuses. There are a lot of very old, very used cars in them. I think you are way off on that starting-salary thing.”
She was right, of course. And was I wrong. The first job I interviewed for when I was A.B.D. was slated to start at $30K, with very limited benefits. I had earned that much back when I taught high-school English.
In a similar vein, I had a friend who was completely green about the way that higher ed worked, and he landed his first college teaching job after working at secondary schools for several years. The college had a formula in place (thanks to collective bargaining) in which secondary experience in the state system was transferable into the college setting. When he arrived for his first day of faculty orientation, he was furious to find that he’d been hired in as an “associate” professor. He marched straight to his vice president for academic affairs to complain, only to be met with laughter.
What’s the most naïve idea you had about the job market in higher education, before you finally gained the wisdom that only experience can bring?
Follow On Hiring through your favorite RSS reader:
3 Responses to Bone-Headed Naivete
kadir yaman - December 7, 2011 at 6:56 am
A very nice page. I think the effort has passed, we have to thank you:))
Göğüs küçültme
Erin Dorney - March 18, 2012 at 9:49 pm
I get to meet Gardner Campbell this week on campus! He is coming to Millersville to do some brainstorming re: our campus transformation agenda. Very excited to chat with him. Your post got me thinking, specifically the line “I want the books I “own” to talk with each other.” I would definitely be willing to sacrifice print-reading preference for “smart” setups that would allow for integrated, collaborative knowledge-sharing. Very thought-provoking as usual.
nadine mathu - April 24, 2012 at 8:20 pm
I relate to your comment about familiarity, but it can work to disadvantage, too. My print copy of “Forest for the Trees” by Betsey Lerner is dogeared and ratty; I must’ve read it 30 times. I bought the e-version and the experience just wasn’t the same. The more I like the book, the less I like the e-book, it seems.