• May 25, 2013

Previous

Next

Seeing Race Outside of Our Own Country

July 30, 2010, 2:32 pm

I just returned from South Africa—a country I have visited for the past nine years every summer.  With me were 23 doctoral students all studying American higher education. As part of their doctoral program, they participate in a two-credit course on South African higher education, history, and culture. I have been teaching this course for many years, but am continually intrigued by my students’ reactions to discussions of race in South Africa. I thought I’d share some of their reactions. As you read, please keep in mind that this is a diverse student group, with Black, White, and Latino students of various ages, faiths, and socioeconomic backgrounds. Over the years, I’ve also taken Asian and Native American students with me to South Africa.

One of the first reactions my students have takes place right after being introduced to some South Africans. You see, many South Africans will introduce themselves and very quickly make their race known. Because of the recentness of apartheid, race permeates the air in South Africa. Many of my students are shocked by the immediate racial identification. They are also surprised by the frankness around discussing issues of race. South Africans tend to be quite comfortable talking about race, unlike many Americans.

Often my White students are surprised at the blatant forms of discrimination and racism that they hear about when we travel to universities and throughout the country. They recoil when they hear how people were treated under apartheid and are still treated by some citizens of the country. It is easy for them to judge and to see racism in South Africa, but much harder to see it in the United States. Many times during class discussions, African American students will say, “but the same things happen in the U.S.—you just don’t notice it because it’s not happening to you.” This is an eye opener for my students overall. 

When I teach about racial issues in the United States, many students have a very difficult time seeing how racial discrmination and disparities manifest in schools, health care, housing, employment. Personal racism is a bit easier for them to see, but systemic racism often goes unnoticed. This is not the case when my students are in South Africa. As we passed by miles of shanty towns in every major city of the country (a leftover from apartheid—Black people from the homelands would set up temporary shelters near cities in order to get jobs), the students saw immense racial disparities. When we visited Kliptown, where my good friend Bob Numeng leads a non-profit dedicated to uplifting children in the shanty towns, the realization that there isn’t a school for the 45,000+ community revealed the impact of decades of apartheid rule. My students saw racism and its evils in South Africa quite vividly.

Perhaps the most difficult issue to grapple with for my students, especially Black Americans, is the differentiation in South Africa between Black (or African) and Coloured. To Americans, the Coloured people of South Africa (a mixture of Malay, Dutch, Koi, and more recently, Indian, and Black) “look” Black and my students often can’t understand why they don’t consider themselves Black and why they don’t align more closely with Black South Africans. In the United States, they think, these individuals would be Black. Why not in South Africa? My students also have difficulty with the use of the word “coloured” because of its painful history here in the United States. Race in South Africa is quite complicated and although apartheid has fallen, its trappings remain vivid. In fact, the entire affirmative-action system in the country is based on the historic racial categories in order to provide equity to those who were oppressed under the apartheid government. Many of my students were frustrated that these racial categories still exist, but could not think of another way to achieve equality within the country.

A few years ago, during a visit to South Africa, I took my students to the Apartheid Museum and the special exhibit was titled “American Apartheid.” Many, if not most of the students were shocked by the exhibit, some even asked me if it was true. They wondered how these atrocities could have happened in the United States. Of course, those students who had lived through the atrocities didn’t have this kind of reaction. As I listened to my students, I couldn’t help but think that we do a terrible job of teaching people about history—especially the history of which we are not proud. It is easy to judge another country’s track record on issues of race, but it is very difficult to look closely at our own issues and to have the hard discussions that move us forward as a nation. I often wonder what we are afraid of. The worst that could happen is that we might find out we have more commonalities than we have differences. We might discover that equity for all makes for a much stronger and better nation. We might figure out that having empathy for other human beings results in a kinder nation. 

Interestingly, as we moved throughout South Africa, many people told us that they look to the United States as a model for moving forward on issues of race. Given the openness with which many South Africans discuss racial issues, I wonder if we might be better off looking to them for some ideas. 

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Seeing Race Outside of Our Own Country

sdblogger - July 30, 2010 at 7:07 pm

I am interested in hearing more about the reactions of your students who are Black and Latino when confronted with questions about race. I have traveled a lot internationally, and being bi-racial (Chinese-American) I have been asked several times, “what ARE you?” At first, I was taken aback and struggled to clarify that what I “AM” is more than just my race…but now, I realize that here in the United States we try to be so politically correct that sometimes we completely ignore this important factor of who we “are.” For more on my views on student development, visit http://www.studentdevelopmentblog.com.

honore - August 1, 2010 at 11:32 am

sdblogger…try to get it into your American-brainwashed head that “latino” is NOT and never has been a “race”, except in the USA, where race ignorance is now a very apparent industry.We all know who we are RACIALLY, ETHNICALLY and CULTURALLY and please believe me when I tell you that the culture of Peru IS NOT that of Paraguay, nor the culture of Puerto Rico NOR the culture of Panama. Try again with you attempt at profound race analysis.

rachel312 - August 2, 2010 at 6:45 am

I teach a course every summer for visiting European students blended with Americans in the U.S. The course is about diversity in America, with the intent of tapping into comparative discussions on diversity and political and social ideas in Europe as well.We have similar experiences in that the Europeans constantly claim there is no discrimination in Europe (around disability, so called race, ethnicity, age, gender, social class), while the white Americans discuss personal or individual experiences in race and don’t see anything systemic.Both groups are shocked at two things: history of discrimination in the U.S. and second, statistics that demonstrate continued discrimination like spending per capita per student in school systems, or percentage of minorities who become physicians, or percentage of women in professional positions in ALL the European countries.

honore - August 2, 2010 at 8:46 am

rachel312…it think it’s called “denial”.It is a very comfortable cushion to rest one’s head on while dreaming of fake diversity and even more fake egalitarian faux-politics…thanks.

22228715 - August 2, 2010 at 8:48 am

Honore, thank you for your very important observation. As a member of the discussion community, I ask that you consider reframing your substantive contributions in a way that is more collegial. In the e-world, some of your communication tools (personal attacks, capitals as shouting, sarcasm) are considered rude or are just not as clear as they might be in speech. With rephrasing, your points would likely land more potently for advancing the discussion. Thanks.

rsgassle - August 2, 2010 at 9:14 am

I believe honore was agreeing with rachel312 that the students were in denial. Not rachel312.

honore - August 2, 2010 at 9:40 am

2228715 & rsgassle…no offense taken…i was in fact referring to the students though…and yes, i recognize that i can at times get abit “colorful” and contentious in my language, but 25 years in the academy have given me a very short fuse on some of the topics presented here…not to worry though, the CHE “delete” police are very adept at removing even the most innocuous of my comments in any language…cheers

gloriawalker - August 2, 2010 at 12:51 pm

I am happy that you admit American is not perfect and students need to be exposed to the real WORLD. I hope that you continue to share with your students and others that claim to be professional yet critical. I have some suggestions to enhance your work and would be happy to share. If you are interested contact me.

ugg123456789 - August 6, 2010 at 1:33 am

This article is a great example of the theme “Change Creates Opportunity” which I write about in my blog about Program Management Office (PMO) activities, structure and behavior.UGG“Change Creates Opportunity” originated with William Bridges in his book JOB SHIFT. But application shows that by being open to change and watching for those “needs” that are not being met, one can fill those “needs” and thereby create new opportunity.

fredcoqi - August 9, 2010 at 1:43 am

I am happy that you admit American is not perfect and students need to be exposed to the real WORLD. I hope that you continue to share with your students and others that claim to be professional yet critical. I have some suggestions to enhance your work and would be happy to share. If you are interested contact me.This article is a great example of the theme “Change Creates Opportunity Short ugg“so that they could also be easily reused and repurposed by others for their own courses.

ellenhunt - August 9, 2010 at 1:07 pm

A further complicating factor about South Africa, is that virtually everyone there is an immigrant of the same period. When the Afrikaaners going north met and fought with the Zulu’s coming south, both were strangers in the land, thousands of miles from their origins. The Zulus are from northern subsaharan Africa, and conquered their way south over centuries. The Zulus drove out and happily slaughtered the peoples they encountered coming south. The only native people in South Africa are the Bushmen and a few others. Everyone else is an alien, and the Afrikaaners have been there exactly as long as the Zulus have. Also, as an African friend said to me, “Whites in Africa are just another tribe, and they are very far from the worst.”

alistair - August 11, 2010 at 8:12 pm

Re: “Coloured people of South Africa (a mixture of Malay, Dutch, Koi, and more recently, Indian, and Black)” in the text above, it should be noted that to be ‘coloured’ in Southern Africa generally (its a community identifier in countries like Zimbabwe and Zambia as well as South Afica) includes those of caucasian and a non-caucasian genetic heritage – with the non caucasian most often being African.

unreality - August 13, 2010 at 3:01 pm

Today, August 13, 2010 I just heard your interview on NPR’s “Here And Now” and am both overjoyed and impressed. I immigrated here some 25 years ago from apartheid South Africa. Expecting to find America the land of complete equality and fairness, I was therefore in for a huge shock. What was so interesting to me, was the reaction of white Americans to me once hearing where I was from. I am white, and their reaction was hostile and accusatory and therefore hypocritical considering the racism I was encountering in this very country. I continue to read about racist incidents in the newspapers and read columns in my local daily town newspaper by a certain columnist that makes me shake my head in sadness. All irony, considering Americans spent so much time protesting and working to end apartheid when it was taking place in their own back yards and very possibly in their own homes. The Tea Party movement currently reminds me very much of the white Broederbonder regime of apartheid South Africa, their rhetoric and behavior being much the same. In fact, many Republicans remind me of Broederbonders in apartheid South Africa, by their speech, tone and attitude. The histories of America and South Africa have chilling similarities and both are steeped in a cruel legacy.

marka - August 17, 2010 at 3:03 pm

“I often wonder what we are afraid of. The worst that could happen is that we might find out we have more commonalities than we have differences.”If only … . We could hope that talking about it would result in us finding our common humanity, but that doesn’t always happen.To the contrary, continuing to focus on ‘race’ (or cultural, or religious, or ethnic) identity can, and has, led to some of the more violent wars thruout history. Our most recent examples are the breakups of larger aggregations — the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia into smaller enclaves (Chechen, Georgian, Slav, Muslim, Serb, etc.)Talking about it doesn’t always make it go away — we’ve been talking about it here in the US for at least as long as Europeans made it over here (and presumably, those peoples already here also had opportunity to talk beforehand … )

  • 1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
  • Washington, D.C. 20037
subscribe today

Get the insight you need for success in academe.