• Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Previous

Next

Walter Kimbrough and the Next Generation of Black-College Presidents

November 3, 2011, 2:06 pm

On Tuesday, the board of trustees of Dillard University selected Walter Kimbrough to be their next president. Kimbrough is the current president of Philander Smith College in Little Rock, Ark. When he stepped into the leadership role of the small Arkansas college, it was somewhat unstable, with uninspired faculty and staff members. Kimbrough turned the institution around completely by empowering students, faculty, and staff, increasing student success, and attracting more external funding support.

I’ve had the opportunity to visit the Philander Smith campus on several occasions and it is vibrant, energetic, and thriving. Kimbrough has the ability to inspire those around him. He hires excellent people and trusts them to do their jobs. But more than inspiration, Kimbrough is wedded to using data to make decisions. He collects data on everything related to his institution’s performance, is open to sharing it with others, and uses it to make change and move his institution forward.

I have written about Kimbrough or his institution several times. He exemplifies bravery in a college president, penning op-eds on a regular basis and taking stands on controversial educational issues. He also represents a new generation of black-college presidents who are young, highly innovative, data-driven, and daring in their approach to education.

But Kimbrough’s departure from Philander Smith College begs the question: Who will lead the institution next and will its next president be able to sustain the momentum that Kimbrough has set in place at the institution? I hope the new president can do it and believe it’s possible because Kimbrough has left a substantial blueprint in place. Philander Smith College, with its ‘Think Justice’ focus is a special college and needs a special leader.

The larger question is where will the future black-college presidents come from? And what kind of background do they need? Are they being groomed? There are those who believe that black-college presidents should be reared within the black-college environment. Interestingly, some of the newest black-college presidents did not go to black colleges and/or have not work extensively or at all in the black-college environment. Of course, there are many black-college presidents who are wonderfully successful and have achieved this success in part because of their experiences at black colleges. But, perhaps, we need to be more open-minded in our understanding of what makes a successful black-college president. There are some terrific leadership prospects on the horizon.

At lease once a month, a young African American tells me that he or she wants to lead a black college. These individuals are excited, committed, and eager to lead. In order to ensure the success of black colleges, we all need to groom these young people—regardless of the type of institution at which they were educated. Black colleges have the potential to have many, many Walter Kimbroughs leading them into the 21st Century.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • bdavi52

    The answer here is blindingly obvious, so obvious I begin to feel that I must be missing a punchline somewhere.  “Where will the future black-college presidents come from?”  Why from the same immense pool which has always supplied non-black-college presidents — they will come from the  administrative staffs currently working at any of the other 5000 colleges and universities across the United States. [On a side note,  I would also hope that several would come from non-academic fields as we badly need such experiential diversity in our leadership ranks.]

    “What kind of background do (these future presidents of black colleges) need?”  Well, they need the same kind of background that any of the other 5000 presidents need. They need a string of experiences which has allowed them the opportunity to develop and prove their Vision, their Strategic Insight, their Leadership, etc. etc. 

    These questions puzzle me.

    But then we see that “at least once a month a young African American tells me that he or she wants to lead a black college.”  Is this a part of the selection/approval criteria?  Is Ms. Gasman implying that skin color/ethnicity is key to the presidential equation?  Must one be black to lead a black college?  And is that why these questions are being asked — because it is that much more difficult to find qualified individuals who possess the right skin color than it is to simply find qualified individuals?

    Clearly that cannot be the case because such a conclusion, such a criteria, such an implication would be incredibly racist.  And, it would be incredibly stupid.  And it would be illegal.  Of course it would also raise the much messier question:  why do we still accept, why do we still tolerate, why do we still positively embrace the very existence of so-called ‘black colleges’ (whatever that term now means)?  Or are we also discussing historically black colleges which are now majority non-black?  How diverse does a student population need to be before Ms. Gasman would be comfortable with a non-African American president?  How non-diverse would it need to be before Ms. Gasman would require only African-American candidates?We must look beyond skin tone if we are to choose the very best.  We must look beyond gender.  We must look beyond ethnicity.  We must, indeed, look beyond all the cosmetic superficialities as we look to build a future much brighter than today.  Only when we do that can we truly find those many, many ‘Walter Kimbroughs’ to lead our universities.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3JQYJHQGYJOLOTYI2KFOQ6OZQ4 Truth