• Monday, May 28, 2012

Previous

Next

British Government Says Universities Aren’t Doing Enough to Combat Radicalism

June 7, 2011, 5:37 pm

The British government on Tuesday published its updated antiterrorism strategy, and made clear that it expects universities and other higher-education institutions to do more to combat radicalism and extremism. The update of the strategy, known as Prevent, expresses concern “that some universities and colleges have failed to engage in Prevent” and says that “this lack of engagement must be addressed.” Higher-education administrators and faculty members “should have access to support if they suspect one of their students may be becoming radicalized,” the report says, and the government plans to help institutions “improve their capacity in this area, training staff to recognize the signs of radicalization and helping them improve their awareness of the help that is available.”

In its response to the government’s publication of the strategy, Universities UK, which represents the vice chancellors of all British universities, issued a statement emphasizing that “as a matter of law universities have to allow views which are not violent to be expressed and challenged, however offensive they may be” and pointing out that, with more than 40 percent of young people taking part in higher education, “care must be taken when making sweeping statements about the link between people attending university and becoming radicalized.”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • bickerstaff

    So, after generations of supporting any corrupt regime that would steal resources and sell them on the cheap to feed our oil lust–after all the ill-effects of pursuing an “enemy of my enemy” foreign policy for over a hundred years has come home to roost, government now looks to the universities and claims they aren’t doing enough to persuade their students to uphold the status quo?  Is that right?  Do I have that right?  

  • jffoster

    It sounds like H M Government do not know what a university is for.  Which may be a good thing, because if they did, they might not want any.

  • jffoster

    Sounds it does as though H M Government may not know what a university is for.   Which might be a good thing, because if they did, they might very well not want any.

  • robertusa

    Terrorism by the British and American governments continues unabated in Afghanistan; how might it be combated?

  • cmorrissey

    Why does it “cost less’?–Most leading accredited institutions’ “on-line” tuitions are the same as residency-
    exploring lower prices will reveal the real value of on-line programs–what are the credentials of on-line faculty?

  • juggler

    Belated comment. Advising would count as service here (public research university). The vast majority of faculty do not care about it. I find this horrifying, because I care a lot. But no assistant professor is going to be denied tenure because he or she shirked advising duties. I wish our tenure expectations more clearly identified advising as a criterion, even if it were modest. Clearly identifying it as important would be a step in the right direction.

    Love the idea of an advising practicum day.