• Monday, May 28, 2012

Previous

Next

Empowering Black Male Youth at Cheyney University

August 10, 2011, 3:44 pm

In recent months, the City of Philadelphia has been the scene of flash mobs—large groups of youth that meet in parts of the city via text message—with the goals of vandalizing, stealing, and causing disruptions to those going about their day in the city. Just this week, Mayor Michael Nutter placed a curfew on youth in Philadelphia, making it illegal for them to be downtown after 9 p.m. without a chaperone. Although Mayor Nutter’s response will hopefully curb the violence resulting from the flash mobs, it doesn’t get at the root of the problem. Thankfully, he is also lengthening the hours of local civic centers and recreation centers.

At its core, the flash-mob problem is the result of youth having little to do and being without structure. Imagine if all of the energy put into planning the flash mobs was put into doing something constructive. These youths are craving adult attention so it’s vital that we give it to them in meaningful ways.

One institution that is reaching out to youth who need direction is Cheyney University, located outside Philadelphia. The institution has a new program, directed by Howard Jean, which focuses on black boys in the greater Philadelphia area. It’s called the Summer Leadership Development Institute. The program’s goals include empowering these boys “to live in greatness as well-adjusted citizens, professionals, and contributors to their community.” Although the leaders at Cheyney, a historically black university, are not directly responding to the flash mobs, they could be given their goals and the needs of the youth participating in the vandalism and mayhem throughout the city.

In actuality, Cheyney created the program to counter the high dropout rates among black males in the city and to decrease the numbers of black youth in prison. The empowering of these young men entails personal, academic, and social mentoring and leadership development. Of note, Cheyney will focus on the academic preparation of these boys, assisting them with SAT success, preparing them for college, and increasing their pre-professional skills. These young men will also get a chance to experience life on a college campus during a week-long residential component of the leadership program. Exposure to college, according to higher-education researchers, is an impetus for college participation.

Through this exposure, mentoring, and some major refocusing, Cheyney hopes to change the lives of these young men and in turn help them to change the lives of other young black men. A key component of this program is the presence of black male role models. Cheyney is using its resources from its pre-service teacher program to bolster the impact of the youth leadership program, exposing these boys to successful black men—a strategy that is backed up by research at all educational levels.

The fact that Cheyney is a historically black institution should not be lost on the reader as the institution is using the very best of what HBCU’s have to offer to make a difference in the lives of young black males. HBCU’s have long offered environments rich in role models, care, and nurturing of African American talent. Cheyney is not the only HBCU to host a program focused on empowering black men. There are programs at Prairie View A&M University, Morehouse College, and Philander Smith College, among others. All of us in higher education could learn a lot about ensuring the success of black males from the successes of these programs.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • http://twitter.com/GerardHarbison Gerard Harbison

    It’s interesting that although they have been happening for at least a year, the ‘establishment’ media seems only to have gotten the cojones to notice flash mobs since the London riots. Such is the complete cowardice they display on racial issues. The conservative media and blogosphere has been on to this for months. NPR even did a piece this morning, and mentioned the perps were young black men (gasp!) but couldn’t quite bring itself to say the attacks are racial and overwhelmingly directed at whites.

    Oh well, tiny steps…

  • goxewu

    So….

    a) Young black men are genetically predisposed to violence and, if not kept in severe check, will riot, rob, rape and pillage because they’re, well, young black males?

    b) Young black men are the most screwed over by a government and system run by and for older white men, and every once in a while, they boil over?

    In order to see Prof. Harbison in his full glory (especially the photo):
    http://homepage.mac.com/gerardharbison/blog/RWP_blog.html

  • http://twitter.com/GerardHarbison Gerard Harbison

    Do explain how young black men are being screwed over, goxewu. Excessively taxed? Drafted? Disenfranchised? And this excuses mob attacks on random white individuals?

    But thanks for the publicity, and I think it’s rather a good photo.

  • goxewu

    Discriminated against in employment and education. (I’ve seen it in action in the UK; it isn’t official, as with U.S. Jim Crow in the segregation era, but it’s there.) Less and less employment in blue-collar jobs, a lot because they’ve been off-shored, all the way to Malaysia and Pakistan. (This effects young white men who don’t, or can’t, go to university, too, but it disproportionately affects young black men.) Disparities in police conduct toward them, and sentencing of them, as opposed to whites who commit the same offences.

    No, this doesn’t “excuse” mob attacks on random white individuals (nor does rampant unemployment and lack of prospects excuse the long, long history of white “yobbo” attacks on random black individuals in the UK), but after the police and courts have had their say, ongoing “get tough” policies don’t, in terms of prevention, do much good.

    Obviously, Prof. Harbison thinks the photo of himself on his website is rather good, or he wouldn’t have posted it. (Is that a toupée?) Alas, there’s no accounting for taste.

    And did Prof. Harbison really refer to a University of Nebraska cheerleader as “sugar t*ts”?

  • http://twitter.com/GerardHarbison Gerard Harbison

    The last video I saw of mob attacks in Philadelphia was a group of urban youts from a Charter school attacking a white guy in hospital scrubs coming home from work. Hard to see how they’re discriminated against in employment, since they’re in school.

    As for the personal attacks from goxewu; no, it’s not a toupee, and the libelous website he’s referring to was put up by someone, probably somone very like him, during my involvement in the Nebraska Civil Rights Initiative. It’s the internet equivalent of a flash mob. If the left can’t outdebate you, they will make up lies to attack you professionally.

  • arthist030

    Is this really all carrot, no stick?     I would say, by the time they’ve reached the point of beating random passers-by to within an inch of their lives, there should be at least some stick involved, to complement the carrot.

  • http://twitter.com/CheyneyUPres Michelle H-Vital

    Cheyney University Wants to Save Our Boys…..Join Us

  • goxewu

    No attack, just asked a couple of questions. First one, about the toupee, answered.

    Second one, about the alleged remark about the U. of Nebraska cheerleader, wasn’t. Prof. Harbison merely fulminated, .”…libelous website…if the left can’t outdebate you, they will make up lies to attack you personally.” Nowhere in there, one notices, is an outright “No.”

    And whoever put up that “libelous” (is there a lawsuit?) website isn’t at all like me, for too many reasons to go into here.

  • goxewu

    Addendum:

    Speaking of questions and answers, am I correct in presuming, because Prof. Harbison rather emphatically rejects other explanations (e.g., discrimination) as underlying causes for young black males’ participation in the UK riots, that he does indeed subscribe to the alternative hypothesis I offered in my reply to his initial comment:

    “Young black men are genetically predisposed to violence and, if not kept
    in severe check, will riot, rob, rape and pillage because they’re,
    well, young black males”?

    Everything Prof. Harbison says would seem to indicate that he does.

  • keis8427

    Have you looked at the make-up of prison inmates recently? Let’s not play make-believe, okay?

  • pesor33

    I believe I read about or saw a story on the news about this same issue only with the Hispanic community.  I think it was in the New York area.  Sounds like a great opportunity to help these underpriviledge youths.

  • pgradphila

    Actually the name of the program is “Saving Our Boys” and the founder is Michelle Lawrence.  Howard Jean and the “Call Me Mister” program is the curriculum used as a model for the young men taking part in the program.  The “Summer Leadership Institute” is the first phase of a year round program that will engage young men from middle grade years through high school mentoring rites of passage components with a emphasis on academic rigor.

  • 22108469

    Good list. Parties were always hard for me, and now that I don’t drink anymore I find that cleaning up messes, getting refills for others, and being the unofficial coat check clerk works pretty well.

  • henry_adams

    “You’ll find other introverts when you step outside
    to decompress?  True, but not really the place where someone will be happy to
    see you.”

    I disagree.  Many introverts are perfectly happy to chat with one other person, preferably another introvert.  But houses crowded with extroverts, roaring and hooting like howler monkeys and expecting all other human beings to enjoy roaring and hooting like howler monkeys?  That exhausts introverts.

    Henry Adams

  • cronicao

    Find out in advance when the party will take place and make plans to be out of town.

  • http://twitter.com/patriciasbowne Patricia S. Bowne

    These are good tips, but I question the premise. I don’t think it is either socially or politically important to be seen at holiday parties. Wiser for those of us without administrative ambitions to put that effort and time into creating our own personal social networks, that will be there for us when the job is over.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/LM-Umpierre/100003030773202 LM Umpierre

    They can be challenging but if you just go with no expectations just for the pleasure of company and looking for nothing else just to make people feel happy about themselves and you feel that you belong. My two cents.

  • d_reamy

    I gather from the article that scholarship money is at the heart of this.  The school gives you an education in return for your commitment to play there.  This is a problem that D-III schools and players don’t really have.  So I would add that the scholarship money and any other stipulations should become a “contract” just like the pros.  The player and the school can negotiate based on that and a courting school can “buy out” or negotiate a new contract.   

  • ggurney

    Institutions should not restrict their athletes from transferring in any manner.  They currently are treated as chattel and universities are intent on protecting the interests of their celebrity coaches.  So long as college athletes are quasi-professionals and not students, they should be freed from their bondage.  Coaches freely break their contracts with the university.  If a player has met his eligibility requirements at the university, he should be free to leave and receive a scholarship to whatever university he wishes.  The APR points is nothing more than an NCAA manufactured mirage to shape public opinion that they treat athlete academic achievement seriously.  For more ideas regarding transferring, see   http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2012/03/22/essay-urges-reforms-how-college-sports-programs-recruit-athletes.

  • sparty43

    Can someone ask Mr. Barnes his take on SMU’s new basketball coach, Larry Brown’s, initial moves on taking over the program and kicking kids out of the basketball program?  While the school offered to provide the players with scholarships, why does the NCAA not see these people (like Coach Brown and other athletic administrators) are the ones teaching the kids that this approach to treating people like this is okay?  It doesn’t even matter if you are committed to the school, the program and a good student.  One day the old coach or the new coach, may not like you anymore.  Heaven forbid, a student-athlete may feel the same!  While I believe the rule was originally set up to prevent coaches from pilfering players from other programs, it should be reconsidered and written with limitations.

  • glenthomas

    It was probably 40 years ago when I first heard the comparison: The only difference between professional athletes and Division I athletes is how they get paid.  Whether the “scholarship” money or the campus’ prestige is the issue, it’s the money that creates the leverage.  The difference in policy with Division III gives that away.