• Monday, May 28, 2012

Previous

Next

Defying Boycott Vote, U. of Johannesburg Continues Partnership With Israeli Institution

July 8, 2011, 2:26 pm

Israel’s Ben-Gurion University and the University of Johannesburg have reinstated a collaborative water-research agreement, defying a vote last March by the South African institution’s faculty senate to cut ties with the Israeli university, reports The Jerusalem Post. The faculty vote had been hailed as the first major success of an international academic boycott campaign against Israel, though the vice chancellor of the Johannesburg university said afterward that the university would not boycott Ben-Gurion.

On Friday, the two universities signed a contract to continue their joint research on water purification and the conversion of algae into energy with the cooperation of scientists from the University of California at Los Angeles and the University of Ghent.

The senate vote followed a decision in September 2010 to end links with its Israeli counterpart if it found “direct or indirect military implications” to the relationship. The senate had called on Ben-Gurion to form partnerships with Palestinian universities and ordered a review of the ties between the two institutions. University of Johannesburg officials had told the senate before the vote in March that no Palestinian university had been found to join Ben-Gurion in the project. The Israeli university has several joint projects with Palestinian universities, researchers, and students.

This entry was posted in Middle East. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • jbarman

    “The faculty vote had been hailed as the first major success of an international academic boycott campaign against Israel”
     
    You have to read the previous stories to find that the “hailers” were a group called “Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions of Israel working group”.

    Kudos to the U. of Johannesburg for bringing back some sanity to the decision.

  • old nassau’67

    1. For once, Kudos to the administration of UJ, a university well-known for its race-relations a generation ago.
    2. “’direct or indirect military implications’ to the relationship”: that criterion would apply to many – if not all – research universities. Examples: (from googling University name + Pentagon Research)
    (a)Princeton researchers to lead major Pentagon-funded initiatives
    (b)Pentagon Research Doubles at Harvard
    and, not to be left out:
    (c)The many uses of cybernetic rats /Pentagon wants paralysis-research rodents trained as tiny soldiers (State University of New York’s Downstate Medical Center).
    Who knew?