• Monday, May 28, 2012

Previous

Next

Black Colleges’ Success in STEM

March 8, 2011, 10:05 am

This week the Urban Institute released a report entitled Capacity Building to Diversify STEM: Realizing Potential among HBCUs. The report evaluates the National Science Foundation’s Historically Black Colleges and Universities Undergraduate Program (HBCU-UP) grantees and has some powerful results.

Too often HBCUs are underresourced, and many cater to students who are from academically and/or economically-challenged backgrounds. In addition to smaller endowments, these two factors make it difficult for HBCUs to fully realize their potential for producing black scientists and engineers. The National Science Foundation initiated HBCU-UP to bolster the resources and strengths of HBCUs.

The report found that compared to STEM graduates nationally, those who participated in the HBCU-UP program were more likely to pursue, and subsequently obtain, graduate degrees, especially degrees in STEM. For example, roughly 34 percent of African-American HBCU-UP graduates obtained graduate degrees as compared to only 20.5 percent of African-Americans nationally. Moreover, those African-Americans who participated in HBCU-UP, were more likely to be employed in full-time STEM employment than their African-American counterparts nationally (33 percent versus 25 percent). Female graduates of HBCU-UP, in particular, outperformed females nationally in educational attainment and in the STEM areas. They also outperform other females in terms of their employment in STEM careers.

The report confirms previous research that found that HBCU students have a greater likelihood of pursuing graduate degrees in the STEM fields. It also solidifies the role of HBCUs as a major source of African-American scientists and engineers. For example, the top five institutions producing African-Americans pursuing graduate STEM degrees are all HBCUs as were 20 of the top 50 producers. The Urban Institute also points to HBCUs’ track record for engaging undergraduate students in research, which plays a part in motivating students to pursue graduate degrees in the STEM fields.

With regard to faculty, the report indicates that HBCU-UP institutions had predominantly male faculties (70 percent), similar to institutions nationally. However, unlike STEM faculties nationally, the HBCU-UP faculties were 50 percent African-American. Most colleges and universities have faculties that are only 5 to 6 percent Black. Of note, and indicative of the power of HBCUs to produce future faculty, 40 percent of the HBCU-UP faculty members earned their undergraduate degrees at HBCUs. As research shows that African-Americans do substantially better in the STEM fields when they have exposure to same race role models and teachers, HBCUs provide an incubator for STEM talent.

The report contains several recommendations; however, the most important one pertains to majority colleges and universities, not HBCUs. The Urban Institute recommends that majority institutions look to the HBCU-UP institutions for direction, adopting some of their policies and practices. When it comes to educating African-American students in the STEM fields, HBCUs have much to teach us. Perhaps we should take a good look at what they are doing.

In case you want to look more closely at the HBCU-UP institutions, they are: Albany State University, Alcorn State University, Bennett College, Clark Atlanta University, Florida A&M University, Hampton University, Howard University, Jackson State University, Miles College, North Carolina A&T University, Oakwood College, Prairie View A&M University, Tuskegee University, University of the Virgin Islands, Fort Valley State University, Jarvis Christian College, Kentucky State University, Saint Augustine’s College, Southern University New Orleans, Tougaloo College, Central State University, Claflin University, Norfolk State University, Talladega College, Wilberforce University, Bethune Cookman College, Delaware State University, Langston University, Savannah State University, Winston-Salem State University and Southern University, Baton Rouge.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • 22261984

    There are two recent reports by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights that are relevant here: “The Educational Effectiveness of Historically Black Colleges and Universities” and “Encouraging Minority Students to Pursue STEM Careers.” From page 9 of the former (and the first recommendation): “African-American students interested in STEM majors may also particularly wish to consider attending a college or university, including a HBCU, at which their academic credentials match those of the typical student so that they avoid experienced the negative effect of academic mismatch.”

  • omiller

    Tennessee State University started a NSF: HBCU-UP project in 2007 and, therefore, was not included in the institutions examined in this study. The TSU HBCU-UP project features a summer bridge program, peer and faculty mentoring, exposure to campus and external research facilities and researchers, faculty development, and curriculum redesign. Please visit us at http://www.tnstate.edu/hbcu_up/ . We are particularly interested in partnering with additional institutions to provide our students with summer research experiences.

  • quesrty

    Never seen any faculty foolish enough to do it.  Not with thousands of new Ph.D.s hungry for a tenure-track slot.  They’ll grumble and whine but at the end of the day they understand supply and demand.

  • http://twitter.com/HBCUDigest HBCU Digest

    There is a dangerous, latent charge with the Civil Rights Commission report, seeking to use HBCUs as a means to end affirmative action. The term “academic mismatch” is an underhanded way to dissuade PWIs from admitting minorities based upon the success of minorities at HBCUs. 

    This report is not one that has demonstrated recommendations for HBCUs receiving financial support on par with PWIs, and is not one that should limit choice for minority students. 

  • drj50

    Students, at least the ones who are interested in learning, are interested in who they will be learning from. Showing them a copy of the curriculum or a picture of the library don’t compare with introducing them to an engaging faculty member in their chosen field.

    Jesor compares admissions work to auto sales. OK. Asking the admissions office to “sell” the university without being able
    to show prospective students who they will be learning from is like trying to sell a
    car without letting the customer actually see it. That’s why it’s not just the job of the admissions office to recruit students.

  • electronicmuse

    Give me the tools to recruit, and I would be genuinely happy to do so.

    What’s my budget?

  • mbelvadi

    I’m going to echo, perhaps a bit more strongly, some of the earlier comments. It’s the height of arrogance for people who are paid to do something (recruit students) to think that they ought to be getting other people who are NOT paid to do that work to help them get their work done. It’s deeply insulting to the faculty, suggesting a lack of respect for the faculty’s own workload.  You can be sure when the enrollment numbers come in, the recruitment officers will be crowing about THEIR department’s success in pretty PowerPoint slides to the univ President/Chancellor, looking for bonuses and raises, asking for more staff, etc.  We all wish we could get someone else to do our jobs for us for free, while we reap the glory. (I’m speaking of undergrad recruitment, which this article seems to be about. Graduate level recruitment is a whole ‘nother matter.)

  • teachfordamasses

    Here, here mbelvadi.  But this is widespread in academic.  The standard MO of administrators is always to get someone else to do the work, sometimes within house and increasingly often by hiring outside vendors.  When did we stop expecting that administrators had skills of their own relevant to their jobs?  Nice work, isn’t it, when the successes accrue to you and any failures are the fault of the folks you tried your very best to get to do the work…

  • teachfordamasses

    There is a validity issue at play here.  Everyone wants faculty to come out and…act really interested and involved in undergraduates.  This is a beautiful thing if it is a true representation of the experience the students will get.  If it is advertising and MISrepresents what the students will actually experience, it is bait-and-switch.  Students deserve an accurate picture of the college, not hype.  If faculty are really excited about undergraduate learning, they will want to participate in recruitment as the first stage of that process.  If they don’t want to recruit, they probably should not be encouraged to do so–by definition, they do not care strongly, won’t do a good job (it’s not what you say; it’s how you say it) and will be pretending. 

    If you talk honestly with faculty, it is the act of pretending and selling that is so aversive about recruiting, not the extra few hours once a year.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_RSRD4KFLLVQHEM4QYHLLFBQR6M chaz

    I think it’s also useful for faculty to continue to engage with students, especially those they don’t like.  These are the students who most need to be pushed and guided; teaching shouldn’t be about satisfying one’s whims all the time and having a cohort of students who hang on one’s every word.  I tend to have a few “trouble” students each semester, and the extra attention that I give to them (in both a critical and supportive sense) pays off when they take the class more seriously and become more rigorous scholars.

  • der_maverick78

    Some great information here. I just wish the writer had more carefully considered how they could disenfranchise faculty by using Robertson’s comments. For example, Mr. Hoover stated that Robertson suggests that “professionally qualified” instructors are better recruiters than “academically qualified” colleagues. Hmm.. what if the academically qualified faculty member worked in admissions for three years while completing their education?

    But this takes the cake, “Consider appealing to faculty members’ empathy, excitement about their discipline, and their … egos: “Faculty members love to be the center of attention; that’s why they’re faculty members.” Funny how people will insult you and then turn around and ask you for help.

  • raza_khan

    Okay… seriously??

    As a faculty, I am willing to help out as long as admission counselors and the folks in that department are WILLING to teach my class!!!!  The reason we have admission department and the folks is to attract students and not recruit faculty.. It is not a recruitment facility of faculty members….   Oh yeah… they have this perception that we teach a class, have office hours and that is it…… oh… what homework grading… what email discussions with students… what meeting…..  what academic projects…??  I thought the faculty had an easy life.

    So… you want my time??…  swap my work with me!!!!  You do my grading for an hour and I will talk to prospective student for an hour!!

    Raza

    __________________________

    Dr. Raza Khan
    Chemistry faculty

    Dr.Raza.Khan@gmail.com

  • wademg

    Phoenix is a trade school, albeit high-toned, and it has many lesser counterparts.  This is one cat that should be the object of a supreme effort to return it to its overtly vocational bag, leaving the word University to schools which fit the original, narrower definition.  Assuming, of course, that these older institutions, particularly in the United States, don’t continue to sell out in their drives to become white-collar vocational centers themselves.

  • jkisner

    Does not the term have its origins in the confessional concept of “the unity of knowledge?”  In that sense, wouldn’t a “university” stress the unity of all knowledge; the inner-connected nature of what can be known?  Hence, would not liberal arts institutions have the best chance at fulfilling this role, based not on size, resources, products, or prestige but a unique kind of epistemology?  Granted, not all so-Carnegie-classified schools do that, but shouldn’t they if they adopt the historic title?

  • henrycalphinjr

    I agree that, perhaps, many institutions are overreaching. If they follow their mission and vision, then there might be less of an identity crisis. I think that many administrators miss the reality that they can be flexible in interpreting and abiding by the mission statement, but creating a new institution is quite risky. Institutions need to focus on what they are good at, who their students are, and how the institution can assist in developing the local economy. Consider the experiential learning components of Drexel, Northeastern and Cincinnati. They are in tough markets, but they do well.

    Colleges are expanding to reach the level of mammoth university for prestige, research funding, and overall perception. With the diversity of institutions, though, it is less obvious to consumers that the culture of these institutions is varied. I think that much of the mission creep has to do with perception, from rankings to what employers expect. It would help to make employers and the business community more involved with the accreditation process, even at the level of simple awareness. I know that UK universities are working closer with industry, and as such, that has helped with applied research funding and better ideas concerning just what employers expect from graduates.

  • gavin_moodie

    This is a common and erroneous assumption.

    ‘University’ originates from the term ‘universitas magistrorum et scholarium’ (guild of masters and scholars).  That is, ‘universitas’ refers to an organisational form recognised in Medieval law and has nothing to do with universal knowledge or values.

  • regdev

    You’re not alone, as a Recruiter I visit at least 200 different places per year. Then I go to people’s homes when they’re home in the evening. After that I have to schedule SEPARATE appointments for the following:
    Finalize application process
    Accuplacer
    Fafsa
    Additional paperwork requested by the D.O.E.
    Registration
    Orientation
    Follow up until they graduate

    •We have to do all this per student•

  • regdev

    Please keep in mind that Recruiters have a sales quota. Either you hit your goals or you’re out! Which means that we have to work until we hit our goal. I remember when I used to give presentations starting at zero period ending at sixth period. Since I lived in a different City I had to wait until I interviewed my appointments in the evening. So there I was crossing the desert to get home in the middle of the night. Yes, you’re right people here are showing how much they ignore!