If you attend any discussion of education policy, you find that it won’t be long before money comes up. Point out how few students in this or that state or city fail to reach proficiency in math or reading, and among the first replies is a call to increase funding, to pay teachers a “living wage,” to equalize funding in nice suburban schools and collapsing inner-city schools.
Those statements also carry a fair degree of resentment and indignation. The speakers I’ve seen have a tinge to their voice that suggests a crime has been committed against schools, teachers, and students alike. If you stand up and say something like, “But the United States spends more per pupil than any nation in the world,” they look at you as if you have just spanked a sixth-grader. The question isn’t up for discussion. Schools need more money, period.
Here’s an article in the recent issue of Education Next, though, that disputes the entire premise. It’s entitled “The Phony Funding Crisis.” Authors James W. Guthrie and Arthur Peng fill the piece with data and charts to argue the opposite.
“If one relies on newspaper headlines for education-funding information,” they open, “one might conclude that America’s schools suffer from a perpetual fiscal crisis, every year perched precariously on the brink of financial ruin, never knowing whether there will be sufficient funding to continue operating. Budgetary shortfalls, school district bankruptcies, teacher and administrator layoffs, hiring and salary freezes, pension system defaults, shorter school years, ever-larger classes, faculty furloughs, fewer course electives, reduced field trips, foregone or curtailed athletics, outdated textbooks, teachers having to make do with fewer supplies, cuts in school maintenance, and other tales of fiscal woe inevitably captivate the news media, particularly during the late-spring and summer budget and appropriations seasons.”
In truth, they counter, “from one year to the next, schools almost always have more real revenue for each of their enrolled students. For the past hundred years, with rare and short exceptions and after controlling for inflation, public schools have had both more money and more employees per student in each succeeding year. Teacher salaries have increased more than 42 percent in constant dollars over the past half century, while educators’ working conditions, health plans, and retirement arrangements have become ever more commodious. Moreover, school-related revenues and employment levels have increased even when the economy (as measured by Gross Domestic Product or GDP) turned down, unlike what typically happens in sectors such as manufacturing and retail sales, where recessions trigger cutbacks in personnel and profits.”


4 Responses to ‘The Phony Funding Crisis’
goxewu - December 5, 2009 at 6:12 pm
Wait, Prof. Bauerlein! Don’t plotz! I’m not here to snark your post on “The Phony Funding Crisis.”I’m here because, at least on my computer, this is the only post open for comment. Every other one on “Brainstorm,” even Prof. Jackson’s on the publication of Obama’s mother’s book posted yesterday, has a notice the end saying “Commenting is closed.”Anybody else finding this to be the case, or am I on a CHE s**tlist? And if it is the case generally, what’s the cause? Censorship? Server malfunction? Staff holiday? Instead of “yesterday’s newspaper” it’s now “last hour’s blog post”?
chuckkle - December 5, 2009 at 11:18 pm
A quick check of a few other Chronicle blogs: same story, comments closed.
please - December 6, 2009 at 10:05 am
I’d be happy to provide the snark:An article written by a senior fellow of the George W. Bush Institute in a journal published by the Hoover Institution says government spending on education is not the answer? You don’t say…
luther_blissett - December 6, 2009 at 11:49 am
The Seattle School District has recently laid off teachers and closed down schools. It and many other school districts are considering a four-day school week to save on transportation and energy costs.And as a participant over at the article’s site wrote, the “spent per pupil” category is essentially meaningless, because it’s including bussing costs, free meal costs, pre- and post-school daycare costs, standardized test costs, ESL and Special Ed costs, etc. — most of which only helps a specific group of students.