• Monday, May 28, 2012

Previous

Next

Business Officers Discuss Deferred Maintenance as a Financial Threat

July 11, 2011, 3:06 pm

Colleges and universities are spending significantly less on capital projects, which may be a sign that deferred maintenance is mounting. (Graphic image courtesy Moody’s Investors Service. Photos below courtesy Stetson University)

Tampa, Fla. — Facilities managers at colleges and universities have been sounding the alarm about mounting concerns about deferred maintenance for some time—a problem that may be getting worse now, as colleges struggle with their finances.

A crowd here at the annual meeting of the National Association of College and University Business Officers was given something else to worry about regarding those crumbling buildings and leaky pipes: The rating agencies may pay more attention to deferred maintenance as they evaluate colleges. Budgeting for depreciation—in other words, having a financial plan for the deterioration of campus infrastructure—can be perceived through a site visit, said Dennis Gephardt, an analyst at Moody’s Investors Service who spoke at the session here.

Curb appeal—or lack thereof—is one part of a feedback loop that affects a college’s finances and can be an indicator financial health. “We want to see what your prospective customers see,” said Mr. Gephardt said. “A lot of this goes toward management and governance. Even asking a simple question like, How do you budget for depreciation across the hundreds of colleges that we rate?, will yield a range of responses that are telling.”

Moody’s is finding that colleges are spending less on infrastructure these days—in 2010, spending went into a sharp decline. (See the graph at top.) It’s an indication that colleges are hunkering down. “We are certainly watching this,” Mr. Gephardt said. “It could be an early warning sign of a wider trend, a period where deferred maintenance piles up.”

Mr. Gephardt was joined in the session by two college administrators: Roger Anderson, chief financial officer and chief operating officer at Centenary College, and George Herbst, vice president for business and chief financial officer at Stetson University.

Mr. Anderson said that because the short-term risks of deferred maintenance are low, it can be a tempting way to deal with financial pressures. In fact, he said, he has heard state officials in New Jersey say that colleges should defer maintenance as a way to deal with cuts in state aid.

One of the problems here, he emphasized, is that deferred maintenance is not explicitly part of the financial indexes used to measure colleges’ financial health. He cited a passage in a book on strategic financial analysis in higher education, which said that colleges that choose to spend money on maintenance might appear less wealthy than colleges that delay repairs, since deferred maintenance is not reported as a liability.

“If an institution seriously addresses deferred-maintenance issues, arguably it is trading one liability, deferred maintenance, for another, like increasing debt or reducing reserves,” he said. “But this doesn’t show up because deferred maintenance is not recognized on the balance sheet.”

His own college has invested in deferred maintenance, he said. The college had a $2-million surplus recently, and it plowed that money into deferred maintenance instead of faculty salaries or the endowment (which, in the current economic climate, might not have yielded attractive returns anyway). Centenary spent much of that money on life-safety improvements, boiler replacements, aesthetic upgrades (which would make the college more attractive to students), and lighting improvements (which had a return on investment through energy savings. (The speakers advocated using green revolving funds to deal with deferred maintenance. Through a lighting-replacement project, Stetson University is saving $375,000 a year.)

Mr. Herbst, of Stetson, offered a tale of caution and redemption that impressed the crowd. Stetson’s DeLand campus, he said, had been in decline over the years, and deferred maintenance had piled up. When Wendy Libby became president last summer, she pulled Mr. Herbst out of retirement (he had been at Rollins College) to help revive the university.

The new administrators determined that deferred maintenance had been hurting the campus’s curb appeal—enrollment had been in decline. The administrators joined prospective students on tours and paid attention when students pointed out unsightly parts of the campus.

The comeback plan involved recruiting talent on the admissions and marketing teams, but also addressing some of that deferred maintenance: The university refinanced its debt and used the savings for landscape issues and classroom renovations. The college hired a landscape architect from Boston, a woman in her 80′s who took on only the most interesting challenges, to revive the campus.

Some of the pictures on this page show before and after scenes of Stetson’s campus. Mr. Herbst emphasized one remarkable fact about this work: It was all done over 60 days in the summer.

Now enrollment numbers for the fall look very good, Mr. Herbst said. Stetson reached its new-student goal by the first week of May, with 192 more students than last fall and more than 100 over what the college predicted.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • http://www.sightlines.com Sightlines

    Based on what we’ve seen on campuses nationwide, it is indeed unfortunate that “deferred
    maintenance is not explicitly part of the financial indexes used to measure
    colleges’ financial health.” The neglect of backlogged maintenance leads to so
    many other crippling issues on campus. In our experience, the failure to
    address deferred maintenance indicates that staffing effectiveness and customer
    satisfaction decreases, while spending and facilities exposure increase due to inevitable
    system failure.  

    Our modeling suggests that a recurring capital fund for facilities coupled with devoting
    even a modest 7% of the operating budget to planned maintenance can have a vast,
    positive impact on institutional integrity, while delaying repairs can lead to
    disastrously expensive liabilities.

  • EricAdler

    You wrote:
    “At times when the weather is exceedingly warm, we hear that this is
    proof of AGW.  But when the weather is similarly cold, we hear that
    this, too, is proof of AGW (for example, from Robert Kennedy jr.)”

    No climate scientists argues that weather in a given day or month at a given location is proof of any climate trend. You will never find such an argument  in any scientific publication on climate science.

    Indeed you quoted Robert Kennedy Jr. who is not a climate scientist. I don’t form my opinion on climate science based on what I read from history teachers or attorneys, unless they are citing real climate scientists.

    Robert Kennedy Jr. who is an attorney did not make make the argument you attributed to him.
     
    http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/news/rfk-jr-15-months-ago-global-warming-means-no-snow-or-cold-dc

    He was not talking about a single winter, but rather about a number of years he remembers in his childhood and pointed out that in general recent years have seen less snow in Washington DC. People normally don’t go skiing or sledding anymore like they used to. This is not a reflection on a single day or months weather, and does qualify as an observation on climate change although it is not global but local climate.

    In fact the opinion editor of the Washington Examiner, from whom you apparently get your opinion on climate science, (you didn’t give a reference but it seems I have found the story online) made the following statement:

    “Having shoveled my walk five times in the midst of this past weekend’s
    extreme cold and blizzard, I think perhaps RFK, Jr. should leave weather
    analysis to the meteorologists instead of trying to attribute every
    global phenomenon to anthropogenic climate change.”

    It is pretty clear that he is trying to confuse  people into thinking that a single blizzard event outweighs the record of many years of weather which we call climate.

    I am dismayed that a professor of History gets his opinons on Climate Change from an opinon editor in a right wing political publication, rather than looking at publications by experts in climatology, and would want expose his folly to the public. This does not seem very scholarly to me.

  • JonasN

    Eric

    Again you are making wide, sweeping, general statements pretending to speak for ‘climate scientists’ (which you definitely are not) and claiming that you can determine which ones are of the ‘real’ variety and which ones aren’t.

    Maybe you should look up what Kevin Trenberth has to say about reversing the meaning of the ‘null hypothesis’ wrt weather events and climate change.

    You might miss most of the points, of course, but there is more to Bergmans observation than just some lines from a newspaper editor.

  • JohnMashey

    Thank you for  expressing your opinion, as per my email shown at:
    http://chronicle.com/blogs/innovations/guest-post-bottling-nonsense-mis-using-a-civil-platform
    about a day ago.  Hopefully, mor NAS affiliates chairs will go on teh record as well.

  • EricAdler

    JonasN,
    Another empty post devoid of substance.
    You say,
    “there is more to Bergmans observation than just some lines from a newspaper editor”
    If Bergman has another point why is he keeping it a secret?
    If you know what it is, why aren’t you more specific?

     Bergman’s opinion about climate change  seems to be based on  a right wing  newspaper editor who is confusing a weather event with climate. In the case of Heidi Cullen, Peter Wood forms his opinion about the actions of a climatologist based on what Rush Limbaugh said. This is not very scholarly to say the least.You don’t even attempt to refute that.

    Bergman is making a straw man argument here on the basis of that confusion. His comment is what you would expect from a bar room conversation about climate change, rather than that of a “Scholar” on web site dealing with issues involving higher education.

    You are saying I missed a point that he made in his brief post.  I have no clue what his secret unspoken point was, or if he has ever heard of Kevin Trenberth, or read anything that he has written.

    Do YOU want to discuss Trenberth’s remarks on communication climate change,  which caused such a stir in the AGW denier blogosphere?

    http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2011/02/22/straight-talk-from-kevin-trenberth-on-denialists-climate-science-communication-and-climate-change-policy/

    http://ams.confex.com/ams/91Annual/webprogram/Paper180230.html

    In his remarks Trenberth points out how the media promotes disinformation about climate change, confusing weather and climate. Trenberth points out:

    “The media continue to report highly misleading material about how cold outbreaks, snow events, or one cold month nullifies global warming when
    the big picture continues to indicate otherwise.”

    It seems that laymen such as Bergman and Woods have fallen as victims to this disinformation, but they are willing victims, because right wingers are motivated by politics to dislike the scientific theory of AGW

  • The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • 1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
  • Washington, D.C. 20037