• Monday, May 28, 2012

Previous

Next

Cheaters, Liars, and Rapists: American Higher Education Today?

November 28, 2011, 9:13 pm

The way some veteran Washingtonians remember the names and locations of U.S. House of Representative Offices Buildings—Cannon, Longworth, and Rayburn—is to remember the expression “cheaters, liars, and robbers,” or, if a juicy congressional sex scandal is underway, “cheaters, liars, and rapists.”

Unfortunately, that came to mind when I recently saw the top 15 stories listed on the electronic front page of USA Today. Three of the stories dealt with college scandals—SAT examination cheating at New York City suburban high schools, thuggery amongst the marching band at Florida A&M University, and more on the Penn State football scandal that indeed appears to involve rape.

The SAT cheating incident was a scandal waiting to happen. In most economic transactions, resources are allocated on the basis of price—you can’t buy the good or service unless you can pay the price. McDonald’s will sell hamburgers to all comers with money—rich or poor, saints or sinners, black or white. But elite schools often will only sell their services to perhaps one out of every five or ten “applicants” (it is interesting McDonald’s calls its clients “customers,” while Harvard calls them “applicants”). The SAT (or sometimes ACT) exam is important in the selection process. Suppose not overly bright applicant A would be willing to pay $100,000 to go to YU (Yuppie University) that charges $40,000 in tuition, but she can’t get in because of her mediocre test scores. Spending $3,000 to bribe a smart kid to take the exam for her makes perfect sense for some, moral considerations notwithstanding. (Another way is for the parent of the student to give a huge gift to the university, which seems often to open admission doors despite institutional protestations to the contrary).

By the way, I do feel that severely punishing the test takers is fine—but to let the bribers off lightly is a travesty, brought on, no doubt, because the high-school students are juveniles. But I think the parents who financed and often instigated these incidents should face jail time, or at least a week in a hotel room with Nancy Pelosi (if they are conservative) or Michele Bachmann (if they are liberal).

Moving on to lying—it is so endemic to college life it is hard to know where to start. Schools, of course, prefer to hide information rather than outright lie. Yet, because of ranking-based “bottom lines,” institutions are prone to cheat on their college rankings. My CCAP organization does the undergraduate rankings for Forbes, and we refuse to use self-reported data because, frankly, I think dishonesty is rampant in higher education.

As to rapists, obviously the Penn State story comes to mind. And now there are allegations of child abuse within the basketball program at Syracuse University. In general, acts of violence such as the kind that allegedly occurred at Florida A&M, Penn State, and Syracuse are often tolerated far too much. If Joe Paterno fought hard to keep students playing football after clear evidence of law or rule breaking, that is sad—but it is precisely the story that Tom Wolfe told years ago in his marvelous novel about college life, I Am Charlotte Simmons. Anyone familiar with big-time college sports or the money-hungry behavior of modern college presidents knows that athletes are often given privileged treatment.

This is a further sign of how moral relativism is pervading, corrupting, and cheapening the quality of life in America. The fact that it is happening so frequently in higher education is so sad, and so undercuts the notion prevalent in the academy that higher education is a special, ennobling niche of society that deserves special treatment, subsidization, and respect.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • eetempleton

    As much as I like the idea in the abstract (and I do like it a great deal in the abstract), the reality of being paperless terrifies me. There’s something very comforting about having the pages of the talk prepared, my marginalia scrawled all over the pages, and my cues to myself (e.g. SLOW DOWN HERE) all present in hard-copy.

    I find that revise more effectively when I do it in longhand, and I can more effectively jot down notes in script. For whatever reason, while my typing is serviceable at home, something goes haywire in my brain when I try to do it on the fly at a conference. I think there’s something about the urgency that gums up my fingers on the keyboard. Perhaps if I had more practice at typing on the go, whether in class or at a talk, I might get more comfortable with this, but as is, it just doesn’t work very well.

  • http://www.samplereality.com Mark Sample

    Erin, I appreciate—and even share—your trepidation about going paperless. I usually have all sorts of marginalia in my paper as well, but I’ve begun incorporating reading cues directly into the document itself (in bold). My papers actually read more like scripts than papers in this regard.

    Quickly jotting down notes does become a problem, though, especially when you’re focused on something else—like listening to an audience member ask a question. It’s a challenge I’m still sorting through, though I wonder if something like a smart pen or voice recorder might help out.

  • http://twitter.com/cliotropic Shane Landrum

    I’ve found that at conferences where I’m reading a paper, it’s actually easier for me to have an inclined laptop screen than to read from paper, since I don’t have to look down quite as far. (Even an angled lectern is much flatter than a nearly-vertical screen.

    For talks where I’m using slides, sometimes I put my text in the Presenter Notes field on Keynote or Powerpoint; other times, I do actually print out my text so that if my slides fail, I’m not left without a text to read. And regardless of how I present, I always have pen and paper with me for the Q & A, because I need to be able to record other people’s ideas quickly and unobtrusively– which typing doesn’t allow.

  • ajgulyas

    At the upcoming Pop Culture/American Culture conference I’m going to attempt to be paperless. iPad for the paper I’m giving, note taking, and conference schedule. I’ll also try using Noteshelf and a capacitive stylus for jotting quick notes. Not sure if it will work, but it’s worth a go.

  • http://about.me/jbj Jason B. Jones

    I have a notecard wallet that I use for this sort of thing. It’s got 3x5s and a Fisher Space Bullet Pen. Whenever there’s a need for jotting quicker than I can on the iPad, I use that.

  • http://about.me/jbj Jason B. Jones

    I will use Evernote if I’m confident about access to outlets sometime during the mid-afternoon. It’s about the battery-draining-est iPad app that I use regularly.

    When that’s less certain, I use a regular text editor.

  • tanyaroth

    I also went paperless for a conference this past January, but at the AHA meeting in Boston. Like you, I used my iPad, and I had my document in PDF format.

    My paper was finalized before the conference, so I didn’t tweak it in advance of the session. I did, however, sit down with it shortly before the presentation and add some marginal notes.

    I used iAnnotate PDF, which I love because I can either type or handwrite notes in the margins. I thought this was really useful, and then I used SmartNote for writing notes during the panel. While this wasn’t putting my notes with my paper, it accomplished the same function – and I can export those notes to a PDF file and email them to myself to save with my original file on my laptop (or anywhere else), if I want to. Or heck, I can combine those with my paper file using Adobe Professional or another PDF program later.

  • engkzl

    I went paperless last October at the SLSA Conference, and I used my iPad to do it. I used Docs to Go for editing my paper, and I used Dropbox to store it (I clicked on the star icon to designate that my paper be stored on the local hard drive). I just used the regular iPad notes function for taking notes re: others’ comments and presentations. The advantages were as Prof Hacker said, but also I had a small and complete entertainment device on the plane.

    The problems, in addition to those she had: no ability to print (eg., my boarding pass for the return flight), limitations in the wireless availability at the hotel. Sometimes the reception was weak in certain rooms, and the hotel turned the connection off too soon (the organizers had to pay a daily rate for our group, and the hotel forgot to include the last day). Having been an early adopter of lots of tech (I publish on it), I brought a backup hardcopy of my paper. Reliability will be somewhat of a problem in the near future, perhaps.
    Kevin LaGrandeur, NYIT

  • http://www.samplereality.com Mark Sample

    Jason, your mention of battery-life reminded me that I forgot to mention that’s one advantage of the iPad over a laptop or netbook. I could regularly squeeze a whole day of heavy usage out of the iPad without worrying about finding a power outlet.

  • sttaylor

    A laptop at the conference wouldn’t work, unless you want to be one of those unfortunates sitting on the floor because it’s the only spot they’ve found to plug it in. The iPad battery lasts all day (with typical use.) I’ve also spent my conference day with just an iPad (as an attendee, not a presenter) and it’s been great. Still need a laptop in the hotel room, though, for writing of any length.

    In place of taking notes in a discussion, you could consider using an app that records audio, but you’d probably want to announce that you’re doing that, and you’d have to go through it in real time later on, to take your notes.

  • engkzl

    I went paperless last October at the SLSA conference (Society for Literature, Science and the Arts). I used Docs to Go as my paper editor and Dropbox to store it (I designated it as a file to store on the iPad’s hard drive by clicking on the “star” icon. That way, I didn’t have to depend on a wireless connection.) I just used iPad’s built-in notes function to record others’ comments and my own notes on presentations.

    Advantages: what ProfHacker noted, plus I had a really great entertainment device for the plane and slow moments at the conference; plus, I could actually read my own notes (lousy handwriting)

    Disadvantages: Nerves: being a chronic early-adopter of tech (I publish on it), I knew about crashes and having to go to plan B, so I brought a backup of my paper in hardcopy; no ability to print (eg. boarding pass for return flight); no ability to project anything except Keystone (ridiculous limitation); wireless limitations caused by the hotel (rooms with weak reception, hotel turning off wireless at the end of the day, or too early)

  • drnels

    I’m kind of with Erin. The idea sounds nice, but I like not traveling with a laptop or any electronic device. I look at conference time as my chance to get away and not have anyone bug me (except for the few who have my cell phone number). I usually have a copy of my paper printed out before I leave but also on a flashdrive as my backup. And I know I can download from Dropbox from a hotel computer. I, too, have had trouble working on a paper once I leave. My brain is already in conference mode, and I find it really hard to concentrate on revising, so I make sure my presentations are done before I leave.

    Plus, I’m the kind of person who will have a slot where there is nothing happening that I want to see, so I pick a room at random and walk in. Having the program helps me figure out names and titles and such.

  • http://twitter.com/heidimiller Heidi Miller

    If you have Keynote for iPad, it’s also a breeze to give your presentation that way. :-)

  • laurajb

    I’d love to go paperless but the national meeting of the American Mathematical Association of Two Year Colleges (AMATYC) does not pay for computer projectors (the organizers would like to but conference centers charge a lot for them and there is already backlash against the cost of the conference). Unless you bring your own projector, you are supposed to use transparencies and an overhead. People and the conference organizers expect multi-page handouts that are replicas of the presentation, even if the presentation is posted at a personal web site or sent to the proceedings. From experience, not having handouts results in irritation and bad evaluations of the talk. It is a difficult situation.

  • kosboot

    Why bother with note-taking software? I use Twitter/Tweetdeck (or Seesmic) to take my notes – so that all can see. I use TwapperKeeper to record either all my notes, or all the notes using the conference’s hashtag. In that way, others can not only benefit from my notetaking, but can be inspired to lower the walls of academia and be more open and transparent about their processes as well.

  • http://twitter.com/blendedlib steven bell

    Maybe there’s a happy medium. If you are concerned about going paperless (I too like to have some notes written down – or just reminders to myself – like who to thank) – but you also want to support sustainability – why not head over to the campus library where there is probably a load of unwanted printouts and photocopies that were just left unused – or paper in your office’s recycling bin. If you just reuse mostly blank sheets you are not exactly creating paper waste with your recycling of paper that was previously wasted by someone else – you’re doing a good thing for the environment. And then when you are done with your talk, if the notes are not needed they the paper can still go in the recycling bin. All that said, providing handouts is a waste of paper.

  • _perplexed_

    I’ve been using nothing but a short stack of 3×5 cards since the mid- eighties…since powerpoihnt has come along, I’m usually able to put my presentation (in pdf format) on another panelist’s or built-in podium computer, either from the cloud or from my thumbdrive. I often take my computer, but it stays in the room…

  • mkt42

    Yup, exactly. I don’t see the point of going completely paperless, in particular with respect to note-taking. A couple of pennies’ worth of paper vs a couple of pennies’ worth of electricity: the ecological footprints are almost identical; advantage paper if you use the backside of old printouts as Steven Bell suggests. Meanwhile the convenience factor is big, and so is the reliability factor: I usually don’t bring anything electronic (except for a cell phone) to conferences but for the last one that I attended I borrowed a laptop from our ITS Office. Which was great for a few hours, but I couldn’t get the recharger to work so by the end of the second day I had myself an expensive doorstop. Thankfully I was only intending to use it for email and small amounts of office work, I was not depending on it for anything critical.

    I agree that paperlessness does have advantages in the other areas that Mark Sample describes. However, as others have mentioned, at some conferences the presenters are expected to have handouts. Moreover, every once in a while the presenter will have tables of statistics that call for detailed reading by the audience; the tables have too much information to be legible on a screen projection and moreover the speaker can move on to the next slide (or focus on the next section of the table) but people in the audience can keep peering at their handout if they wish. Or if the handout includes a bibliography, the audience can jump ahead to check out the presenter’s citations, which again is not something that I wish to do very often (at conferences that is; I’m apt to do it quite a bit while reading an article), but it happens occasionally.

    Still, it’s probably true that at least 90% of handouts didn’t really need to be handed out.

  • http://brendabethman.com Brenda Bethman

    I have also recently made the travel part of conferences paperless, thanks to the TripIt iPhone app. All my details are stored in my trip, so I no longer need to drag around a bunch of paper with my flight numbers, hotel reservations, etc. I check in on my phone and just print a boarding pass when I get to the airport. It’s so much easier than fumbling through a bunch of papers.

  • drnels

    I wonder if it’s the style of handouts that are a problem? I tend to stick to one-page handouts with significant quotations and bibliography, and I’ve gotten several emails over the years thanking me for those handouts, so much so that I make them even when I think they are irrelevant.

  • cprender1

    I did a study with a Slovak colleague about the respective uses of, ease of access to, and attitudes about paper in our respective English departments. Basically, we consider a paper a necessity, whereas to much of the world, it is a scarce commodity. Particularly in Slovakia, where junk mail didn’t exist two decades ago, and where, during the communist regime, photocopiers were tightly controlled, paper isn’t “normed” the way it is in the U.S. In our study we examined the histories of paper use in our countries and departments, with particular emphasis on how paper goes from being an alternative, to a desire, to a preference, to a requirement or bare necessity in people’s thinking. A quick trip through the many Slovak paper-making towns where the air has been fouled will give you the courage to go paperless soon enough.

  • dsbergccp

    At a recent conference, I gave a workshop on use of the iPad in the classroom for academics (the professors that is). Of course I used Apple’s Keynote and had my presentation already to go in GoodReader (the most versatile app on the iPad). Of course I had a paper copy of my presentation in my bag JUST IN CASE as well as another copy on a flash drive in the event I needed it; I would have borrowed someone’s laptop because I didn’t need one since I had my iPad.

    Finally for note taking, I recommend SoundNote. You can type or use a stylus (Pogo Stylus from Amazon is about $10) or even your finger to write. SoundNote will record the lecture that you attend, type keywords along the way, and when listening back will jump to any part of the lecture by simply hitting the keyword you typed. Invaluable!

    So yes, you can go paperless, but a good backup strategy is to always have that copy of your presentation in some other form be it on paper, index cards, or a flash drive.

  • mzlillian

    occidentalir, I absolute agree with you and Steve Bell about using paper from the recycle bin for your notes…one small warning. Mark the used side or only use “typed on” paper. I thought I’d lost my mind when I failed to notice that several of the paapers I was using had hand written notes on them. Even though the previous noter’s hand writing was not much like mine, the stress of the preconference wind up made me think I had some sort of strange stroke before I realized that I was looking at the back of my notes!

  • jmittell

    I’ve been essentially paperless at a few conferences now, both with MacBook and iPad. Definitely an improvement on presentation delivery, for both screen angle and the ability to edit on the fly. The biggest drawback on using the iPad is the limited multitasking – if you’re on Twitter, you’re on Twitter. So ping-ponging between taking notes, checking the program, Twittering, etc. is less seamless than on a laptop. Also, I’ve found sometimes the iPad WiFi connection can be touchy with public authenticated networks, like at most hotels. But the battery life is crucial for long conference days with few available outlets.

  • http://www.samplereality.com Mark Sample

    kosboot – Like you, most of my notetaking actually takes the form of tweets. I’m far more likely to revisit my notes, I found, if they’re public. And the added benefit is that other people often chime in to the tweets, making for a richer note-taking experience. Tweetdeck for the iPad is great for this, because you can monitor multiple column/hashtags quite easily.

  • bghansel

    I’m not completely paperless, but I now carry a netbook with me to conferences and simply type my notes on my lap very comfortably. I can get much more information and edit it while I type since I’m a really fast typist trained in the days when it was assumed I’d grow up to be a secretary. These notes NEVER get printed unless they do by someone I share them with.

    I like to plan my program out ahead of time and some conferences actually have some terrific schedulers, so I avoid carrying those huge conference books and leave those books in the hotel room those along with all the advertisements for great things to do in this city and Expo advertisements. How does one get rid of these? On the other hand, I always print a foldable copy of the schedule I planned for myself (with alternate sessions sometimes) and carry it in those name badge holders you have to wear. This is easier than powering up the netbook and making sure I have enough battery. That said, I usually try to find a chair near an outlet so I can keep my netbook charging. If I-pads can be used all day without a re-charge, that would be a real plus.

    On the other hand, for presentations, I need my paper notes, which I make in a table that includes the approximate start time for each concept/slide I want to present and timing for each open Q&A or discussion. THEN I use highlighter and make marginal notes when I practice the presentation. Since I usually have a powerpoint in full screen mode, it’s hard to read the computer for the presentation notes while the powerpoint is being shown. I believe that this is now technically possible but not with my eyesight.

  • hkacpa

    I presented The Next Generation Accounting Professor: http://aandaupdate.com/technology-in-the-classroom/scaae-meeting-february-18-19-2011-rock-hill-sc/ at the SC Association of Accounting Educators this past week at Winthrop University in Rock Hill SC.

    The link includes my favorite tools that I used to go completely paperless in the classroom as well as a video of my presentation. The tools are free!

    Of course, no one received any paper and I used my website for my presentation materials. It also made it easy for participants to get information after the seminar.

  • david_balch

    Great post-Yes, I have done the same with a laptop. But being a little obsessive I also bring a hard copy and everything on a flash drive. I have even emailed it to myself, just in case.
    I have finally gotten over printing out overhead transparencies-a little growth :-)

  • dkompare

    I’ve been teaching paperless all semester thus far, and will go paperless at my presentations at SCMS next month, using Keynote presenter notes on my MacBook. It felt naked initially not holding anything while I talk, but I’ve gotten used to it. Blow up the font to 28pts or more, and you’re good to go. The only other downside is to remember to scroll through the notes window in KeyNote with the trackpad, and NOT the cursor keys (which advance the slides; oops!).

    Following Amanda French’s ProfHacker post from a few weeks back, I’ll also (ideally…) post an article-like version of my presentation on my blog.

  • cwl53

    I use a netbook and go paperless at all conferences. The handouts of presentations are sent on line and I download on to a flash drive or directly into the netbook. Using Evernote or just Word, I can take notes during presentations. The netbook is very small and not blocking your view of the speaker (or them of you in smaller settings) and fits easily on my lap if needed.

  • rfish117

    Maybe the font might not be as large, but I would rather use my phone. It can do 90% of what the Ipad does, and if it malfunctions, I use the laptop as a failsafe.

    Remember- the phones have recorders, speech to text software (see android by Google), among other software for quick note taking. It is quite effective.

  • http://micahvandegrift.wordpress.com Micah Vandegrift

    I don’t have experience going paperless yet, but I am planning on it for ALA in June. As I’ll be there as an attendee only, I’m not thinking about a presentation yet, but did find this info useful. Question – how would you go about presenting with slides using an iPad? I haven’t tried Keynote on the iPad, but I’d imagine the notes might be difficult to read in presenter mode.

  • wordmongerphd

    oops. Talk about the Digital Illegal Immigrant walking into the wrong classroom! I was trying to email this interesting article to my son and comment that his Ipad would have saved my back a good 25 to 30 pounds of luggage at that COTESOL conference in November, and I blooped into the Comments page.***Obviously this is great technology that I’m too old to use!

  • http://derekbruff.com Derek Bruff

    All this talk of reading a conference paper (literally reading a paper) still mystifies me. That’s certainly not the practice at math conferences, although, as you note, there’s an expectation of slides (digital ones or transparencies) and sometimes handouts. My practice these days is more like what Amanda French outlined in a guest post here recently–I put some version of my talk up on my blog before my session and just point audience members there. Since I’m not reading a paper, I don’t need much in the way of notes, and I find I do a better job when I *don’t* use notes during a presentation. And I’ve stopped bringing handouts to my talks since (a) everything that might be in the handout is on my blog, (b) putting content on the blog means I don’t have to worry about printing handouts (either before I leave town or at the conference), and (c) I might as well save a tree.

    Of course, not having handouts means I sometimes get asked, “Can I have a copy of your presentation?” I usually reply by saying that the *slides* I used in my presentation are available on my website, secretly gritting my teeth at the implication that my slides *are* my presentation!

  • http://derekbruff.com Derek Bruff

    Ha! Discus auto-completed my tag. And will no doubt do so again now.

  • tee_bee

    I’ve been doing this for five years now. And my professional association has finally caught up to 2003 and has a way of picking panels and making one’s agenda on a web site. Print it as PDF, stick in drop box–win!

    I do appreciate the tips for doing this on an iPad. I just got one, and it seems well suited to this. Reading off a laptop is doable, but a bit clunky–esp if you’re running a slide show at the same time.

  • tee_bee

    I just sync Evernote, then turn off the WiFi. I can go all do without fully battery drain. When I get to an outlet, I resync.

  • rickman

    I sometimes use my iPod touch or iPad for presenting. But like many others I find a small notebook more reliable for taking lots of detailed notes. To avoid the problem of losing the notes, I scan them using my ScanSnap.

  • jwr12

    “how moral relativism” … There’s nothing in your article that justifies its conclusion.  Penn State wasn’t about “moral relativism”: Paterno (for what it’s worth) was a hard-line Republican and orthodox Catholic.  What it’s about, alas, is the money, and since you claim to be an expert on the new economy one would think you would understand that.  Just today, Urban Meyer was hired for nearly 27 million dollars (over 6 years) to be a college football coach.  Our schools are being eaten alive by people who are trying to mount capitalist enterprises on top of them — enterprises which in most cases are not profitable, bottom line, for the universities themselves, read the data–of which the sports-industrial entertainment complex is a great example.  Like the “innovation” economy so widely praised here, it outsources the expense of maintaining facilities to universities, allows them to be marginally in the black if they’re lucky (but mostly in the red, and begging) — and to boot, it then provides us with this parade of human vice.  And then, to top it all off, we get non sequitur attacks on “moral relativism” (as if somehow if it weren’t for those hippies …), by columnists who regularly defend this deeply unjust economy and pour scorn on educators actually interested in their fields.  Nice.

  • opentosuggestion

    Yuppie University?  Moral relativism?  Was this rant written in the eighties?

  • rhoccrim

    There seems to be some painting with a broad brush here, or perhaps a super sized paint sprayer. Over half of all crises in organizations are created by individual malfeasance. Often allowed by institutional negligence or organizational blindness, these three anecdotal cases are no more representative of the state of higher education that Urban Meyer’s compensation level reflects his value to society. That a few students [and their parents] have engaged in SAT cheating or hazing at FL A & M has had deadly consequences, or Jo Pa wielded too much power at PSU and others sought to preserve a mythic reputation founded on rhetorical branding does not take the pulse of education nor is it analogous to miscreants in Congress. These exceptions point out the opposite truth; that with all the institutions of higher education in this country and students engaged in study, we note these few because most are not doing any of these things. Will some students cheat? Yes. Will power corrupt, even in the practices of a musical group? Yes. Will appearance trump honor in maintaining brand over ethics. Yes. It happens outside of the academy and will happen inside the academy. Is it so rampant that these are representative of higher education as liars cheaters and rapists within higher education? No!

  • tjfarrel

    None of the incidents recounted here is more than tangential to higher education: none has anything to do with the encounter of teacher and student in the classroom.  You want to criticize, criticize the excrescent parasites making big bucks by attaching themselves to the educational enterprise.

  • jeff_winger

    Why two women in power? Why not Michael Moore and Rush Limbaugh?

  • drj50

    While these reported stories are sad, especially for the victims, we do need a little perspective. Current charges concern two coaches — out of how many nationwide? And, of course, we have so far heard only one side. (Remember Duke lacrosse, anyone?) It is easy, without offering evidence, to opine that these stories are both true and exemplary of things that permeate higher education. Are there lots of problems? Sure. Are these small number of stories indicative of major trends? I doubt it.

  • pianiste

    The issue is not how many coaches in Division I sports are child molesters (and at Penn State, where there are many, many coaches, only one is accused of molesting children), but, should the accusations against Jerry Sandusky prove valid,* the coverup.

    The Penn State coverup involves the winningest Division I football coach of all time, who had a 46-tenure as head coach at Penn State and was arguably the most powerful man on campus,** the president of Penn State, a vice-president at Penn State, the athletic director at Penn State, and an assistant coach who apparently witnessed the rape of a child and didn’t call 911.

    Why was there a coverup? Because football is so big at Penn State: an alleged $70 million profit last year (the largest in the U.S.), 100,000+ fans in the stadium for every home game, membership in the Big Ten with its additional TV revenue and better bowl prospects, etc. Nobody wanted to be the whistleblower against all that, especially the football coach and the athletic director, who’d be blowing the whistle on themselves.

    Division I football, whose relevance to university’s mission is tenuous at best and destructive at worst, enjoys similar powers at most all universities with prominent football programs. Malfeasances other than sexual ones–e.g., grade-fixing, criminal behavior by players, academically unqualified recruits, and (at least in my opinion) the outrageous salaries paid to football coaches (Urban Meyer, the new coach at Ohio State will get $4 million a year)–are rife at Division I football schools. Whistleblowers are fired, intimidated, and blacklisted.

    This is why the Penn State scandal is not merely a matter of “out of how many [coaches] nationwide?,” but of a revelation as to just how corrupting the inordinate and academically inappropriate power of Division I football is to the universities who participate in it.

    * The charges against Sandusky–the product of a long grand jury investigation, whose stomach-turning report is publicly available in full–appear pretty formidable.

    ** President Spanier wanted Joe Paterno out in 2004. Unable to fire a man with much more power on campus than he had, Spanier had to ask Paterno to retire, and was summarily rebuffed.

  • manhire
  • drj50

    It has not been established that there was a coverup. Again, we have only heard one side of all this. If grand juries established guilt, there would be no need of a trial.

    I can easily understand that those who reported the one incident to the vp who oversaw campus police (both Paterno and the asst. did so according to published reports) may have thought that they fulfilled their legal AND moral duty. I sure would have thought that had I been in their shoes. And, no, there is no obligation on the part of one reporting to see what action was taken. (You don’t call the district attorney to find out what happened to the kids who sprayed graffiti on your neighbors house. You report it and let the authorities deal with it.) The offense, according to published reports, seems to be with the vp, not with the athletics staff.

  • 12080243

    The commenters just below are either not working at a college or university or they are ignoring what’s going on on their own campuses. I’m in contact with colleagues at universities across the country and their experiences are similar to mine at The University of Southern Mississippi. See, http://www.usmnews.net. It’s also instructive to read authors like Benjamin Ginsberg, “The Fall of The Faculty.”

    By the way, our stories at usmnews are well documented. We support our news with USM’s own documents which administrators reluctantly give up through freedom of information requests.

    Chauncey M. DePree, Jr., DBA, Professor, School of Accountancy, University of Southern Mississippi 

  • Guest

    Remember the history of pogroms, witch hunts, and brownshirts. There is another side to all these stories which we haven’t heard yet. I refrain from condemning when later facts might surface which could exonerate people we assume are guilty and/or reveal the true problem to lie where we don’t see it. Beware hysteria, especially in ourselves.

  • pianiste

    It is fatiguing to have to repeat that “innocent until proven guilty” applies only in the legal sense. In other words, Jerry Sandusky cannot be sent to prison or fined or made to make restitution or to perform “community service” unless he is found guilty by a judge or a jury.

    But we who read the newspapers, news and commentary on the Internet, watch television, read the grand jury report, and are capable of connceting the dots, are perfectly entitled to form and express opinions on whether Sandusky did molest children or not. If a trial verdict determined public opinion once and for all, then we’d all think that O.J. didn’t commit double murder.

    And what equivocating words: “I can easily understand that those who reported the one incident to the vp who oversaw campus police (both Paterno and the asst. did so according to published reports) may have thought that they fulfilled their legal AND moral duty.”

    A man says he saw a 10-year-old boy being anally raped by a Penn State athletic figure whom he knew, DID NOT immediately call 911, and djr50 thinks that this man fulfilled his “legal AND moral duty”? Unbelievable! I suppose if Jerry Sandusky had been observed committing another kind of felony, say committing an armed robbery, and the man witnessing it had gone home, consulted with his father and then, the next day, told Paterno about it, that would have been fulfilling “his legal AND moral duty,” too?

    Personally, I don’t think that any of those involved in a coverup (and there was a coverup–why does djr50 think that Paterno and Spanier were summarily fired–because the football team was 8 – 1 at the time?) actually thought they’d fulfilled their moral duties. If they did, they’d have to be confirmed amoralists. No, they put their moral duties on the shelf and tried to figure out the LEAST they could do and still cover their rear ends legally. What does djr50 think that McQueary–after not having called 911, after not having gone directly to the police–talked to his father about, if not “Dad, what’s the least I can do without being held legally liable for not reporting a crime, and still not flush my career in the athletic department down the toilet?” What does djr50 think that the vice-president, the AD, Spanier, and Paterno (listed in ascending order of power at Penn State) thought about their moral duty other than to ask, “What is the least we can do to cover our rear ends legally and not damage the $70-million-profit Penn State football program?”

  • doctorpapa

    Actually, I’m quite sure I wouldn’t want to spend any time with any of them, the women or the men.

  • josiahmdaniel3

    Richard Vedder would have people believe that “dishonesty is rampant in higher education.”  This sort of rhetoric is part of Vedder’s ongoing effort to acquire national profile by picking on someone (or something) that cannot easily fight back:  higher education. 

    Thoughtful people don’t buy what Vedder is selling.  His premise is palpably untrue in my experience, both back in the seventies when I was an undergrad and grad student and today when I am involved in supporting the university that awarded two of my three degrees.

    Cool the inflammatory rhetoric, and find someone or something worthy of attack, Vedder.  It is not higher education.

    Josiah Daniel
    jdaniel@velaw.com
    Dallas