• Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Previous

Next

To Meet Housing Demand, an Australian University Turns to Shipping Containers

March 7, 2011, 2:04 pm

Laurus WingAt the Australian National U., a six-story residence hall for graduate was constructed from prefabricated modules based on shipping containers. (Hutchinson Builders photos).

Canberra, Australia — Colleges that experience rapid rises in enrollment often resort to drastic housing measures: They put students in motels for months, or crowd three or four students into dorm rooms designed for two.

But at the Australian National University here, booming international enrollment and a high proportion of out-of-town students prompted an unusual rapid response: The university built a residence hall out of stacked shipping containers. It was the first such project in Australia, and one of few in the world.

The new facility, known as the Laurus Wing, was constructed as part of a dormitory complex called Ursula Hall. The Laurus Wing opened in three stages in 2010 with 161 studios, seven handicapped-accessible rooms, and 24 L-shaped one-bedroom units made from one and a half containers each. The rooms, intended for graduate students, range from 237 to 377 square feet. Also incorporated were computer, common-room, laundry, and bicycle-parking facilities.

Stacking the modulesThe first stages of the building opened just six months after the container modules were ordered, far quicker than a regular structure would have. The Australian company that designed the modules, Quicksmart Homes, originally planned to use existing containers, but found that the necessary modifications would be too costly, says Brian Hood, a regional manager for Hutchinson Builders, the Queensland-based construction firm for the project.

So the university turned to a Chinese manufacturer of shipping and self-storage containers to build the modules, which the company did by altering its standard containers to add in hallway and balcony components, as well as such design features as drainage and flashing. The company also insured that the units met Australian design requirements for fire resistance and  acoustic insulation, and it installed kitchens, bathrooms, and other interior features.

“We found we could manufacture purpose-built containerized modules in China cheaper and more carbon-efficiently” than existing containers could be modified in Australia, Mr. Hood says.

The Chinese company sent the fitted-out modules to Australia on ships, stacked as containers generally are. Hutchinson transported them by road the 200 miles from Port Botany, in Sydney, to Canberra, and then configured them—as many as 18 a day—to create the first two stages of the six-story facility. For the third and final stage of the project, Hutchinson made modules itself at its Queensland facility and brought them 750 miles to the campus here in Canberra, the national capital.

Module interiorEach unit has a small bathroom by the front door, then a kitchenette and a study area with built-in bookcases. A single bed is placed by a sliding door that opens onto a private balcony large enough for a table and chair—though certainly not for a kegger. Widthwise, the units are undeniably snug. For its next student-housing project, nearing completion at Central Queensland University, in Mackay, Hutchinson has used a wider but considerably shorter unit with square footage similar to that of the Laurus rooms.

During Canberra winters, the mercury often drops to about 20 degrees Fahrenheit, but small wall heaters suffice to keep the modules warm. Hutchinson considered air-conditioning the units for summer, but decided instead to rely on cross ventilation through the sliding balcony door and louvered windows above the entryway. On a recent scorching afternoon—it’s summer in the southern hemisphere—a unit opened for a visitor was surprisingly comfortable.

Set among eucalyptus trees, the Laurus Wing has a utilitarian look relieved by colored glass panels beneath the balcony railings. The building’s appearance and many design features won Quicksmart Homes an Australian Capital Territory Sustainable Cities Award.

The idea of using shipping containers for accommodations is not new. But increasing concerns over sustainability and affordability are encouraging an embrace of the shipping containers for building, according to Rodney Moss, a professor of architecture at the University of Canberra who is also a director of a leading Australian design firm, Cox Architecture. Writing in Architecture Bulletin, Mr. Moss noted that five years ago the Dutch company Tempohousing completed a village made from modified Chinese shipping containers that now houses 1,000 students in the Netherlands. And a 2007 competition in the U.S. for the dorm room of the future was won by a modular design.

Architects have also looked to containers for such projects as prefabricated homes that evoke the nostalgia of caravans by the beach. “If you ask around,” wrote Mr. Moss, “you’ll find many individual small practitioners are experimenting with single-dwelling prefab prototypes.”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • jplampin

    What about it’s rating (or lack thereof) for earthquakes?

  • opendna

    Stock shipping containers have a max gross weight of 24,000 kg and are designed to be stay in place even at 30-degree angles. If a ship is weighted improperly then it might snap back from wave too fast and cause stacks of containers keeling over. It’s pretty rare that a stack of containers actually falls over, but even then: they’ve got a few million kg of momentum, which you’ll never see in a dorm.

    These buildings usually require fresh study by zoning authorities, because they’re completely different from traditional structures. Southern California architect Peter DeMaria got his work approved in Redondo Beach, CA (high earthquake risk) and it won an award from the American Institute of Architects. For the 2010 Olympics, the city of Whister (another high risk community) used containers for workforce housing. I’m not finding a whole lot from earthquake zones (usually UK or Germany), but those two examples suggest that the idea isn’t totally irresponsible.

    Personally, I’d feel safer in a building made of steel shipping containers than any steel-reinforced concrete/masonry structure.

  • 22108469

    I didn’t think that area had much in the way of seismic activity (?)

  • tee_bee

    Apparently, the seismic hazard is moderate, not severe. http://www.ga.gov.au/image_cache/GA11006.pdf

    I doubt there’s be enough lateral acceleration to topple these, and my sense is that the structure is tied together via the stairwells, and other parts of the structure that aren’t made of “containers.”

    What’s disappointing about this headline is that I thought they were really recycling the actual containers themselves, in some way. There are an awful lot of these empty containers around the world, constituting a lot of steel and other resources. But it appears that the ANU folks factored in all the inputs before reaching their solution. So this is pretty cool.

  • sarasansh

    I thought that was the case as well,a great way to recycle.

  • sullivab

    I don’t know: tell a bunch of testosterone- & beer-addled 19-year-olds that there is no way that they can tip these things over, and they will undoubtedly rise to the challenge. Seriously though, this is a pretty clever idea. Bravo to ANU, Hutchinson Builders, and their Chinese partners for developing this “inside the box” (so to speak) solution.

  • tdb489

    I’ve seen this in South Africa though the containers are not stacked, they are used as individual houses. They are insufferably hot in the summer and cold in the winter regardless of ventilation. It is semi-suitable for people who earn less than $5.00 per day. It is despicable that HDCs can no longer afford traditional housing. I called the international faculty housing in South Korea a shanty house for immigrants. I will NEVER endure such indignities again.

  • beverlypwood

    Glad to see they have drainage and “flashing”, is that peculiar to Australian students? Hope they will stand the test of time, they do not look very stable or ready for longevity.

  • chemteach

    Some of the comments here indicate that the readers did not understand these are not the standard shipping containers. Rather, the company who produces shipping containers in China, was asked to make these containers to order.

  • djacobs12

    They have been using shipping containers in vancouver as low cost housing for at least a year, and I believe in london as well, so maybe this can help meet student housing demand and drive costs down too.

  • http://twitter.com/RobynBradley RobynBradley

    Congrats, Isaac, on the new position and for speaking up! :)

  • smilintoday

    It appears the key word here is “constructively”.   I’ve heard both:  the whiner, and the person with constructive comments.   Hired the latter; the former is still looking for a job.

  • henry_adams

    Great news.  Congratulations on the job, Isaac. 

    Keep telling the truth about higher ed, even though higher ed doesn’t like it.

    Henry Adams

  • 12080243

    “I believe that pointing out inadequacies can lead to changes for the better…Speak out constructively.”

    Here, here! 

    “Speaking out constructively” will allow you to test your freedoms. Make it relevant. That is, take instances when there’s “skin in the game”–yours, your colleagues, and administrators. Don’t start with a difficult issue, like sports corruption. Instead, assume you identify reliable, preferably documented, evidence that, say, your school made several material misrepresentations in its accreditation reports. Honesty is important to you. Now, “constructively speak out” to your colleagues and administrators.

    Pick any instance of misconduct or corruption where you and your school has “skin in the game.” You shouldn’t have long to wait. For details, see “University and AACSB Diversity” and “A General Theory To Test Social Reality.” (http://ssrn.com/author=397169)

    Chauncey M. DePree, Jr., DBA
    Professor
    School of Accountancy
    College of Business
    University of Southern Mississippi
    http://www.usmnews.net

  • southerntransplant

    I’m curious as to what kind of message he is sending. The best way to get a TT job is to rail against the status quo in a CHE blog? Or does the quality of the writing have anything to do with this?

    If the former, does it apply to people with access to general blogging sites, or will only the CHE imprimatur hold sway over search committees?

    As a STEM person who gets annoyed at fallacious correlations, I kind of think he’s dispensing some potentially problematic advice.

  • edwoof

    Congratulations, Professor Sweeney!

    I’m glad this ended well and a few months at Richard Bland will hopefully take the away the sting of James Madison.

    Yes, we all should always speak out and we are very grateful that you did.

  • http://twitter.com/IsaacSweeney IsaacSweeney

    Thanks for everyone’s well-wishes!

  • fiona

    OK, I’m against character assassination. But I think there’s a huge amount of wisdom on the CHE fora that wouldn’t appear if people (including me) had to post under their real names. I’m not interested in attacking people, but I do reveal secrets of the academic trade that I wouldn’t want to reveal under my real name. I do make negative comments about academic practices or (sometimes) the things that academic people have done. I don’t believe in attacking individuals, but I do believe in attacking bad behavior, which is often inseparable from the individual. I think you have to, um, “nuance” what you’re saying :).

  • clarinetsarethebest

    In general, I’m a believer in disclosing one’s name – if you say something, you should be proud enough to put your own name behind it.

    However, if I may, it’s a lot easier when your name is Rob Jenkins, which is clearly both masculine and English.  When you know that your more controversial comments may very likely provoke racist and sexist attacks as well as the usual attacks, it takes more courage to use your real name.  Of course, these attacks generally come from people (or trolls) who don’t use their real names, so it’s a bit of a circle – it’s even harder to use your real name knowing that other people don’t have to.

  • http://twitter.com/IsaacSweeney IsaacSweeney

    Always a fan of using one’s real name.

  • robjenkins

    I can’t help my name, clarinets. All I can do is use it. (Although I suppose I could have used my full name, Robin, which is decidedly less masculine, if no less English [Welsh, actually]. But I’ve been going by “Rob” since I was six, and that’s how everyone knows me, so it never occurred to me to attach any other name to my writings.)

  • clarinetsarethebest

    I’m not judging you for your name!  It’s a great name.  I’m just saying that some names (mine’s Eileen Nguyen) invite racist, sexist attacks more than others.

    Although I suppose everyone gets called “Nazi” equally.

  • corvus_caurinus

    The real issue at stake is that in a Google world, everything I sign my name to can be cross-linked to every single other thing I’ve ever signed my name to. There’s a huge difference between being willing to put my name behind a statement or an opinion as a one-time act, and allowing that statement or opinion to be aggregated into the larger corpus of information that allows anyone to triangulate who I am by simply typing my name into a search engine. This is the predominant reason that I use pseudonyms on internet forums.

  • fizmath

    Anonymity is an essential component of free speech.  In every society there are taboo subjects that can’t easily be discussed openly.

  • polisciguy

    As someone who has been the subject of a very hateful MySpace page when I was a new teacher (let’s say the title of the page would have been criminal had I acted quicker on it), I know the power of people using the anonymity of the Internet for their own nefarious purposes. And the people who know me are always stunned when I tell them this, because most often I am described a nice guy. The only reason I post anonymously here is because I am in (slow) transition from K-12 to CC teaching and I don’t like to advertise this fact about myself to those who may read these fora and also making job decisions with that in mind. 

    I never am ashamed of what I post here (I am of the camp that believes if you wouldn’t say it out loud, you should never post it online) and your column is making me re-think my preference toward concealing rather than revealing my identity.

  • boiler

    “I confess that I always have a little more respect for — and pay a
    little more attention to — those courageous souls who post under their
    real names.”

    That’s funny — for me, it’s just the opposite. In academia, we’re surrounded constantly by people who want their names on everything, who want to make sure that everyone understands just how brilliant and important they and their opinions are. An anonymous post represents the opposite, an opinion stated not for the purpose of drawing attention to the writer, but just to contribute to the conversation. Maybe it’s unfair, but when I see a signed post, I don’t tend to think, “How courageous!”, but rather, “How pompous!”

  • http://who-will-kiss-the-pig.blogspot.com Richard Grayson

    It *is* easier when you have a generic “Anglo” name (my parents changed our “ethnic” surname), and it’s even better when there are so many people with the same name that it invites the confusion can offer a small degree of protection to any one person with that generic name (and that can work, except for deflecting racist comments, even if it is not Anglo but common — for example, Thien Nguyen).

  • http://whytheology.wordpress.com/ Trey Medley

    For me, anyway, I don’t generally think of my name as anonymity, (It’s George Medley), but as merely the standard way of speaking on forums. Generally you have a username that may or may not reflect your actual name (in my case I’m technically George Medley, III and go by “Trey” hence t_rey). Although this is becoming less common place (to have a username that may not necessarily have any ties to your actual name), often times (though certainly not always) it is not a question of anonymity, but merely some unspoken convention.
     
    That said, it seems there are two interesting issues to consider here. First, giving your name does not necessarily eliminate anonymity. If your name is Joseph Smith, for instance, how many out there share your name? The top result for my name on Google is usually an orthapaedic surgeon or a petroleum engineer. I only know one of those people. If I get more specific and add the “III” or use “trey” I usually get a youth pastor from Alabama, which was slightly bizarre when I lived in Alabama. More recently I’ve been getting a Medley of songs from R&B semi-amateur artist “Trey Songz” Now that could be resolved is we merely gave significant personal information. But at some point it’s too much (and I’m not just talking about identity theft). I like keeping certain aspects of my life separate. People who use online forums or virtual games even moreso. For “gamers” there’s the phrase IRL (Invading or In Real Life) where there becomes a crossover between virtual worlds and the physical world (usually in fun/surreal ways), but the term has had some crossover from Facebook, Twitter, and the like. At what point do we need to keep these identities separate and at what point should we acknowledge their commonality? Granted the CHE is not really a place to worry much about that, at least for me, but it might be for others.
     
    The second issue has to do with credibility the other way ‘round. For instance, if I give my name, the usual response would be “who?” That is warranted. I am a lowly PhD student (granted one who has taught at a few small schools, but they’re not well-known schools either). Giving my name does little to add or detract from my credibility, until it is placed next to a very well known scholar. Suddenly, it doesn’t matter who I am, or what I say as much (it may still matter, but if I’m in disagreement, and the issue is contentious, then those “on the fence” will likely throw their support to the well known scholar for that reason alone). While the anonymity of the internet may lead to abuses as mentioned here, it also has become a great “equalizer” of sorts. Suddenly, my voice actually matters. Things can be evaluated on the basis of the arguments and not who is giving them. Again this has its pros and cons, but I think in this instance the pros greatly outweigh the cons. So the issue isn’t all that simple as “give your name you coward.” I don’t have a problem giving my name (as noted above). I just don’t think that the presence or absence of a name should be given much (if any) weight, particularly in online forums. If people make baseless attacks let them. It doesn’t make them good because they’ve been posted. It also doesn’t make them good if they add their name to them (though I suppose it might open them up for litigation). It doesn’t take that much courage to add a name most of the time, so why focus on it?

  • bigtwin

    Funny, I always thought that the anonymous posting that take place on CHE was about as civil as one could hope for on the Internet.  The author should compare what goes on here to, say, the posting on Youtube or craigslist.

    In fact, some of those posts the author would likely describe as “character assasination” I actually find to often be the most thought provoking and insightful.  I wonder if this is really about criticizing people who don’t agree with you.

  • tgroleau

    I’m a bit torn on this.  I’ve never tried to hide my identity on-line.  My id, tgroleau, is for Tom Groleau and a simple Google search on “tgroleau” will reveal that.

    On the other hand, there have been several times when I refrained from commenting on a Chronicle article or responding to a comment because I could easily be identified.  I’ve been in higher ed long enough to have experience with “sensitive issues”  that could be useful, or at least interesting, to other readers. However, in some cases, publishing those experiences with my name attached is more than I’m willing to reveal.

    Over the years, I’ve also been on the receiving end of a few attacks to my comments here and elsewhere (I differentiate “attack” from legitimate questions and critiques).   Then I have to decide if I want to get into a public shouting match or just ignore the troll.  That would be an easier decision if I were anonymous. 

    Therefore, I’m not opposed to anonymous posting/writing, but I wish there were some way to require a minimum level of maturity and civility for anonymous posters (if you want to be immature and uncivil, then at least sign your name).  Of course that could lead to censorship and … well, there’s no easy answer.

  • fiona

    I don’t get what this is about. Staying or going where? Who is this about? If this is for humanities Ph.Ds, not staying somewhere often means the end of a career. This entry seems half-written.

  • bigtwin

    yeah, you left out a little thing in this post – the subject.

  • mwilsonk

    This must be about staff or administrators.  Faculty who leave almost never “come back.”  I know of exactly one person in my discipline who returned to a previous institution where she had been tenured before her departure.  

    And beloved dentists?  I know of people who miss particular restaurants, but (with apologies to dentists) I’ve never heard of anyone who missed their dentist.

  • raza_khan

    I agre with mwilsonk.   Faculty who have left rarely come back… there are those rare expceptions.

    Having taught in more than 4 different colleges (with three as full-time),  the day I do not feel good going to work to enjoy what I will do as a faculty , that is the first day I start seriously think of moving…  My take is simple…. I gotta love work enough that I am willing to be on campus half an hour every single day before I have any scheduled committments.

    Raza
    ____________________
    Raza Khan, Ph.D.
    Dr.Raza.Khan@gmail.com

  • mnprof

    From the information on the sidebar, the author is vice president for human resources at the University of Arizona…

    Leave it to an upper-level administrator to be verbose AND vague… (just me being snarky, of course)

  • david_brown

    I’ve heard of few endowed-chair faculty leaving and returning, but never for any faculty at a less accomplished level. I’m sure it must happen from time to time, but is exceedingly rare.

  • nyhist

    in one case I am familiar with, a senior faculty member moved to a new place, soon regretted it, asked to come back, and was refused because his original institution had tired of his repeated searches for other jobs while on its payroll. In another case, a  faculty member resigned to take a job with a research institute but two years later, when the original institution had just started to gear up to search for a replacement, asked to come back, and was taken back (the search for a successor was never formally begun). So it does happen for faculty as well as staff, in my experience.

  • elgato1204

    My department loses at least one faculty member every year, and usually more than one, to departments that offer more money or are higher in the pecking order.  I take this as a sign that we’re hiring and supporting really good people.  But it sure is hard to be trying to find first-rate people every year who might be movable, and then actually hiring them, to replace the people who leave.  I agree, however, that they very rarely return.

    As for dentists, if you live in a university town (small) and have kids, then you probably have one you love and will surely miss. 

     

  • richardtaborgreene

    We all imagine, if we stay, that effort or new directions will somehow allow us to continue to learn, change, and grow  in any reasonably decent locale, the web enabling all that now.  HOWEVER, the AMOUNT of learning, changing, and growth done THAT way is approximately 1/100th the AMOUNT done by putting ourselves in new environments where we HAVE to adapt LOTS of ways whether we want to or not of feel good or not or have to time or not or feel competence and prepared or not.  

    So the dream of “I will put down roots here and develop” is not real and does not become real.   We stagnate in familiar environments except for a rare few who develop there DUE TO BAD HORRIBLE CRISES.   If we want to be different than our selves ten years from now, the easiest way is the forced adaptations of a move.   Painful but inescapable growth beats painful and voluntarily self evaded growth.  

    HOWEVER,  exploring who you are, what you can do, what you want, if done by constant change and moves, makes you uinreliable and shallow.   We can safely explore ONLY by exploring via contributions and minimal contributions take about 3 or 4 years in any one place.  Exploring by visiting means never contributing so after 3  or so explorations you have an 8 year patch of nothing done to prove your worth.   

  • totoro

    I also don’t understand this article at all. In response to those who say that faculty never leave and then come back, that isn’t true in my experience. First there are all those who go to work in government etc. for a while and then come back. And I worked at my current university (not in the US from in the late 90s for 5 years and then worked in the US and then I came back here recently and just got an offer of a permanent job). In international moves it is quite common. I also was a VAP at my alma mater (in the US) after doing a post-doc elsewhere. So, I’ve “come back” twice in my career.

  • http://whytheology.wordpress.com/ Trey Medley

    That’s a very interesting story that I think does reval the all to common existence of unfounded claims and rants against individuals that occurs on the internet, often from people who owuld never consider making the same statements in another forum (print media or in person). However, it does not address the point of anonymity and giving a name. As you mention yourself, this particular individual gave his name, and posted this anyway. I am  more than a little doubtful that the simple act of signing a name, or using your real name as your ID will have any genuine deterrent effect against such rants and wild allegations. Unfortunately, that is just the nature of the online world, names or not, people either don’t internalize the real world consequences of their online actions, or they simply don’t care. The absence or presence of a name is a distraction from the real issue, namely, unfounded, and often potentially detrimental claims made online. Is giving a real name or remaining anonymous somewhere we really want to stake our flag, especially when nothing is to stop someone else from using another person’s name (or you don’t even know who the person is)?

  • cwm4c

    “…but two years later, when the original institution had just started to gear up to search for a replacement, asked to come back, and was taken back (the search for a successor was never formally begun).” 

     Funny that this doesn’t strike us as an insane way for an organization to operate.

  • lkaplan

    I this piece is reflective. Thank you for making me think and realize that not one institution can define you and no position can make you stay put.

  • 22108469

    “…and having to wear a coat in the winter makes them even more annoying.”

    Well, OMG, like, wearing a coat is SO geriatric! 

  • jeeb47

    For me, the decision to leave my beloved “home” institution and state was based on my desire to advance to the next level in my administrative career with no place to go at my current, small institution.  At the next institution, I was forced to make a change and move to yet another state and administrative position which, so far, has been a great fit for me.  So while I didn’t really want to leave, circumstances forced me to make change and have new experiences which have enhanced my knowledge of higher education.  I have yet to find a new dentist in my current town, but I’m sure that will work out too!

  • nkharlamov

    Interestingly enough, in this particular opinion piece (which I am saving to refer to whenever I have to justify my ‘trans/post/multi/whatever-disciplinary work’ :) Professor Thrift seems to leave out a good deal of things related to everyday life, affect, body, etc., i.e. those very things that essentially form the substantive connexion between this current ‘urban science’ and urban debates of the middle of the XX century. All the weirder omission, given Professor Thrift’s own formative role in shaping the renewed interest to all these things and in recasting ‘mobility’ as much more than just ‘movement of transport & traffic in urban infrastructure’.

  • jmodeste

    Well, yes… cities require deeper integration of all things bc everyone lives so closely, and typically in vertical arrangements. Ways of life are altered in such conditions and in ways that are beneficial! Ever notice how city dwellers will stand to the side and allow passengers to get off a subway or bus before trying to board? It’s those who are not used to living amongst crowds of people who try to force their way onto the train/bus as if there is a race to board.  

    “Another problem has been the tendency to split the social and the technological apart as though these were somehow different things.” — yes. 

    It seems to me that centuries ago the disciplines of study were thought to be interrelated; a philosopher thought about all things, stars, mathematics, religion, natural sciences, etc. We should get back to that…. thought doesn’t occur in segregated disciplinary chambers but happens broadly (and deeply, if we are lucky!)

  • The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • 1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
  • Washington, D.C. 20037