Last May there were reports of exploding watermelons in China. Apparently, farmers applied fertilizer that made the melons grow really big really fast and then KAPOW! They exploded. It is with a fair amount of distress that I am observing a similar phenomenon at my own institution. No, we aren’t growing fruit on campus, but we do seem to be growing some mighty big egos, and I fear the splatter of gray matter as a few heads begin to explode.
I’ve been trying to understand how and why watermelon people are created and have discovered a few common variables. Variable A = Person is smart. Variable B = Person is unusual in some way. Variable C = Person was initially very likeable, due in part to Variable B. Variable D = Person is young, or at least new to the role or organization. Variable F = Organization gives person constant positive feedback about how wonderful he or she is, in part to show organizational commitment and to encourage retention. All of these variables are good things. We want smart, unique, likeable people, and positive feedback is a glorious thing. So, why does positive feedback turn certain people into potential exploding watermelons? And what are the consequences?
Admittedly, I am not a fan of people who think they are “all that.” But because I knew the watermelon people back when they seemed normal, I still like them and I’m worried about their futures. And I have to say that those futures might just be in jeopardy as these “rising stars” ignore the advice of senior people, remind their colleagues of their growing importance, and make fairly ridiculous demands. If they don’t knock it off, they won’t be “all that” for too much longer. That won’t be good for them, and it won’t be good for us.
I’ve been asked for advice on how to talk to the watermelon people about the need to tone things down without crushing their spirits, but I haven’t come up with anything particularly brilliant. Any suggestions?

