• Monday, May 28, 2012

Previous

Next

HBCU’s Are Not Segregated Institutions

February 12, 2011, 5:28 pm

What is it about Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) that gets under some people’s skin? All too often, I receive calls, e-mail messages or comments on blog posts from those who think that HBCUs are “vestiges of segregation,” promote racism, segregate Black students, and should not exist. These same individuals fail to understand that the United States has Historically White Institutions (HWIs) as well—many that are still very, very White in terms of student, faculty, and administrative make-up.

Both HBCUs and HWIs were created during a time of immense segregation. HWIs were created to educate Whites and kept African Americans out for a long time—save a few exceptions. Some HBCUs were created by African Americans with a thirst for learning, often with the help of missionaries and philanthropists (for various reasons). Others were created by Southern states in an effort to keep Blacks out of HWIs. These institutions were separate and were never funded at equal levels compared to their White counterparts. In all but a few cases, they are still not funded equally.

Regardless of their founding and their lack of funding, HBCUs have a long history of shaping and educating African Americans. Although some of them struggle today (just as some HWIs do), they continue to make substantial contributions to the lives, education, and careers of African American students and others. They are a choice for students not a mandate as in the past.

One reason why some people cannot understand the role and purpose of HBCUs is that they assume that “Black” institutions are inferior. This assumption is tied to a deep racism that permeates our nation, that is, Black = inferior. Others assume that HBCUs segregate when in fact, they are often more diverse in make-up—students, faculty, and staff—than HWIs. Still others think that you must believe in segregation if you support HBCUs as an educational choice. I can assure you that one can support HBCUs and also support integration of HWIs (and HBCUs for that matter). Think about it this way: can one support women’s colleges and co-ed institutions? I’d say yes. Students benefit from having different educational choices. As Earl Richardson, the former president of Morgan State University has said over and over, the term “Historically Black College and University” denotes history. It does not mean that HBCUs are segregated institutions in the current day.

I have read the research (and conducted quite a bit of it) and I know that for some students HBCUs offer the best educational experience. For years, sociologists and higher-education researchers have shown, using empirical data, that HBCUs build self-esteem, challenge, and support their students in meaningful ways that lead to future success. If not for HBCUs, I often wonder what the landscape of graduate and professional education would look like. I know for sure that we would boast far fewer African American scholars and leaders.

Before criticizing HBCUs, people should take the time to read the history of these institutions and American racism. The role of HBCUs and reasons for their existence become much clearer with a better understanding of these institutions’ historic and current contributions to society.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • zagros

    Interestingly, HBCUs perform similar functions for African-American students as women’s colleges perform for women, albeit with less than 100% attendance by the group in question. Women’s colleges provide women with leadership opportunities that they may not otherwise have at other institutions and HBCUs do the same for African-American students. This is the same reason why the Supreme Court has mandated majority-minority districts to allow African-Americans to have a voice in Congress. Indeed, even though we now have an African-American president, racism still exists in this country and there are not the same level of opportunities for all.

    Furthermore, Dr. Gasman correctly points out that most people forget the H is HBCU. These are HISTORICALLY Black Colleges and Universities. Some are still majority African-American but there are also some where African-Americans form a minority. This does not diminish their importance. The history of a place determines its culture and its place in society. HBCUs, having been marginalized from the start, are particularly adept at “doing more with less.” They continue to receive fewer funds than HWIs and in this era of budget cutting, the HWIs are merely having to learn what HBCUs have had to do all this time: concentrate on core functions rather than fluff.

    Finally, rather than eliminate HBCUs, what needs to happen is to strengthen them. Even those institutions that are currently given funding on a par with HWIs are still underfunded from a legacy standpoint. HBCU faculty, because of the mission of the school, perform critical research on race and race relations and have a different take on this subject than do HWIs. HBCU students CHOOSE to come to HBCUs because of the culture that is present but are denied an equal education due to inferior funding. Indeed, the history of the HBCU is to deliver an equal or superior education with inferior funding. Isn’t it time to put funding where it does the most good, i.e., at HBCUs?

  • mbelvadi

    After at least two generations being told by higher ed administrators and judges at every level up to the Supreme Court that “diversity” in the student body is such an important part of a high quality education that it justifies non-color-blind admissions processes, is it really fair to call racist the suggestion that HBCUs are inferior because they lack diversity in the student body?

  • g_martin

    Yes it is really fair to call racist the suggestion that HBCUs are inferior because they lack diversity in the student body, unless you also saying that HWI’s are inferior too for the same reason.

  • goxewu

    Prof. Gasman talks around the subject. Whether or not HBCUs are “inferior,” whether or not they offer many black students the best environment/opportunity for a college education, and whether or not there a small fraction of students attending them, are irrelevant to whether they are de facto “segregated.” Of course, they’re segregated, or at least segregating. “Historical” is the hedge word, with its heavy implication that there’s a tradition at work in HBCUs (being predominantly black) that should be continued. If HWIs officially proclaimed themselves, or marketed themselves, to be operating in the interest of white students the way that HBCUs do regarding black students, the outcry would be deafening.

    And the parallel with women’s colleges is false. To cite the obvious, society maintains separate restrooms for women and men, but not separate restrooms for different races. The NCAA conducts separate sports championships for women and men, but not for the different races. There are many other instances of separate facilities and procedures for men and women that have to do with biological differences between the sexes that’s not paralleled in racial differences.

    HBCUs should be given much greater funds and resources as (in instances where they are) state colleges and universities…and should be slowly phased out as HBCUs, to become, simply, colleges and universities.

  • mbelvadi

    That was exactly my point – people in positions of authority (judges and IHE admins) HAVE implicitly been calling HWIs inferior for lacking diversity – that’s the clear implication of their claims that affirmative action admissions is necessary to create a diverse environment. I believe the legal term is “compelling interest” – that a strong claim for sine qua non value of diversity.

  • betterschool

    Whatever the merits of the HBCU’s, the double standards, polite winks, and outright hypocrisy are beneath respect. Without qualification, HBCU’s have the lowest graduation rates, the highest loan default rates, and fewest credits produced per total dollar expended of any typically defined sector of IHE (independents, for-profits, community colleges, publics, etc.). How do we work those facts into current HE thinking and policy? The current answer is that we pretend it isn’t there.

  • Guest

    It is time to phase out HCBU’s — and soon. While no one can claim they didn’t serve a useful purpose at one time in the past, no one in touch with the performance evidence can suggest that they serve a positive purpose today. Their performance is an embarrassment to all involved. I have no problem should some of these institutions wish to preserve themselves but they need to do so without the exceptional public largess that now makes their existence possible.

  • marktropolis

    Let’s be careful about throwing accusations of racism around. First off, diversity initiative have been, and continue to be, related to increasing diversity in institutions that have been historically white. HBUCs don’t have the same problem.

    When you have an example of a white student being denied admission to an HBCU, call me. I know for a fact that many HBCUs have in fact expended institutional resources to increase their diversity. So, in reality, your accusation is false, both in terms of what I will call it’s “baiting” quality, but also because you don’t have the facts.

  • marktropolis

    I think you need to check your data. Your critique (related to graduation rates and loan defaults) are the same one’s aimed at the for-profit sector. Secondly, apart from places like Morehouse and Spelman, HBCUs have historically been some of the cheapest places to go (in terms of student costs). And most of your critiques have more to do with the fact that these institutions *are* under-resourced.

    And I didn’t see Gasman “pretend it isn’t there” but rather attempt to make a case that HBCUs should be supported – in better and different ways.

  • marktropolis

    I agree – phase out HBCUs, as soon as HWI are phased out. When students of color have as good a chance to get into any of the top 50 colleges in this country as white students, I’ll shut up.

    And please define “exceptional public largess.” Last I checked, the CEOs of the largest for-profit universities are making over $10M annually, and 90% of that income comes from federally guaranteed student loans and Pell Grants. I’d call that “exceptional public largess.”

  • betterschool

    Here are the loan repayment rates and average debt load for higher performing HBCU’s:

    Coppin State University, 23, $11,958.00
    Morgan State University, 23, $14,765.00
    U of Maryland, Eastern Shore, 31,$12,433.00
    Bethune-Cookman, 15, $12,890.00
    South Carolina State, 17, $15,583.00
    Savannah State, 20, $12,511.00
    Delaware State, 21, $15,316.00
    North Carolina Central, 22, $20,367.00
    Norfolk State, 24, $13,325.00
    North Carolina A&T, 27, $12,036.00
    Howard, 32, $31,789.00
    Florida A&M, 32, $18,804.00
    Hampton, 42, $17,377.00

    >> Average percent Repay and Debt Load – 25%, $16,088.77

    Large for-profits (recall, of the 1,000, some serve only elite and specialized audiences. Capella University, for example, has a default rate of less than 4% — better than 90% of state universities and private colleges).

    Strayer, 25, $14,908.00
    Kaplan, 28, $7,458.00
    ITT Education, 32, $10,608.00
    DeVry, 35, $13,373.00
    Career Education, 36, $10,775.00
    Apollo Group, 44, $13,324.00

    >> Average percent Repay and Debt Load – 32%, $11,034.29

    This post is really for interested parties. You seem to be driven more by ideology that facts.

  • kopernikus

    Of course they are segregated. Any physical separation is segregation. The author does not want to admit this because segregations became a bad word due to our peculiar history. The HWI schools still have segregated Greek organizations. Students segregate themselves in countless ways: race, money, drugs, sports, course major. If Black students want to immerse themselves in their own culture, then so be it.

  • marktropolis

    Yeah, I hate facts. Please cite the source for your data; I’m curious how you define “higher performing HBCU’s” and if you used the same definition for your list of for-profits.

    One of the reasons HBCUs have such bad numbers tracks back to the lack of resources. As the Education Sector has pointed out, when “default aversion” strategies are employed, HBCUs have significantly lowered their default rates (see http://www.educationsector.org/publications/lowering-student-loan-default-rates). But, “Their story is one of teamwork, collaboration, and relationship-building and proves that when institutions are armed with the tools, resources, support, and commitment needed to lower default rates, they can do so successfully.” Meaning, if the support is there (Gasman’s argument) those numbers start to look better.

    But to suggest that HBCUs shouldn’t be in business because their students struggle to pay off their loans? Is that your argument? If it all hinges on “double standards, polite winks, and outright hypocrisy” then perhaps you should take a look at Wall Street. Or maybe the GOP.

    The point is that HBCUs have, and continue to, serve an important function – a function important to African Americans. And accusations of segregation are ill-informed, and ignore the history and function of race in higher education access and success.

  • Guest

    MARKTROPOLIS – I don’t know if you are willing to pay betterschools to educate you but, as you probably say to your students, sooner or later, you need to learn to do your own digging.

    All of the above data betterschools refers to and much more is available from NCES and other ED departments. BTW: The data below (or above) reflect 2-year models, 3-year models are in the works. Let me know if you need help. I can link you to the detailed ED spreadsheets. They are easy to sort and read. From your perspective, it looks like you have a rude awakening in store. These data seem to go out of their way to avoid the really bad HCBU’s and do not mention that the majority of the for-profits are much lower than the big ones represented here.

    But I guess we all know HBCU’s are terribly inefficient. The question is, do we need them in spite of how much they are costing us? Let’s see . . .

    - HBCU’s have high loan default rates (which may or may not result in a net cost to the taxpayer – the jury is still out and contested), are inefficient, get hundreds of millions in property, sales, and use tax breaks, are handed large numbers of federal grants, are eligible for state student incentives, and pay no income taxes.

    >> Yet, we can make a case that we need them nonetheless because they serve a disadvantaged sector of the underclass.

    - For-profits, have high loan default rates (which may or may not result in a net cost to the taxpayer – the jury is still out and contested), are highly efficient, pay billions in property use, and sales taxes, are handed no federal grants, are not eligible for state student incentives, and pay billions in income taxes.

    >> Yet, we can make a case that we need them nonetheless because they serve a disadvantaged sector of the underclass.

    What would impartial, well-informed minds say about this? Those who have their minds made up will change the subject or pick on an immaterial side issue.

    Public universities have been good to me. I love them. But I think we are obligated to rise above our self-interests, material or petty.

  • koufax33

    After a great on-campus interview for a student affairs position at a large midwest University, I sent thank you cards to the search committee members. Unknown to me, one of those I sent was a blank thank-you card, nothing written inside. I was offered the position two days later.

    Two months into my new job, I receive back a thank you card, which the card itself was rather quite familiar to me. She thanked me for accepting the job, etc and said she was glad they hired me, even if I sent blank thank cards. Zing! Since then, I always double check my cards before sealing an envelope!

  • minnesotan

    That story made my day.

    It also reminds me that I have some thank you notes to write (and double-check they’re filled out properly).

  • ndcollier

    ditto. i received a confirmation letter addressed to the wrong name.

  • aeonelpis

    Some details matter more than others. We had a candidate this year who listed the wrong name for the Major Journal that published hir first article. Failing to swap out a school in a letter is understandable. But not knowing where you published? That raised a lot of concerns about knowledge of the field, professionalization, etc.

  • westfalldavis

    Re: ndcollier & wolf359

    At least you got a rejection letter! I think there must be a Black Hole of the universe filled with packets from new graduates that are never acknowledged.

  • elfnes2

    I wonder what you really think . . .?

  • fortysomethingprof

    86% of those who graduated from high school _last year_ think getting a college degree is worth it?  How would they know?

  • gahnett

    Yes, I agree with fortysomethingprof.

    The poll asks the attendees that have yet to be the primary payees.  Ask them in five years if it was worth it or ask the parents who are footing the bill.

  • dailyreader

    Maybe this small summary is incomplete but I can’t help but wonder why they would ask high school graduates if going to college was worth it.  And of those who didn’t 80% plan to do it later.  Well, naturally they would. 

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3JQYJHQGYJOLOTYI2KFOQ6OZQ4 Truth