• Monday, May 28, 2012

Previous

Next

WikiLeaks-Released Diplomatic Cable Says Canadian Universities Foster Anti-Americanism

May 2, 2011, 7:24 pm

The latest tranche of WikiLeaks material involving Canada contains a diplomatic cable from the U.S. Embassy in Ottawa to Washington alleging that Canadian universities and academics have an anti-American bias, says a report in the National Post.

The complaint comes from an unnamed American embassy official who was taking graduate courses at the University of Ottawa and relates classroom experiences in two courses in which fellow students and the professor were often critical of former President George W. Bush’s policies. The official made no headway when he tried to explain the American geopolitical positions.

The cable also referred to a speech by President Obama on the spread of anti-Americanism. While Mr. Obama was talking about Europe, the cable author said, the same could be said of Canada, especially of academics at traditionally liberal Canadian universities who have “resorted too easily to a shallow anti-Americanism.”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • jimislew

    “An unnamed [student]… who was taking graduate courses … relates classroom experiences in two courses in which fellow students and the professor were often critical of former President George W. Bush’s policies. The [student] made no headway when he tried to explain the American geopolitical positions.”

    Kekeke… That said, I have encountered a lot of shallow anti-Americanism. No one likes the big kid and sometimes the only reason is because the big kid isn’t doing what they would do if they were the big kid.

  • 11134078

    “Heavens to Murgatroyd!” as Snagglepuss used to say. (You have to be of a certain age to get that one.) You don’t mean to tell me that there are Canadian professors who were critical of George W. Bush? Can that be possible? Whatever in the world can we do about it?

  • 11134078

    How about a bit of non-shallow, perhaps even profound, objections to many of our country’s policies—and attitudes about the world?

  • bigtwin

    umm… aren’t all universities pretty much anti-establishment when it comes to anything?

  • jimislew

    Yeah, there’s some of that too.

  • dbnewman

    Um.. yeah. They have JUST realised that? What about the flood of US academics looking for jobs in Canadian institutions during the Vietnam War era? I’m anti-American Empire and proud of it (and my dissertation deals with resistance against the US), but that doesn’t mean I’m against the American people. I have many very good friends (and a son) who are American citizens. It is just their government and policies I’m against. As a critical scholar, I’m also against the Conservative Party in Canada, but again that is normal. I had a student ask me once why there were so few Conservatives teaching in the university system and I suggested he thinks about some of the common values of Conservatives and whether they really fit with teachers wanting their students to think critically and find ways to improve the world.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Dave-Newport/100000330111921 Dave Newport

    A better number 1 might be: “how old are you? If you are over 50, plan for retirement, not a new job.” If <50, read on.

  • livebythegoldenrule

    At what point does moving on make sense?  I’m at that point now.  I have been actively searching for a decent librarian and/or archivist position for several years after my museum art librarian position was downsized, never to return.  Nada.  Nada.  Landed one school librarian job after that which was like being incarcerated in Leavenworth and critically understaffed and underpaid.  The competition for these jobs (or, I should say, what is left of these jobs) is fierce.  It’s not that I have no experience in the field – have 15 years, but still no takers.  I’ve come close in a few interviews where it’s down to two people, but when you have 300 people going for one job, “close” is still not enough.  So, after much thinking, I am leaving the profession for good and returning to the administrative field – that’s right – clerical and secretarial jobs.  This is all I can find in this abysmal economy and, even then, competition is tight.  I am very afraid for our future when I see the state of the economy and its lack of good jobs.  Most that I see are $10 – 15/hr with no benefits.  Who can realistically live on that for any length of time, let alone support a family?  Middle manager jobs have been almost totally eliminated – and that is what most librarians and archivists are.  So, now I’m off to an interview for a part-time job as an administrative assistant to a local scientist.  This is all I can find and I’m grateful for even this.  Just sign me – No Longer a Librarian.  Yes, I’ve moved on.

  • http://twitter.com/JoVanEvery Jo VanEvery

    I would advise that the corollary to #1 is “are you publishing”? There are too many people out there that think all the low paid teaching jobs they are doing are “good experience”. They aren’t. If you cannot demonstrate that you are committed to scholarship by finishing your PhD and publishing from it, then you aren’t going to get a tenure track job. If you don’t like the sound of that, stop looking sooner rather than later.

  • http://who-will-kiss-the-pig.blogspot.com Richard Grayson

    I’m old enough to know a great many people who have moved on and are now over forty, and by now I don’t think any one of them regrets it.  Humans are wonderfully adaptive.

  • ElizaBro

    “It is unconscionable that this publication continues to natter on, fiddling while the academic world to which the writers refer burns to the ground.”  You’re not a regular reader of this publication, are you? It’s been publishing Thomas H. Benton’s columns for years, ranting about adjunctification and urging graduate students to reconsider graduate school. And there have been countless news stories about these trends for 10-plus years. 

  • sciencegrad

    I can see there being some issues associated with this exceedingly common exaggeration of students’ abilities in letters of recommendation.  I applied for a national fellowship this year and my advisor told me that I would be better off looking elsewhere for letters of recommendation because she cannot bring herself to exaggerate at the level that the review committee will expect of successful applicants.  Let’s hope they don’t think it odd that my advisor, whom I write about in my proposal, did not write me a letter.

  • jranelli

    the praise game is lazy either way…a cop-out for teachers who need a far more varied repepetoire of strategies, (most know it but fashion is fashion and the educationists who govern schools and agencies have their  addiction thereto) and the same for colleges which, with the technology available today, should empahsize both a kind of e-portfolio assembled over time and edited for applications with the aid and advice of qualified secondary school guidance counselors and more attentive interview practices (there are models) for a comprehensive evaluation of candidates…unless, of course, the continued decline in rigor makes the entire exercise of preparatory education and selective admisssion moot.

  • 11191774

    Reminds me of the Wall of Gaylord, and the ninth-place ribbon:

    http://www.metacafe.com/watch/an-Sm5Nbt4ttht7u/meet_the_fockers_2004_gaylords_hall_of_fame/ 

  • http://twitter.com/BrendaTNYC Brenda Tobias

    The operative term in “self-esteem” is SELF.  Praise does not build self-esteem a feeling of competency does.  All the “My Child Is An Honor Student” bumper stickers in the world will never take the place allowing children to do for themselves.  Learning to do one’s own laundry, homework, social mediation, does more than any trophy can ever do.
    Admissions officers are in essence detectives, weeding through the superlatives and hype.
     www.HereSheIsBoys.com

  • manoflamancha

    Maybe we are on the cusp of a new age: modesty.

  • chrisboyatzis

    We’re seeing the unfortunate fruit of the self-esteem movement begun in the 1980s in California.  I squirm every time I see a “My child is an honors students” bumper-sticker (to keep my oldest daughter humble, the first time she brought one of those home I proudly affixed it–to the back of my sit-down lawn mower).

    The affluent entitled students I teach need more push-back than praise; their parents and HS teachers lathered them with enough of that.  But some students (often first-generation, or minorities at very White institutions) need encouragement in ways that others do not.   It is about effort, not ability; esteem comes from accomplishment and mastery, not words.  We hurt all of them when we lose sight of that.  Remember the resentment Willy Loman’s son had for the father when he entered the work world and realized his father’s empty praise.

    I’m fully conscious of these problems yet continue to struggle with my inflated grades, with saying things in recommendation letters for average students that stretch the truth.  I work hard to temper these problems, yet still commit them.  It’s like resistance is futile–you will be assimilated.  Ugh.  So many of us seem to have earned a degree in academic spin, I think faculty, not just students, need some lessons in academic honesty and integrity.

  • jlucido

    Let’s put it together in the admissions context.  Students and families believe getting into a selective college secures the future.  Selective colleges are increasingly selective.  Pressure is placed on schools to “get students in” and on teachers to ease grading.  Students, deprived of an environment that allows them to fail, learn, regroup, and progress, learn ways to grub grades but not how to think.  This is the extreme case, but it is frighteningly generalizable these days.  College faculty members complain about it regularly.

    Meanwhile, there are movements in the common core standards and in changes being made in AP, the IB, and in the Cambridge Assessments that infuse greater process skills and higher standards. Hybrid courses may emerge.  Whether these changes are accepted by parents and schools, especially in the cases of the latter three programs, will likely be determined by how well they are viewed in admission offices.  College admission officers know that 17 and 18 year olds are not fully developed humans, but the measures used to describe the first year class are inadequate to describe its true characteristics and to emphasize learning.  The latter needs to be the message of our system of admissions.

  • adjunctivitis

    I tell my students they are AMAZING in every way.  I also tell them that my job is dependent on selecting “EXCELLENT” in all the categories on the student evaluation, especially questions 14 and 15 at one school.  If I tell them they are not AMAZING in every possible way, then I get poor evaluations. Colleges and universities should stop expecting 4′s and 5′s on adjunct evaluations and embrace the 3′s and 2′s. Lead by example!

  • art_of_nurture

    One of my better students decided to try to switch universities. He came to me for a recommendation. One of the questions on the forms was something like, “Does this student respect his/her teachers?” That question was relevant, and the answer could not be better answered by looking at his transcripts. The quality of the evaluation depends on the perspicacity and the objectivity of the teacher. Not many questions of recommendation forms pick out characteristics that could be the basis for point-on-point comparisons with other students.

    The questions that frustrate me the most are those that ask how some characteristic of the student compares with all the other students I have taught over a good many decades. If I had anticipated having to answer these questions I suppose I might have created an evaluation card with numerical scores for several dozen characteristics and kept a card for each student, a running average for each characteristic, etc. Even with that information, an objective answer would still be difficult because I have tried to get students who are not adequately prepared to drop a course rather than rack up a D or an F. The best students are generally the ones who ask for recommendations, and the differences among their performances may have more to do with turbulence in their environments (death of a parent, for instance) than their real capacities. 

    Maybe the admissions officer that Eric Hoover tells us about would have a more informative set of recommendations to work through if numerical rankings were left to transcripts, standard tests, etc., and questions were asked that might pick up the teachers’ reactions to overall characteristics that could be revealed in classroom situations, in the writing of papers, etc. (Pick the five characteristics listed below that differentiate the candidate most clearly from his/her classmates and describe the candidate in terms of them: (1) Respect for teachers (2) Respect for classmates (3) Intellectual curiosity (4) …..)

    It would be interesting to see lists of characteristics that various institutions sought to have evaluated.

  • icbomber23

    It’s really interesting to me that one of the takeaways from the Wash. Post piece is that “Children praised for trying hard or taking risks tend to enjoy challenges and find greater success,” because one of the things I’m seeing pop up are students who get a poor grade and then say “But I worked really hard on this!” as if that’s enough for me to say “Okay, now it’s an A paper.”

    I agree that we should encourage our students to challenge themselves and rise to meet the occasion, but I wonder if we’re going too far with that, and creating a batch of students who believe that effort *alone* should result in the grades they want.

  • anderskc

    I have worked in public university admissions for 20 years, and although I can’t say that this phenomenon is new, I can say that it makes me more than a little bonkers. What distresses me most is watching the process a student goes through when, for example, they get ACT/SAT scores back which are mediocre. “But I’m a 3.5 GPA student!” What I want to say is: “Well, maybe not. Maybe you have been led along for years because you’re a nice kid and your teachers like you. You follow rules well (which is what K-12 is all about) and ingratiate yourself to adults. I recommend using this opportunity to do some self reflection about your strengths and areas to improve.” However, what usually happens is not reflection, but dismissal…”well, I just don’t test well. It’s just one opinion.” Yes, let’s not have any facts interrupt the main narrative of your life.

    Just yesterday, I had an applicant from a small parochial high school who was last in his class and had a 3.0 GPA. REALLY???!

     I sound crabby. I don’t want their egos shredded. Rather, I am disappointed with their parents and our social/educational system that have done these individuals a huge disservice.

  • nontraditional001

    No letter from your advisor is bad.

  • nontraditional001

    I went grad school to pursue a doctorate at the age of 36.  Its good to find someone similar.  Its not easy being the old guy in the lab/classroom.

  • 5768

    Albert Ellis in the 1980s denounced self-esteem calling it “the worst sickness known to man or woman, because it says “I did well, therefore I am good,” which means when I do badly–back to shithood for me.” Pretty much anathema to even suggest such a thing nowadays. Shithood?  How dare him whether I did badly or not.

    Ellis opposed self-esteem to self-acceptance. The latter means I accept myself whether or not I do well, according to Ellis.

    Needless to say, even the notion of “self” itself varies from traditional Eastern to Western societies and is likely undergoing considerable transformation just as did the word “freedom” in Chinese which originally was attached to a word that meant “to stand out” from the collective in the pejorative sense. Given enough time “shithood” may come to be a most admirable quality worth of “praise” depending how far society sinks.

    “Praise” is something I myself think of as reserved for training dogs by behavioral conditioning, which when similarly employed for children may speak volumes, both having formative reasons. Use of praise (empty praise or false praise) in adults whether on the part of giver or receiver seems manipulative and suspect, whether used to manipulate committees or individuals. Giving standing ovations based on mere enthusiasm alone bespeaks how low quality both audience and performer likely are.

  • mycantarella

    I plead guilty. As a parent– and now grandparent– I issue praise all the time. Maybe too much. But I also plead some special circumstances. I am African American.  Minority kids don’t always bask in the glory of a world that loves them. There are studies that even show that their parents, more concerned with survival, don’t praise as much as those more privileged by ethnicity or affluence. So while as a dean and administrator I also have concerns about students who come to college with attitudes of great entitlement they feel is due them. I also think that we have to take cases individually and that maybe some students need more affirmation than others. At The Eagle Academy Schools for Boys in New York City where I chair the advisory board, one of the strategies helping these minority young men beat the odds and graduate is that they are in a culture where finally they feel valued. Some ego strength is needed for survival, too much becomes arrogance and is unacceptable. Finding the balance is key.
    Marcia Y. Cantarella, PhD Author, I CAN Finish College: The Overcome Any Obstacle and Get Your Degree Guide

  • KMHahn

    As I think about this I am reminded about my first application to graduate school. I asked my boss for a letter of recommendation and he asked me to write something up to get him started. In the end he just signed what I wrote. I had taken the reference instructions at face value, writing a letter highlighting my strengths and weaknesses. I was too young and naive to understand that mentioning weaknesses on a letter of recommendation is not common.  At the interview I met an almost hostile group. Looking back (the story is much longer) and considering the experience (I did not get in), I learned that letters of recommendation are not to be written honestly. This seems to permeate our culture more than can be blamed on “generation me.”

  • texasguy

    The University of California, San Diego was built top-down around an existing research institute.  The idea was to develop academic excellence from the beginning.  Universities that start as a teaching institution have problems recruiting research-oriented faculty and end filling the gaps with teaching-oriented faculty who will not necessarily adapt very well when the university starts adding graduate and doctoral programs.

  • TownsendRalph72

    like Janice replied I’m shocked that any one able to get paid $7106 in one month on the internet. have you seen this page ===>>⇛►http://meetfreelancer.blogspot.com/