• Monday, May 28, 2012

Previous

Next

The Terror of Volcanoes

April 18, 2010, 1:37 pm

If you follow the news, you’d think that the volcanic eruption under Iceland’s Eyjafjallajokull glacier is nothing but a story about an enormous travel headache that happens to come with some nasty economic repercussions. Thousands of flights to and from cities all over Europe have been cancelled. Poor John Cleese, for example. Stranded in Norway because planes can’t fly in skies that have been made dangerous by spreading volcanic ash, Cleese managed to return to England by taking a $5,000 cab ride to Brussels, and then catching a train back to London.

In a letter to a friend written a few years after Pompeii was destroyed by the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79 C.E., Pliny the Younger, who managed to escape Pompeii, recorded the terror of those days. He writes that on the second day of the disaster, “Many besought the aid of the gods, but still more imagined there were no gods left, and that the universe was plunged into eternal darkness for evermore.” But the human story has no bearing on the bigger story. A volcanic eruption is a geologic event, and as such, it occurs blankly—supremely oblivious to the trials and tribulations of the mice and men who live on the planet.  Where earthquakes tend to be over rather rapidly, volcanic eruptions, such as Vesuvius, or the more recent Krakatoa eruption in 1883, often last for a long time and can lead to changes in topography and even the climate.

Civilization effectively propels itself forward by guiding people to join in and contribute to a human-constructed world. It blinds us to the majestic indifference of nature, protecting us, making us forget that we are, in the scheme of things, as insignificant as ants. Whenever we truly face the meaning of the moiling and toiling rumblings and explosions deep within the earth—or, heaven forbid, far out in the universe itself—we gasp in terror.

Because we don’t like these moments of realization, we’ve learned to do things to prevent them from occurring. We follow our daily routines, we tend to our appetites, we make the best-laid plans, and we willingly commit ourselves to irrational belief systems—mercifully forgetting, most of the time, anyway, that in geologic time all of this is pointless. The volcano lying under the Eyjafjallajokull glacier had lain dormant for 200 years. That’s nothing in geologic terms, but it was plenty of time for human beings to forget it was dangerous and turn the whole area into hiking trails for tourists.

Long ago, I was persuaded of the truth of evolution. But unlike a lot of people, I’m not a happy camper about it. Add together volcanoes and Darwin, and you arrive at a world where we are nothing but an accident perched precariously on the surface of the planet. It’s no wonder that so many religious people, for whom human beings exist purposefully in relation to a God who created them, reject both evolution and geologic time. How can a God who acts in history—who demands obedience and asks for honor, who responds to individual and group prayers, who feels our woes with us, who loves us—fit in with volcanoes and the slow, geologic ticking of evolution? And to add insult to injury, the principles of evolution do not lead to an end-game. Who knows how long, or even if, the branch of Homo sapiens will endure?

This morning, the countryside around the Icelandic volcano was rocked by strong tremors. There’s no consensus among volcano experts (a term that’s a bit of an oxymoron, don’t you think, given that volcanic experts don’t seem to know much about predicting volcanic behavior) on how long the Icelandic volcanic eruption will last. This much is certain: Anyone who thinks that the Icelandic volcano eruption is only about travel disruption, or human health, or the economy, understands little about either nature or civilization. Or, for that matter, the disinterest of God.

This entry was posted in Books. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment (5)

5 Responses to The Terror of Volcanoes

mgcardin - April 19, 2010 at 8:10 am

Well said, and well taken.FYI, you might consider checking out Thomas Ligotti’s THE CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE HUMAN RACE, published just this month (I’m not sure if it’s shipping yet). It’s a dark, humorous, and wonderfully lucid uber-treatise — short in length, profound in depth — on the subject of philosophical pessimism. Although it’s mainly centered in the idea that the peculiar human faculty of self-aware consciousness is intrinsically a horror, it also addresses the subject you’ve raised here (the horror of human insignificance in the physical universe), and in both cases it pursues the idea of the mental/neurological and physical filtering mechanisms that we use as prophylactics against a full, stark realization of the awfulness of our plight — again, much as you’ve expressed it here with your reference to the things we do to prevent unpleasant realizations from occurring.Matt Cardin

philosophy - April 19, 2010 at 10:39 am

Fendrich might benefit from a dose of evolutionary optimism, courtesy of Richard Dawkins, who says on p.1 of Unweaving the Rainbow: “We are going to die, and that makes us the lucky ones. Most people are never going to die, because they are never going to be born. The potential people who could have been here in my place but who will in fact never see the light of day outnumber the grains of sand in Arabia . . . In the teeth of these stupefying odds it is you and I, in our ordinariness, that are here.”

mgcardin - April 19, 2010 at 3:28 pm

philosophy – Kind of funny to read the quote from Dawkins on the heels of my recommendation of Ligotti, since one of Ligotti’s fundamental tenets is, in line with the entire history of philosophical pessimism, that life is intrinsically awful, and that nonexistence is entirely preferable to the alternative (regardless of the presence or absence of active volanoes in Iceland or anywhere else).

millardfcoffin - April 19, 2010 at 4:28 pm

I agree with Fendrich’s placing of humans in the context of geologic time, but object strenuously to her cheap shot at ‘volcanic experts’ (i.e., volcanologists) in her last paragraph. On the basis of her logic, could we not consider every ‘expert’ an oxymoron, from economists who couldn’t reach consensus on the global financial meltdown, to meteorologists who can’t reach consensus on the weather a week, month, or year from now, to fine arts ‘experts’ who can’t reach consensus on where fine arts will be a year, a decade, or a century from now? More than a few volcanologists have sacrificed their lives to understand the behavior of volcanoes, a greater proportion, I suspect, than economists or artists have sacrificed to their respective fields of expertise.Mike Coffin

falzf - April 20, 2010 at 7:46 am

Mike Coffin is right about my comment about volcanologists. It came off as catty, not to say dismissive of a group of people whom I actually admire. I apologize, particularly to any volcano experts who happened to read this post. I had intended the comment not as a specific swipe at at volcano experts, but as a way to point out that despite expertise about volcanoes (and other aspects of nature), knowledge of the world is really profoundly limited. Because there’s no editor, blogging easily gets one into trouble. An editor would have asked, “Laurie, do you really mean to sound so snotty?”