• Monday, May 28, 2012

Previous

Next

Redefining Admissions ‘Success’ for Black Males

April 18, 2011, 8:18 pm

Hunt Valley, Md.—Forget “access” and “admission.” Today’s high-school counselors and admissions officers should think in terms of “completion” and “attainment” when dealing with students, especially black males and other underrepresented students.

That was the consensus among those who attended an intriguing session here on Monday at the Potomac & Chesapeake Association for College Admission Counseling’s annual conference. When working with underrepresented students, high-school counselors and deans alike must not think of matriculation as the “end” of the admissions process, said Carl Ahlgren, director of college counseling at the Gilman School, in Baltimore.

Mr. Ahlgren offered a description of a “transitional counseling” model, in which the conclusion is understood to come four to six years after a student enrolls at college. This differs, of course, from the traditional counseling model, in which the ultimate goal is admissions, and families typically have high aspirations and vague notions of institutional prestige.

In that model, the counselor’s job is basically done as soon as Mom and Dad slap that coveted college sticker on their car. “For them, success is admission in the face of ambition,” Mr. Ahlgren said.

Students from underrepresented families are in a much different situation, however. They are often uninformed and unambitious. Mr. Ahlgren has found that while white, affluent applicants often need to lower their expectations about which colleges they can attend, the opposite is true for underprivileged applicants. “Instead of talking those students down, we need to talk them up,” he said. After all, when “at risk” students enroll at colleges for which they are overqualified, they are less likely to graduate.

Some speakers described the need for more hands-on admissions officers, who can communicate regularly with students after they enroll—all in the name of retention. Darryl Jones, senior associate director of admissions at Gettysburg College, in Pennsylvania, considers his institution’s minority graduation rates a point of pride, as well as a crucial responsibility of his department.

Recently, he spoke to a prospective student who was considering a college with a lower graduation rate that had offered him more financial aid than Gettysburg had. “Hey,” Mr. Jones said, “do you want to graduate or just go to college?”

Mr. Jones urged his colleagues to work more closely with other campus offices, such as financial aid and multicultural affairs.” Make it your business to create space where you can be part of retention,” he said. “Your institution depends on it.”

Shameek Robinson, statewide network coordinator for the National College Access Network, said admissions officers can do much to help ease students’ transition to college. How? By linking them up with campus services, by checking in with academic deans, or just by contacting them from time to time.

“When you’re in trouble, you want a familiar face,” Mr. Robinson said, “and if you don’t have that, it’s going to be a problem.”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • http://twitter.com/SirSharp7 Keywuan Caulk

    This article is on point!

  • vceross

    In my experience, the observations made here are true: underrepresented students will aim for local colleges that are attended by their friends or that are near their homes. One thing that needs to be understood, however, is that this isn’t merely “aiming low”–it also has to do with feeling the need to continue working and supporting one’s family, as well as negotiating the expenses of traveling across the country: no easy feat for economically challenged students. Also, once you coach and mentor a young person and successfully get them into college, they face all of the same issues once again, and universities seldom have good programs for mentoring such students over the years. It can be devastating for an underrepresented student, particularly one of limited means, to get to an upper-tier school, know no one, feel utterly out of place, and fail: an enormous setback all around.

  • realeducator09

    As a mother of three young black men, two have graduated from college, one is still matriculating, these young men absolutely must have the academic skills necessary for successful college completion. This begins much earlier than high school and expands beyond the counseling realm. Unfortunately in the k-12 arena, ample development of reading, writing, math and critical thinking skills have been replaced by scant standardized testing teaching. And…teachers absolutely must stop stringing these students along and giving them grades just because they see some motivation. Honestly, k-12 educators have to get real with themselves, be truthful, stress the basics and beyond and re-implement rigorous study. Not just for this population but for all students.

  • dlws8607

    I wish news organizations, and especially ones that target higher education, would stop the sexist and racist practices demonstrated in the title of this article, “Redefining Admissions ‘Success’ for Black Males.” How often do you see the “F” word, “female” in articles and titles of articles on this site? Why is it that when referring to men it is common practice, and almost universal, to use “male,” and when referring to black men it is especially common practice to use “black male?” If the editing standards are to avoid the F word, than they should also be to avoid the M word.

  • robert_wyatt

    ????

    5713 results

    Black and Female in the Academy
    By April Gregory

    Foreign and Female on the Job Market
    By Shabana Mir

    Courting Female Donors
    By ERIN STROUT

    Why ‘Female’ Science Professor?
    By Female Science Professor

    Female Athletes on the Campus

    Harvard to Encourage Female Professors
    By ROBIN WILSON

    A Hothouse for Female Scientists
    By ROBIN WILSON

    Wanted in Sweden: Female Professors
    By BURTON BOLLAG

    Female Undergraduates Continue to Outnumber Men, but Gap Holds Steady
    By Andrea Fuller

    Female Scientists Trail Men in Earning Patents
    By SAMANTHA HENIG

    Increase Projected in Female Merit Scholars
    By JASON HUGHES

    Female Placekicker’s Lawsuit Against Duke Is Reinstated
    By WELCH SUGGS

    etc

  • vsuprof1

    Do you have any research that demonstrates that black males are “unambitious”? This is offensive; the rest of us are living in 2011!!!!

  • old nassau’67

    First: Using dlws8607′s question as a starting point, one reason the “f” word – and the “J” (Jewish) and the A (Asian) – words do not appear as frequently in articles dealing with academic achievement is that other identifiable minorities do not have the scholastic difficulties of the “black males”. Two example articles:

    “Fifty-seven percent of all students who enroll in four-year, nonprofit colleges earn diplomas within six years, but the graduation rates for different groups of students vary vastly. On average, 60 percent of white students who start college have earned bachelor’s degrees six years later. But only 49 percent of Hispanic students and 40 percent of black students do.” (http://chronicle.com/article/Reports-Highlight-Disparities/123857/)

    “But for the past five years the graduation rate for black men has improved by one percentage point and now stands at 36 percent……This year the college graduation rate for black women rose by one percentage point to 47 percent.” (http://www.jbhe.com/preview/winter07preview.html)

    Second: the term “underrepresented”. By what criterion? Population? Income? High School Graduation? Apply to College? SAT’s? GPA’s? Is there some law stating that the % of a group admitted to college must = the % in the population?

  • burger1376

    There are many underrepresented groups in higher education for which there are no statistics done for them. For example: the poor whites of the appalachian region, the mixted white/native American groups of the East coast, the pacific islanders who are usually mixed in with Asian, the single parent families where there is only a dad and no mom, coal mining families, cajun famlies, etc. Using statistics that focus on race is inherently racists. It ignores many other underreprested groups while it also includes a lot of non-underrepresented blacks in with the underreprested blacks, mainly the difference between rich blacks and poor blacks. By the way, I wonder how many Amish who left the family are represented in colleges like Harvard or Yale? Maybe we should give them handouts like we do the blacks.

  • AbdulKareemaWheat

    Good article.

    Add this factor to the mix. How many remedial classes do “…black males and other underrepresented students” attend in their first year at State U or XYZ College?

    This is important for the very obvious reason(s) that, time spent in remedial classes burns through money–the student’s, Pell grants, school money, etc.–while piling up exactly 0 credit hours toward graduation.

    Put another way: how ready are “…black males and other underrepresented students” for post secondary work?

  • AbdulKareemaWheat

    I can assure you that Alaska Natives and their success/failure in college are studied to death here in Alaska. Some meaningful results have been obtained from such studies (a Native-centered engineering school at the Univ. of Alaska Anchorage, for example, makes an attempt to keep like-race, like-cultural individuals together in a course of study), but generally the studies only serve to highlight and quantify failures.

  • burger1376

    Yes, but I think you missed my point. Don’t take offense; I am not sure if you missed my point, but I am just assuming. My point is that you can’t use race when the group is too diverse. Whites are not all in the same catagory, but studies done on race would put them all in the same catagory. Blacks are certainly not in the same catagory as some are rich and some are not. Richer blacks and richer whites are closer to each other and poor blacks and poor whites are closer to each other when it comes to being underreprested. However, racist studies would not show that. As for Alaskan natives, the group is (I am assuming here, because I am not a scholar on Alaskan natives) small and relatively homogenous.

    If we really want to study inequalities in America, we have to stop using such vague groups and start using real groups based on many more factores such as income, wealth, region, religion, histories, etc. Until then, the liberal academics will continue to be puzzled as to why their studies create no results. As they focus on blacks, they will use more policies to help blacks. But yet, those policies only help richer blacks become richer while neglecting both poor whites and poor blacks. Liberals lack logic and a sense of reality. But at the same time, liberals control academia.

  • kirillrez

    What makes a potentially good university great in reality?
    Is it the money?

    I believe money is a part of it, but people matter more. If you had all the money
    in the world, but no highly motivated professionals to realise it’s promise,
    then it would all be for nothing.

    I hope they will succeed and I’ll keep following the latest developments.

  • raza_khan

    No matter how educated they get, one thing is for certain… Saudi women will be treated as second-class… sorry … make it third-class… they can not even drive anywhere in the land of Sauds as it should be called….. Education is to bring about a change and not keep an unthinkable rituals and practices at place…..

    Lucky, these women are at least treated as third class citizens… You really do not want to know how Saudis treat foreign low-income workers…. you really do not want to know…

    Raza
    ______________________
    Raza Khan, Ph.D.

  • gammapoint

    One may be able to make technical advances at such a University, but in such a truly conservative, religious environment it is impossible to really have a true scientific/academic environment in which free speech is protected and ideas (or lack thereof) can be criticized.

  • prasadjacob

    It’s funny. Sooner or later crackdown of Saudi Arabian protests would extend to these campuses too. “Bahrain’s Crackdown on Protest Extends to Academe, With Interrogations, Firings, and Expulsions”. If it can happen in Bahrain using Saudi military under US sponsorship why Saudi
    itself be an exception.