• Monday, May 28, 2012

Previous

Next

Walking to Save the U. of California

September 23, 2009, 1:46 pm

x-posted: howtheuniversityworks.com

Dear University of California students, staff and faculty: Thank you. As a California parent, I am grateful for your courage in standing up to this administration in the massive walkout you’ve planned for Thursday, September 24th.

You are wise. Without you, tuition would soon rise to a point where most Californians couldn’t afford it. Public higher education in this state used to be free — and now it’s going to cost more than a new small car every year? Pretty soon a UC bachelor’s degree will cost the equivalent of four luxury cars. Who can afford that? Thank you for throwing yourselves into the trenches against the Schwarzeneggers and the Yudofs who want to turn public higher education into a subsidy for the rich.

You are compassionate. You are demanding that cuts not fall on employees earning less than $40,000. Thank you for demanding fairness, and asking that — if cuts are actually necessary — the thousands of wealthiest UC employees dig a little deeper.

You are honest. The reality is that undergraduate tuition subsidizes every other activity in the university, and the administration has billions of reserve funds. As Bob Samuels says, “UC does not have a budget crisis; it has a crisis in priorities.” The savage 40-percent tuition hike — while raising class sizes, cutting sections, etc. — is really a massive increase in the tax on undergraduates represented by cross-subsidy. Thank you for asking that education come first.

You are fighting racism in admissions. Economic discrimination is always wrong in a democracy, but in our state it falls much harder on African-Americans and Hispanics.

You are fighting racism in university employment. Faculty salaries in the humanities already offer an unbelievably low return on the 10 years it takes to get a Ph.D. (if you’re lucky, around age 35 or 40 you’ll get a job that pays you $55,000, or less than a bartender). This means that mostly persons from wealthier backgrounds can afford to become professors — a form of economic discrimination that explains why university faculties are among the most disproportionately white workforces in the country.

You make us think. It seems the administration has been trying to mislead the media with the statistic that UC professors make an average over $100,000. Funny thing about averages, though. If your neighbor earns a million dollars a year, and you earn $15,000 — guess what? Your average salary is half a million bucks! The fact is that “average” salary includes a lot of people making huge, inflated salaries, and a lot more folks barely scraping by.

Your typical humanities prof — you know, the person they show as a prof in the movies, talking to you about history, culture, or philosophy — puts in about 10 years getting the Ph.D., then another three or four years on temporary appointment, before even starting a tenure-track job.

Even worse, most university teachers aren’t tenured profs at all. Most courses are taught by grad students or folks on temporary, part-time and nontenurable appointments. Most of these faculty make $50 or $100 per student per year. Thank you for inspiring us to ask: If it’s not going to the persons teaching our students: where’s our money going?

In solidarity, Marc Bousquet

UC Student Association (pdf)
UC Faculty blog (FAQ, teach-in materials, etc)
UC Staff one-day strike in solidarity

 

 

This entry was posted in Books. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment (2)

2 Responses to Walking to Save the U. of California

bridgetmiller - September 24, 2009 at 4:21 pm

I find it very strange that a walk-out has been planned to protest student costs and budget priorities. Where is the logic that being supportive of lower costs to students means you refuse to provide the service they’ve already paid for? Even for one day. Will the faculty be refunding students for the day of classes they won’t receive? Will faculty be paid for that day’s work? Will the pro rata share of their health insurance and retirement contributions still be made? Exactly what is to be accomplished by the walk out? Exactly who is sacrificing what?An action like this creates divisions within an institution that are difficult to bridge. Faculty and administration as parts of the whole of an organization have to work together. This is the right arm striking the left and student body. I see this devolution to a dichotomy of faculty versus administration as sinking to the lowest possible bar. It’s destructive and dysfunctional and serves no one. A flashy PR stunt that does nothing to solve a problem, offer alternative solutions, or contribute to the conversation in any meaningful way, should not be applauded. No, it should have been reconsidered.

gtkarn - September 24, 2009 at 6:16 pm

Well, Bridget, from a look at the signatories so far, I think it’s fair to say that this gesture was carefully “considered,” and that for you to call for “reconsideration” is, at the very least, both laughable and insulting. But there will always be those who will assume that such gestures are merely whimsical rather than the product of mature reflection. It’s an easy put-down and also assumes that efforts to, as you say “solve the problem,” haven’t happened as yet.