• Monday, May 28, 2012

Previous

Next

Architects Teach Old Dorms New Tricks at Franklin & Marshall

August 26, 2010, 11:00 am

F&M College

An addition to the front of Buchanan and Marshall Halls brings big improvements to the 1956 dorms. (Chronicle photographs by Lawrence Biemiller)

Buchanan Hall was only 20 years old in 1976, when I moved in as a Franklin & Marshall College freshman, but already it left a lot to be desired. Like its twin, Marshall Hall, Buchanan was a three-story shoebox of a dorm, with 20 double rooms per floor and cinderblock walls that echoed with the music pounding out of our giant stereo speakers. The showers were communal, but that was about it for social space, except for an underused lounge outside of what had once been a dining hall connecting Buchanan and Marshall. Buchanan’s red-brick exterior had one horizontal band of limestone trim and a couple of vertical stripes, but architecturally it was about as exciting as wax paper.

F&M College

A decade or so ago, both Buchanan and Marshall got partial makeovers—new windows, air conditioning, renovated bathrooms—but more recently they’ve gotten new missions as well: They now make up two-thirds of Brooks College House, one of the four houses to which F&M students are assigned (think Gryffindor, Slytherin, &c.—that’s invariably how F&M students explain the house system). Earlier this year Buchanan and Marshall got a major addition in the form of a new, $2.5-million common area for Brooks students: a living room with a fireplace, a seminar room, and a large multipurpose space, all of them in bold. glassly blocks that pop out from the front of the old dining hall area into the college’s main residential quadrangle.

The improvement is remarkable. The addition has an open, lively feel that couldn’t be more different from the inward, almost obsessive focus of the two original structures. They’re still standing, of course, and they’re fully occupied, but now they’re in the background. Their entrances have been redone to make them bright and transparent and to blend the two buildings into the addition, whose sleek modern sensibility takes precedence.

And because the new space is assymetrical, with its big multipurpose space jutting far out from the front of Marshall, the addition helps invigorate the whole residential quadrangle. So do two earlier college-house additions that the same firm, MGA Partners, Architects, grafted onto opposite ends of the nearby 1964 Ben Franklin Residence Hall (which was, before the additions, so plain that it made even Buchanan and Marshall look like masterpieces). The two earlier additions, Boncheck College House and Ware College House, help moderate Ben Franklin’s enormity as well as its tedium. Schnader Hall, a 1959 building along the same lines as Buchanan and Marshall, is due for a college-house addition in the near future.

F&M has promoted the house system heavily in recent years. I haven’t heard students go out of their way to praise the programming or their sense of belonging to one house or another, but they do seem to like, and use, the new spaces. And even if all the house system ever does is bring first-rate architectural improvements to the residential quadrangle, its accomplishments will have been more than worthwhile.

F&M College

The Bonchek College House addition to Ben Franklin was the second of three completed so far by MGA Partners, Architects.

F&M College

The rear of Buchanan Hall maintains its original design.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment (5)

5 Responses to Architects Teach Old Dorms New Tricks at Franklin & Marshall

jbarman - August 26, 2010 at 4:37 pm

I lived in the aforementioned Schnader Hall during my freshman year (1968-69), and most of what I remember was how well those cinder block edifices conducted noise from room to room. I don’t think I slept more than four hours per night.The dorms look more inviting now, but can you still hear the guy in the next room turning the pages of a book?

rhicks73 - August 27, 2010 at 7:01 am

Too bad you failed to credit the architects who did the work.

lbiemiller - August 27, 2010 at 9:37 am

@rhicks73: The name of the architecture firm is in the fourth paragraph — MGA Partners, Architects.– Lawrence Biemiller

panzel1 - August 28, 2010 at 9:16 am

Might I suggest that photos of the interior spaces,- its materials, scale, details and functions,- would be far more informative than 4 photos of an unspectacular exterior.martin zelnik, architect

lbonchek - August 28, 2010 at 3:16 pm

“I haven’t heard students go out of their way to praise the programming or their sense of belonging to one house or another.”How did you manage to miss the fact that the Houses are now the central feature of campus life? You seem too wrapped up in your architectural “box” and must not have spent much time speaking with students or learning about the non-stop program of House activities (bagel breakfasts, discussion groups, musical evenings, etc). Students have a fierce sense of identity with their Houses, and there is an annual contest for students to vote for the “Best House” based on spirit and programs – architecture has nothing to do with it.At Commencement 2010, for the first time, diplomas were presented to graduates according to their House (’2010 was the first class to spend all four years as members of a House). L. Bonchek, Trustee

  • The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • 1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
  • Washington, D.C. 20037