We all know the drill by now: Faced with a major financial shortfall, the university announces that it has no choice but to sharply raise student tuition once again. “We remain committed to providing an affordable education for all,” says the university president, in somber tones. “But we will not degrade the high academic standards that make this institution great. We continue to provide an excellent value to our students, and we call on all members of the university community to come together in this difficult time of shared sacrifice.” Students complain, while some of the more outspoken members of the faculty wonder aloud why “high academic standards” never seem to involve “paying professors more money.” They are ignored. I think this standard line of rhetoric is growing less persuasive by the year. And it’s really hard to pull off in light of the new NCAA report detailing the recent orgy of spending on college sports. A few years ago, the NCAA put some numbers on a fact that had long been suspected: The vast majority of big-time college sports programs lose large amounts of money, hundreds of thousands of dollars or more. A handful turn a profit, but most run big deficits that have to be made up with funds from student tuition, state appropriations, layoffs, salary freezes and elsewhere. Faced with this harsh reality and an uncertain economic future, the nation’s most prominent Division I institutions naturally decided to further ratchet up sports spending by nearly 11 percent per year, from an average of $31-million in 2004 to over $42-million in 2007. Of course these types of studies are always shrouded in anonymity, so there’s no way to pick them up and compare your university’s annual sports deficit / major spending increase and compare it to new student charges and departmental budget cuts elsewhere. But given the scarce number of universities that turn a profit, the odds are high that if your institution has aspirations of playing football in January, it’s somewhere on the list.
-

Carl Elliott
is a professor of bioethics at the University of Minnesota. His books include White Coat, Black Hat: Adventures on the Dark Side of Medicine.
Read Carl's posts
-
David P. Barash
is an evolutionary biologist and professor of psychology at the University of Washington.
Read David's posts
-

Gina Barreca
is a professor of English and feminist theory at the University of Connecticut.
Read Gina's posts
Jacques Berlinerblau
is director of the Program for Jewish Civilization at Georgetown University.
Read Jacques's posts
-

Kevin Carey
is the policy director for Education Sector, an independent think tank in Washington.
Read Kevin's posts
-

Laurie Essig
teaches at Middlebury College and is the author of American Plastic: Boob Jobs, Credit Cards and Our Quest for Perfection.
Read Laurie's posts
-

-

Marc Bousquet
is the author of How the University Works: Higher Education and the Low-Wage Nation.
Read Marc's posts
-

-

Michael Ruse
directs the program in history and philosophy of science at Florida State University. His forthcoming book is Science and Spirituality: Making Room for Faith in the Age of Science.
Read Michael's posts
-

Michele Goodwin
is a professor of law at the University of Minnesota with joint appointments at the university's medical and public-health schools.
Read Michele's posts
-

Todd Gitlin
is a professor of journalism and sociology and chair of the communications program at Columbia University, and a prolific author whose most recent book is a novel, Undying.
Read Todd's posts
About This Blog
Posts on Brainstorm present the views of their authors. They do not represent the position of the editors, nor does posting here imply any endorsement by The Chronicle.
Brainstorm Bloggers
Recent Posts
Archives
Follow Brainstorm through your favorite RSS reader.

