• May 20, 2013

Previous

Next

In China’s Internet Cafes, Content-Blocking Is Largely Effective

September 13, 2010, 12:05 pm

Beijing — Information does not want to be free. It doesn’t care, really. Despite the famous aphorism that the Internet inevitably drives openness, information might just as well want to be forgotten about — there’s plenty else for people to do in cyberspace that has nothing to do with news, politics, or activism.

That’s what I felt after visiting an Internet cafe near Peking University, a smoky basement where more than 50 people played video games, chatted with friends on instant messenger, or watched videos. None of them seemed to be blogging. Or Tweeting (that’s blocked here). Or trying to search for information on any of the subjects the Chinese government blocks on the nation’s Internet connections.

People I talked with here get it — they know they’re not privy to all the information online. “The Chinese government doesn’t want people to see some stuff,” said Ma Ning, a recent college graduate sitting in the back corner of the cafe chatting online with her friends. And she does see it as a problem. “Because China is not as democratic as you are in the U.S.,” she said. But she said she had never tried the services that let Internet users circumvent the “Great Firewall” of China. She’s too busy.

A new scholarly book on the culture of Internet cafes in China concludes that the country’s content-blocking policies are highly effective — that despite utopian views that the Internet is inherently democratic, it can be subjected to central controls. The book’s author is Helen Sun, an assistant professor of communication at the University of Texas of the Permian Basin, who was born in China and has been traveling back here each summer for her research.

She surveyed patrons and owners of Internet cafes in one unnamed Chinese city over a period of several years and found that information can be locked out — or at least made so much of a hassle to get that it is kept from most people’s view.

While Internet cafes are waning in popularity here now that more people have laptops, during the early years of Ms. Sun’s study they were a key access point for many Chinese college students. In an interview last month, she said that she believes hers is the first book on Chinese Internet cafes.

In most of the professor’s surveys, she found that Internet-cafe users, most of them college students, primarily checked e-mail, chatted online, or played video games. Only 19 percent in her most recent survey, conducted last year, said they participated in group discussions online. “This study finds that Internet users in Net bars are more likely to perceive and use the Internet as a means of entertainment and sociability rather than other purposes,” she writes.

Cafe patrons told her that the blocking policies did not really have an effect on them, and many even agreed with the government’s argument that the restrictions help society. “While they claimed to believe the regulations were good for the stability of society,” she writes, “they stated that those same regulations were irrelevant to their situation, perhaps because they did not think they would play any role in public affairs.”

I found the same pattern in the cafe I visited. Wang Leikai, a 24-year-old supermarket employee watching a friend play the video game Dragon Bone, said he did not feel deprived of Twitter, YouTube, or other Western sites because he could visit local versions of those sites in China that offer similar features. “I don’t think people would be interested,” he told me.

Ms. Sun argues that in some ways government officials in China can exert more control over information than when print media dominated the landscape. Officials can not only stop some content; they can also watch what articles are being read, and by whom. In fact, users of Internet cafes here have to sign in and present ID to use the computers, and the log book is handed in to authorities, said Ms. Sun.

Yet Ms. Sun’s nuanced book — which has a deceptively straightforward title, Internet Policy in China (Lexington Books) — does point out that in some cases Chinese do use the Internet for public discussion and dissent. For instance, some discussion forums on the country’s most popular search engine, Baidu, get five million posts a day.

Ms. Ning, whom I talked to in the Internet cafe, said she did regularly visit one site where people post articles from the West that are blocked in China. At least, when she has time.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to In China’s Internet Cafes, Content-Blocking Is Largely Effective

drjeff - September 14, 2010 at 12:37 pm

Right now, the university I work for has its domain blocked from access by anyone in China, which is a problem for me, since the department whose website I do has clients in China who can’t access my site.As nearly as I can tell, we’re being blocked because the Dalai Lama is coming here soon, and/or because he’s mentioned prominently on the university’s home page. (The second could be done mechanically, without any human having made any decision, or at least that’s how I would have done it.)Just thought this might provoke some discussion.

communicateasia - September 14, 2010 at 8:29 pm

Nice post, Jeff. Along the way, did you come across any data supporting the observation that popularity of Internet cafes is decreasing as more people get laptops? This is the first time I have heard this about the China market specifically, so am only curious. Enjoying the posts from China!

educationfrontlines - September 15, 2010 at 9:31 pm

A deep discussion of internet self-censorship, with many interviews with Chinese parties, is found in “Historicizing Online Politics: Telegraphy, the Internet, and Political Participation in China” by Zhou Yongming, Stanford University Press. One particularly useful discussion is the political spectrum Zhou describes between the “New Left” and the “Liberals” in China. The New Left is adjusting older ideology to modern developments and remains concerned with the spread of ideas that will disrupt the harmony of a very crowded country, while the Liberals believe that the internet will eventually result in a wider democracy from a (naive) belief that wide open discussion will necessarily drive society that direction. While we think solely in terms of “rights,” the Chinese value “responsibility” in a population so crowded. If we were five times more crowded, we in the US would be sharply curtailed in what we could do. No ambassador could sleep at night if China went through the disruptions that occurred with the fall of the USSR. Note the limits imposed by the crowded democratic Singapore. If we had the internet around in the 1950s, we could never have eradicated smallpox and polio…the anti-vaccination movement gains its strength from this new medium. China is aware of the price of this “democracy of the internet” that spreads harmful falsehoods that have real consequences. They see reasons to filter the internet far beyond a few limited political issues.We know from the recent H1N1 episode that when the bird flu hits,with a potential death rate similar to the flu of 1918, it will be the U.S. that will have massive deaths from anti-vaccination. John Richard Schrock

  • 1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
  • Washington, D.C. 20037
subscribe today

Get the insight you need for success in academe.